One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Way to go President Trump
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19 next>>
Dec 2, 2018 11:01:07   #
bilordinary
 
Allah is frowned upon in those countries!

Peewee wrote:
What's odd about that? Those are the three nations that will not bow to the NWO.

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 11:16:48   #
Peewee (a regular here)
 
DASHY wrote:
I get it. Your idea of our president gaining the respect of other world leaders is knowing that 35 of 37 of them think Trump is a fool. Despite Trump's brag about being a great deal maker, just Russia and Israel are buying what he's selling.


What I'm saying is the majority isn't always right, especially when they are all disarmed by their leaders. Those three nations allow their citizens to be armed. Next question?

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 11:34:35   #
Pennylynn (a regular here)
 
I am sure you did not intend to show disrespect for me and my opinion in making this comment and therefore you will realize I mean no disrespect when I ask you for proof.
And if no proof exists, then provide me with a chain of events that has led you to your conclusion.

jimpack123 wrote:
No Trump buckled under orders from Putin

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 11:43:33   #
Pennylynn (a regular here)
 
Some of the smartest people I have ever known are those who know how and when to play stupid. Now if you think your obvious attempt to insult me works.....better luck next time.
DASHY wrote:
To place yourself under Trump in the category of being smart must be really close to the bottom of the range.

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 11:49:51   #
Peewee (a regular here)
 
Pennylynn wrote:
I am sure you did not intend to show disrespect for me and my opinion in making this comment and therefore you will realize I mean no disrespect when I ask you for proof.
And if no proof exists, then provide me with a chain of events that has led you to your conclusion.


Happy Hanukkah my friend! Sorry about being pulled into the middle of your post. I'm also saddened by the destruction that occurred on the Temple Mount during Ramadan by the so-called religion of peace.

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 12:21:52   #
Pennylynn (a regular here)
 
This is not true under 18 U.S.C. § 1503. Read this very carefully: "Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

It is hard to prove intent... but, not impossible. So far the President has not impeded or had any influence in any legal process. Second, one can state their opinion; an elected official does not give up their Constitutional rights when assuming the office. By saying that he, as the President, could pardon any of the people being persecuted (and yes, that is the term I intended) by Mueller is not obstruction. It is stating a fact, he could pardon them. It is not a threat or an stumbling block for Mueller, it is simply a fact of the Constitution that gives him that power.

Lonewolf wrote:
When he puts it out to the press it's called obstruction which is a crime he doesn't have to do it saying it is enough!!

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 12:40:24   #
son of witless (a regular here)
 
Kevyn wrote:
Where did you come up with that? Trump folded putting off the promised increase from 10% to 25% tariffs on Chinese goods for an additional 90 days. Xi guaranteed nothing concrete in return.


So you think Trump should continue to be tough on China ?

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 16:21:01   #
old marine
 
Pennylynn wrote:
I am sure you did not intend to show disrespect for me and my opinion in making this comment and therefore you will realize I mean no disrespect when I ask you for proof.
And if no proof exists, then provide me with a chain of events that has led you to your conclusion.

You have to ignore 99% of the mentally challegened Democrats.

They don't know where they have been or

Know where they are or

Know where they are going.

Pray they may find their way before a bus makes a greasy spot of them.

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 16:25:01   #
old marine
 
Pennylynn wrote:
This is not true under 18 U.S.C. § 1503. Read this very carefully: "Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

It is hard to prove intent... but, not impossible. So far the President has not impeded or had any influence in any legal process. Second, one can state their opinion; an elected official does not give up their Constitutional rights when assuming the office. By saying that he, as the President, could pardon any of the people being persecuted (and yes, that is the term I intended) by Mueller is not obstruction. It is stating a fact, he could pardon them. It is not a threat or an stumbling block for Mueller, it is simply a fact of the Constitution that gives him that power.
This is not true under 18 U.S.C. § 1503. Read th... (show quote)

Nice post.

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 16:28:22   #
Sicilianthing (suspended)
 
Pennylynn wrote:
China just cried "uncle" in the tariff war. "BUENOS AIRES — The United States and China called a truce in their trade war on Saturday after President Trump agreed to hold off on new tariffs and President Xi Jinping pledged to increase Chinese purchases of American products. The two also set the stage for more painstaking negotiations to resolve deeply rooted differences over trade." I know there is a long way to go, but every journey starts with the first step. This is a lot further than our last president could manage.

So... good for you Mr. President!!
China just cried "uncle" in the tariff w... (show quote)


>>>

I’m not impressed.

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 16:51:33   #
old marine
 
son of witless wrote:
So you think Trump should continue to be tough on China ?


A B S O L U T E L Y

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 17:24:46   #
son of witless (a regular here)
 
old marine wrote:
A B S O L U T E L Y


What does Kevyn think ?

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 17:27:35   #
old marine
 
son of witless wrote:
What does Kevyn think ?


Who cares what Kevyn thinks when he is able to think?

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 17:34:18   #
Nickolai (a regular here)
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
I always thought there was a limit to human ignorance, but you are proving me wrong. Watergate was an amateur stage play compared to the progressive assault on president Trump. This "collusion" monster is the greatest political scandal in American history, bar none. Mueller's witch hunt is entirely illegal according to DOJ regulations and unconstitutional according to Article II, Section 2, Appointments clause. I am not about to try to enlighten you simply because the effort would be futile and you are not capable of discriminate thought. Somebody is doing all your thinking for you. You are definitely not a self-aware human being.

What we are witnessing is the destruction of our justice system, a nearly complete breakdown of law and order. If you are incapable of facing facts, or just willfully blind due to ideological indoctrination and relentless media spoon feeding, then the only conclusion is that you are not an American at heart. You are a programmed fool.
I always thought there was a limit to human ignora... (show quote)






No what is crimes that far surpass any thing Nixon Did Breaking into DNC emails is far more egregious the water gate burglars did not get what they went after the Russians got what they wee after and that is A Russian agent in the White house. While this scandal parallels Water gate it is far more egregious far more. Our justice system is working just fine what is in danger is our Republic

| Reply
Dec 2, 2018 17:35:49   #
son of witless (a regular here)
 
old marine wrote:
Who cares what Kevyn thinks when he is able to think?


I care. I asked him a specific question. I do that a lot to Liberals. I rarely get answers. They run their mouths and I shut them up by asking innocent questions they cannot answer.

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.