Feds Revoke License Of Gun Shop That Sold Assault Weapons Used In Sandy Hook Shooting
Apr 9, 2013 02:10:04 #
Apr 9, 2013 10:51:54 #
Was there a reason for this gun shop havingits license revoked? I bet there was not a good reason if there was one at all. Probably something like I smoked cigarettes because it was the adult thing to do and got cancer and died. Therefore it was the tabaco companies fault I made a bad decision, so lets close them down and make them pay. Or the auto industry because people are k**led while driving cars every day. Make the auto industry pay also. But the auto industry gets off scott free.
Apr 9, 2013 11:46:34 #
How did our "officials" become so totally insane seemingly overnight? Some of the most bizarre news is coming out in droves these days of oppression like never before seen in America, committed by our "duly elected officials" who seem to be dumber than the average rock.
If we don't stop this insanity in its tracks, sane people will not have a snowball's chance in hell of surviving. The war the left is waging is a war against sanity, against decency, against all that is good. They have destroyed our economy, they have destroyed our nation's standing in the world, they bow down to the UN who despises our nation, and left alone, they will k**l out all that is good, all that is worthwhile.
I am a responsible, law-abiding person, but the credibility of most officials has reached such a LOW level that when I hear an obscene story about some insane stunt they have pulled, I tend to believe it on its face rather than question the veracity of it. I have come to EXPECT an insane action rather than a sane one. Were I an official, I'd worry about that. This morning alone, I have read about a chef being arrested for cooking a dove that k**led itself by flying into a glass window, an elderly man who shot and k**led a bear in the man's yard when the bear threatened him by approaching him, a flake insisting that children don't belong to their parents, but to the community - and the press was eating it up. Our world seems to have gone completely crazy - until talk with some local person, some long distant friend, and they seem to be sane and that makes me feel better. But the people we PAY to lead us are k*****g us slowly and getting a bang out of it. They belong in an insane asylum, NOT out on the streets, and definitely NOT making decisions for those of us who are not mentally incapacitated.
If we don't stop this insanity in its tracks, sane people will not have a snowball's chance in hell of surviving. The war the left is waging is a war against sanity, against decency, against all that is good. They have destroyed our economy, they have destroyed our nation's standing in the world, they bow down to the UN who despises our nation, and left alone, they will k**l out all that is good, all that is worthwhile.
I am a responsible, law-abiding person, but the credibility of most officials has reached such a LOW level that when I hear an obscene story about some insane stunt they have pulled, I tend to believe it on its face rather than question the veracity of it. I have come to EXPECT an insane action rather than a sane one. Were I an official, I'd worry about that. This morning alone, I have read about a chef being arrested for cooking a dove that k**led itself by flying into a glass window, an elderly man who shot and k**led a bear in the man's yard when the bear threatened him by approaching him, a flake insisting that children don't belong to their parents, but to the community - and the press was eating it up. Our world seems to have gone completely crazy - until talk with some local person, some long distant friend, and they seem to be sane and that makes me feel better. But the people we PAY to lead us are k*****g us slowly and getting a bang out of it. They belong in an insane asylum, NOT out on the streets, and definitely NOT making decisions for those of us who are not mentally incapacitated.
Apr 9, 2013 22:22:55 #
L.E. Liesner
Loc: New Mexico
In the words of Thomas Jefferson "When injustice becomes law, then r*******n becomes duty" injustice is becoming a frequent event in this country today. The farther our government gets away from the Constitution the closer it get to tyranny. "We the People" are allowing this destruction of our country through apathy and the re-electing of the same self serving politicians that dishonor their oath of office.
Apr 10, 2013 08:57:32 #
L.E. Liesner wrote:
In the words of Thomas Jefferson "When injustice becomes law, then r*******n becomes duty" injustice is becoming a frequent event in this country today. The farther our government gets away from the Constitution the closer it get to tyranny. "We the People" are allowing this destruction of our country through apathy and the re-electing of the same self serving politicians that dishonor their oath of office.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Absolutely correct! And my question is: haven't we already allowed too much distancing from the US Constitution? Isn't it already sold down the river? Haven't we already lost our representative government? The only thing I see left is the "fairy tale" about the WHY this oppression is being shifted into high gear.
Every institution we have "at our disposal" to LEGALLY stop this constant rape has been so polluted as to be worse than destroyed. Our own decency is now the tool of the usurpers and is turned against us. Must we wait for the mass k*****gs of citizens to put a timid toe forward and FORCE some constitutional redress. I ask this because I have come to believe that ANYONE OUTSIDE THE CABAL OF CONTROLLERS IN POWER WILL BE STOPPED, BY DISSEMBLING IF POSSIBLE, AND BY FORCE IF NECESSARY. As I see it, our country is totally o*******wn, not by force, but by stupidity of too many Americans who know nothing about our government and care nothing about it, and by the timidity of good people in power to challenge "unconstitutional power" that is corrupt.
Apr 10, 2013 20:18:54 #
Sane people begin to lose seemingly simple arguments like the current gun debate when they allow the insane to co-opt the language used to frame the argument. I.E., using the perjorative term "assault weapon" to describe semi-automatic AR platform rifles (load automatically but trigger must be pulled every time to fire them) used for hunting and self-defense purposes. At the same time, the DHS refers to the M-16 fully automatic/select fire rifles the AR platform is taken from, in the same .223/5.56 x 45 mm caliber, as "personal defense weapons" in their order for 7,000 of them to be paid for by the taxpayers. (Department of Homeland Security? To use domestically? With super-deadly expanding hollow point ammunition? Against whom or what threat?)
Government hypocrisy is turning deadly, and all because our elected officials and the people to whom they are responsible have forgotten that Narual Law is the basis for our Constitution. UNALIENABLE as an adjective used in the Declaration to modify "rights" means that we have the rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness because we are part of God's (the Creator's) creation along with the Laws of Nature ("... and of Nature's God"). Since government has no power over the Laws of Nature or the laws of creation, unalienable rights cannot be altered, sold, t***sferred or revoked by coercion, edict, legislation or treaty. They cannot even be given up by the person possessing the rights. UNALIENABLE rights exist in us because we were created by Him, we exist as members of the Family of Man and man created government. Unalienable rights are not subject to v**e. Once a government admits its citizens have unalienable rights as ours did in 1776, it can NEVER later say that the people have changed their minds and wish to give them up.
Inalienable rights, on the other hand, cannot be sold or t***sferred without the CONSENT of the person(s) possessing the rights. Your v**e is your consent to representation.
Government hypocrisy is turning deadly, and all because our elected officials and the people to whom they are responsible have forgotten that Narual Law is the basis for our Constitution. UNALIENABLE as an adjective used in the Declaration to modify "rights" means that we have the rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness because we are part of God's (the Creator's) creation along with the Laws of Nature ("... and of Nature's God"). Since government has no power over the Laws of Nature or the laws of creation, unalienable rights cannot be altered, sold, t***sferred or revoked by coercion, edict, legislation or treaty. They cannot even be given up by the person possessing the rights. UNALIENABLE rights exist in us because we were created by Him, we exist as members of the Family of Man and man created government. Unalienable rights are not subject to v**e. Once a government admits its citizens have unalienable rights as ours did in 1776, it can NEVER later say that the people have changed their minds and wish to give them up.
Inalienable rights, on the other hand, cannot be sold or t***sferred without the CONSENT of the person(s) possessing the rights. Your v**e is your consent to representation.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.