Are you stupid? Look at the districts in Pennsylvania and Ohio, none of the districts were changed, only the outcome of the v**e was changed, from v****g for Democrats in the older e******n, and those same people in those exact same districts v**ed for President Trump in the last e******n.
You liberals like to ignore the fact that it took many, many millions of Democratic v**es for Donald Trump for him to win the Presidency in those former blue states. Can you not recognioze that the districts in those two sates didn't change, but they were changed in North Carolina, but again too many Democrats v**ed for President Trump, and the districts have absolutely nothing to do with awarding of the states e*****rial v**es, it has only to do with who won the majority total of all the individual v**es in the entire state, no matter who won in each of the districts, and President T***p w*n in North Carolina because to many Democrats v**ed for him.
Each time you make your claim that redistricting won the e******n for President Trump, you prove your stupidity and ignorance, why can't you get it in your head that winning of districts didn't count in the P**********l e******n, but only the total v**e in the entire state is what determined who got the e*****rial v**es by winner of the popular v**e in each state getting all the e*****rial v**es in that state. President T***p w*n the popular v**e in most of the states, while Hillary Clinton only won the popular v**e in a very few states that had high population numbers in those few states. But you refuse to believe the facts because it disproves what you want to believe, that President Trump c***ted in the e******n, which tens of thousands of investigators a whole lot smarter than you have been trying to prove for well over a year, but have admitted that they can find no proof of any wrong doing by President Trump in the e******n, or in collusion with any Russians. Accept the t***h for a change and quit making yourself look so incredibly stupid.
Each political party elects their own e*****rial representatives of each state at their national conventions, and the political party that wins the popular v**e in each state gets their e*****rial representatives to v**e the e*****rial v**es in that state, again it has absolutely nothing to do with the districts or gerrymandering by redistricting, but only by the winner of the popular v**e in each state, his political party e*****rial representative gets to cast the e*****rial v**es of that state, whioch is a republic method of choosing a President. Look closely at the districts in Pennsylvania and Ohio and compare each of the different e******n results that you have shown, and you'll see that none of the districts were changed in those two states, but only the way the people v**ed in those districts of those two states is what changed, but not one single district was changed, just the political party that the people in those exact same districts v**ed for.
You need help! You have it all wrong on how the e*****rial college works. Seek out someone who can explain it to you, because it has nothing to do with who wins the v****g districts in each state, but only the majority of the popular v**e in each state, not the total popular v**e of the entire country. You have got it completely wrong and are making a fool of yourself. Get help and have someone explain to you how the e*****rial college really works.
Morgan wrote:
I just showed you the changes in redistricting for Ohio and Penn, are you blind?This is exactly how the v**es switched from Democrats to Republicans, which also occurred in NC, by gerrymandering and through our Republican house in NC, thereby allowing Trump to win the e*******l v**e, but the majority of Democratic v**es still outweighed the e******n for the governor contrary to the gerrymandering of red districts.
There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires E*****rs to v**e according to the results of the popular v**e in their states. Some states, however, require E*****rs to cast their v**es according to the popular v**e. These pledges fall into two categories—E*****rs bound by state law and those bound by pledges to political parties.
To win by popular v**e we would not be a Republic and have no need for e*******l representatives, which it is about time we did away with them since they no longer are used in a fair bipartisan way but instead as a manipulation to corrupt our v****g process, though I know this doesn't matter to you, it is only about the win, ethics and fair play are not a consideration.
I just showed you the changes in redistricting for... (
show quote)