Liberty Tree

Should Kavanaugh's accuser be vetted as much as he has been?

Kevyn

Dr. Ford is a well respected tenured professor at Stanford, her reputation is well established. The Senate and American people deserve to her from her if she is willing to testify under oath and then make a determination of wether she or Kavanaugh is telling the t***h, and if the t***h should preclude his addition to the nations highest court.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

And Kavanaugh’s credentials are without question, outstanding.

And allegations being made from a high school or college romp? Give me a break.

Whenever the dems are losing you can Pretty well guarantee some sort of sex scandals going to come up trying to knock the opponent out.. Truly pathetic.

What is more the case is the retaliatory action being taken over a case that Mr. Kavanaughs mother presided over involving Foreclosure of a property by her family members.. Revenge is not necessarily true! Its revenge for crying out loud. Good grief!!

Where is that side of your story??

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6177971/amp/Kavanaughs-mother-ruled-against-accusers-father-1996-court-case.html

Liberty Tree

You did not answer the question.

Kevyn

The story about Kavanaughs mother deciding a case involving Fords parents is a fabrication, it never happened. Further to consider a drunken attempted rape “a high school romp” is making a mindless excuse for a serious felony. Kavanaugh was a squirming weasel during the hearings evading every question about his opinions he could, his credentials are far from impeccable. He is a pro torture anti woman right wing ideologue.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

You are so full of it kevvy.~~ would you like to see her rulings in it?? Look it big boy...

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Let's examine what you have done here: you've convicted Kavanaugh without proof and you've vindicated Ford without a hearing. You call Kavanaugh a squirming weasel who advocates torture and predatory towards the rights of women to legally murder their unborn children. (We do not know how he would rule on a******n but you evidently do.) Yet virtually everyone who knows Kavanaugh calls him a good and honorable man. Ford, to you, is the caricature of every perfect woman yet some who know her have a different opinion. Kevin, people who believe and condemn without proof like you do are a greater threat to America than every foreign enemy we have fought. The stuff that comes out of your mind that you put to pen is dripping with a******l and dangerous h**e. Many of us don't want to engage with you in dialogue because it makes us feel dirty. There seems to be a darkness around you. Yet this is only my own opinion and observation.

Airforceone

Yes: I believe the accuser should be vetted and Kavanaughs also.

What disturbs me on the Kavanaugh hearings is non answers or refuse to answer questions. What really bother me the most was, Kavanaughs former White House Advisor was hired to review White House documents and decided what was released to congress. Over 100,000 documents that William Burck classified as Executive privilege. That’s a six year gap in Kavanaughs life in the White House. Those documents are the responsibility of the National Archives to review and what could be released but the Chairman refused to give the National archives a week to review and submit to the committee for review. So the Republican chairman dumped 44,000 documents on the democrats at close of business the night before the hearing started.

This is not t***sparency on a man that is about to be appointed to the SCOTUS.

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI

I think a person on the sidelines deciding innocence or guilt is non productive.
In having a hope of trying the case in public on an emotional basis..
In the hope of influencing the out come of an issue.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

Kavanaugh's mother, according to the following, ruled in favor of Mrs. Ford's parents...the pertinent excerpt following the link:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/kavanaughs-downfall-impossible-now-seems-likely-121329375.html

"John Cornyn of Texas, the Senate GOP’s second-in-command and a member of the Judiciary Committee, lambasted Democrats for having 'egregiously mishandled' the Kavanaugh nomination — presumably by making the accusations against him public so late in the process. Cornyn suggested that Ford’s charge was nothing but 'a smear.'

As did many Trump supporters on social media. Some touted poor student ratings for Ford, failing to notice that they had found an altogether different California professor with a similar name. Others pointed out that Kavanaugh’s mother, also a judge, had been involved in foreclosure proceedings against Ford’s parents. This was true, but this was not revenge served cryogenically cold: Her ruling had been for Ford’s parents, not against them."

This, seemingly, eliminates any "revenge" factor. However, I admit to limited knowledge of all the details.

Airforceone

Kevyn don’t forget the Kavanaughs opinion on the president being above the law.

I went back to Trump during the campaign. Trump had the heritage foundation and the Republicans in the Senate to put a list of judges that could be consider for appointment to the SCOTUS. Neil Gorsuch was on that list. Trump quoted constantly that any appointees would come from that list. So I looked back that list did not include Brett Kavanaugh. What concerned republicans was his 6 year stint in the Bush White House and the paper trail that would be required to be released. They were very concerned about not only Kavanaugh but the Bush White House and what might be exposed.
So Trump appointed Kavanaugh only because he does not believe a sitting president should be subpoenaed, or indicted for any crime.

Then they blocked all White House documents during his 6 year stint in the White House and imposed executive privilege during Bushs term.
But as I checked this out it’s not a former deputy to Kavanaugh to determine what’s gets released it’s the National Archives.
Now I understand during that hearing on Kavanaugh the democrats had requested a 1 week delay to allow the National Archives to review approximate 144,000 documents and Grassley refused. ( SO IT WAS KAVANAUGHS FORMER DEPUTY AND GUESS WHAT STEVE BANNON WHO REVIEWED THOSE DOCUMENTS AND DETERMINED WHAT WAS RELEASED)

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

Release what, it's public record. Democrats want more information than they are entitled to have.
http://www.startribune.com/national-archives-rejects-dems-request-on-kavanaugh-records/490007301/

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Absolutely!!!!Whats good for the goose,is good for the gander....Especially when gander is h**er of the goose....