The government watchdog group that revealed that president Barack Obama failed to attend over half of his daily intelligence briefings (PDB) released a devastating B******i timeline Wednesday.
It reveals Obama's schedule in the weeks leading up to the terrorist attacks that claimed the lives of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Release of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) B******i timeline comes as a new senate report published Wednesday concluded that "THE ATTACKS WERE PREVENTABLE."
As the GAI timeline reveals, Obama failed to attend his daily intelligence briefings for the five consecutive days leading up to the September 11, 2012 attack on th U.S. Consulate in B******i.
The B******i timeline catalogs Obama's continuous campaigning even as terrorist forces vowed Libyan attacks and state department officials were warning of security threats.
The day following the deadly attacks, Obama departed for a Las Vega campaign rally.
So does this not prove that the scab we now have in the White House was more interested in getting elected to another term in a posh job than he was in the safety of Americans that were in harms way?
He was much too busy pulling the wool over his supports eyes.
carolyn wrote:
The government watchdog group that revealed that president Barack Obama failed to attend over half of his daily intelligence briefings (PDB) released a devastating B******i timeline Wednesday.
It reveals Obama's schedule in the weeks leading up to the terrorist attacks that claimed the lives of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Release of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) B******i timeline comes as a new senate report published Wednesday concluded that "THE ATTACKS WERE PREVENTABLE."
As the GAI timeline reveals, Obama failed to attend his daily intelligence briefings for the five consecutive days leading up to the September 11, 2012 attack on th U.S. Consulate in B******i.
The B******i timeline catalogs Obama's continuous campaigning even as terrorist forces vowed Libyan attacks and state department officials were warning of security threats.
The day following the deadly attacks, Obama departed for a Las Vega campaign rally.
So does this not prove that the scab we now have in the White House was more interested in getting elected to another term in a posh job than he was in the safety of Americans that were in harms way?
The government watchdog group that revealed that p... (
show quote)
bmac32 wrote:
He was much too busy pulling the wool over his supports eyes.
bmac32-thus the difference between a real president and an empty suit. A v**e for such a pathetic, indifferent fraud has to come from one who is just like him or an amoeba. This shadow of a man now occupies the position once held by Jimmy Carter, who would have been in the situation room on the night of the attack instead of in bed resting for an all important fund raiser. If that does not clearly explain his priorities to you, then you are a mind numbed robot or mentally challenged. Its all about Obama and what the Obamas can get out of this free ride. They will bleed the country dry then probably move to Indonesia and live the high life at taxpayer expense. It is amazing that responsible democrats cannot see through this charade . Good Luck America !!!
carolyn wrote:
The government watchdog group that revealed that president Barack Obama failed to attend over half of his daily intelligence briefings (PDB) released a devastating B******i timeline Wednesday.
It reveals Obama's schedule in the weeks leading up to the terrorist attacks that claimed the lives of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Release of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) B******i timeline comes as a new senate report published Wednesday concluded that "THE ATTACKS WERE PREVENTABLE."
As the GAI timeline reveals, Obama failed to attend his daily intelligence briefings for the five consecutive days leading up to the September 11, 2012 attack on th U.S. Consulate in B******i.
The B******i timeline catalogs Obama's continuous campaigning even as terrorist forces vowed Libyan attacks and state department officials were warning of security threats.
The day following the deadly attacks, Obama departed for a Las Vega campaign rally.
So does this not prove that the scab we now have in the White House was more interested in getting elected to another term in a posh job than he was in the safety of Americans that were in harms way?
The government watchdog group that revealed that p... (
show quote)
carolyn-not attending security briefings gives him plausible deniability. The old," I didn't know" routine which only a weak, irresponsible president, who is afraid of making critical decisions, would use. This is dereliction of duty to the nth degree. If a military commander had acted in a similar manner the courts martial would have taken place immediately and he/she would be incarcerated and given a dishonorable discharge. The most cowardly act that a leader can commit is leaving his people behind to fend for themselves until death while he rests. How would you like to serve under such a Commander-in-Chief ? Good Luck America !!!
carolyn wrote:
The government watchdog group that revealed that president Barack Obama failed to attend over half of his daily intelligence briefings (PDB) released a devastating B******i timeline Wednesday.
It reveals Obama's schedule in the weeks leading up to the terrorist attacks that claimed the lives of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Release of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) B******i timeline comes as a new senate report published Wednesday concluded that "THE ATTACKS WERE PREVENTABLE."
As the GAI timeline reveals, Obama failed to attend his daily intelligence briefings for the five consecutive days leading up to the September 11, 2012 attack on th U.S. Consulate in B******i.
The B******i timeline catalogs Obama's continuous campaigning even as terrorist forces vowed Libyan attacks and state department officials were warning of security threats.
The day following the deadly attacks, Obama departed for a Las Vega campaign rally.
So does this not prove that the scab we now have in the White House was more interested in getting elected to another term in a posh job than he was in the safety of Americans that were in harms way?
The government watchdog group that revealed that p... (
show quote)
Good ol' Joe was there in his place.
carolyn wrote:
The government watchdog group that revealed that president Barack Obama failed to attend over half of his daily intelligence briefings (PDB) released a devastating B******i timeline Wednesday.
It reveals Obama's schedule in the weeks leading up to the terrorist attacks that claimed the lives of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Release of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) B******i timeline comes as a new senate report published Wednesday concluded that "THE ATTACKS WERE PREVENTABLE."
As the GAI timeline reveals, Obama failed to attend his daily intelligence briefings for the five consecutive days leading up to the September 11, 2012 attack on th U.S. Consulate in B******i.
The B******i timeline catalogs Obama's continuous campaigning even as terrorist forces vowed Libyan attacks and state department officials were warning of security threats.
The day following the deadly attacks, Obama departed for a Las Vega campaign rally.
So does this not prove that the scab we now have in the White House was more interested in getting elected to another term in a posh job than he was in the safety of Americans that were in harms way?
The government watchdog group that revealed that p... (
show quote)
He was not MIA, because they knew exactly were he was. In bed resting up for his ordeal in Vegas the next day. That is so much more important then any old Ambassador is.
He has been k*****g military people left and right ever since he took over, so what are a few more on his list. With his Terms of Engagement, you are guaranteed to get people k**led. I really feel sorry for the troops over there since he has effectively disarmed them. This guy is our Commander in Chief and you really expect him to show up for something as minor as a terrorist attack????
By the way, if you don't understand sarcasm, then don't blame me.
This man is a disgrace to our country. I will never call him commander in chief because that is one thing he is NOT! He's a liar & a fraud and I cannot believe the amount of people that are just baffled by his BS. He will stop at nothing to bleed this country dry. All the crap he gets away with is shameful. Shame on us for not doing something about it. If I knew where to start I would do something. He needs to be impeached & tried for his wrongful doings. I hope something happens before it goes to far. I think this country will have to hit rock bottom before enough wake up to see the damage he is doing. All I can say is God help us & for those that don't believe in God, well what ever you think can help us ya better start using it. We are going down fast!
Skippy wrote:
This man is a disgrace to our country. I will never call him commander in chief because that is one thing he is NOT! He's a liar & a fraud and I cannot believe the amount of people that are just baffled by his BS. He will stop at nothing to bleed this country dry. All the crap he gets away with is shameful. Shame on us for not doing something about it. If I knew where to start I would do something. He needs to be impeached & tried for his wrongful doings. I hope something happens before it goes to far. I think this country will have to hit rock bottom before enough wake up to see the damage he is doing. All I can say is God help us & for those that don't believe in God, well what ever you think can help us ya better start using it. We are going down fast!
This man is a disgrace to our country. I will neve... (
show quote)
You know, for the past 5 years, the congress has done nothing but complain and campaign. They have NOT been running the country, so the President had to. Right or wrong that's how it's been.
lpnmajor wrote:
Good ol' Joe was there in his place.
But Good ol' Joe is not smart enough to be anywhere but in front of a microphone making stupid remarks on how to tale a double-barreled-shotgun and shooting up in the air to thwart a would be robber or murderer.
carolyn wrote:
But Good ol' Joe is not smart enough to be anywhere but in front of a microphone making stupid remarks on how to tale a double-barreled-shotgun and shooting up in the air to thwart a would be robber or murderer.
I certainly didn't mean to imply that he was the best choice, he's just a patsy. THAT he's good at.
lpnmajor wrote:
You know, for the past 5 years, the congress has done nothing but complain and campaign. They have NOT been running the country, so the President had to. Right or wrong that's how it's been.
So you say that forsaking the country when it is in a volatile situation to go on a campaigning tour is running the country? Remember, the GAI found him to be absent from his daily intelligence meeting for the 5 CONSECUTIVE days leading up to the September 11, 2012 attack on our Libyan embassy. So here is the question? Was his campaigning for another term more important to the country's welfare than the situation we had going in Libya? And should he not have concentrated on fulfilling his present term before he started planning full time for being elected to another term?
I don't care what any biased Democrat has to say about this, but I say he should, among other things, be called up on charges of dereliction of duty. If it had been a Republican guilty of this, he would have been impeached within a month.
' If it had been a Republican guilty of this, he would have been impeached within a month.'
The media slammed Bush for being at a school and not acting with a minute of the 9-11 attack but they still try and cover this.
carolyn wrote:
So you say that forsaking the country when it is in a volatile situation to go on a campaigning tour is running the country? Remember, the GAI found him to be absent from his daily intelligence meeting for the 5 CONSECUTIVE days leading up to the September 11, 2012 attack on our Libyan embassy. So here is the question? Was his campaigning for another term more important to the country's welfare than the situation we had going in Libya? And should he not have concentrated on fulfilling his present term before he started planning full time for being elected to another term?
I don't care what any biased Democrat has to say about this, but I say he should, among other things, be called up on charges of dereliction of duty. If it had been a Republican guilty of this, he would have been impeached within a month.
So you say that forsaking the country when it is i... (
show quote)
carolyn wrote:
The government watchdog group that revealed that president Barack Obama failed to attend over half of his daily intelligence briefings (PDB) released a devastating B******i timeline Wednesday.
It reveals Obama's schedule in the weeks leading up to the terrorist attacks that claimed the lives of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Release of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) B******i timeline comes as a new senate report published Wednesday concluded that "THE ATTACKS WERE PREVENTABLE."
As the GAI timeline reveals, Obama failed to attend his daily intelligence briefings for the five consecutive days leading up to the September 11, 2012 attack on th U.S. Consulate in B******i.
The B******i timeline catalogs Obama's continuous campaigning even as terrorist forces vowed Libyan attacks and state department officials were warning of security threats.
The day following the deadly attacks, Obama departed for a Las Vega campaign rally.
So does this not prove that the scab we now have in the White House was more interested in getting elected to another term in a posh job than he was in the safety of Americans that were in harms way?
The government watchdog group that revealed that p... (
show quote)
Had not heard of this organization and wondered how relevent it was....
The Government Accountability Project (GAP) is a United States whistleblower protection organization. Through litigating of whistleblower cases, publicizing concerns and developing legal reforms, GAPs mission is to protect the public interest by promoting government and corporate accountability. Founded in 1975 as part of the Institute for Policy Studies,[2] GAP is a non-profit, non-partisan advocacy organization in Washington, D.C. GAP's leadership includes Louis Clark as President, Beatrice Edwards as Executive Director, and Tom Devine as Legal Director.[3]
Seem like a very good source.. solid history and good staffing so I will give a hard look at the information of the post..
Caroline, Lost my point while I looked the organization.. Do we have a link to the article which posted the time line?
permafrost wrote:
Caroline, Lost my point while I looked the organization.. Do we have a link to the article which posted the time line?
I deleted the link I received but have several websites that have the very same article. One is as follows...
personalliberty.com/2014/01/16/B******i-timeline-Obama...
Hope this helps you out.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.