One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What is "v**er intent?"
Nov 12, 2018 15:08:51   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Apparently the b****t in Florida had a design so as to cause someone to miss out on v****g in the senate race and rather, by not looking carefully, v**e only for governor. These guys at CNN and MSNBC are implying that those who v**ed for the dem Gov candidate should be given a v**e for the Dem senator, even though they left it blank!? Really!!??

Reply
Nov 12, 2018 15:17:41   #
EmilyD
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Apparently the b****t in Florida had a design so as to cause someone to miss out on v****g in the senate race and rather, by not looking carefully, v**e only for governor. These guys at CNN and MSNBC are implying that those who v**ed for the dem Gov candidate should be given a v**e for the Dem senator, even though they left it blank!? Really!!??

I saw that, too. If that's the case (which would be major fraud, imo) then I hope they apply it to those who v**ed for the Republican Governor but left the Republican Senator box unchecked as well.

Reply
Nov 12, 2018 15:30:39   #
Liberty Tree
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Apparently the b****t in Florida had a design so as to cause someone to miss out on v****g in the senate race and rather, by not looking carefully, v**e only for governor. These guys at CNN and MSNBC are implying that those who v**ed for the dem Gov candidate should be given a v**e for the Dem senator, even though they left it blank!? Really!!??


The problem is that the Democrats in charge of the b****ts think every v**e is intended for the Democrat no matter how it is marked.

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2018 15:31:50   #
woodguru
 
EmilyD wrote:
I saw that, too. If that's the case (which would be major fraud, imo) then I hope they apply it to those who v**ed for the Republican Governor but left the Republican Senator box unchecked as well.


It would have to be applied fairly

Reply
Nov 12, 2018 15:35:46   #
woodguru
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
The problem is that the Democrats in charge of the b****ts think every v**e is intended for the Democrat no matter how it is marked.


No, the problem is intentional BS and confusion, something Florida excels at.

How about a popular bill on legalizing pot that is combined with an unpopular Gulf drilling bill, you v**e for pot you v**e for the drilling the GOP wants.

Reply
Nov 12, 2018 15:52:03   #
Liberty Tree
 
woodguru wrote:
No, the problem is intentional BS and confusion, something Florida excels at.

How about a popular bill on legalizing pot that is combined with an unpopular Gulf drilling bill, you v**e for pot you v**e for the drilling the GOP wants.


No the problem is intentional c***ting by the Democrats.

Reply
Nov 12, 2018 16:49:23   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
EmilyD wrote:
I saw that, too. If that's the case (which would be major fraud, imo) then I hope they apply it to those who v**ed for the Republican Governor but left the Republican Senator box unchecked as well.


Exactly, but we know how that would go!

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2018 16:49:45   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
The problem is that the Democrats in charge of the b****ts think every v**e is intended for the Democrat no matter how it is marked.


Yep!!

Reply
Nov 12, 2018 16:50:22   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
woodguru wrote:
No, the problem is intentional BS and confusion, something Florida excels at.

How about a popular bill on legalizing pot that is combined with an unpopular Gulf drilling bill, you v**e for pot you v**e for the drilling the GOP wants.


Unless you are admitting the left is dumber than the right, it would effect both sides equally!

Reply
Nov 13, 2018 16:35:35   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
woodguru wrote:
It would have to be applied fairly


Okay... Define 'fairly' in that context. And also, who gets to decide what's 'fair'?

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.