One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
O vomit
Page 1 of 22 next> last>>
Apr 30, 2014 10:11:03   #
Lena
 
Why has ovomit not been impeached?



Reply
Apr 30, 2014 10:29:19   #
Patty
 
Welcome to the forum Lena.

Reply
Apr 30, 2014 10:41:41   #
oldladyfromwaco
 
Lena wrote:
Why has ovomit not been impeached?


They are working on it, believe me....particularly LaRouche and his people. I know the legislative process can be initiated, but with the imbalance in the house and senate and all the other factors, the process wouldn't be completed....imho. I'd like to see them ALL gone....and a clean slate......of individuals with allegiance to the country instead of to a party.....and honesty, honor, integrity...ah...dream on, dream on. LOL

Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2014 10:42:14   #
Caboose Loc: South Carolina
 
Lena wrote:
Why has ovomit not been impeached?


According to the congressional rules: Impeachment must be
done by the house of represenatives. Then the Senate must
try him with the Chief Supreme Court Justice being present.
Now can you see why he hasnt been impeached? The present
senate wouldnt impeach the devil himself. Neither would Boehner.

Reply
Apr 30, 2014 10:46:48   #
Lena
 
Good answers.

Reply
Apr 30, 2014 11:18:09   #
skott Loc: Bama
 
Lena wrote:
Why has ovomit not been impeached?


Where to begin? Domestic spying started under Bush and has been reauthorized by every congress since then. B******i cost the lives of 4 Americans, while 9/11 was thousands and Beruit bombing was 400. But the conservatives did not blame either conservative president when it happened nor did they call for impeachment. The unsustainable debt was here before Obama and congress spends money not the president. I don't even remember what else was on the list, but these should suffice. Did I lie about any of these? Was I wrong about these? Please show proof if I was.

Reply
Apr 30, 2014 11:39:53   #
Patty
 
Bush's lies were not revealed until his time was up.
skott wrote:
Where to begin? Domestic spying started under Bush and has been reauthorized by every congress since then. B******i cost the lives of 4 Americans, while 9/11 was thousands and Beruit bombing was 400. But the conservatives did not blame either conservative president when it happened nor did they call for impeachment. The unsustainable debt was here before Obama and congress spends money not the president. I don't even remember what else was on the list, but these should suffice. Did I lie about any of these? Was I wrong about these? Please show proof if I was.
Where to begin? Domestic spying started under Bush... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2014 11:41:56   #
skott Loc: Bama
 
Patty wrote:
Bush's lies were not revealed until his time was up.


So.....

My point was that Repubs don't complain about their own when they do worse.

Reply
Apr 30, 2014 11:52:45   #
Caboose Loc: South Carolina
 
skott wrote:
So.....

My point was that Repubs don't complain about their own when they do worse.


My point is you dont complain about your messiah about anything.
Bengazi, fast and furious, IRS, Suppling the muslimbrotherhood
with arms.

Reply
Apr 30, 2014 11:53:28   #
Patty
 
Caboose wrote:
My point is you dont complain about your messiah about anything.
Bengazi, fast and furious, IRS, Suppling the muslimbrotherhood
with arms.


:thumbup:

Reply
Apr 30, 2014 12:08:15   #
skott Loc: Bama
 
Caboose wrote:
My point is you dont complain about your messiah about anything.
Bengazi, fast and furious, IRS, Suppling the muslimbrotherhood
with arms.


Fast and furious began under Bush. Once again, anything wrong with the world is the black guys fault, never the white guy who implemented the program. My messiah is Jesus, who is your's?

Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2014 12:16:28   #
Caboose Loc: South Carolina
 
skott wrote:
Fast and furious began under Bush. Once again, anything wrong with the world is the black guys fault, never the white guy who implemented the program. My messiah is Jesus, who is your's?


If fast and furious began under Bush then why did Obuma continue with it. Are you sure about your messiah?

Reply
Apr 30, 2014 12:18:07   #
skott Loc: Bama
 
Caboose wrote:
If fast and furious began under Bush then why did Obuma continue with it.


Because we do not start over when a new president is elected.

Reply
Apr 30, 2014 12:18:45   #
Patty
 
There are several differences in Bush's "Wide Receiver" operation and Obama's "Fast and Furious" Wide Receiver actually involved not gun-walking but controlled delivery. Unlike gun-walking, which seems (for good reason) to have been unheard of until Fast & Furious, controlled delivery is a very common law enforcement tactic. Fast & Furious involved uncontrolled deliveries — of thousands of weapons. It was an utterly heedless program in which the feds allowed these guns to be sold to straw purchasers — often leaning on reluctant gun dealers to make the sales. The straw purchasers were not followed by close physical surveillance; they were freely permitted to bulk t***sfer the guns to, among others, Mexican drug gangs and other violent criminals — with no agents on hand to swoop in, make arrests, and grab the firearms.
The Fast & Furious idea of “trace” is that, after violent crimes occur in Mexico, we can trace any guns the Mexican police are lucky enough to seize back to the sales to U.S. straw purchasers … who should never have been allowed to t***sfer them (or even buy them) in the first place. That is not law enforcement; that is abetting a criminal rampage.

Reply
Apr 30, 2014 12:47:11   #
Caboose Loc: South Carolina
 
skott wrote:
Because we do not start over when a new president is elected.


Youre a certified jackass.

Reply
Page 1 of 22 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.