Trump vs. the Fed: When Markets Crash, who is to Blame ?
Oct 16, 2018 11:33:18 #
This is as real as it gets...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
After a certain length of time studying history in-depth, anyone who is honest and relatively objective comes to understand that most of what we are told about our past in the mainstream is completely fabricated. We learn that much of "history" is not about posterity or heritage and more about a continuous set of false narratives peppered with half-t***hs. That is to say, most of what we thought we knew is actually lies.
Unfortunately, these lies can be complex, to the point that even many alternative researchers get caught up in their own biases to the point that they lose track of reality. Of course, this is what propaganda and 4th generation warfare is meant to accomplish; it creates a series of filters that thin out the crowd of t***h seekers a little at a time. Those few who make it through to the other side might discover the bigger picture, but when they turn around to explain what they have seen there's sometimes hardly anyone left to listen.
Intricate propaganda narratives are actually rooted in simple archetypal memes that resonate with the average person's sense of story. Think of mainstream historical events as more of a screenplay with a well-practiced set of beats, and the people who draft this screenplay intend we the public to act as an audience with limited participation. Our jobs are merely to continue providing fuel for the machine with our labor until the machine no longer needs us, and to continue perpetuating the fantasies that the machine conjures up as news feed fodder.
There are many actors that read lines from the historic screenplay and act out elaborate scenes meant to emotionally manipulate the masses. These actors play the roles of politicians and leaders of state. They are banking moguls and corporate heads. They are media gatekeepers and manufactured celebrities. If a person sits in what appears to be a position of power, they are seldom what they seem.
I'm explaining this conundrum because a lot of people out there claim such things are obvious, yet they continue to fall for the same Kabuki theater over and over again. I am also explaining it because the subject matter of this article is a perfect example of 4th generation warfare narrative in action. The latest escalation of what I consider an inevitable battle between the Trump administration and the Federal Reserve is not at all what the mainstream or much of the alternative media think it is.
I have examined Donald Trump's dubious background and associations thoroughly in multiple articles. To summarize, Trump has been tied to g*******t financiers and think tank members for at least 25 years. He has nominated and/or stacked his cabinet with those same ghoulish people over the past two years.
To illustrate the severity of the problem, I suggest readers look into people like Wilber Ross, the Rothschild banking agent that bailed Trump out of his considerable Taj Mahal casino debts decades ago, who is now the Commerce Secretary.
Larry Kudlow, the director of the National Economic Council and an adviser to Trump is a former economist for the New York Federal Reserve. Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury Secretary, was prominent member of Goldman Sachs.
During the e******n, Trump's rhetoric surrounding the banking takeover of Washington was highly critical, yet he now associates closely with banking alumni that many conservatives would consider suspicious or untrustworthy in their motives. Some cycle out and are replaced with yet more banking elites. At any given time, there are always several financial elitists looming in the halls of the White House and most of them are linked to organizations with a decidedly g*******t mission.
This fact should make it clear to anyone with common sense that when Trump "goes to war" with the bankers in his speeches, what he is producing is theater. So, when I read the latest news that Trump is calling the Federal Reserve "crazy" and blaming them for the most recent stock market plunge in October, I have to point out that this is likely even more theater. However, it is likely theater with a purpose.
In February 2017 in my article 'In A Battle Between Trump And The Fed, Who Really Wins?', I outlined why a conflict between Trump and the central bank would actually help g*******ts in their goal of dethroning the U.S. dollar as the world reserve in a way that makes it appear like a random catastrophe of political chaos rather than a planned event. This would clear the way for a new single world currency system which some internationalists refer to as the "global economic reset."
In my article 'Trump vs The Fed: America Sacrificed At The NWO Altar', published in July, I went even further and predicted a choreographed clash between Trump and the Federal Reserve.
Now it appears that this clash has been initiated.
The fact that the mainstream financial media has suddenly reverted to panic mode over a drop of a couple of thousand points in the Dow Jones should give people pause. What this showcases is a change in tone to previous declines in which the media shrugged off or dismissed falling equities as a mere "correction." Today, outlets like Bloomberg talk of "crisis."
As I have noted in the past, the mainstream media and central banks do not warn of crisis far in advance like the alternative media. Rather, they warn of crisis mere weeks or months in advance; too late for the average person to do much to prepare. The recent change in attitude by the mainstream suggests that the next stage of the collapse that has been ongoing since 2008 is here.
For the g*******ts this is a precarious time. If a crash occurs in a narrative vacuum the public will naturally blame the most obvious culprits — namely the central banks and international banks. They are the obvious culprits because they have essentially admitted to economic sabotage in the past. Ben Bernanke admitted that the Fed was responsible for the drawn-out pain of the Great Depression. Alan Greenspan admitted to Fed culpability for the bubble of the 1990s and the derivatives bubble of 2008. In 2012, Jerome Powell warned that when the Fed decided to finally institute interest rate hikes and balance sheet cuts, stimulus addicted markets would crash. Today as Fed chairman he is implementing those exact polices knowing exactly what the consequences will be.
The problem is, once again, false narrative. Central bankers admit to playing a large part in historic crashes, but they pretend as if they were "unaware" of the bigger dangers at the time. They also exploit scapegoats as a means to divert public attention away from their activities.
For the Great Depression, Bernanke admits that the Fed's tightening actions into economic weakness prolonged and increased the horror of the Great Depression, yet the Fed's official position is to blame the existence of the gold standard. For the derivatives bubble, central bankers admit to a "lack of foresight" on the part of the Fed, but still blame "deregulation" as the primary cause of the crash of 2008. For the next phase of economic decline in 2018, they have a new scapegoat; a scapegoat that is helping them — Donald Trump.
As I warned in March of this year, Trump's p**********l career has so far closely (and strangely) matched that of Republican president Herbert Hoover just before the crash of 1929. Trump has implemented major tax cuts, infrastructure spending programs and major tariffs all on the heels of economic instability, just as Hoover did. And much like at the beginning of the Great Depression, the Federal Reserve is also hiking rates as the rest of the economy falters.
Trump is providing perfect cover for the banking elites to continue pulling life support from the system and imploding a 10-year bubble in stocks. His trade war can be used in numerous ways to offset any blame from the Fed as it deliberately demolishes equities and other markets. The fact that Trump has readily taken credit for epic stock market gains the past two years also aids the central bank greatly.
During his campaign, Trump warned that stock markets were "a big bubble" created artificially by the Fed's low interest rates. Now, Trump attacks the Fed as crazy for raising interest rates and deflating that same bubble. Trump is playing a special role in the g*******t screenplay — that of the bumbling villain; the guy who had too much hubris and destroyed everything.
If the conflict between the private Federal Reserve and the White House continues, conservatives may get the outcome they always wanted, but with many strings attached. As the farce goes forward, expect foreign involvement in U.S. Treasurys and the dollar to fall even further. Ten years ago, an audit or shutdown of the Fed could have reversed America's course for the better. Now, it is possible that the g*******ts want to sacrifice the Fed and the dollar. Why? As noted in the Rothschild run The Economist in 1988 in their article on a global currency launch in 2018, the dollar must be diminished in order to make war for a new model led by the International Monetary Fund. The Fed is nothing more than a branch of a franchise, and if closing it down wins the g*******ts more power in the long run, that is exactly what they will do.
Trump's scripted follies are not only setting the stage for a market crash which he and conservatives will be blamed for instead of the Fed, but also setting the stage for the death rattle of the dollar. To answer the original question of who is to blame for the coming disaster — both the Fed and Trump are to blame, as they are both playing their parts in the same false narrative.
To t***h and knowledge,
Brandon Smith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
After a certain length of time studying history in-depth, anyone who is honest and relatively objective comes to understand that most of what we are told about our past in the mainstream is completely fabricated. We learn that much of "history" is not about posterity or heritage and more about a continuous set of false narratives peppered with half-t***hs. That is to say, most of what we thought we knew is actually lies.
Unfortunately, these lies can be complex, to the point that even many alternative researchers get caught up in their own biases to the point that they lose track of reality. Of course, this is what propaganda and 4th generation warfare is meant to accomplish; it creates a series of filters that thin out the crowd of t***h seekers a little at a time. Those few who make it through to the other side might discover the bigger picture, but when they turn around to explain what they have seen there's sometimes hardly anyone left to listen.
Intricate propaganda narratives are actually rooted in simple archetypal memes that resonate with the average person's sense of story. Think of mainstream historical events as more of a screenplay with a well-practiced set of beats, and the people who draft this screenplay intend we the public to act as an audience with limited participation. Our jobs are merely to continue providing fuel for the machine with our labor until the machine no longer needs us, and to continue perpetuating the fantasies that the machine conjures up as news feed fodder.
There are many actors that read lines from the historic screenplay and act out elaborate scenes meant to emotionally manipulate the masses. These actors play the roles of politicians and leaders of state. They are banking moguls and corporate heads. They are media gatekeepers and manufactured celebrities. If a person sits in what appears to be a position of power, they are seldom what they seem.
I'm explaining this conundrum because a lot of people out there claim such things are obvious, yet they continue to fall for the same Kabuki theater over and over again. I am also explaining it because the subject matter of this article is a perfect example of 4th generation warfare narrative in action. The latest escalation of what I consider an inevitable battle between the Trump administration and the Federal Reserve is not at all what the mainstream or much of the alternative media think it is.
I have examined Donald Trump's dubious background and associations thoroughly in multiple articles. To summarize, Trump has been tied to g*******t financiers and think tank members for at least 25 years. He has nominated and/or stacked his cabinet with those same ghoulish people over the past two years.
To illustrate the severity of the problem, I suggest readers look into people like Wilber Ross, the Rothschild banking agent that bailed Trump out of his considerable Taj Mahal casino debts decades ago, who is now the Commerce Secretary.
Larry Kudlow, the director of the National Economic Council and an adviser to Trump is a former economist for the New York Federal Reserve. Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury Secretary, was prominent member of Goldman Sachs.
During the e******n, Trump's rhetoric surrounding the banking takeover of Washington was highly critical, yet he now associates closely with banking alumni that many conservatives would consider suspicious or untrustworthy in their motives. Some cycle out and are replaced with yet more banking elites. At any given time, there are always several financial elitists looming in the halls of the White House and most of them are linked to organizations with a decidedly g*******t mission.
This fact should make it clear to anyone with common sense that when Trump "goes to war" with the bankers in his speeches, what he is producing is theater. So, when I read the latest news that Trump is calling the Federal Reserve "crazy" and blaming them for the most recent stock market plunge in October, I have to point out that this is likely even more theater. However, it is likely theater with a purpose.
In February 2017 in my article 'In A Battle Between Trump And The Fed, Who Really Wins?', I outlined why a conflict between Trump and the central bank would actually help g*******ts in their goal of dethroning the U.S. dollar as the world reserve in a way that makes it appear like a random catastrophe of political chaos rather than a planned event. This would clear the way for a new single world currency system which some internationalists refer to as the "global economic reset."
In my article 'Trump vs The Fed: America Sacrificed At The NWO Altar', published in July, I went even further and predicted a choreographed clash between Trump and the Federal Reserve.
Now it appears that this clash has been initiated.
The fact that the mainstream financial media has suddenly reverted to panic mode over a drop of a couple of thousand points in the Dow Jones should give people pause. What this showcases is a change in tone to previous declines in which the media shrugged off or dismissed falling equities as a mere "correction." Today, outlets like Bloomberg talk of "crisis."
As I have noted in the past, the mainstream media and central banks do not warn of crisis far in advance like the alternative media. Rather, they warn of crisis mere weeks or months in advance; too late for the average person to do much to prepare. The recent change in attitude by the mainstream suggests that the next stage of the collapse that has been ongoing since 2008 is here.
For the g*******ts this is a precarious time. If a crash occurs in a narrative vacuum the public will naturally blame the most obvious culprits — namely the central banks and international banks. They are the obvious culprits because they have essentially admitted to economic sabotage in the past. Ben Bernanke admitted that the Fed was responsible for the drawn-out pain of the Great Depression. Alan Greenspan admitted to Fed culpability for the bubble of the 1990s and the derivatives bubble of 2008. In 2012, Jerome Powell warned that when the Fed decided to finally institute interest rate hikes and balance sheet cuts, stimulus addicted markets would crash. Today as Fed chairman he is implementing those exact polices knowing exactly what the consequences will be.
The problem is, once again, false narrative. Central bankers admit to playing a large part in historic crashes, but they pretend as if they were "unaware" of the bigger dangers at the time. They also exploit scapegoats as a means to divert public attention away from their activities.
For the Great Depression, Bernanke admits that the Fed's tightening actions into economic weakness prolonged and increased the horror of the Great Depression, yet the Fed's official position is to blame the existence of the gold standard. For the derivatives bubble, central bankers admit to a "lack of foresight" on the part of the Fed, but still blame "deregulation" as the primary cause of the crash of 2008. For the next phase of economic decline in 2018, they have a new scapegoat; a scapegoat that is helping them — Donald Trump.
As I warned in March of this year, Trump's p**********l career has so far closely (and strangely) matched that of Republican president Herbert Hoover just before the crash of 1929. Trump has implemented major tax cuts, infrastructure spending programs and major tariffs all on the heels of economic instability, just as Hoover did. And much like at the beginning of the Great Depression, the Federal Reserve is also hiking rates as the rest of the economy falters.
Trump is providing perfect cover for the banking elites to continue pulling life support from the system and imploding a 10-year bubble in stocks. His trade war can be used in numerous ways to offset any blame from the Fed as it deliberately demolishes equities and other markets. The fact that Trump has readily taken credit for epic stock market gains the past two years also aids the central bank greatly.
During his campaign, Trump warned that stock markets were "a big bubble" created artificially by the Fed's low interest rates. Now, Trump attacks the Fed as crazy for raising interest rates and deflating that same bubble. Trump is playing a special role in the g*******t screenplay — that of the bumbling villain; the guy who had too much hubris and destroyed everything.
If the conflict between the private Federal Reserve and the White House continues, conservatives may get the outcome they always wanted, but with many strings attached. As the farce goes forward, expect foreign involvement in U.S. Treasurys and the dollar to fall even further. Ten years ago, an audit or shutdown of the Fed could have reversed America's course for the better. Now, it is possible that the g*******ts want to sacrifice the Fed and the dollar. Why? As noted in the Rothschild run The Economist in 1988 in their article on a global currency launch in 2018, the dollar must be diminished in order to make war for a new model led by the International Monetary Fund. The Fed is nothing more than a branch of a franchise, and if closing it down wins the g*******ts more power in the long run, that is exactly what they will do.
Trump's scripted follies are not only setting the stage for a market crash which he and conservatives will be blamed for instead of the Fed, but also setting the stage for the death rattle of the dollar. To answer the original question of who is to blame for the coming disaster — both the Fed and Trump are to blame, as they are both playing their parts in the same false narrative.
To t***h and knowledge,
Brandon Smith
Oct 16, 2018 12:08:20 #
Trump will blame Obama and Hillary
Sicilianthing wrote:
This is as real as it gets... br br br >>... (show quote)
Oct 16, 2018 12:12:20 #
Lonewolf wrote:
Trump will blame Obama and Hillary
>>>>
Probably but no matter what he does things don’t look good for this scenario.
Trump needs to decide between us and them.
What is the right thing to do?
He can’t have it both ways.
Oct 16, 2018 14:27:41 #
h**e to tell you this but he is not the least bit interested in us except our v**es but to his favor, this describes Congress to a tee also!
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>
Probably but no matter what he does things don’t look good for this scenario.
Trump needs to decide between us and them.
What is the right thing to do?
He can’t have it both ways.
Probably but no matter what he does things don’t look good for this scenario.
Trump needs to decide between us and them.
What is the right thing to do?
He can’t have it both ways.
Oct 16, 2018 23:00:31 #
Lonewolf wrote:
h**e to tell you this but he is not the least bit interested in us except our v**es but to his favor, this describes Congress to a tee also!
>>>>
I know it’s very depressing.
Oct 17, 2018 11:33:55 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
This is as real as it gets... br br br >>... (show quote)
What would be ideal, is, for you to research the Clintons, Barry Sotoro aka Barrack Hussein Obama. and apply it.
I have examined Donald Trump's dubious background and associations thoroughly in multiple articles. To summarize, Trump has been tied to g*******t financiers and think tank members for at least 25 years. He has nominated and/or stacked his cabinet with those same ghoulish people over the past two years.
Since YOU pasted the article, you believe whole heartedly in the author and his beliefs. How about YOU, give a complete back ground of the CLINTONS and SOTORO aka Barack Hussein Obama. Lets really take a look at it.
Oct 17, 2018 11:39:13 #
plainlogic wrote:
What would be ideal, is, for you to research the C... (show quote)
>>>>
I’m quite aware of all that, yes you have valid points, it’s true, it’s a conundrum of epic proportions and it’s about to blow at any moment...
It’s why myself and others are working feverishly at pushing him over the edge to do something about it.
So far he’s just appeasing the sheeple and going along with the status quo’ You mention about big banking, the FED and economy...
There are many groups and very intelligent people, investigators and patriots working to expose it all and it’s prettymuch been released it seems.
I keep creating New Topics as they come to me.
Oct 17, 2018 11:41:54 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>
Probably but no matter what he does things don’t look good for this scenario.
Trump needs to decide between us and them.
What is the right thing to do?
He can’t have it both ways.
Probably but no matter what he does things don’t look good for this scenario.
Trump needs to decide between us and them.
What is the right thing to do?
He can’t have it both ways.
So thing, you were happy with the way Clinons worked from the early days? happy about Obamas reign of power and the agenda Hillary had for POTUS if she had won. Interesting, looking into you psyche.
Oct 17, 2018 11:44:06 #
plainlogic wrote:
So thing, you were happy with the way Clinons worked from the early days? happy about Obamas reign of power and the agenda Hillary had for POTUS if she had won. Interesting, looking into you psyche.
>>>>
No I wasn’t happy with them eventhough I made more money during Clinton than today but no worries.
Yes Trump is trying but there’s something wrong with this picture, I think he’s been c*********d early on by the Banking Families et al and I’m going to prove in the coming months.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.