I saw this in my Facebook.. This is so true!!!!!....
Dec 10, 2018 17:56:04 #
emarine wrote:
liberals... how do you know they were liberals?... Lots of businesses are closed on Sundays, Christian or not... but most places that sell food are open on Sundays... I would think a food service business would be open Sundays on a collage campus … kids like eating 24/7 is nothing new … I would also think that conservative kids go to collage & like eating on Sunday too..
Look it up if you don't believe it. The kids v**ed to open a chick filet and the school said they didn't "share the schools values". And libs tried to boycott them 2 or so years ago.
Dec 10, 2018 17:56:39 #
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Whadayamean, off topic, Morg? I thought it was about freedom but your posts are about "bigots", "gays", etc. I guess it's only off topic if it's what you want to talk about, huh?
Dec 10, 2018 17:58:17 #
debeda wrote:
Lolololololololhahahahahaha very funny. Obviously you haven't been reading your own posts. Fairly decent avoidance tactic, tho, so as not to be seen as a hypocrite.
Deb~duh, comprehension a bit of a challenge, I understand my own posts, but apparently, you don't, this is shown when replying completely off topic, I don't give a hoot about chic-filet and some college, go write them a letter and b***h. You think it was because they weren't picked because they were Christian based, I think not, but you go ahead and think what you chose and feel victimized once again.
Dec 10, 2018 18:09:18 #
Morgan wrote:
Deb~duh, comprehension a bit of a challenge, I understand my own posts, but apparently, you don't, this is shown when replying completely off topic, I don't give a hoot about chic-filet and some college, go write them a letter and b***h. You think it was because they weren't picked because they were Christian based, I think not, but you go ahead and think what you chose and feel victimized once again.
You were whining about bakers. Is that on topic?
Dec 10, 2018 18:21:58 #
debeda wrote:
You were whining about bakers. Is that on topic?
"Oh you were whining", grow the frig up, the topic was about the BS excuse of religious rights they were trying to hide behind, we all know it was about a bigoty against gays, they're not fooling anyone, and the people who patronize them follow and align themselves in the same prejudice, which when serving the public is against the law, our constitutional law btw and that is about E******Y.
Dec 10, 2018 18:46:29 #
debeda wrote:
Look it up if you don't believe it. The kids v**ed to open a chick filet and the school said they didn't "share the schools values". And libs tried to boycott them 2 or so years ago.
Seems kids like chicken & American University's who follow our Constitutional freedoms don't contract with anti gay Company's who discriminate .., I guess all kids have the right to eat chicken in America weather gay or not... seems the Chick filet people have been banned from several other places for the same reasons... they donate to anti gay orgs... personally I don't care either way... if it were me I would have chose pizza from anyone who made good pizza... I would not care if the pizza place owner was gay or not, as long as the pizza was good... what the gay pizza owner does on is own time is not any of my concern or business … its called free will... now I'm not saying that I understand why people are gay... but I do understand freedom & what's involved in keeping it...Hatred and intolerance are bred in ignorance...
Dec 10, 2018 19:51:47 #
Morgan wrote:
The supreme court.
How so?? What case would you be referring to??
Dec 10, 2018 19:54:16 #
Morgan wrote:
This is off topic, you can't highjack people and posts that way. Create your own post if you want to discuss an issue.
Whose rule is this?? Does this forum have such a rule ????
Dec 10, 2018 20:00:41 #
lindajoy wrote:
Whose rule is this?? Does this forum have such a rule ????
Yes!!!
https://youtu.be/NPqhm36sjVE
Correction;
There are no rules on OPP!!
Dec 10, 2018 20:01:34 #
emarine wrote:
Are you two like a tag team?... how do we know which one is posting?... very tricky rabbits...
Ohhh now this is rich....Good one coming from you always to the rescue for your “good friend. Morgan”... lolololl 👍👍
Seems kinda tacky doesn’t it, when accused of the same thing ...very twicky wabbits indeed~~~
Dec 10, 2018 20:46:06 #
eagleye13 wrote:
Lololol, that was a great movie!! Seen it more than once and always found it entertaining..
Newman and Redford says it all!!!
Correction again~~ ain’t no stinken rules~~
Dec 10, 2018 20:56:55 #
Morgan wrote:
Me? I'm the one trying to stay on track, you guys divert so much it's like following a butterfly on crack. It wasn't about freedom, it was about e******y, where've ya been??? 
Morgan, please go back to the beginning of this thread and re-read. Then tell me again what it's about. If you're going to call other posters for t***sgressions, then it's only fair that you abide by the same rules, which you are not. Merry Christmas.
Dec 10, 2018 21:39:14 #
Morgan wrote:
"Oh you were whining", grow the frig up, the topic was about the BS excuse of religious rights they were trying to hide behind, we all know it was about a bigoty against gays, they're not fooling anyone, and the people who patronize them follow and align themselves in the same prejudice, which when serving the public is against the law, our constitutional law btw and that is about E******Y.
What Supreme Court would that be and how do you come to the conclusion the baker wasn’t standing on his religious principals?? How “do we all know it was about serving gays??
Washington (CNN) The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a cake to celebrate the marriage of a same sex couple because of a religious objection.
The ruling was 7-2.
Ironically this follows what you said~~The ruling, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, held that members of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission showed animus toward Phillips specifically when they suggested his claims of religious freedom were made to justify discrimination.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/06/04/politics/masterpiece-colorado-gay-marriage-cake-supreme-court/index.html
You may remember the florist case in Washington going on about the same time who shipped it back to the lower court to revisit their decision in light of the findings in the Colorado case..
Richland florist Barronelle Stutzman is proclaiming a victory for her religious beliefs after the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday vacated the Washington State Supreme Court ruling that she had violated a gay couple’s civil rights by refusing service.
“I’m very thankful and grateful the Supreme Court will allow my case to continue,” said Stutzman, owner of Arlene’s Flowers. “This isn’t just about my freedom, it’s about everyone’s freedom.”
Then we have federal law~Under federal anti-discrimination laws, businesses can refuse service to any person for any reason, unless the business is discriminating against a protected class.
Gays are not a protected class...
Now states can enforce their own standards of deemed classes but those state laws are not federal laws..
At the national level, protected classes include:
Race or color
National origin or citizenship status
Religion or creed
Sex
Age
Disability, pregnancy, or genetic information
Veteran status
Dec 10, 2018 22:23:53 #
lindajoy wrote:
Ohhh now this is rich....Good one coming from you always to the rescue for your “good friend. Morgan”... lolololl 👍👍
Seems kinda tacky doesn’t it, when accused of the same thing ...very twicky wabbits indeed~~~
Seems kinda tacky doesn’t it, when accused of the same thing ...very twicky wabbits indeed~~~
The lady doesn't require any help from me...seems she deals with a half dozen hostile righties all the time solo... Morgan has a good heart & is fair… nothing too far off base for all the abuse she gets from some hard core Trumpers with Trump ethics "none" … anyway I always support the underdog in a mob pile on… it's fun...
… now back to my "very twicky wabbits" comment... since there are two people in their photo how do we know which one to reply to?... got it?... the tag team was humor.... 
Dec 10, 2018 22:59:21 #
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Morgan, please go back to the beginning of this thread and re-read. Then tell me again what it's about. If you're going to call other posters for t***sgressions, then it's only fair that you abide by the same rules, which you are not. Merry Christmas.
Ok now fess up...which one of you is posting?... also Emily D stared the baker part & the topic has moved around a bit by several others... now who's the picky one?...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.