One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The current leftwing attack on Donald Trump...you know...collusion, etc
Page 1 of 2 next>
Aug 21, 2018 20:52:00   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
I agree;
"It behoves me to add a comment or two to the current leftwing attack on Donald Trump...you know...collusion, etc. without any evidence. It is being conducted in a psychological arena that is foreign to most people...one involving "EMOTIONS" that those so encumbered may use as their yardstick for decision making...not common sense. I call them Demo-N**ies, as they use N**I fear techniques invented in America by the Democrats or Dummycrats...ref: Dinesh D'Souza.

CNN uses that approach almost exclusively as it is easily picked up by females especially, as they are extremely tuned into the emotional content of anything broadcast...over and over. They (CNN) rightfully assume and know it is very effective. It creates violence by inciting people to r**t, destroy property, etc. without thinking, which is counter to a conservative or "right wing" approach that males tend to favor in their decision process. The Clinton Foundation, run by Hillary Clinton finances much of this rhetoric against Trump. CNN, which is their champion of anti-Trump "f**e news" delivered by gay announcers (not a psychological threat to women) in many cases.

An analysis of this procedure can be verified by watching CNN, and determine whether or not they are telling half-t***hs, or outright unsupported lies that will never fly in a court of law. The elite favor Clinton as they feather their income nests by direct ownership of the means of war material production...unseen by the general public. The wealthy Koch brothers were, and still are on the Clinton band wagon. They want Trump to fail and Pence to take the reins, for he is more easily influenced by the financial crowd of Wall Street...and the personal assault on Trump and his family and friends...you guessed it, paid for by the elite cabal and the Clintons.

A socialist female would h**e Trump, for he is the personification of a single man with lots of dough to throw around to get what he wanted...they think. In reality, he's quite normal, is conversant with the working class, and smells a bad deal when he sees one. He doesn't pay the "Now you see it, then, now you don't", which is the usual political process we have seen over many years...from wanna be rich candidates for president, so they are owned by the wealthy elite when the political dust settles.

Personally, I will NEVER v**e for a crooked candidate, which includes any Democrat (including Elizabeth Warren) who believes the government is entitled to steal from Americas citizens through the tax system and high interest rate loans for college students...their fair-share tax does not make a theft look OK. Hogwash."
-R:))-

Reply
Aug 21, 2018 20:58:30   #
Carol Kelly
 
eagleye13 wrote:
I agree;
"It behoves me to add a comment or two to the current leftwing attack on Donald Trump...you know...collusion, etc. without any evidence. It is being conducted in a psychological arena that is foreign to most people...one involving "EMOTIONS" that those so encumbered may use as their yardstick for decision making...not common sense. I call them Demo-N**ies, as they use N**I fear techniques invented in America by the Democrats or Dummycrats...ref: Dinesh D'Souza.

CNN uses that approach almost exclusively as it is easily picked up by females especially, as they are extremely tuned into the emotional content of anything broadcast...over and over. They (CNN) rightfully assume and know it is very effective. It creates violence by inciting people to r**t, destroy property, etc. without thinking, which is counter to a conservative or "right wing" approach that males tend to favor in their decision process. The Clinton Foundation, run by Hillary Clinton finances much of this rhetoric against Trump. CNN, which is their champion of anti-Trump "f**e news" delivered by gay announcers (not a psychological threat to women) in many cases.

An analysis of this procedure can be verified by watching CNN, and determine whether or not they are telling half-t***hs, or outright unsupported lies that will never fly in a court of law. The elite favor Clinton as they feather their income nests by direct ownership of the means of war material production...unseen by the general public. The wealthy Koch brothers were, and still are on the Clinton band wagon. They want Trump to fail and Pence to take the reins, for he is more easily influenced by the financial crowd of Wall Street...and the personal assault on Trump and his family and friends...you guessed it, paid for by the elite cabal and the Clintons.

A socialist female would h**e Trump, for he is the personification of a single man with lots of dough to throw around to get what he wanted...they think. In reality, he's quite normal, is conversant with the working class, and smells a bad deal when he sees one. He doesn't pay the "Now you see it, then, now you don't", which is the usual political process we have seen over many years...from wanna be rich candidates for president, so they are owned by the wealthy elite when the political dust settles.

Personally, I will NEVER v**e for a crooked candidate, which includes any Democrat (including Elizabeth Warren) who believes the government is entitled to steal from Americas citizens through the tax system and high interest rate loans for college students...their fair-share tax does not make a theft look OK. Hogwash."
-R:))-
I agree; br "It behoves me to add a comment o... (show quote)


Especially Elizabeth Warren, the phony American Indian.

Reply
Aug 21, 2018 21:13:31   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
Especially Elizabeth Warren, the phony American Indian.


"Especially Elizabeth Warren, the phony American Indian." - Carol Kelly

Yep; those high cheek bones are something else.

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2018 21:40:15   #
Airforceone
 
eagleye13 wrote:
I agree;
"It behoves me to add a comment or two to the current leftwing attack on Donald Trump...you know...collusion, etc. without any evidence. It is being conducted in a psychological arena that is foreign to most people...one involving "EMOTIONS" that those so encumbered may use as their yardstick for decision making...not common sense. I call them Demo-N**ies, as they use N**I fear techniques invented in America by the Democrats or Dummycrats...ref: Dinesh D'Souza.

CNN uses that approach almost exclusively as it is easily picked up by females especially, as they are extremely tuned into the emotional content of anything broadcast...over and over. They (CNN) rightfully assume and know it is very effective. It creates violence by inciting people to r**t, destroy property, etc. without thinking, which is counter to a conservative or "right wing" approach that males tend to favor in their decision process. The Clinton Foundation, run by Hillary Clinton finances much of this rhetoric against Trump. CNN, which is their champion of anti-Trump "f**e news" delivered by gay announcers (not a psychological threat to women) in many cases.

An analysis of this procedure can be verified by watching CNN, and determine whether or not they are telling half-t***hs, or outright unsupported lies that will never fly in a court of law. The elite favor Clinton as they feather their income nests by direct ownership of the means of war material production...unseen by the general public. The wealthy Koch brothers were, and still are on the Clinton band wagon. They want Trump to fail and Pence to take the reins, for he is more easily influenced by the financial crowd of Wall Street...and the personal assault on Trump and his family and friends...you guessed it, paid for by the elite cabal and the Clintons.

A socialist female would h**e Trump, for he is the personification of a single man with lots of dough to throw around to get what he wanted...they think. In reality, he's quite normal, is conversant with the working class, and smells a bad deal when he sees one. He doesn't pay the "Now you see it, then, now you don't", which is the usual political process we have seen over many years...from wanna be rich candidates for president, so they are owned by the wealthy elite when the political dust settles.

Personally, I will NEVER v**e for a crooked candidate, which includes any Democrat (including Elizabeth Warren) who believes the government is entitled to steal from Americas citizens through the tax system and high interest rate loans for college students...their fair-share tax does not make a theft look OK. Hogwash."
-R:))-
I agree; br "It behoves me to add a comment o... (show quote)


Well will you v**e for a Republican that believes in giving our tax dollars to the corporate elite. WTF isxwrong with you people.

Reply
Aug 21, 2018 22:22:28   #
Snoopy
 
Airforce:

WTF is wrong with us? Nothing! We see through your BS every day.

Snoopy

Reply
Aug 22, 2018 07:51:47   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Airforceone wrote:
Well will you v**e for a Republican that believes in giving our tax dollars to the corporate elite. WTF isxwrong with you people.


AirFarce; You would still v**e for this?

Hillary Clinton Song - "Dishonesty" A Parody of Billy Joel's "Honesty"
https://youtu.be/Vjz7gHU2UeU

Reply
Aug 22, 2018 11:20:02   #
Airforceone
 
eagleye13 wrote:
AirFarce; You would still v**e for this?

Hillary Clinton Song - "Dishonesty" A Parody of Billy Joel's "Honesty"
https://youtu.be/Vjz7gHU2UeU


Hilliary Clinton is not the GD president Trump is stop that kind of BS and just sit back and admit you elected a freak

Reply
 
 
Aug 22, 2018 13:41:36   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Airforceone wrote:
Hilliary Clinton is not the GD president Trump is stop that kind of BS and just sit back and admit you elected a freak


A Compilation of Hillary Incompetencies
https://youtu.be/wwwrYMwD8U0

Reply
Aug 22, 2018 14:11:17   #
woodguru
 
The "current attack" as you refer to it as has zero to do with Russian collusion.

It has to do with paying off women he had an affair with to keep them from going public right before the e******n. That may not have been a problem had he simply opened his personal check book and written them a check.

Cohen making the payment might not have been a problem either, at least not nearly as much as it is, if he had not been payed back by the campaign fund to reelect Trump. There are disclosure laws, and there are rules as to how the money can be used, and it for sure is not to pay Cohen back for paying off Trump's e******n related NDA's.

But people don't realize the thing that may have the most teeth has to do with public servants in positions of public trust (which Trump is) lying to the public. There are specific statutes that make it black and white clear what constitutes a violation of that public trust. People have gotten so used to lying being what Trump does that they don't see one more lie as being any big deal. Well it is if it's repeatedly done in full public view, and evidence comes out later that 100% reveals that he was blatantly lying the whole time.

The statute involved carries the potential for a prison sentence. We may very well be looking at testing whether a sitting president can be indicted and prosecuted. I do know that a president under indictment cannot be president. The right seems to think that this means they can't be indicted while president, many prosecutors see it the other way, that an indictment is in effect an impeachment. It's the long way to go because there would be no reason for Trump not to challenge it in the supreme court, which would be a crap shoot. There is no challenge to an impeachment.

Reply
Aug 22, 2018 14:17:18   #
woodguru
 
eagleye13 wrote:

Personally, I will NEVER v**e for a crooked candidate,


Which statement is 100% wrong when any republican is seen as better than a dem.

Trump had a vast array of stories and articles chronicling his mob ties, casino peccadillos, his thousands of lawsuits for stiffing contractors for honest work done, Trump University which was a pure ripoff on an epic scale, ties to Russian money (illegal).

If you v**ed for Trump you v**ed for a crook, and you either knew it or you are deeply ignorant and delusional.

Reply
Aug 22, 2018 14:29:57   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
woodguru wrote:
The "current attack" as you refer to it as has zero to do with Russian collusion.

It has to do with paying off women he had an affair with to keep them from going public right before the e******n. That may not have been a problem had he simply opened his personal check book and written them a check.

Cohen making the payment might not have been a problem either, at least not nearly as much as it is, if he had not been payed back by the campaign fund to reelect Trump. There are disclosure laws, and there are rules as to how the money can be used, and it for sure is not to pay Cohen back for paying off Trump's e******n related NDA's.

But people don't realize the thing that may have the most teeth has to do with public servants in positions of public trust (which Trump is) lying to the public. There are specific statutes that make it black and white clear what constitutes a violation of that public trust. People have gotten so used to lying being what Trump does that they don't see one more lie as being any big deal. Well it is if it's repeatedly done in full public view, and evidence comes out later that 100% reveals that he was blatantly lying the whole time.

The statute involved carries the potential for a prison sentence. We may very well be looking at testing whether a sitting president can be indicted and prosecuted. I do know that a president under indictment cannot be president. The right seems to think that this means they can't be indicted while president, many prosecutors see it the other way, that an indictment is in effect an impeachment. It's the long way to go because there would be no reason for Trump not to challenge it in the supreme court, which would be a crap shoot. There is no challenge to an impeachment.
The "current attack" as you refer to it ... (show quote)
Newsflash!

There is absolutely nothing in these convictions or plea bargains that implicate president Trump in any way, there is nothing there that has anything to with Trump's campaign or in violation of campaign finance law.

Following the passage of the McCain Feingold Act, upon recommendation from senators and reps, Bill Clinton appointed Bradley Smith to chair the Federal E******n Commission. Smith was an outspoken opponent of the McCain Feingold Act, but he was the most knowledgeable about the law and most articulate in writing the best interpretations of it. He chaired the commission when it wrote the MF Act into FEC law. Today, Smith came on a radio program and explained quite clearly that the charges against Cohen did not in any way violate campaign finance law.

In this case, the prosecutor attempted to write his own campaign finance law in an effort to connect this to the president. Fact is, Herr Mueller handed off the investigation and prosecution of Cohen to the Southern District US Court of New York, which essentially removed the case from the special counsel witch hunt. Mueller knew there was nothing there that could implicate Trump.

Contrary to the media hype, when Trump told Cohen to make a payoff to eliminate a problem, he did not "order Cohen to commit a crime". There is no law against making such a payoff, especially since the money did not come from any campaign fund.

Cohen and his lawyer are as crooked as a bag of snakes. Davis is a hard-core Hillary supporter and donor, Cohen is a tax c***t. both of them are shysters. A lawyer who records meetings with his client is deceptive, dishonest and violates attorney/client confidentiality.

No mystery why a fool like you would see a criminal lawyer as one whose integrity is impeccable.

In Manafort's case, all the charges against him, the crimes he committed, all occurred before he ever became a short term campaign manager for Trump.

Neither of these two crooks have anything whatsoever with which to "flip" on Trump.

I will stand with the expert analysis by the FEC chairman who wrote the campaign finance law rather than the emotional hype of a highly prejudiced media and the biased opinions of so-called "legal experts" the media parades across their stages.

Reply
 
 
Aug 22, 2018 14:49:41   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
woodguru wrote:
Which statement is 100% wrong when any republican is seen as better than a dem.

Trump had a vast array of stories and articles chronicling his mob ties, casino peccadillos, his thousands of lawsuits for stiffing contractors for honest work done, Trump University which was a pure ripoff on an epic scale, ties to Russian money (illegal).

If you v**ed for Trump you v**ed for a crook, and you either knew it or you are deeply ignorant and delusional.


woody. you must be deaf and blind?

Hillary the Scandals
http://youtu.be/BYKAzJcU-DA

Reply
Aug 22, 2018 15:05:35   #
woodguru
 
eagleye13 wrote:
woody. you must be deaf and blind?

Hillary the Scandals
http://youtu.be/BYKAzJcU-DA


Why do you bring up Hillary when the topic is Trump, it's irrelevant.

Reply
Aug 22, 2018 17:14:20   #
Airforceone
 
woodguru wrote:
Which statement is 100% wrong when any republican is seen as better than a dem.

Trump had a vast array of stories and articles chronicling his mob ties, casino peccadillos, his thousands of lawsuits for stiffing contractors for honest work done, Trump University which was a pure ripoff on an epic scale, ties to Russian money (illegal).

If you v**ed for Trump you v**ed for a crook, and you either knew it or you are deeply ignorant and delusional.


There deeply ignorant and delusional. Most Trump supporters are evangelicals that love the fact that Trump is a known r****t. Evangelicals are not about making America great they want to make America White ruled under an Autocratic. And that is what Trump is. He wants the US just like Russia and Trump as the leader.

Reply
Aug 23, 2018 09:07:58   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
woodguru wrote:
Why do you bring up Hillary when the topic is Trump, it's irrelevant.


"Why do you bring up Hillary when the topic is Trump, it's irrelevant." - woodguru

Hillary will NEVER be irrelevant.
She almost became President.
Trump saved america from that.
The Scum Bag is still around, and not in jail where she belongs.
The Left is not going away.

BTW;
Hillary the Scandals
http://youtu.be/BYKAzJcU-DA

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.