whole2th wrote:
What does not make perfect sense is your willingness to give arguments proving Cossiga to be eminently qualified to comment about state sponsored false f**gs operations. Thanks for providing the credentials which include his role in exposing Operation Gladio.
Cossiga is eminently qualified--you say 'fruitcake'. This is the first use of 'fruitcake' in the over 70 pages of messages. Thanks for breaking the monotony with a new word. We've grown immune to being called (stupid, N**i, ignorant, etc.)
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/9-11_solved118.htmlMay I offer that you are being STUPID to assist us in arguing the qualifications of Cossiga to expose Mossad and Israel's role in 9-11.
What does not make perfect sense is your willingne... (
show quote)
Apparently human history begins on the day you were born. You simply cannot go back any further than that.
The big unanswered question is what possible reason would the CIA and the Mossad have to perpetrate such a horrendous massacre on 9/11?
Cossiga put it thus:
"the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Z*****t world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part … in Iraq and Afghanistan.""Put under accusation"? "western powers take part in Iraq and Afghanistan." WTF is this supposed to mean? The ambiguity is stunning. Take part? Good Lord. If someone "takes part" in something, it generally means they join in an activity; get involved, participate, enter, play a role, be a participant, contribute, help, assist, lend a hand. So, who was engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan when the western powers decided to lend a hand?
The narrative in the 9/11 conspiracy reads something like this: "9/11 was a government false f**g operation intended to give Bush an excuse to go to war with Islam." The number of holes in that theory are too numerous to count. The idea that the CIA and Mossad were behind it is absurd. Since when does any civilized nation need an excuse to go to war with Islamic fundamentalists?
The United States was a teenager, just 14 years old, when we had to go to war with Muslims. The bastards captured many of our commercial ships and ens***ed the sailors and either held them for ransom or k**led them.
Jump forward 182 years.
In 1983, Muslim terrorists bombed the US embassy in Beirut (63 dead). In the same year, Muslim terrorists attacked the US Marine barracks in Beirut (241 dead).
In 1984, Islamic terrorists (Hezbollah, with support and direction from the Islamic Regime of Iran) bombed the US embassy in Beirut. (24 dead)
In 1993, Islamic terrorists bombed the WTC North Tower. (6 dead, 1042 injured). After he was arrested, the Blind Sheik promised they would come back to finish the job.
In 1996, Islamic terrorists bombed the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia. (19 USAF personnel dead).
In 1998, Islamic terrorists bombed the US embassies in Tanzania ( Dar es Salaam) and Kenya (Nairobi). Nearly simultaneous detonations. 11 dead, 65 injured in Dar es Salaam, and 213 dead, and 4000 injured. Americans were targeted but only 12 were k**led.
In 2000, Yemen, Islamic terrorists bombed the USS Cole in Aden's harbor. (17 USNavy personnel dead, 39 injured).
Al Qaeda's attack on 9/11 was the last straw.
And, since 9/11, Islamic terrorists have carried out over 30,000 attacks, including Ft Hood, the Boston Marathon, San Bernardino, Orlando night club in the continental US. Must we mention France? Something must be done about these subhuman cockroaches.
But, you go ahead, goose stepper, and play like Cossiga is eminently qualified to comment on 9/11. You may have "grown immune" to being called ignorant, but that doesn't change the fact.