One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why do conservatives believe liberals want to ban all guns?
Page <<first <prev 16 of 16
Mar 13, 2018 17:30:24   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
politediscourse wrote:
I want to go on record as being second amendment supporter and gun owner. That being said the Supreme Court confirmed when they incorporated the second amendment as an individual right that it was acceptable to regulate firearms including confiscation from individuals who possessed them illegally. The reference to Hitler’s Germany as concerns gun control is disingenuous and counterfactual. In the pre-Hitler Weimar Government German citizens had no right to bear arms and gun laws were very strict. When Hitler came to power he legally loosened the gun laws for N**i party members and tightened it for Jews and other out of favor groups. In the U.S. individuals have a constitutional right to bear arms that is protected by the second amendment. A revolution overturning our government would have to occur before our arms could be legally confiscated on such a broad and insidious basis. It is instructive to note that Hitler operated with in the limits of the law in his actions. In the U.S. such an action would not be legally possible.

The Hitler’s Germany example doesn’t serve as a cautionary tale concerning gun control, but rather underscores how different we are from historical Germany because we have the Second Amendment and all of the other individual rights enumerated in the bill of rights to control the behaviors of our elected officials. The importance of protecting those rights from the actions of activist judges far exceeds any threat that REASONIBLE restriction or regulation of firearms could potentially pose
I want to go on record as being second amendment s... (show quote)




I don't believe conservatives are afraid democrats will pass a bill outlawing guns anytime in the near future. What fears conservatives is the small continuous chipping away by States and the federal government with over 2000 laws passed combined fed and states.
Were will this lead. Currently it is illegal for an American citizen to open carry a gun anywhere in all 50 states and illegal to have a clip legal in one state but not another. Our rights right now have been infringed, unconstitutionaly. Conservatives see an erosion of rights leading to bans and the possibility of a future confiscation once one is aware to the extent of laws passed to date. Where will we be in 30-40 years, another 2000 additional laws?

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 18:09:27   #
Wm. E. Smith
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Thank you for coming forward Wm. I appreciate that.


Well, what you said was true, and we need more folks like you to tell the t***h about things.
Our young are being taught that telling lies is socially acceptable.
Thanks again EAGLEYE13 !

Reply
Mar 13, 2018 18:52:21   #
politediscourse
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Pretty good summary of what went on in Germany and under Hitler.
Some insidious forces were at work there.

"The importance of protecting those rights from the actions of activist judges far exceeds any threat that REASONIBLE restriction or regulation of firearms could potentially pose"
A reasonable point;
BUT
Americans must be constantly aware that there are insidious forces with a hidden agenda, and not be duped as Australia was.
And with that you have struck at the heart of the matter. How can we have a reasonable dialog about firearms when there is a nagging suspicion that every concession is a move to eliminate gun ownership through stealthy incremental gains. It there any proof that this or that new restriction will actually make us Safer. Can anyone cite research saying that raising the gun ownership age to 21 will help or is it “Just Common Sense”? BTW does that “just common sense” apply to those same individuals that join the armed forces? Consider this little bit of quackery the left has introduced: “Gun Violence”. I have never met a violent gun; most seem rather mundane and taciturn. So now we don’t want to eliminate murder just a murder involving a gun? Is an accident involving a gun considered “gun violence”? Is suicide involving a gun, “gun violence”? The states that have passed assisted suicide measures also have restrictive gun laws so are we to assume you can k**l yourself there as long as it’s not with a gun? The left always is pointing out that “gun violence” is almost non-existent in Europe. True, because Europe has very restrictive gun laws, oh but the murder rate there is about the same as it is in the U.S. for caucasians i.e 1.6 per 100,000 which is identical to that of France and Finland. They just use rocks or knives or poison or hand grenades or something else to k**l each other. Our rates in the U.S. are skewered by the black population, which has a murder rate of 11.5 per 100,000 most by illegal guns. Want to solve that violence then legalize all forms of drugs like Spain did and there won’t be any turf wars. But as long as the airwaves push propaganda like “Gun Violence” at us then beware. Its like I mentioned above about redefinitions. The left has moved the discussion away from violence to violence involving guns. It’s not the same discussion and as demonstrated in Europe removing guns does not directly equate to stopping violence. Many on the left are just philosophically opposed to firearm ownership, which is fine. But when will they learn that then ends do not justify the means. If fact they often result in catastrophes never imagined.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 16 of 16
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.