Why has ovomit not been impeached?
Welcome to the forum Lena.
Lena wrote:
Why has ovomit not been impeached?
They are working on it, believe me....particularly LaRouche and his people. I know the legislative process can be initiated, but with the imbalance in the house and senate and all the other factors, the process wouldn't be completed....imho. I'd like to see them ALL gone....and a clean slate......of individuals with allegiance to the country instead of to a party.....and honesty, honor, integrity...ah...dream on, dream on. LOL
Lena wrote:
Why has ovomit not been impeached?
According to the congressional rules: Impeachment must be
done by the house of represenatives. Then the Senate must
try him with the Chief Supreme Court Justice being present.
Now can you see why he hasnt been impeached? The present
senate wouldnt impeach the devil himself. Neither would Boehner.
Lena wrote:
Why has ovomit not been impeached?
Where to begin? Domestic spying started under Bush and has been reauthorized by every congress since then. B******i cost the lives of 4 Americans, while 9/11 was thousands and Beruit bombing was 400. But the conservatives did not blame either conservative president when it happened nor did they call for impeachment. The unsustainable debt was here before Obama and congress spends money not the president. I don't even remember what else was on the list, but these should suffice. Did I lie about any of these? Was I wrong about these? Please show proof if I was.
Bush's lies were not revealed until his time was up.
skott wrote:
Where to begin? Domestic spying started under Bush and has been reauthorized by every congress since then. B******i cost the lives of 4 Americans, while 9/11 was thousands and Beruit bombing was 400. But the conservatives did not blame either conservative president when it happened nor did they call for impeachment. The unsustainable debt was here before Obama and congress spends money not the president. I don't even remember what else was on the list, but these should suffice. Did I lie about any of these? Was I wrong about these? Please show proof if I was.
Where to begin? Domestic spying started under Bush... (
show quote)
Patty wrote:
Bush's lies were not revealed until his time was up.
So.....
My point was that Repubs don't complain about their own when they do worse.
skott wrote:
So.....
My point was that Repubs don't complain about their own when they do worse.
My point is you dont complain about your messiah about anything.
Bengazi, fast and furious, IRS, Suppling the muslimbrotherhood
with arms.
Caboose wrote:
My point is you dont complain about your messiah about anything.
Bengazi, fast and furious, IRS, Suppling the muslimbrotherhood
with arms.
Fast and furious began under Bush. Once again, anything wrong with the world is the black guys fault, never the white guy who implemented the program. My messiah is Jesus, who is your's?
skott wrote:
Fast and furious began under Bush. Once again, anything wrong with the world is the black guys fault, never the white guy who implemented the program. My messiah is Jesus, who is your's?
If fast and furious began under Bush then why did Obuma continue with it. Are you sure about your messiah?
Caboose wrote:
If fast and furious began under Bush then why did Obuma continue with it.
Because we do not start over when a new president is elected.
There are several differences in Bush's "Wide Receiver" operation and Obama's "Fast and Furious" Wide Receiver actually involved not gun-walking but controlled delivery. Unlike gun-walking, which seems (for good reason) to have been unheard of until Fast & Furious, controlled delivery is a very common law enforcement tactic. Fast & Furious involved uncontrolled deliveries of thousands of weapons. It was an utterly heedless program in which the feds allowed these guns to be sold to straw purchasers often leaning on reluctant gun dealers to make the sales. The straw purchasers were not followed by close physical surveillance; they were freely permitted to bulk t***sfer the guns to, among others, Mexican drug gangs and other violent criminals with no agents on hand to swoop in, make arrests, and grab the firearms.
The Fast & Furious idea of trace is that, after violent crimes occur in Mexico, we can trace any guns the Mexican police are lucky enough to seize back to the sales to U.S. straw purchasers
who should never have been allowed to t***sfer them (or even buy them) in the first place. That is not law enforcement; that is abetting a criminal rampage.
skott wrote:
Because we do not start over when a new president is elected.
Youre a certified jackass.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.