tactful Loc: just North of the District of LMAO

No,of course not Pat Buchanan shouldn't be ignored.
what has happened is well documented and criminal,
and it's not just the one side but both as his other expose' writings prove.
I know what quotation marks are and mean.when speed reading one reads to blow right by them or at least I did.
in brief summary what is right is,similarly what is wrong is terribly wrong which can almost these days be considered the " new norm"
being a moderate isn't easy for us.
basically trying to take the best of both aisles( seeing the glass half full)if there are any bests and try to balance between both hoping
there is a valid candidate out there that meets what v**ers and the people want.as previously stated I am of the school of logic and common sense which mean his articles are good even if slanted or tainted at tmes in some direction they're still good. gets the gray matter moving ,that's a good thing. however tough it is;does do it. I appreciate it.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Sounds like we are on the same page on this subject. Pat usually hits the target.

tactful Loc: just North of the District of LMAO

indeed it does,perhaps a slight spectrum difference but on the whole:the subject remains the same. agreed.
Pat is unquestionably good even though hitting the target and hitting the bullseye technically differ but not by much!

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Bulls eye is a k**l shot, but just hitting the target isn't necessarily.

tactful Loc: just North of the District of LMAO

point made,kind of like a headshot vs a flesh wound - both count.