permafrost wrote:
Good point.. To cover their butt they are willing to also cover the other butt..... But regrettably... If we have parties, A B and C, a v**e for party C, if he can not win or be effective in the case that he does, is effectively a yes v**e for the least desired (in the v**ers eyes) of A or B....
Not if enough people v**e for "C", and if enough "C" candidates get into office then I believe the Congress could learn their "ABC'S" all over again!