Are Liberals Less Selfish Than Other People? Here is a great story about Democrats and Republicans with the true facts.

saveamerica Loc: Texas

Here is a great story about Democrats and Republicans with the true facts.

http://americanthinker.com/2014/03/are_liberals_less_selfish_than_other_people.html

cesspool jones Loc: atlanta

saveamerica wrote:

Here is a great story about Democrats and Republicans with the true facts.

http://americanthinker.com/2014/03/are_liberals_less_selfish_than_other_people.html

this has been known for quite some time. liberals have the $$$ nowadays and use it to promote a 'biased agenda' in favor of 'grand collectivism' to promote e******y. does that make them less selfish than other people? no it does not, but only under one condition...they will get theirs first then dole out what they feel is right to others. they are the ultimate hypocrite that this country has ever seen. wanna pay off the debt?...socialize every bank account these wanna-be americans have and give it to china!!!!

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

you are pretty mad but your language is better. I know we had a rough start but I really believe you a re a hard working man.

cesspool jones wrote:

this has been known for quite some time. liberals ... (show quote)

madshark

saveamerica wrote:

Here is a great story about Democrats and Republicans with the true facts.

http://americanthinker.com/2014/03/are_liberals_less_selfish_than_other_people.html

Where are the trolls? BoBlowhard? Kelvin? R****ded666? Byron Devoid? Facts got you on the run?

L*****ts are only charitable with other people's money. Conservatives are charitable with their own money.

madshark

cesspool jones wrote:

this has been known for quite some time. liberals ... (show quote)

It actually makes them far more selfish than others.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

madshark wrote:

Where are the trolls? BoBlowhard? Kelvin? R****ded666? Byron Devoid? Facts got you on the run?

L*****ts are only charitable with other people's money. Conservatives are charitable with their own money.

None of them are more charitable than the maximum tax deduction will allow. Which means that the rest of us are paying for their charity anyway. It isn't charity, it's for appearance only.

madshark

lpnmajor wrote:

None of them are more charitable than the maximum tax deduction will allow. Which means that the rest of us are paying for their charity anyway. It isn't charity, it's for appearance only.

You are full of s**t. Post a source showing the actual numbers, or you are only posting an unsupported opinion. I do admire you for the attemptx though. The rest of the looney l*****ts on here ran for the hills. But you hung around to say something stupid, and wrong.

What was Rush Limbaugh's contribution to the Leukemia Society this year, $500,000? Now, say something else stupid.

cesspool jones Loc: atlanta

madshark wrote:

You are full of s**t. Post a source showing the actual numbers, or you are only posting an unsupported opinion. I do admire you for the attemptx though. The rest of the looney l*****ts on here ran for the hills. But you hung around to say something stupid, and wrong.

What was Rush Limbaugh's contribution to the Leukemia Society this year, $500,000? Now, say something else stupid.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

madshark wrote:

You are full of s**t. Post a source showing the actual numbers, or you are only posting an unsupported opinion. I do admire you for the attemptx though. The rest of the looney l*****ts on here ran for the hills. But you hung around to say something stupid, and wrong.

What was Rush Limbaugh's contribution to the Leukemia Society this year, $500,000? Now, say something else stupid.

Something stupid? Ok, here goes; you know exactly what you're talking about. Now that's a stupid statement. Happy now?

rumitoid

Catholic advances toward social justice are not as protestant or Evangelical eyes perceive. The phrase "social justice" is not as abhorrent as conservatives are wont us to belive.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

rumitoid wrote:

Catholic advances toward social justice are not as protestant or Evangelical eyes perceive. The phrase "social justice" is not as abhorrent as conservatives are wont us to belive.

Social justice is subjective. That means that a majority consensus would need to be achieved for any lasting changes. Our society is so polarized right now that no consensus could ever be reached.

Here's an example; a man is k**led - a homeless man is k**led - a gay homeless man is k**led - a gay drug addicted homeless man is k**led. It's the same man but I bet there are 5 different attitudes about his murder, ranging from outrage to total indifference. Criminal justice is supposed to be blind but we know it isn't in practice. The murderer of the above man is still a murderer but many here would rather give him a medal if the last scenario were true.

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

lpnmajor wrote:

Social justice is subjective. That means that a ma... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup:

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Great response!

lpnmajor wrote:

Social justice is subjective. That means that a ma... (show quote)

rumitoid

ginnyt wrote:

Great response!

great response yet very limited and hardly illustrative of true social justice; more of the clownish or in kindly terms, playful, being without real punch.

ibKelly

lpnmajor wrote:

None of them are more charitable than the maximum tax deduction will allow. Which means that the rest of us are paying for their charity anyway. It isn't charity, it's for appearance only.

It would be interesting how many Black Dems... contribute to Charity!! Wanna bet NONE !!! Someone needs to ask them sometime...