Is Bundy the true face of the republicans?
Apr 25, 2014 13:14:08 #
...so, as a independent watching this story unfold, I have to ask myself:
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Apr 25, 2014 13:22:14 #
Good points, and the answer is a resounding yes.
SouthernTide wrote:
...so, as a independent watching this story unfold, I have to ask myself, Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government and the propensity for r****m, and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Apr 25, 2014 13:54:21 #
Then, all Congressmen/women, both Democrat and Republican that have been found in Adultery, even with a Love Child, Child Porn, found soliciting their homosexuality, is the face of that Political Party?
If that's the case, then Bill Clinton put the most unpatriotic, slimy, low, gross- face on his Party with his actions, being a Democrat, just before the turn of the new millennium.
But that's all ok, right!
What that old Rancher is trying to say is no different in point than what Obama stated about those that if not educating themselves properly, that they may find themselves 'having' to go into the military for a job.
That rancher is trying to say that he 'would' employ the B****s on his ranch and in his fields, taking those off Government Dependency for a living. The taxpayers pay for Government Dependency, and he is saying he would put them to work- give them p***e in employment.
He is just old, an old but real cowboy, not very eloquent in words. (due to that however, and having swallowed his foot, leg, and part of his own ass, he needs to "shut-up" now)
If that's the case, then Bill Clinton put the most unpatriotic, slimy, low, gross- face on his Party with his actions, being a Democrat, just before the turn of the new millennium.
But that's all ok, right!
What that old Rancher is trying to say is no different in point than what Obama stated about those that if not educating themselves properly, that they may find themselves 'having' to go into the military for a job.
That rancher is trying to say that he 'would' employ the B****s on his ranch and in his fields, taking those off Government Dependency for a living. The taxpayers pay for Government Dependency, and he is saying he would put them to work- give them p***e in employment.
He is just old, an old but real cowboy, not very eloquent in words. (due to that however, and having swallowed his foot, leg, and part of his own ass, he needs to "shut-up" now)
BoJester wrote:
Good points, and the answer is a resounding yes.
Apr 25, 2014 15:42:02 #
BoJester wrote:
Good points, and the answer is a resounding yes.
Geez surprised this wasn't your post bo bo.
Are there any other groups you want to label r****t
Like Mormons, cowboys or gun owners?
How about labeling all b****s as government welfare recipients or perhaps coin a new term Muslim somebody down.
Or should we judge each person as an individual.
Personally I've never met a Mormon I didn't have great respect for, but I haven't met Harry Reid yet.
Apr 25, 2014 15:56:00 #
As you said, it isn't my post, so go pester someone else.
And you should deal with your own problems, especially if you are so confused about the various groups YOU mentioned.
And you should deal with your own problems, especially if you are so confused about the various groups YOU mentioned.
Constitutional libertarian wrote:
Geez surprised this wasn't your post bo bo.
Are there any other groups you want to label r****t
Like Mormons, cowboys or gun owners?
How about labeling all b****s as government welfare recipients or perhaps coin a new term Muslim somebody down.
Or should we judge each person as an individual.
Personally I've never met a Mormon I didn't have great respect for, but I haven't met Harry Reid yet.
Are there any other groups you want to label r****t
Like Mormons, cowboys or gun owners?
How about labeling all b****s as government welfare recipients or perhaps coin a new term Muslim somebody down.
Or should we judge each person as an individual.
Personally I've never met a Mormon I didn't have great respect for, but I haven't met Harry Reid yet.
Apr 25, 2014 16:21:18 #
BoJester wrote:
As you said, it isn't my post, so go pester someone else.
And you should deal with your own problems, especially if you are so confused about the various groups YOU mentioned.
And you should deal with your own problems, especially if you are so confused about the various groups YOU mentioned.
Ooh did I hurt your widdle feeler ?
No of course you wouldn't label any of those groups as r****t but Bundy is all of those too.
So why do you feel it's ok to label someone who is nothing more than fiscally conservative r****t?
Or can't you see past your own h**e issues ???
Apr 25, 2014 16:44:33 #
No, you told the t***h and Bo can't stand the t***h.
Constitutional libertarian wrote:
Ooh did I hurt your widdle feeler ?
No of course you wouldn't label any of those groups as r****t but Bundy is all of those too.
So why do you feel it's ok to label someone who is nothing more than fiscally conservative r****t?
Or can't you see past your own h**e issues ???
No of course you wouldn't label any of those groups as r****t but Bundy is all of those too.
So why do you feel it's ok to label someone who is nothing more than fiscally conservative r****t?
Or can't you see past your own h**e issues ???
Apr 25, 2014 16:53:12 #
SouthernTide wrote:
...so, as a independent watching this story unfold, I have to ask myself:
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Good question... from an independent point of view... it does appear that way.... the TP and the far right are intertwined together to the point of no return, its a shame that the original intent has been stolen from the people who really care for America.
Apr 25, 2014 17:11:21 #
emarine wrote:
Good question... from an independent point of view... it does appear that way.... the TP and the far right are intertwined together to the point of no return, its a shame that the original intent has been stolen from the people who really care for America.
Thanks for an honest answer...
Apr 26, 2014 02:10:43 #
SouthernTide wrote:
...so, as a independent watching this story unfold, I have to ask myself:
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
As an independent reading your diatribe, Southern, I must say, I fail to see itemized the intense hatred this president and his administration bears toward America's citizens.
After you've castigated an eighty year old, hard working American who is trying to make this federal government abide by the constitution, and apply a miniscule amount of fair play to all it's legal citizens, please examine those who currently reside in Washington, D.C. with that same merciless spotlight.
As an independent American, I'm proud of Cliven Bundy, and both the Republican party and the hundreds of individual Tea Party organizations across the U.S. should be equally proud.
The Media has been in a feeding frenzy misrepresenting his remarks on our nation's minorities, but anyone who searches the internet for ten seconds can find Mr. Bundy's entire unedited remarks:
http://www.infowars.com/black-marines-cliven-bundy-is-not-r****t/
He is NOT a r****t.
That is reserved to our current president, his administration and all those who blindly follow them as they divide this nation.
Apr 26, 2014 07:01:11 #
"He is NOT a r****t.
That is reserved to our current president, his administration and all those who blindly follow them as they divide this nation."
...you can call yourself wh**ever you like. If he is not, why did the darlings of the tea party distance themselves so quickly? Do you think that they judged to quickly out of fear? Do you think that what was once a legit challenge to power is now caught up in perception politics just like everything else?
..regarding division of this country, the tea party and talking heads have done far, far more to drive a wedge than anyone else...and if you look back through time, you will see that....IF you honestly look at it through independent eyes...
...i hereby challenge your "independence"...
...so let's hear it
That is reserved to our current president, his administration and all those who blindly follow them as they divide this nation."
...you can call yourself wh**ever you like. If he is not, why did the darlings of the tea party distance themselves so quickly? Do you think that they judged to quickly out of fear? Do you think that what was once a legit challenge to power is now caught up in perception politics just like everything else?
..regarding division of this country, the tea party and talking heads have done far, far more to drive a wedge than anyone else...and if you look back through time, you will see that....IF you honestly look at it through independent eyes...
...i hereby challenge your "independence"...
...so let's hear it
Apr 26, 2014 07:06:45 #
SouthernTide wrote:
...so, as a independent watching this story unfold, I have to ask myself:
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Bundy did not get the memo, think r****t, v**e r****t, behave r****t, but never admit it. This clown is now a pariah and all of his supporters in the media are wearing his stink like they crapped their own pants. The Fox news clown car is shockingly empty of Bundy supporters after weeks of singing his praises.
Apr 26, 2014 07:08:12 #
Zemirah wrote:
As an independent reading your diatribe, Southern,... (show quote)
interesting Z...you immediately open with an insult to my intelligence by calling my honest question "diatribe". I can see you are certainly an :::cough::: "independent" ....
...you can call yourself wh**ever you like. If he is did not issue r****t comments, why did the darlings of the tea party distance themselves so quickly, including fox? Do you think that they judged to quickly out of fear? Do you think that what was once a legit challenge to power is now caught up in perception politics just like everything else?
..regarding division of this country, the tea party and talking heads have done far, far more to drive a wedge than anyone else...and if you look back through time, you will see that....IF you honestly look at it through independent eyes...
...i hereby challenge your "independence"...
...so let's hear it, itemize for us why obama is a r****t ...
Apr 26, 2014 07:13:24 #
SouthernTide wrote:
...so, as a independent watching this story unfold, I have to ask myself:
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Bundy as a wellfare rancher is the true face of the republican party. Why settle for a pittance in food stamps when you can take a million bucks of taxpayer owned grazing rights for free! Just like big oil getting government handouts in the form of subsidys or a poor working mom on assistance Bundy is a wellfare boy with his hand out, but unlike the mom he dosn't need a hand out, it is just his feeling of entitlement to the government teet that drives his greed.
Apr 26, 2014 11:03:30 #
SouthernTide wrote:
...so, as a independent watching this story unfold, I have to ask myself:
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Does Bundy represent the true face of the republican party or the tea party, or both? Either way, it seems the true underlying h**e for the government, the propensity for r****m and misogyny continues to rise to the surface...
Yep...you bet!! This one person represents the views of tens of millions of Americans who want a government that doesn't have it's finger on every aspect of their lives. He stated exactly what ALL republicans, and ALL of the tea party movement think. They are ALL r****t, h**e women, and all government. For an independant, your question seems a bit left leaning to me. It covers three of the lefts main talking points against republicans, and they are all false. This is just one guy who opened his mouth, and stepped all over his own junk.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.