Nobody disagrees at all that inadequate security measures were not in place to protect this covert CIA facility.

But how does any of this factor into your proposal to send in aerial combat planes to rescue them?

The problem you Obama-h**ers have is that you seem to be unable to separate

a: the pre-attack security issues
b. the attack itself
c. the public statements afterward.

Both a and c are very valid criticisms to which I don't think anyone disagrees (except for those who would add that it was all part of some big plan to assassinate Amb Stevens). But even Susan Rice's comments that have been so widely criticized included references to the effect that we would need to wait until the investigation was completed before we could know exactly what happened. H**ers choose to ignore that, though.

What I object to are the charges that Obama and Hillary and our military failed to do what could have been done to protect Amb Stevens and the others as the attack was underway. I believe the comments of the 4-star general in charge of AFRICOM when he said that there was no viable military operation.

Criticize Obama and Hillary as much as you want for a and c, and I will be right there with you! I would have to include Amb Stevens in that as well, though, as much as I dislike placing part of the blame on a victim, because he should not have been there if the place was not secured.

Patty, there are many reasons for this the 1st is OIL! There is lots of extra oil laying around there that hasn't been fought over for many years. 2nd, It's about causing even more instability in the region. In-turn giving the big corporate and bankster rulers access to and control of the resources from there as well.
It is safe to say that we gone from being N**i k**lers to being N**i's in about 65 years. Our unwavering support for the zion**i's in israel and their N**i like treatment of the Palestinians where they are shut in Warsaw like ghettos for the last 60 years in their own homeland, makes those activities carried out by israel and it's prime supporters 60 times worse than what Hitler did.
Until we demand our government to stop this support and to sanction the israeli's with real enforced hard sanctions that takes away their ability to occupy Palestine and conduct any offensive military actions this will never end.
We need to cut our military spending enough to not allow them the funds to carry out these activities, also petition our elected officials telling them to end the madness that this has become.

Nobody disagrees at all that inadequate security measures were not in place to protect this covert CIA facility.

But how does any of this factor into your proposal to send in aerial combat planes to rescue them?

The problem you Obama-h**ers have is that you seem to be unable to separate

a: the pre-attack security issues
b. the attack itself
c. the public statements afterward.

Both a and c are very valid criticisms to which I don't think anyone disagrees (except for those who would add that it was all part of some big plan to assassinate Amb Stevens). But even Susan Rice's comments that have been so widely criticized included references to the effect that we would need to wait until the investigation was completed before we could know exactly what happened. H**ers choose to ignore that, though.

What I object to are the charges that Obama and Hillary and our military failed to do what could have been done to protect Amb Stevens and the others as the attack was underway. I believe the comments of the 4-star general in charge of AFRICOM when he said that there was no viable military operation.

Criticize Obama and Hillary as much as you want for a and c, and I will be right there with you! I would have to include Amb Stevens in that as well, though, as much as I dislike placing part of the blame on a victim, because he should not have been there if the place was not secured.

Could it be because Africa covers more than 11 million square miles and makes up over 20% of the earth's land mass? Or could it be because there was not enough information about the attack, or enough time (remember, Amb Stevens was k**led within 1-1/2 hrs after the attack started) to gather the necessary forces and deploy them?

Why don't you tell us exactly how U.S. forces could have repelled the attack? Give us a timeline.

Tell us why the most senior general in AFRICOM didn't feel that there was a viable military option that night.

I think you watch too much tv.

General David Rodriguez, replaced General Carter Ham on 9-11-12, when Gen. Ham along with others like Rear Admiral Charles Gauette, were "purged" by Husseyn-Obama, while their response to B******i was ongoing and ready to deploy, their refusal to abandon the B******i Compound's attack, has questionable reasoning to say the least, the weapons being funneled to Al'Qaeda, were in large part supplied by Ukraine's P.M. Yanukovych, through the Black Sea ports of Turkey the shared borders that Turkey possesses is of relative interest, to the Ukraine/Crimean (crisis) given that Russia has been more decisively and successfully fighting Al'Qaeda than this Husseyn-Obama Islamicate.