One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
...So there is no way we are going to win midterms.....
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
Sep 14, 2018 11:57:16   #
Mikeyavelli
 
byronglimish wrote:
Thank you brother Mike. We do know the t***h.


Right now there ain't too much t***h going on. Pencilneck Rosenstein and Wussy Wray are looking the other way as the evidence (which we knew all along) showing a massive government wide plot to keep Trump out of the Whitehouse and now to remove Trump from the Whitehouse piles up daily. Pencilneck and Wussy would rather help mueller remove Trump from office than serve justice.

Reply
Sep 14, 2018 12:01:20   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Right now there ain't too much t***h going on. Pencilneck Rosenstein and Wussy Wray are looking the other way as the evidence (which we knew all along) showing a massive government wide plot to keep Trump out of the Whitehouse and now to remove Trump from the Whitehouse piles up daily. Pencilneck and Wussy would rather help mueller remove Trump from office than serve justice.




It's the bottom line.

Reply
Sep 14, 2018 13:15:07   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Right now there ain't too much t***h going on. Pencilneck Rosenstein and Wussy Wray are looking the other way as the evidence (which we knew all along) showing a massive government wide plot to keep Trump out of the Whitehouse and now to remove Trump from the Whitehouse piles up daily. Pencilneck and Wussy would rather help mueller remove Trump from office than serve justice.


Trump can stop & listen to his advisers before he walks in to situations he knows little about.
But he has shown nothing in the way of truly knowing how problems are solved & things take place in the real world.
With the flaping of his mouth & tweeting he just keeps screwing up.

The issue was not about removing him from office at the start.
It was his mouthing off that kept the spot light on him.

It only proves out incompetent he really is.
He opened his mouth & stuck his foot in it & now the attention he aways wanted on him self has become more than casual.
It has become a burden & will not go away.

It is now a case of how do those who support him get viewed personally.
Their credibilty has been challenged.
Respect has been damaged.

Reply
 
 
Sep 14, 2018 14:06:44   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
Trump can stop & listen to his advisers before he walks in to situations he knows little about.
But he has shown nothing in the way of truly knowing how problems are solved & things take place in the real world.
With the flaping of his mouth & tweeting he just keeps screwing up.

The issue was not about removing him from office at the start.
It was his mouthing off that kept the spot light on him.

It only proves out incompetent he really is.
He opened his mouth & stuck his foot in it & now the attention he aways wanted on him self has become more than casual.
It has become a burden & will not go away.

It is now a case of how do those who support him get viewed personally.
Their credibilty has been challenged.
Respect has been damaged.
Trump can stop & listen to his advisers before... (show quote)


How has my credibility been damaged because I support what he's doing?
I have never, and still don't like him, but I support what he's doing.

Everyone who knows me knows I'm a man of my word old school style.
So tell me, how has my credibility been damaged, Floyd.

Reply
Sep 14, 2018 15:18:51   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
I think we had better listen to the experts on this one.
Your logic is a bit off.


The experts were able to adjust how they looked at this and get even more precise but they were still showing that warming occurred and within some 10's of thousands of years the CO2 levels rose, much more significantly than it has risen since mankind started producing CO2. And, even after this adjustment could only say that there must be some other explanation since it MUST be how they proclaim it to be; CO2 levels result in warming. That's what they feel MUST be and yet their own most tedious research shows that CO2 levels rise after g****l w*****g.

I'm a scientist and am well able to understand what they do, how they do it, their methods of analysis, etc. There are many, many such as myself who are beginning to come to the same conclusion; AGW, that is "man caused" g****l w*****g is based on BAD AND WEAK SCIENCE. Too many times the vast majority of science will wrap it's hands around an idea and inevitably resist when it's found not to be how things are, as in cholesterol and heart disease. I remember the president of the AMA finally admitting a few years ago that they just assumed, incorrectly, that elevated levels of cholesterol caused heart disease. It had so permeated the medical environment that there are still medical sources promoting it and still doctors treating elevated cholesterol to "prevent" heart disease.

It's a weakness in science and part of the reason why science tries to check, recheck and double check and check again and then must repeat and have repeatable measurements on all things measurable.

Reply
Sep 14, 2018 16:16:52   #
Mikeyavelli
 
And witchcraft caused the Bubonic Plague.
C*****e c****e has nothing to do with humans. We wish we could affect the weather. All bullmueller trying to get me to ride the train and become vegan and get used to living a s**thole country's lifestyle.
No science involved, just paid schills to convince me that I must do what they say otherwise the world will come to an end.
Bullmueller. All bullmueller.

Reply
Sep 14, 2018 17:05:03   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
The experts were able to adjust how they looked at this and get even more precise but they were still showing that warming occurred and within some 10's of thousands of years the CO2 levels rose, much more significantly than it has risen since mankind started producing CO2. And, even after this adjustment could only say that there must be some other explanation since it MUST be how they proclaim it to be; CO2 levels result in warming. That's what they feel MUST be and yet their own most tedious research shows that CO2 levels rise after g****l w*****g.

I'm a scientist and am well able to understand what they do, how they do it, their methods of analysis, etc. There are many, many such as myself who are beginning to come to the same conclusion; AGW, that is "man caused" g****l w*****g is based on BAD AND WEAK SCIENCE. Too many times the vast majority of science will wrap it's hands around an idea and inevitably resist when it's found not to be how things are, as in cholesterol and heart disease. I remember the president of the AMA finally admitting a few years ago that they just assumed, incorrectly, that elevated levels of cholesterol caused heart disease. It had so permeated the medical environment that there are still medical sources promoting it and still doctors treating elevated cholesterol to "prevent" heart disease.

It's a weakness in science and part of the reason why science tries to check, recheck and double check and check again and then must repeat and have repeatable measurements on all things measurable.
The experts were able to adjust how they looked at... (show quote)


The line states CO2 levels rise after g****l w*****g.
So you tend to believe that man made additions of CO2 are not a part of any warming of the planet.
So we have basicly 2 schoolos of thought on this issue & the one you tend to believe is the right one.

That we can discount the other views as being (hot air) that may be the cause of the CO2 after the planet is warmed.
That is just a strech of the issue on my part.

The ice packs are melting & the seas are rising. & this is all seen as not happening because of a scientific failure in measurement.

I think that while you wish to express the conserative big money picture of whatt is going on.
I will stick to those with all the faulty science.
While trying to reduce my carbon foot print.

I will leave you trying to please those that wish to keep using carbon based fuels.

Reply
 
 
Sep 14, 2018 17:19:48   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
archie bunker wrote:
How has my credibility been damaged because I support what he's doing?
I have never, and still don't like him, but I support what he's doing.

Everyone who knows me knows I'm a man of my word old school style.
So tell me, how has my credibility been damaged, Floyd.


Well since you answered to a post I made to another person.
I will personal challenge your credibility,

My credibility is always being challenged.
Of course I don't really offer much put my opinion of views on issues.

If I have offered any thing that has credibilty that credibility could only come from another person.
In & of it's self there is no credibilty.

As is most information offered on his site.

Reply
Sep 14, 2018 17:25:03   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
The line states CO2 levels rise after g****l w*****g.
So you tend to believe that man made additions of CO2 are not a part of any warming of the planet.
So we have basicly 2 schoolos of thought on this issue & the one you tend to believe is the right one.

That we can discount the other views as being (hot air) that may be the cause of the CO2 after the planet is warmed.
That is just a strech of the issue on my part.

The ice packs are melting & the seas are rising. & this is all seen as not happening because of a scientific failure in measurement.

I think that while you wish to express the conserative big money picture of whatt is going on.
I will stick to those with all the faulty science.
While trying to reduce my carbon foot print.

I will leave you trying to please those that wish to keep using carbon based fuels.
The line states CO2 levels rise after g****l w****... (show quote)


I ain't gonna do diddly mueller to save the planet. I am the planet. I brought nothing, I take nothing. I'm as incidental as a rock.
Things are exactly as they were before me, exactly as they were during me, and exactly as they were after me. I don't breath, fart, eat, piss or mueller anything that wasn't here in the first place. It's all the same. We are as passing as the wind.
The planet owes me nothing, I owe nothing to the planet.

Reply
Sep 14, 2018 17:32:02   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
Well since you answered to a post I made to another person.
I will personal challenge your credibility,

My credibility is always being challenged.
Of course I don't really offer much put my opinion of views on issues.

If I have offered any thing that has credibilty that credibility could only come from another person.
In & of it's self there is no credibilty.

As is most information offered on his site.


You started it.

Reply
Sep 14, 2018 18:10:20   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
archie bunker wrote:
You started it.


No matter I still like to match words with you.
I have started lots of things.

I may not be as good finishing things as I am starting things.

Can we still share words from time to time?
I know we both have better things to do.
But I do feel it is an obligation for those of us who have bee around longer than others to share what we think we know.

Good our bad they may age to be much like us.

The hope is that we can share what we have done & if nothing else can save them from or mistakes.

Reply
 
 
Sep 14, 2018 18:48:40   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Hey Floyd, you know that you always hurt my feelings so bad when you say nasty things about Trump. I'm really sensitive. It's difficult for me to bear the insensitivity about something I care so deeply about. I can start with an appeal to you and hope that it carries over to the rest of the left. I am offended over the constant vitriol you spew about my President, Donald Trump. I'm forced to kowtow to your sensitivities. How about kowtowing to mine?

Reply
Sep 14, 2018 18:49:16   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Floyd Brown wrote:
No matter I still like to match words with you.
I have started lots of things.

I may not be as good finishing things as I am starting things.

Can we still share words from time to time?
I know we both have better things to do.
But I do feel it is an obligation for those of us who have bee around longer than others to share what we think we know.

Good our bad they may age to be much like us.

The hope is that we can share what we have done & if nothing else can save them from or mistakes.
No matter I still like to match words with you. br... (show quote)


Yeah Floyd, we can talk. As long as you don't try to sell me a Jack donkey disguised as a unicorn.

Reply
Sep 14, 2018 19:58:01   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
archie bunker wrote:
Yeah Floyd, we can talk. As long as you don't try to sell me a Jack donkey disguised as a unicorn.


I think I will look around and find where you might buy one of those donkeys.

I really don't have any thing to sell.
All I really have is a bunch of junk in my head I like to boor people with.
It is all free.

I will just wait until you ask for my advice.
Or get tired writing to other people.

I keep telling my self there a lot of other things I should be doing.
But then I get in front of this PC & my fingers just can't stop puting all of that stuff wanting to get out of my head down for others move past on this site.

Reply
Sep 14, 2018 20:27:12   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Hey Floyd, you know that you always hurt my feelings so bad when you say nasty things about Trump. I'm really sensitive. It's difficult for me to bear the insensitivity about something I care so deeply about. I can start with an appeal to you and hope that it carries over to the rest of the left. I am offended over the constant vitriol you spew about my President, Donald Trump. I'm forced to kowtow to your sensitivities. How about kowtowing to mine?


Just for you I will.
No I won't go there.

I try so hard to not say nasty things about Trump but is so easy to find things wrong with him.

But first tell me how I force you to kowtow to my sensitivities.
I will go back over the posts and address my sins.

I hope you realize that I look at your post as a humorous jab at me.
I am trying to answer you with a bit of humor.

If I can give my self a thrashing with a wet leather belt.
I will do so if you say it will make things right between us.
I would never want it to be said that I was insensitive to another persons dignity.
Or some thing like that.

I hope you know that now to redeem my nastiness side.
I think I should go & insult several other people.

If I could only get paid for what comes out of my head.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.