One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
State Department picks hijab-wearing Somali Muslim to represent American youth at UN
Oct 11, 2017 13:04:55   #
Turk182
 
Here we go, creeping Sharia still works, and the American State department effort to represent America youth
as a hi-jab wearing indigenous in U.N. is more Democratic or Islamic in office mis-representation to America,
SO WHERE IS TRUMP.... and where are the American people while creeping SHARIA invades the American culture...
State Department picks hijab-wearing Somali Muslim to represent American youth at UN
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/10/state-department-picks-hijab-wearing-somali-muslim-to-represent-american-youth-at-un

Here is yet more evidence that the State Department is a swamp that has yet to be drained, and may never be drained.
Munira Khalif may be a wonderful U.S. Youth Observer to the United Nations, even if her statement here is full of the expected platitudes (“empower,” “diversity,” “globalized world,” etc.). But she was clearly chosen for her symbolic value. She is a living, walking symbol of the State Department’s anxiousness to show that the United States is not “Islamophobic.” She is a demonstration of the State Department’s determination to “empower” Muslims and show our “diversity,” so as to refute the jihadist narrative that the U.S. is at war with Islam, which will keep Muslims in the U.S. from becoming “alienated” and joining the jihad.
The whole idea is based on the assumption that Muslims turn to jihad because of the injustices suffered by Muslims at the hand of the U.S., and so if the U.S. is nice to Muslims, the jihad will end. This is based on completely ignoring the teachings about jihad in the Qur’an and Sunnah, and so is doomed to failure, but that doesn’t keep the deep state State Department wonks from trying and trying, again and again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roKCUFeWFmQ

Semper Fi

Joe

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 18:24:19   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
A muslim cannot be a Constitutional Republic member of our American form of government. islam and sharia are not compatible with our Constitution and founding documents and governing law.

It is a legal fiction created by the corporate governance. More one world order bulls**t perpetrated upon we the people.

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 18:26:17   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
and so it goes.





Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2017 18:57:33   #
Turk182
 
Muslims Not Allowed AAAA
Muslims Were Banned From the Americas as Early as the 16th Century
Long before today’s anxiety about terror attacks, Spain and England feared that ens***ed Africans would be more susceptible to revolt if they were Muslim
image: https://thumbs-media.smithsonianmag.com/filer/cc/06/cc067ce4-c0e2-45f4-8f89-6d67060f2a08/the_history_of_s***ery_and_the_s***e_trade_ancient_and_moder-wr.jpg__800x600_q85_crop.jpg

Islam Banned From the USA in 1952
No Muslims Allowed: Was Islam Banned From the USA in 1952



Nationality Act June 27, 1952



I’ve seen this graphic a handful of times recently on Facebook, always posted as a legal justification for Donald Trump-like bigotry towards Muslims. In every instance, this meme was posted by someone claiming to be an Evangelical Christian. As we were watching last night’s episode of The Trevor Noah Show, I mentioned that Donald Trump has exposed an ugly t***h about the religious right; that bigotry and r****m is flourishing among those who say they are followers Jesus, a man who had far more in common with Middle Eastern Muslims, Palestinians, and Jews than the w***e A******ns who worship him today.
Last I knew, Evangelicals still consider lying a sin. Why then, do Christians continue to post falsities like those mentioned in this graphic? It took me all of 30 seconds to determine that this graphic is false. While this meme might express the wet-dream sentiment of white, redneck Evangelical bigots, there’s no t***h to it.
Here’s what the venerable Snopes.com has to say on the matter:
The meme sharply escalated in popularity following an unprecedented statement from Republican p**********l candidate Donald Trump, who on 7 December 2015 suggested that the United States should bar all Muslims from entering the country until such time as lawmakers could “figure out what [was] going on” in the wake of a mass shooting in San Bernardino that had occurred five days earlier.
….
Simply put, the rumor maintained that Muslims as a group were ineligible for admission to the United States based upon a law that prohibited entry to any alien who “belongs to an organization seeking to o*******w the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.'” The meme didn’t directly reference the Islamic State (ISIS) as the organization in question, instead suggesting that Islam itself (particularly because of Sharia law and adherence to it by devout Muslims) was a prohibited group.
The law referenced was the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran–Walter Act. Its text is available in full at the U.S. Citizenship and Naturalization Services (USCIS) web site, where a preface indicates that the law has “been amended many times over the years, but is still the basic body of i*********n l*w.” The meme cited “Chapter 2 Section 212” of the Act, which is subtitled “INA: ACT 212 – GENERAL CLASSES OF ALIENS INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE VISAS AND INELIGIBLE FOR ADMISSION; WAIVERS OF [INADMISSIBILITY].” Subsection (A) of that section pertains to “Classes of Aliens Ineligible for Visas or Admission,” subdivision (3) of which is titled “Security and related grounds.” Paragraph (a), subsection (iii) excludes as ineligible for admission the following persons:
In general any alien who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or o*******w of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means.
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 was not without critics, among them President Harry S. Truman, who vetoed the bill on 25 June 1952. In a letter titled “Veto of Bill to Revise the Laws Relating to Immigration, Naturalization, and Nationality” and addressed to the House of Representatives, President Truman described the bill’s provisions as both antithetical to American values and discriminatory:
The greatest vice of the present quota system, however, is that it discriminates, deliberately and intentionally, against many of the peoples of the world … The desired effect [of selective admission of immigrants] was obtained … People from such countries as Greece, or Spain, or Latvia were virtually deprived of any opportunity to come here at all, simply because Greeks or Spaniards or Latvians had not come here before 1920 in any substantial numbers.
The idea behind this discriminatory policy was, to put it baldly, that Americans with English or Irish names were better people and better citizens than Americans with Italian or Greek or Polish names. It was thought that people of West European origin made better citizens than Rumanians or Yugoslavs or Ukrainians or Hungarians or Baits or Austrians. Such a concept is utterly unworthy of our traditions and our ideals. It violates the great political doctrine of the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal.” It denies the humanitarian creed inscribed beneath the Statue of Liberty proclaiming to all nations, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.”
It repudiates our basic religious concepts, our belief in the brotherhood of man, and in the words of St. Paul that “there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free …. for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”
….
The “ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952” meme proved popular following a period of increasing rhetoric similar to that which Truman decried as discriminatory and outdated in 1952. The meme’s basic claim hinged on the tautological assertion that adherence to Islam alone constitutes participation in an “organization seeking to o*******w the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.'” Most major religions involve basic, agreed-upon sets of tenets by which their faithful live, and no widely-accepted understanding of Islam encompasses a prohibition on following the laws of any country or advocates the o*******w of government.
….
The meme “ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952” claimed that adherence to Islam and/or Sharia law constituted definitive membership within an “organization seeking to o*******w the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.'” Multiple non-factual statements or implications were presented in the meme, including the notions that all Muslims strictly adhere to Sharia law, that Sharia law is a cohesive faith-based form of governance, that adherence to Sharia law is mutually exclusive with adherence to the laws of the United States, that Islam in some way demands the eventual o*******w of the United States government, or that any “organization” to which Muslims purportedly belong by merit of their faith somehow places them under the provisions of section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. Not one of those assertions or implications is supported by extant law, precedent, or any accepted interpretation of Islam, United States immigration policy, or the act in question.

the corporation can't even enforce their own laws.

Semper Fi

Joe

Reply
Oct 11, 2017 19:02:20   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
the corporate governance won't enforce its own laws that are to their corporate detriment. They enforce the code upon American not subject to their US inc codes. That is being changed.

Turk182 wrote:
Muslims Not Allowed AAAA
Muslims Were Banned From the Americas as Early as the 16th Century
Long before today’s anxiety about terror attacks, Spain and England feared that ens***ed Africans would be more susceptible to revolt if they were Muslim
image: https://thumbs-media.smithsonianmag.com/filer/cc/06/cc067ce4-c0e2-45f4-8f89-6d67060f2a08/the_history_of_s***ery_and_the_s***e_trade_ancient_and_moder-wr.jpg__800x600_q85_crop.jpg

Islam Banned From the USA in 1952
No Muslims Allowed: Was Islam Banned From the USA in 1952



Nationality Act June 27, 1952



I’ve seen this graphic a handful of times recently on Facebook, always posted as a legal justification for Donald Trump-like bigotry towards Muslims. In every instance, this meme was posted by someone claiming to be an Evangelical Christian. As Polly and I were watching last night’s episode of The Trevor Noah Show, I mentioned that Donald Trump has exposed an ugly t***h about the religious right; that bigotry and r****m is flourishing among those who say they are followers Jesus, a man who had far more in common with Middle Eastern Muslims, Palestinians, and Jews than the w***e A******ns who worship him today.
Last I knew, Evangelicals still consider lying a sin. Why then, do Christians continue to post falsities like those mentioned in this graphic? It took me all of 30 seconds to determine that this graphic is false. While this meme might express the wet-dream sentiment of white, redneck Evangelical bigots, there’s no t***h to it.
Here’s what the venerable Snopes.com has to say on the matter:
The meme sharply escalated in popularity following an unprecedented statement from Republican p**********l candidate Donald Trump, who on 7 December 2015 suggested that the United States should bar all Muslims from entering the country until such time as lawmakers could “figure out what [was] going on” in the wake of a mass shooting in San Bernardino that had occurred five days earlier.
….
Simply put, the rumor maintained that Muslims as a group were ineligible for admission to the United States based upon a law that prohibited entry to any alien who “belongs to an organization seeking to o*******w the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.'” The meme didn’t directly reference the Islamic State (ISIS) as the organization in question, instead suggesting that Islam itself (particularly because of Sharia law and adherence to it by devout Muslims) was a prohibited group.
The law referenced was the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran–Walter Act. Its text is available in full at the U.S. Citizenship and Naturalization Services (USCIS) web site, where a preface indicates that the law has “been amended many times over the years, but is still the basic body of i*********n l*w.” The meme cited “Chapter 2 Section 212” of the Act, which is subtitled “INA: ACT 212 – GENERAL CLASSES OF ALIENS INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE VISAS AND INELIGIBLE FOR ADMISSION; WAIVERS OF [INADMISSIBILITY].” Subsection (A) of that section pertains to “Classes of Aliens Ineligible for Visas or Admission,” subdivision (3) of which is titled “Security and related grounds.” Paragraph (a), subsection (iii) excludes as ineligible for admission the following persons:
In general any alien who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or o*******w of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means.
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 was not without critics, among them President Harry S. Truman, who vetoed the bill on 25 June 1952. In a letter titled “Veto of Bill to Revise the Laws Relating to Immigration, Naturalization, and Nationality” and addressed to the House of Representatives, President Truman described the bill’s provisions as both antithetical to American values and discriminatory:
The greatest vice of the present quota system, however, is that it discriminates, deliberately and intentionally, against many of the peoples of the world … The desired effect [of selective admission of immigrants] was obtained … People from such countries as Greece, or Spain, or Latvia were virtually deprived of any opportunity to come here at all, simply because Greeks or Spaniards or Latvians had not come here before 1920 in any substantial numbers.
The idea behind this discriminatory policy was, to put it baldly, that Americans with English or Irish names were better people and better citizens than Americans with Italian or Greek or Polish names. It was thought that people of West European origin made better citizens than Rumanians or Yugoslavs or Ukrainians or Hungarians or Baits or Austrians. Such a concept is utterly unworthy of our traditions and our ideals. It violates the great political doctrine of the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal.” It denies the humanitarian creed inscribed beneath the Statue of Liberty proclaiming to all nations, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.”
It repudiates our basic religious concepts, our belief in the brotherhood of man, and in the words of St. Paul that “there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free …. for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”
….
The “ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952” meme proved popular following a period of increasing rhetoric similar to that which Truman decried as discriminatory and outdated in 1952. The meme’s basic claim hinged on the tautological assertion that adherence to Islam alone constitutes participation in an “organization seeking to o*******w the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.'” Most major religions involve basic, agreed-upon sets of tenets by which their faithful live, and no widely-accepted understanding of Islam encompasses a prohibition on following the laws of any country or advocates the o*******w of government.
….
The meme “ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952” claimed that adherence to Islam and/or Sharia law constituted definitive membership within an “organization seeking to o*******w the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.'” Multiple non-factual statements or implications were presented in the meme, including the notions that all Muslims strictly adhere to Sharia law, that Sharia law is a cohesive faith-based form of governance, that adherence to Sharia law is mutually exclusive with adherence to the laws of the United States, that Islam in some way demands the eventual o*******w of the United States government, or that any “organization” to which Muslims purportedly belong by merit of their faith somehow places them under the provisions of section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. Not one of those assertions or implications is supported by extant law, precedent, or any accepted interpretation of Islam, United States immigration policy, or the act in question.

the corporation can't even enforce their own laws.

Semper Fi

Joe
Muslims Not Allowed AAAA br Muslims Were Banned Fr... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 18:45:10   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Why doesn't the UN just keep the kid.
And who forced Nikki Haley to send a Muslim in costume? Obama?

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 22:32:57   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
why do you not ask the principals in the issue???

Mikeyavelli wrote:
Why doesn't the UN just keep the kid.
And who forced Nikki Haley to send a Muslim in costume? Obama?

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2017 22:51:17   #
Mikeyavelli
 
ron vrooman wrote:
why do you not ask the principals in the issue???


Rhetorical question volleyed to inspire thought.
If you have direct access to them, t***sfer my concern or give me the link.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 23:37:32   #
ron vrooman Loc: Now OR, born NV
 
there is no link on the internet. It is just hard work. I'll help you and show you what I know.
It is a mind set.
I am an American national an Oregonian a beneficiary to the founding documents. You might want to read them another time or two. Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of/for the u(U)nited States of America.Now comprehend you are one of we the people a sovereign member of the 4th branch of government Now read your states Constitution. You do not need to read and comprehend the Statutes at Large now.

Now pick the due process that has been violated.

Now contact me and we'll write the claim to file into federal district court in DC.

Either we are a nation of law or we are not. I say we are and I am guaranteed Article III, 11th and VII amendment due process.
What say you Mike??? Do you skype ron.vrooman1


Mikeyavelli wrote:
Rhetorical question volleyed to inspire thought.
If you have direct access to them, t***sfer my concern or give me the link.



Reply
Oct 13, 2017 09:08:54   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Hmm
I don't Skype
....

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.