One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Michael Cohen raid should terrify Donald Trump
Page <<first <prev 6 of 19 next> last>>
Apr 10, 2018 22:03:38   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
lindajoy wrote:
Must say Jim you are right on the money with your sentiments here..

I put nothing past any of these players, not after what we have already seen... This just may be another liberal Judge ruling that will be challenged later..

Smells kind of like how the FISA warrant was extracted.. They lied about that one what makes you think they aren’t lying here too???

Will be interesting to see what does t***spire and what Cohen claims about all this too. Too early to say right now.. As you can see the speculstion is running rampet.. Trumps approval rstings have the dems in panic koid.!!!
Must say Jim you are right on the money with your ... (show quote)

Hey LJ..maybe you can explain to me why it is so important that Muller would raid Trumps attorney to find out if Trump paid a porn start 130,000 to keep her mouth shut because they had a one night stand. Why is this illegal? I've been kind of out of the loop lately. Thx

Reply
Apr 10, 2018 22:23:24   #
vernon01
 
slatten49 wrote:
Fox News explains exactly why the Michael Cohen raid should terrify Donald Trump

Attorney-client privilege doesn't apply if there's "a serious allegation of illegal activity."

Addy Baird, Apr 9, 2018, 6:32 pm

On Monday, FBI agents raided the office and residences of Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s longtime personal attorney. The search warrants reportedly included conversations between Cohen and Trump, who has been Cohen’s only client for years.

The search reportedly included, possibly among other things, documents related a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, which Cohen made just days before the 2016 e******n. Daniels, an adult film actress, says she had an affair with Trump in 2006.

But it was the approval of the search warrants themselves that should terrify Trump. The best explanation, remarkably, came from Andrew Napolitano, a Fox News legal analyst. Napolitano explained that, under normal circumstances, communications between Trump and his attorney are privileged. But this privilege does not apply if there is “a serious allegation of illegal activity, by the lawyer with the client,” he said.

“There must be some evidence presented to a federal judge here in New York City sufficient to persuade that judge to sign a search warrant to permit the FBI in broad daylight to raid an attorney’s office, particularly when that attorney has one client and it happens to be the president of the United States,” Napolitano told Fox News’ Neil Cavuto.

“That evidence would have to be such as to persuade a neutral observer, the federal judge, that it is more likely than not, that among these seized documents is evidence of crimes by Mr. Cohen or Mr. Cohen and the president,” he continued.

The crime in question, Napolitano speculated, could be related to the $130,000 payment to Daniels.

Napolitano did echo some of Fox News’ favorite arguments about the ongoing investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 p**********l e******n, saying there “seems to be no limit” to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe. But then Napolitano reiterated that a judge would only issue the warrant if there was sufficient “evidence of crimes.”

“You’re talking about the most confidential and protected relationship there is — lawyer and client — and the federal government has just invaded that with the express authority and approval of a federal judge, who may only permit that invasion when she or he, the federal judge, has been satisfied that it’s more likely than not that in those materials are evidence of crimes,” he said.

It would be a crime, Napolitano went on to say, if the Trump campaign accepted a gift of $130,000, and if the funds came from the campaign. In that instance, “all bets are off,” as Cavuto put it.

What makes Napolitano’s comments Monday even more interesting is that when Napolitano talks, Trump listens. Trump directly echoed Napolitano’s arguments on Fox in a recent tweet about government surveillance shortly after Napolitano appeared on the network, and the White House has cited Napolitano’s claim, without evidence, that British intelligence operatives had surveilled Trump Tower as a favor to Barack Obama during the 2016 campaign.

According to a report from February, the president and Napolitano have spoken a number of times in recent months, as well.
Fox News explains exactly why the Michael Cohen ra... (show quote)



I really think Trump needs to pardon all concern partied and himself if necessary and then he needs to fire every us attorney in the D O J.Then he can go about implementing his programs.

Reply
Apr 10, 2018 22:30:37   #
vernon01
 
kankune wrote:
Hey LJ..maybe you can explain to me why it is so important that Muller would raid Trumps attorney to find out if Trump paid a porn start 130,000 to keep her mouth shut because they had a one night stand. Why is this illegal? I've been kind of out of the loop lately. Thx



Muller is desperate he is looking like a loser and he cant have that.Trump needs to start an investigation into the muller probe .

Reply
 
 
Apr 10, 2018 22:34:55   #
vernon01
 
I'll bet it was a clinton or obama judge.
kankune wrote:
Who's the federal judge the issued the warrant????

Reply
Apr 10, 2018 22:49:36   #
theotts
 
Qui autem, si maxime hoc placeat, moderatius tamen id volunt fieri, difficilem quandam temperantiam postulant in eo, quod semel admissum coerceri reprimique non potest, ut propemodum iustioribus utamur illis, qui omnino avocent a philosophia, quam his, qui rebus infinitis modum constituant in reque eo meliore, quo maior sit, mediocritatem desiderent.Sive enim ad sapientiam perveniri potest, non paranda nobis solum ea, sed fruenda etiam sapientia est; sive hoc difficile est,...

Reply
Apr 10, 2018 23:17:32   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
theotts wrote:
Qui autem, si maxime hoc placeat, moderatius tamen id volunt fieri, difficilem quandam temperantiam postulant in eo, quod semel admissum coerceri reprimique non potest, ut propemodum iustioribus utamur illis, qui omnino avocent a philosophia, quam his, qui rebus infinitis modum constituant in reque eo meliore, quo maior sit, mediocritatem desiderent.Sive enim ad sapientiam perveniri potest, non paranda nobis solum ea, sed fruenda etiam sapientia est; sive hoc difficile est,...


Dude...speak freakin English or.go away!

Reply
Apr 10, 2018 23:33:55   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
kankune wrote:
Dude...speak freakin English or.go away!


You’re too nice. Should only give this troll (glaucon) one choice.

Reply
 
 
Apr 10, 2018 23:41:06   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
JFlorio wrote:
You’re too nice. Should only give this troll (glaucon) one choice.


Jim you're so right..its Glaucon. I thought he sounded familiar!

Reply
Apr 11, 2018 00:56:19   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Your crying



Reply
Apr 11, 2018 05:16:53   #
Radiance3
 
slatten49 wrote:
Fox News explains exactly why the Michael Cohen raid should terrify Donald Trump

Attorney-client privilege doesn't apply if there's "a serious allegation of illegal activity."

Addy Baird, Apr 9, 2018, 6:32 pm

On Monday, FBI agents raided the office and residences of Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s longtime personal attorney. The search warrants reportedly included conversations between Cohen and Trump, who has been Cohen’s only client for years.

The search reportedly included, possibly among other things, documents related a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, which Cohen made just days before the 2016 e******n. Daniels, an adult film actress, says she had an affair with Trump in 2006.

But it was the approval of the search warrants themselves that should terrify Trump. The best explanation, remarkably, came from Andrew Napolitano, a Fox News legal analyst. Napolitano explained that, under normal circumstances, communications between Trump and his attorney are privileged. But this privilege does not apply if there is “a serious allegation of illegal activity, by the lawyer with the client,” he said.

“There must be some evidence presented to a federal judge here in New York City sufficient to persuade that judge to sign a search warrant to permit the FBI in broad daylight to raid an attorney’s office, particularly when that attorney has one client and it happens to be the president of the United States,” Napolitano told Fox News’ Neil Cavuto.

“That evidence would have to be such as to persuade a neutral observer, the federal judge, that it is more likely than not, that among these seized documents is evidence of crimes by Mr. Cohen or Mr. Cohen and the president,” he continued.

The crime in question, Napolitano speculated, could be related to the $130,000 payment to Daniels.

Napolitano did echo some of Fox News’ favorite arguments about the ongoing investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 p**********l e******n, saying there “seems to be no limit” to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe. But then Napolitano reiterated that a judge would only issue the warrant if there was sufficient “evidence of crimes.”

“You’re talking about the most confidential and protected relationship there is — lawyer and client — and the federal government has just invaded that with the express authority and approval of a federal judge, who may only permit that invasion when she or he, the federal judge, has been satisfied that it’s more likely than not that in those materials are evidence of crimes,” he said.

It would be a crime, Napolitano went on to say, if the Trump campaign accepted a gift of $130,000, and if the funds came from the campaign. In that instance, “all bets are off,” as Cavuto put it.

What makes Napolitano’s comments Monday even more interesting is that when Napolitano talks, Trump listens. Trump directly echoed Napolitano’s arguments on Fox in a recent tweet about government surveillance shortly after Napolitano appeared on the network, and the White House has cited Napolitano’s claim, without evidence, that British intelligence operatives had surveilled Trump Tower as a favor to Barack Obama during the 2016 campaign.

According to a report from February, the president and Napolitano have spoken a number of times in recent months, as well.
Fox News explains exactly why the Michael Cohen ra... (show quote)

===============
Nothing to do with Russia collusion. Client -lawyer privilege violated.
Mueller and FBI gang will retire in jail!!

These activities are planned to evade the FISA Warrant and the huge DOSSIER!
To shift attention of the people to this Mueller violation of Cohen. Bring them to the SC.

Those massive crimes of the FBI GANGSTERS including Mueller are being sidetracked. To remove attention of the people from the crimes of Obama and Hillary and instead now focus on Cohen by violating his constitution rights.

I want focus on the crimes of Hillary, Obama, and the whole FBI GANGSTERS especially Rosenstein.

Reply
Apr 11, 2018 06:56:56   #
Big Kahuna
 
slatten49 wrote:
Fox News explains exactly why the Michael Cohen raid should terrify Donald Trump

Attorney-client privilege doesn't apply if there's "a serious allegation of illegal activity."

Addy Baird, Apr 9, 2018, 6:32 pm

On Monday, FBI agents raided the office and residences of Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s longtime personal attorney. The search warrants reportedly included conversations between Cohen and Trump, who has been Cohen’s only client for years.

The search reportedly included, possibly among other things, documents related a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, which Cohen made just days before the 2016 e******n. Daniels, an adult film actress, says she had an affair with Trump in 2006.

But it was the approval of the search warrants themselves that should terrify Trump. The best explanation, remarkably, came from Andrew Napolitano, a Fox News legal analyst. Napolitano explained that, under normal circumstances, communications between Trump and his attorney are privileged. But this privilege does not apply if there is “a serious allegation of illegal activity, by the lawyer with the client,” he said.

“There must be some evidence presented to a federal judge here in New York City sufficient to persuade that judge to sign a search warrant to permit the FBI in broad daylight to raid an attorney’s office, particularly when that attorney has one client and it happens to be the president of the United States,” Napolitano told Fox News’ Neil Cavuto.

“That evidence would have to be such as to persuade a neutral observer, the federal judge, that it is more likely than not, that among these seized documents is evidence of crimes by Mr. Cohen or Mr. Cohen and the president,” he continued.

The crime in question, Napolitano speculated, could be related to the $130,000 payment to Daniels.

Napolitano did echo some of Fox News’ favorite arguments about the ongoing investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 p**********l e******n, saying there “seems to be no limit” to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe. But then Napolitano reiterated that a judge would only issue the warrant if there was sufficient “evidence of crimes.”

“You’re talking about the most confidential and protected relationship there is — lawyer and client — and the federal government has just invaded that with the express authority and approval of a federal judge, who may only permit that invasion when she or he, the federal judge, has been satisfied that it’s more likely than not that in those materials are evidence of crimes,” he said.

It would be a crime, Napolitano went on to say, if the Trump campaign accepted a gift of $130,000, and if the funds came from the campaign. In that instance, “all bets are off,” as Cavuto put it.

What makes Napolitano’s comments Monday even more interesting is that when Napolitano talks, Trump listens. Trump directly echoed Napolitano’s arguments on Fox in a recent tweet about government surveillance shortly after Napolitano appeared on the network, and the White House has cited Napolitano’s claim, without evidence, that British intelligence operatives had surveilled Trump Tower as a favor to Barack Obama during the 2016 campaign.

According to a report from February, the president and Napolitano have spoken a number of times in recent months, as well.
Fox News explains exactly why the Michael Cohen ra... (show quote)


What terrifies me more is that the real proven criminals, Hitlary clinton and ovommit , never had their offices raided by the corrupt FBI, CIA or any other agency that is trying very hard to find a speck of dirt on President Trump. Someone with big balls needs to step up and put these demonratic hacks and establishment rino's in their place and that would be in front of an honest judge (very hard to find), expose all their shenanigans and hang them on national t.v. for Americans to see what happens when you try to take down a duly elected president with fictitious stories and endless dead ends. These crooks in high powered positions think they can keep this charade and circus up but soon these baffoons will be in front of an impartial judge who believes in real justice and their crimes will be exposed. Hopefully the gallows await mueller, comey, rosenstein, hitlary, ovommit, lynch , stroyck, page, holder, reid, l*****t corrupt judges, any t*****rous rino, the media elites that have been complicit in peddling a false narrative for over a year, and any other t*****r that has been pushing this false bs story for over a year.

Reply
 
 
Apr 11, 2018 07:01:02   #
theotts
 
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
Nothing to do with Russia collusion. Client -lawyer privilege violated.
Mueller and FBI gang will retire in jail!!

These activities are planned to evade the FISA Warrant and the huge DOSSIER!
To shift attention of the people to this Mueller violation of Cohen. Bring them to the SC.

Those massive crimes of the FBI GANGSTERS including Mueller are being sidetracked. To remove attention of the people from the crimes of Obama and Hillary and instead now focus on Cohen by violating his constitution rights.

I want focus on the crimes of Hillary, Obama, and the whole FBI GANGSTERS especially Rosenstein.
=============== br Nothing to do with Russia collu... (show quote)


Privilege does not protect the solicitation of a criminal act.
Rosenstein is not FBI. He's a Trump appointee.
The rest is a pathetic attempt at distraction from the Colluder in Chief. Clinton has been exonerated. Twice. Obama wasn't even accused, hard as the pinheads tried.
You lot would be funny if you were institutionalized and restrained.

Reply
Apr 11, 2018 07:13:40   #
Radiance3
 
theotts wrote:
Privilege does not protect the solicitation of a criminal act.
Rosenstein is not FBI. He's a Trump appointee.
The rest is a pathetic attempt at distraction from the Colluder in Chief. Clinton has been exonerated. Twice. Obama wasn't even accused, hard as the pinheads tried.
You lot would be funny if you were institutionalized and restrained.

=================
Dumb! Rosenstein was FBI appointee during the Barack time, under DOJ Lynch.
Rosenstien reported to the DOJ Lynch. Now he reports to Session.

President Trump did not appoint Rosenstein. Trump appoints Cabinet Secretaries and DOJ, like Session. Do you now understand?

Reply
Apr 11, 2018 07:22:23   #
theotts
 
drlarrygino wrote:
What terrifies me more is that the real proven criminals, Hitlary clinton and ovommit , never had their offices raided by the corrupt FBI, CIA or any other agency that is trying very hard to find a speck of dirt on President Trump. Someone with big balls needs to step up and put these demonratic hacks and establishment rino's in their place and that would be in front of an honest judge (very hard to find), expose all their shenanigans and hang them on national t.v. for Americans to see what happens when you try to take down a duly elected president with fictitious stories and endless dead ends. These crooks in high powered positions think they can keep this charade and circus up but soon these baffoons will be in front of an impartial judge who believes in real justice and their crimes will be exposed. Hopefully the gallows await mueller, comey, rosenstein, hitlary, ovommit, lynch , stroyck, page, holder, reid, l*****t corrupt judges, any t*****rous rino, the media elites that have been complicit in peddling a false narrative for over a year, and any other t*****r that has been pushing this false bs story for over a year.
What terrifies me more is that the real proven cr... (show quote)

Why don't you tell us one of the fictitious stories Alice?
President Obama was "duly elected" twice. He got the Nobel Peace Prize. He presided over eight years of declining unemployment and prosperity. He didn't enable bigotry, wasn't a serial liar, serial adulterer, serial bankrupt, or a feckless i***t. If the petulant child currently serving accomplished a fraction of one percent of what Obama did with a reactionary congress, bought and paid for by a cabal of clutching, venal cranks impeding him, His Azzholiness would be demanding sainthood. From that congress, more than twenty indicted for corruption or resigned because of sexual incontinence, malfeasance, bribery or outright theft.
And your belief in a vast conspiracy is precisely like believing in Santa Claus; it simply isn't possible.
Now take your meds and leave the adults alone.

Reply
Apr 11, 2018 07:24:33   #
theotts
 
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
Nothing to do with Russia collusion. Client -lawyer privilege violated.
Mueller and FBI gang will retire in jail!!

These activities are planned to evade the FISA Warrant and the huge DOSSIER!
To shift attention of the people to this Mueller violation of Cohen. Bring them to the SC.

Those massive crimes of the FBI GANGSTERS including Mueller are being sidetracked. To remove attention of the people from the crimes of Obama and Hillary and instead now focus on Cohen by violating his constitution rights.

I want focus on the crimes of Hillary, Obama, and the whole FBI GANGSTERS especially Rosenstein.
=============== br Nothing to do with Russia collu... (show quote)


And the tooth fairy is real.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.