One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Home | Political Digest | Active Topics | Newest Pictures | Search | Login | Register | Help
Not logged in

You must be logged in to compose private messages. Please use the Login link at the top.

The Newest Discussions On Our Forum:
heart warming
Article ran in WSJ Monday July 23, 2018.

"We were overwhelmed," said Lt. Col. Nick Jaskolski. "I don't really have words to describe how surprised and moved we all were. I had never even heard of the town before."

Col. Jaskolski, a veteran of the Iraq war, is commander of the 142nd Field Artillery Brigade of the Arkansas Army National Guard. For three weeks earlier this summer, the 142nd had been conducting an emergency deployment readiness exercise in Wyoming, training and sleeping outdoors, subsisting on field rations. Now it was time for the 700 soldiers to return to their base.

A charter bus company had been hired for the 18-hour drive back to Arkansas. The Army had budgeted for a stop to get snacks. The bus company determined that the soldiers would reach North Platte, in western Nebraska, around the time they would likely be hungry. The company placed a call to the visitors' bureau: Was there anywhere in town that could handle a succession of 21 buses, and get 700 soldiers in and out for a quick snack?

North Platte said yes. North Platte has always said yes. The community welcomed more than 700 service men and women, North Platte, Nebraska, June 18-19.

During World War II, North Platte was a geographically isolated town of 12,000. Soldiers, sailors and aviators on their way to fight the war rode troop trains across the nation, bound for Europe via the East Coast or the Pacific via the West Coast. The Union Pacific Railroad trains that transported the soldiers always made 10-minute stops in North Platte to take on water.

The townspeople made those 10 minutes count. Starting in December 1941, they met every train: up to 23 a day, beginning at 5 a.m. and ending after midnight. Those volunteers greeted between 3,000 and 5,000 soldiers a day. They presented them with sandwiches and gifts, played music for them, danced with them, baked birthday cakes for them. Every day of the year, every day of the war, they were there at the depot. They never missed a train, never missed a soldier. They fed six million soldiers by the end of the war. Not 1 cent of government money was asked for or spent, save for a $5 bill sent by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

The soldiers never forgot the kindness. Most of them, and most of the townspeople who greeted them, are dead. And now, in 2018, those 21 busloads from the 142nd Field Artillery were on their way, expecting to stop at some fast-food joint.

"We couldn't believe what we saw when we pulled up," Col. Jaskolski said. As each bus arrived over a two-day period, the soldiers stepped out to be greeted by lines of cheering people holding signs of thanks. They weren't at a fast-food restaurant: They were at North Platte's events center, which had been opened and decorated especially for them.

"People just started calling our office when they heard the soldiers were on their way," said Lisa Burke, the director of the visitors' bureau. "Hundreds of people, who wanted to help."

The soldiers entered the events center to the aroma of steaks grilling and the sound of recorded music: current songs by Luke Bryan, Justin Timberlake, Florida Georgia Line; World War II songs by Glenn Miller, the Andrews Sisters, Jimmy Dorsey. They were served steak sandwiches, ham sandwiches, turkey sandwiches, deviled eggs, salads and fruit; local church groups baked pies, brownies and cookies.

Mayor Dwight Livingston stood at the door for two days and shook every soldier's hand. Mr. Livingston served in the Air Force in Vietnam and came home to no words of thanks. Now, he said, as he shook the hands and welcomed the soldiers, "I don't know whether those moments were more important for them, or for me. I knew I had to be there."

"It was one soldier's 21st birthday," Lisa Burke said. "When I gave him his cake, he told me it was the first birthday cake he'd ever had in his life." Not wanting to pry, she didn't ask him how that could possibly be. "I was able to hold my emotions together," she said. "Until later."

When it became time to settle up, "the Army, after all, had that money budgeted for snacks" the 142nd Field Artillery was told: Nope. You're not spending a penny here. This is on us. This is on North Platte.

...continue reading this topic >>
Myths about Christine Blasey Ford debunked
By Dean Arrindell, Yahoo News

Since Christine Blasey Ford came forward on Sunday, accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her when they were teenagers, she has been subjected to death threats and email hacking, and her family has had to leave their home and hire security, according to her lawyers.

Myths about Ford that attempt to discredit her have also been circulating. The myths have been debunked.

Myth: Students left bad reviews about Ford on a website.

Fact: Ford is a professor at Palo Alto University, and several right-wing media outlets said she received negative reviews on the website calling her “mad,” “troubled” and “unprofessional.”

The reviews exist, but they were about another professor: Christine Adams Ford at California State University, Fullerton.

Myth: Ford is a major Democratic donor.

Fact: Ford is a registered Democrat, which was disclosed when she came forward in the Washington Post.

The Mercury News in San Jose, Calif., reports that she attended a Women’s March protesting Trump in 2017 and wore a pink “brain hat” in a March for Science in 2017 that protested the Trump administration’s proposed cuts to science research.

But her donations to Democratic committees and campaigns were small. According to the Federal Election Commission, they totaled around $80 between 2013 and 2017.

Myth: Brett Kavanagh’s mother ruled against Ford’s parents in a foreclosure case.

Fact: Kavanaugh’s mother, Martha Kavanaugh, presided as a Maryland district court judge in a foreclosure case where Ford’s parents, Ralph and Paula Blasey, were the defendants in 1996.

However, the Blaseys were able to refinance their mortgage, and according to CBS News, Judge Martha Kavanaugh dismissed the case. The dismissal allowed the Blaseys to keep their house.

Ford has been given the opportunity to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
...continue reading this topic >>
Keith Ellison is a violent abuser but that doesn't matter to the Left
‘Emotional And Physical Abuse’: Muslim Brotherhood DNC Deputy Chair Ellison Accuser Posts Doctor’s Report Naming Him As Alleged Abuser
While the Democrats are in a lather over Ford and Kavanaugh, demanding a delay of the confirmation vote until after the midterm elections that they are sure will go their way, they couldn’t care less about Karen Monahan.
Pamela Geller — September 20, 2018

There is abundant evidence that Karen Monahan is telling the truth when she says that Muslim Brotherhood Congressman Hakim Muhammad, aka Keith Ellison, abused her. By contrast, there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Brett Kavanaugh abused Christine Blasey Ford. But while the Democrats are in a lather over Ford and Kavanaugh, demanding a delay of the confirmation vote until after the midterm elections that they are sure will go their way, they couldn’t care less about Karen Monahan. And that shows that all their #MeToo rhetoric is pure politically-motivated hypocrisy — as if anyone didn’t know that by now.

“‘Emotional And Physical Abuse’: Ellison Accuser Posts Doctor’s Report Naming Congressman As Alleged Abuser,” by Peter Hasson, Daily Caller, September 19, 2018 (thanks to Christian):

The ex-girlfriend accusing Democratic Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison of domestic abuse told her doctor in 2017 about alleged “emotional and physical abuse” from Ellison, according to a document the woman published Wednesday.
take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

Karen Monahan’s account in the doctor’s report is consistent with what she has been saying publicly since August: that Ellison was emotionally and physically abusive to her while the two were dating.

Ellison is the deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and is the Democratic nominee for Minnesota attorney general. He has adamantly denied emotionally or physically abusing Monahan.

“She states that she was in a very stressful environment for years, emotional and physical abuse by a partner with whom she is now separated,” reads the November 2017 report, a picture of which Monahan posted on Twitter.

“She did not have any physical injuries that required an examination in the past. She identifies the individual she was involved with as congressman Ellison, and she is worried about retribution if she identifies him publicly,” the report states.

Ellison’s congressional office did not immediately return a request for comment.

The Democratic Party has maintained its support for Ellison’s attorney general campaign despite the allegations. DNC Chair Tom Perez previously said the committee was “reviewing” the allegations.

Perez later deferred to an investigation by the party’s Minnesota arm, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (DFL), which endorsed Ellison’s campaign in spite of Monahan’s allegations.

Monahan wrote Wednesday that Ellison declined any meeting with her as part of the investigation.

“I told the investigator I would be happy to talk with @keithellison [with] them in the room. They asked Keith if he would be willing [and] he declined any meeting [with] me,” she wrote….
Pamela Geller
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.
...continue reading this topic >>
Islamic Terrorist Uses American Courts To Enforce Sharia Law
Legal Jihad: Islamic Terrorist Uses American Courts To Enforce Sharia Law
Jihad is conquest. Terrorists have used our legal system against us. Every judicial win reinforces a message that Americans are weak. Terrorists are encouraged to continue their conquest to destroy America from within.
Gerald Lostutter — September 20, 2018

America remembers the terror attacks on September 11, 2001: Over 3,000 Americans died, and thousands injured, due to Jihadis’ attacks using airlines to destroy buildings as metaphors of western dominance: Jihadis destroyed the World Trade Center’s towers; and damaged the Pentagon; but failed to attack a target speculated to be the White House.

America remembers the terror attack on February 26, 1993: Six Americans died, and a thousand injured, due to Jihadis’ attack using explosives intended to destroy the World Trade Center’s towers. Four co-conspirators were convicted in March, 1994. Ahmad Ajaj was convicted of nine counts for his acts in the early stages of the conspiracy. Ajaj was sentenced to 114 years, fined $250,000, and ordered to pay 250 million dollars in restitution. [Wikipedia; Fox News]

Islam’s core doctrine
take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

Under Sharia law, the Kafir (unbeliever) has only three options:

Convert to Islam;
Become a second-class citizen, and pay Jizya, a tax; or

Process of Civilization-Jihad

Read the Muslim Brotherhood (HAMAS-CAIR)’s Strategic Memorandum to designate Islam as the official religion and impose Sharia law in the United States. (Clarion Project; Geller Report)

In the Muslim Brotherhood’s Memorandum: “The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers…” [p. 7]

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Quran should be the highest authority in America.” – CAIR founding chairman Omar Ahmad, quoted in the Muslim Mafia, by P. David Gaubatz [Ch. 17, p. 265; See Ahmad’s denial: fn 1, p. 400]. CAIR was named a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates in 2014. (Fox News)

Muslims use American courts, under the guise of religious freedom, to secure Sharia law. Via multiple lawsuits, Ahmad Ajaj, has alleged interference with mail, lack of access to lawyers, and violations of the First, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Ajaj has two current lawsuits, alleging discrimination based on religion. Yet Islam is a political system wrapped in religion.

Protection of the free exercise of religion

The U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

The above should be sufficient, but the federal Congress reinforced it via the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (1993) (42 U.S. Code §2000bb-1): “Government shall not specifically burden a person’s exercise of religion” unless there is a “least restrictive means” to further “a compelling governmental interest.”

This Act was intended to protect legitimate exercise of religion. Did the Congress, and supported by evangelicals, intend for the law to protect Jihadis who attack Americans?

Ahmad Ajaj’s allegations

As summarized in Findings, Conclusions and Order of Judgment (09-13-18), signed by U.S. District Judge R. Brooke Jackson (appointed by President Obama):

“In his original Complaint [Ahmad Ajaj] alleged that his rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act …, and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution were being violated because he was not allowed to consume food and drink, and take medications, outside the fasting hours of dawn to dusk during the holy month of Ramadan.” [Order; pg. 1]

“In an Amended Complaint … plaintiff added claims under the Fifth Amendment and the Federal Torts Claims Act … He also named 15 individual defendants in addition to the Bureau of Prisons. His claims were expanded to include Sunnah fasts. He also alleged a failure to honor his requirement of a halal diet, lack of meaningful access to an Imam, and an inability to participate in group prayer.” [Order; pp. 1-2]

In-other-words, Ajaj had the audacity to try to sue the prison personnel as individuals, but these claims were dismissed. The only remaining defendant was the Bureau of Prisons.

“When all the dust settled, two issues remained for trial: Mr. Ajaj’s alleged entitlement to (1) a certified halal diet; and (2) meaningful access to an Imam.” [Order; pg. 4]

Bureau of Prison’s defenses

During this case, the Bureau of Prisons transferred Ajaj from a prison in Colorado to a prison in Indiana.

Judge Jackson further summarized that the Bureau of Prisons “was able to contract to purchase a supply of halal-certified meals … as well as a microwave dedicated to heating only the halal meals.” The last business day before trial, “Mr. Ajaj began receiving certified halal meals.” [Order; pg. 5]

According to the Bureau of Prisons, reports Judge Jackson: As an employee, an Imam must “have either a degree in theology or graduate level equivalency (the same qualifications as chaplains in other religious faiths); pass a security check; and, of course, be willing to move to Terre Haute [Indiana]. The BOP did find a qualified Imam who agreed to take the position and was in the process of moving from Houston [Texas] to Terre Haute [Indiana], but changed his mind about two weeks before trial. The BOP then reached out to Bashar Murad, an Imam who had worked as a part-time Imam at Terre Haute in the past, and agreed to hire him on a month to month contract to provide not more than 30 hours of service per week while the BOP continues to try to find a full-time Imam for the facility.” [Order; pg. 6]

“Imam Murad is the only on-site Imam available to Mr. Ajaj and other Muslim inmates at USP Terre Haute [at] the present time. However, another option is what is called the Minister of Record program. That permits an inmate to communicate by telephone, mail or email with essentially any Imam in the country of the inmate’s choosing (excluding the 13 Imams presently working full time at other BOP institutions). An outside Imam may also visit an inmate, although there was no evidence of any Imams in the vicinity of Terre Haute who would be likely to visit as a practical matter.” [Order; pg. 6]

Also at the prison, “the Life Connections Program is a faith-based life skills program in which participants are taught to take their basic faith teachings and integrate them into their lives so they can make healthy connections to their family and their community.” Ajaj joined an Islamic group of the program in May, 2018, about three months before trial. [Order; pg. 7]

The Bureau of Prisons listed an “LCP Program Islamic Spiritual Guide” with an “Estimated Dollar Range” from $250,000 to $500,000 for a “Target Award Date” of 10/1/2016, and an “Incumbent” identified as Imam Bashar Murad. [Thank you, taxpayers, Allah be praised. /sarc]

“Imam Murad is Sunni … However, Mr. Ajaj believes that Imam Murad is Sufi, which is an aspect of Islam that can be found in Sunni or Shia groups. Mr. Ajaj has made it clear that his beliefs are different than those of Imam Murad. He has informed personnel at USP Terre Haute that because of Imam Murad’s beliefs, it would go against his religious principles to attend Imam Murad’s classes. Therefore, he has declined to attend his classes.” [Order; pgs. 7-8] Note that Imam Murad teaches a basic course of Islam, avoiding differences of sects, to accommodate all Muslims in the prison.

“The Court frankly does not know what else can reasonably be expected of the BOP.” [Order; pg. 12]

The Court rules to enforce Sharia law

“The United States Bureau of Prisons is enjoined from discontinuing Mr. Ajaj’s certified halal diet unless that is required to serve a governmental compelling interest and no reasonable alternative exists … The Court awards the plaintiff Ahmad Ajaj reasonable attorney’s fees … As the prevailing party, plaintiff is also awarded costs.” [Order; pg. 15]

“There is no attorney’s fee clause in RFRA, but fees can be awarded to the prevailing party under the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976 … Here, the plaintiff did not incur fees, as representation was provided by the law school’s civil rights clinic. However, fees may be awarded to public interest lawyers, including those associated with a legal type agency, just as they are to private lawyers.” [Order; pg. 14]


Judge Jackson reported: “The BOP stipulated, and the Court finds, that Mr. Ajaj’s religious beliefs are sincerely held.” [Order; pg. 9] Of course, that is why Ahmad Ajaj follows Muhammad’s instruction: It is every Muslim’s duty to commit Jihad and murder Kafirs, the unbelievers. Ajaj murdered Americans in 1993; and if released, Ajaj would murder Americans again.

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act was intended to protect legitimate exercise of religion. Did Congress, and supported by evangelicals, intend for the law to protect Jihadis who attack Americans?

Jihad is conquest. Terrorists have used our legal system against us. Every judicial win reinforces a message that Americans are weak. Terrorists are encouraged to continue their conquest to destroy America from within.

Ahmad Ajaj has been a prolific litigator, and whiner, including previous cases not discussed in this article. This lawsuit may be effectively done; but Ajaj still has another pending case, likely moot in context of his halal diet, listed below.

Contrast the taxpayers’ burden:

Salaries of personnel in courts and nine prisons including Imams (13 full-time Imams multiplied at least by $250,000 per Imam);
This Judge will oversee a determination of legal fees and costs to be paid by the Bureau of Prisons to Ajaj’s attorneys associated with the University of Denver Sturn College of Law;
The cost to procure halal food (and a separate microwave); and
Taxpayers have already paid for surgery to remove Ajaj’s lung due to cancer.

All of these costs could have been avoided by an inexpensive needle in Ajaj’s arm, but he avoided the death penalty.

As a taxpayer and attorney, I am ashamed and alarmed how liberal judges, and liberal law schools, have effectively promoted Sharia law.

Case #1: Review pleadings:

Amended Complaint;

Order Re Motion to Dismiss;

Order Re Reconsideration of Motion to Dismiss;

Plaintiff’s Trial Brief;

Defendant’s Trial Brief;

Order of Judgment; and

Clerk’s Entry of Judgement.

Case #2: Review pleadings:

Second Amended Complaint; and

Order Re Procedure.

Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.
...continue reading this topic >>

An excellent read!!!!!!!!!!

If you walk like a duck and quack like a duck; have feathers like a duck; eat like a duck and lay eggs like a duck; there is a very high probability that you're a duck!
Mike Gallagher, the 8th most recognized talk radio personality, in the U.SA., he is heard by over 2.25 million listeners weekly. He compiled and wrote the following essay entitled,

"Obama: It was You."

* It was you who spoke these words at an Islamic dinner -"I am one of you."

* It was you who on ABC News referenced -"My Muslim faith."

* It was you who gave $100 million in U.S. taxpayer funds to re-build foreign mosques.

* It was you who wrote that in the event of a conflict -"I will stand with the Muslims."

* It was you who assured the Egyptian Foreign Minister that -"I am a

* It was you who bowed in submission before the Saudi King.

* It was you who sat for 20 years in a Liberation Theology Church condemning Christianity and professing Marxism.

* It was you who exempted Muslims from penalties under Obamacare that the rest of us have to pay.

* It was you who purposefully omitted - "endowed by our Creator " - from your recitation of The Declaration Of Independence.

* It was you who mocked the Bible and Jesus Christ's Sermon On The Mount while repeatedly referring to the 'HOLY' Qur'an.

* It was you who traveled the Islamic world denigrating the United States Of America.

* It was you who instantly threw the support of your administration behind the building of the Ground Zero Victory mosque overlooking the hallowed crater of the World Trade Center.

* It was you who refused to attend the National Prayer Breakfast, but hastened to host an Islamic prayer breakfast at the White House.

* It was you who ordered Georgetown Univ. and Notre Dame to shroud
all vestiges of Jesus Christ BEFORE you would agree to go there to speak, but in contrast, you have NEVER requested the mosques you have visited to adjust their decor.

* It was you who appointed anti-Christian fanatics to your Czar Corps.

* It was you who appointed rabid Islamists to Homeland Security.

* It was you who said that NASA's "foremost mission" was an outreach to Muslim communities.

* It was you who as an Illinois Senator was the ONLY individual who would speak in favor of infanticide.

* It was you who was the first President not to give a Christmas Greeting from the White House, and went so far as to hang photos of Chairman Mao on the White House tree.

* It was you who curtailed the military tribunals of all Islamic terrorists.

* It was you who refused to condemn the Ft. Hood killer as an Islamic terrorist.

* It is you who has refused to speak-out concerning the horrific executions of women throughout the Muslim culture, but yet, have submitted Arizona to the UN for investigation of hypothetical human-rights abuses.

* It was you who when queried in India refused to acknowledge the true extent of radical global Jihadists, and instead profusely praised Islam in a country that is 82% Hindu and the victim of numerous Islamic terrorists assaults.

* It was you who funneled $900 Million in U.S. taxpayer dollars to Hamas.

* It was you who ordered the United States Postal Service to honor
the MUSLIM holiday with a new commemorative stamp.

* It was you who directed our UK Embassy to conduct outreach to help
"empower" the British Muslim community.

* It was you who funded mandatory Arabic language and culture studies in Grammar schools across our country.

* It is you who follows the Muslim custom of not wearing any form of jewelry during Ramadan.

* It is you who departs for Hawaii over the Christmas season so as to avoid past criticism for NOT participating in seasonal White House religious events.

* It was you who was uncharacteristically quick to join the chorus of the Muslim Brotherhood to depose Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, formerly America's strongest ally in North Africa; but, remain muted in your non-response to the Brotherhood led slaughter of Egyptian Christians.

* It was you who appointed your chief adviser, Valerie Jarrett, an Iranian, who is a member of the Muslim Sisterhood, an off-shoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.

* It was you who said this country is not a Christian nation.

PLEASE! Distribute this far and wide

Yep, he's a Duck, alright.
...continue reading this topic >>
It is my responsibility to obtain my rights and freedom.!! Yours also!!
I give All of you lots of credit and well earned also. Do you recall the exact feeling of belonging? .I appreciate all that you send . and the profound depth of your knowledge rivals my own. I however was busy doing things in other areas until 2014. I was fooled for 75 years. Some say that I am still not awake.

Tell me where this went wrong in the logic and thought.

A bunch of mal contents, most of whom were killed or ruined, wrote a document and sent a copy to the KING. There are several copies around. I have one. Then the same and additional Revolutionaries wrote their Articles of Confederation. Then they improvised a Constitution. Fought some wars, lied, cheated, killed, stole and conquered, bought and sold territory and created States from territory and operated a Constitutional Republic form of government from 1819 thru 1860 - 61.

I claim there are no lawful treaties, they all fail upon examination. I think, I know, the SAL 1858 is bogus. Written after the War between the states.
That pile of information is four corners on the table for de facto and de jure; the deviation toward the fed and incorporating the states, war, with de facto running the business of state under common law until 1947. and the switch was complete to statutory in Florida 1950. But not Constitutionally.

The individual national as well as the citizen are both identified in Real ID Act 2005. I'm there and defined and I can prove it. ORCP 20A. There is no change to the first law of the land lawfully sin color of law and legal fiction since 1860. de jure changes stopped in 1860.

The corporation uses whatever it wants to make a statute about. We are not concerned, the mind, body and spirit, with the de facto which is required to serve the national and the citizen. The Acarrdi (sp)Doctrine requires them to abide by their own rules. Which requires when reading the lawful documents of the de jure and the de facto that the one with the enumerated power must provide what is written in the table. I'm Oregonian therefore I have the Original Oregon Constitution as the second law on Oregon. 1859 to 1910 Oregon operated as a government they switched to corporate governance 1910 Nov 8th. I think, I know, where and what the law is. and it is stated in writing. All the pages of rhetoric about Cannons and Rome and Supreme Court rulings is for de facto to guide them and their citizens of the corporation.

Changes in de jure law ceased 1860.

The de facto must adhere to SAL, SCOTUS, POTUS, Congress, deep state, swamp, treaties, rules, regulations, ordinances.

The flesh, blood, soul the being known as Ron; the expatriated, to national from citizen, individual . The one with a birth certificate in cursive and the owner/TRUSTEE of the PMA RONALD CHARLES VROOMAN was injured, over 50 times by over 50 employees of the various levels of corporation dba government, wrongfully. I am collecting the benefits guaranteed Constitutionally in whatever one you want to look in. Article III, 11th amendment and VII amendment is in that Constitution. Even the one for the Dutch on Manhattan.
Please, refute as I need to understand the exact error in my knowledge.
...continue reading this topic >>
New concern for republicans.
I'm getting feed back from my conservative friends. Don't capitulate to this "victim" beyond a hearing this Monday. Loss of Kavanaugh will cost the current republicans their posts.

Basically, they want to delve into the background role of democrats in this, and they want her under oath. Nothing less than under oath.
...continue reading this topic >>
Guilty until proven Innocent....
Democrats and celebrities already pronounced Judge Kavanaugh guilty!!!1...Presumption of innocence is gone out of window!!!1....One Democratic Senator said "We have to believe Dr.Ford!!".....That means Judge Kavanaugh doesnt stand a chance....That is very scary,because i have son...So any woman from his past can accuse him of something awful and we have to believe her just because she is a woman???That is very unfair....Or...There could be another reason for all this circus to happen...Could it be, the reason all this is happening is because Judge Kavanaugh is registered Republican and was nominated by Republican President????...Oh no, you say!!That cant be why its happening!!!....Our Judiciary system is fair, you say......Well, case in point my friends...Keith Ellison...DNC chair assistant or whatever he is!!1...His girlfriend complained to DNC that he beat her and assaulted her...She even had medical records, bruises on her face....Dr's notes that noted all her abuse...She showed all this to DNC and what did they say to her???According to victim they said "We dont believe you!!".....He also won nomination for Attorney General. of MASS..Really???...Really???,,So let me get this straight!!!You believe a woman who has no prove of anything happening, no bruises,no witnesses, doesnt remember where it happen, what year it happen...But she is a registered Democrat and most important she is anti -Trump!!!So she MUST be believed!!!.....Wow!!!...I wonder if Judge Kavanaugh was nominated by Obama, would we be going through this circus today???I think we all know the answer!!!
...continue reading this topic >>
What or why , What or who is really Obama?
This is kind of a re-do, hopefully a little better and some specific details from a book.

What or why are “more difficult” the negotiations with North Korea? What or who is really Obama?

Mr. Trump is a “good negotiator” maybe a “great one” as he believed himself to be! And the meeting with the North Korea dictator seemed to be very fructíferous!
However shortly after, Mr. Kim Jong-un made a visit to his Godfather and closest allied, dictator of China, Xi Jinping, then things kind of changed!
It should be understood that China is the same as North Korea;
A communist Country! And an enemy of this country!

They enriched themself with the help from the West “using capitalisms instead of socialisms ideas”

Mr. Xi Jinping and China don’t want the disartment from North Korea! So, even if Kim Jong-un was sincere as he appeared in the Summit with Mr.Trump, it is understable things did not go smoothly between Trump and Kim Jong-un after that meeting in China.

However, things are not just as simple as what’s been said.

There were things done by this country that influenced even greater than an special “Godfather” association and same ideals between China and North Korea.

Ok, let’s go back a little bit and see what happened with Obama’s policy.

Mr. Obama was never in favor of the war against Iraq!

He was one of the few who voted against when he was a Senator!

The majority of democrats and republicans voted in favor!

Including his “two” Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry!

One of the reasons they gave the green light to Mr. Bush was because the United States was attacked by terrorists on Sep.11, and Mr. Saddam Hussein was the biggest promoter of terrorisms at that time!

So, Obama promised to withdraw from Iraq before becoming President, and he did!

However he did not left Iraq in a dignified way!

He got out of Iraq probably “knowing” it was not the right thing to do at that time!
All the Generals advised Mr. Obama of what would likely happened if they withdraw too early!
Specially when the country was stable and the war was considered a success! But he did regardless!

The President of the United States; Mr. Obama fulfilled a promise, however because of “the way and moment it was done”he did something against the interest of this country and the interest against the war on terrorisms! and of course, the people of Iraq.

However, the Media and most democrats ignored the reality of what happened!

He reversed any good of that war!

Obama made sure it would be a “debacle” instead of any success!

But “the Media was and is Liberal” and was in love with Obama!
They ignored what really happened and supported his actions regardless!

The foreign affairs policies of Obama did a lot of damage to the influence of the United States in any future negotiations.
And a lot of harm to a lot of people in general!

Of course, we are not just talking about Iraq.

If we should talk about Libya specially, what happened and why?

Mr. Muammar Gaddafi was a well known dictator and supporter of terrorisms and an enemy of this country for a long time.

However, even before the United States under the leadership of Bush declared war against terrorists and his supporters, Mr. Gaddafi was trying to go toward reconciliations with the West, perhaps wanting the lift of economy sanctions, as in 1999 Libya extradites the two suspects in the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight to Scottish authorities for trial.

But we should go on details and taken from this great book:
Architects of Disaster: The Destruction of Libya
Book by Peter Hoekstra

Continuous the following:
The same year(1999) The UN suspends sanctions against Libya.

In July 1999- Britain and Libya resume diplomatic relations.

December 1999- Gaddafi denounces terrorisms, having already expelled the Abu Nidal terrorist organization and closed training camps.

However, after the attack of september 11, 2001 in New York, the dramatic shift from Gaddafi was stunning!
[“Perhaps out of fear of the mighty USA after the subsequent reaction from Mr. Bush terminating on the invasion of Iraq”]

The month after 9/11, Assistant Secretary of State William j. Burns, along with Ben Bonk, deputy director of the CIA’s counter-terrorisms center flew to London to meet with Libyan Intelligence chief, Moussa Koussa, who reportedly provided the names of libyan islamist operatives who trained in afghanistan as well as detailed information about leaders of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG)-- information to be a windfall for the CIA in it’s hunt for jihadists!
The Bush administration made it clear that any new Libyan-American partnership was predicated on Gaddafi’s payment of compensation to the families of the Lockerbie victims, as well as on Libyan termination of it’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs!

In August 2003, Gaddafi agreed to pay the Lockerbie families $2.7 billion.

Four months later, he made the stunning announcement that he was surrendering his WMD programs.

After years of building on his WMD program now, at Gaddafi’s request, American and British teams entered the country and disabled or removed all of Libya’s centrifuges and other dual-use nuclear equipment!

September 12, 2003---- In a 13--0 vote, the UN Security council formally lifts sanctions on Libya.
January 18, 2004----U.S. and British officials arrived in Libya to begin eliminating and removing WMD designs and stockpiles.
February 6, 2004---- A U.S.- led delegation meets with Libyan officials in London “to begin a political dialogue about the future of U.S. -Libya relations”.
February 12, 2004--- Former House Intelligence Committee chairman Pete Hoekstra participates in the first of three congressional delegations to meet with Gaddafi in Libya. The State Department asks Hoekstra and other members of the delegation to express the United States gratitude for Libya’s having abandoned its WMD programs and having renounced its ties to terror groups.

February 26, 2004--- The United States lifts its Libya travel ban, U.S. citizens are allowed to spend money in Libya, and businesses may enter negotiations to reacquire pre-sanctions holdings inside Libya. The United States also offers Libya the possibility of opening a diplomatic interests section in Washington.

March 5, 2004--- Libyan officials submit a complete declaration of the state’s chemical weapons stockpile and facilities.

September 20, 2004--- The United States lifts most of its remaining sanctions on Libya.

May 15, 2006--- Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice announces the establishment of full diplomatic relations between the United States and Libya.

October 16, 2007--- Libya gains a seat on the UN Security Council.

January 3, 2008--- U.S. and Libyan officials sign their first bilateral agreement, the Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement.

August 14, 2008--- The United States and Libya sign the U.S.- Libya Claims Settlement Agreement, providing full compensation for victims of the Lockerbie bombing of the Berlin Disco.

September 5, 2008--- Rice meets with Gaddafi, becoming the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit Libya in more than fifty years.

Condoleezza Rice's visit opens new era in US-Libya relations

Condoleezza Rice became the first American secretary of state to visit Libya in more than half a century on Friday, delivering a diplomatic dividend to the country's unpredictable leader Muammar Gaddafi.

The value of the cooperation from Libya was huge!

In addition to providing extensive information to the CIA about libyan nationals in Al Qaeda, the regime gave Washington a treasure trove of information about black market suppliers.
Kenneth Katzman, a terrorism analyst at the Congressional Research Service said, information provided by the libyans “helped us to track down aspects of the black-market network and contribute to the shutdown of parts of that network in Malaysia and the United Arab Emirates”.

Gaddafi’s intelligence cooperation became even more invaluable when libyan jihadists flocked to Iraq to fight U.S.-led coalition forces.
In contrast to the Saudis, the libyan leader did not undercut his cooperation in the war with terror by turning a blind eye to jihadist infiltration of Iraq or by spending billions of dollars promoting the spread of radical Wahhabi Islamist ideology around the world.

This was the Gaddafi, and the Libya inherited by the Obama administration after the 2008 presidential elections:

A Libya that was stable, and a Gaddafi helping to keep the lid on the threat posed by radical jihadists!

But with radically different thinking in the White House, neither a stable Libya nor Gaddafi would survive Obama’s first term!
Neither would the American ambassador, nor three other Americans!

Mr. Obama soon after assuming office began reaching out terrorists groups Hamas and Egypt’s powerful Muslim Brotherhood shunned by all previous administrations as clearly enemies of Israel that pretended to be moderates, or I would rather say, Obama accepted them as such!

Obama sided with jihadists and was trying to make a distinction among them, but there were countless salafi- jihadists veterans of the global Al Qaeda network.

Mr. Obama who previously had signaled his acceptance of radical jihadism by siding with the Iranian regime over pro-democracy protestors during the Green Revolution, as well as the Egypt’s Muslim brotherhood-both in 2009.

All that information from the book,
Architects of Disaster: The Destruction of Libya
Book by Peter Hoekstra

And from all that I would say,

Mr. Obama triggered and made possible the fall and dead of a dictator that became an allied against the war of terrorism!

However,Obama went to Cuba and shake hands with Castro legitimizing a dictatorship and lifting all the sanctions without asking for anything in return, ignoring the thousands of cubans and others innocents who died because of the Castros.

So, it is obvious that Mr. Obama felt very comfortable with the Castro’s regime that have been terrorisms supporters and active terrorists for a long time!
He even removed Cuba from the terrorists List with “NOT EVEN A COMMITMENT” from them!

Then, who or what is really Obama?

Is he an “incompetent president” because he withdrew clearly too early from Iraq ignoring the advise from all the Generals in command?

Is Mr. Obama an “incompetent” president” because he created a case (mostly proven lies by International watch) against a country; Libya that became probably the most valuable allied against the war to terrorisms!

Is Mr. Obama an “incompetent president” because he forced “a terrible deal” in favor of the Major supporter of terrorisms; Iran! ignoring any
advise (including a detailed case from Israel) our only real friend and democratic country in that region!

Then, what about Obama accusing his own country, of being torturers in time of war? Which he never accepted as such!
Obama even swapped four of the worst prisoners of war from Guantánamo Prison Camp for a desertor! Then, he received him at the White House as a hero! Is that incompetence?

Or, was (is) Mr. Obama hiding what or who he really is instead?

Obama’s actions showed him as a supporter and friend of the Jihadists! The palestinian terrorists! The egyptians terrorists!

Obama’s actions showed him as a friend of declared enemies of this country; as Iran and Cuba!

Obama’s actions showed him as an enemy of “countries that fight or are against islamists terrorists” as Israel and probably most of the arab countries, as well as a former (not anymore, thanks to Obama!) added fighter of terrorism, Libya.

And what about, Obama’s refusal to ever accept that there was a war against “Islamist terrorists” and not even “MENTIONING” the word “islamists” attached to terrorisms as he considered it as being offensive!

Mr.Obama is or was not incompetent as some “conservatives and republicans” called him, trying to find answer to his actions!

Or maybe they’ve been so naived that it topped the stupidity mark!

Mr. Obama is rather “very smart” because he was able to change the democratic Party!
There are not discerning or different views anymore!

Not moderates among democrats anymore!

Obama divided this country because he wanted to!

Mr. Obama’s actions (instead of what he said) showed that he cares more for Muslims than Christians!

Obama’s actions showed that he is either a sympathizer or a supporter of Islamic terrorisms!

Obama’s actions showed that he is an enemy instead of a friend of Israel!

Obama’s actions and his past showed him as a marxist, not even close of being a friend of capitalism!

Because of Obama’s “very wrong” and insolent way of “acting with what it seems a complete disregard for the lost of american lives in the war” as it seems apparent that his ideology was “what really most matters to him”.
Because of his actions hundreds of thousands! Perhaps “Millions” of people died or were affected for the rest of their lives!

However, The “FAKE MEDIA” will never admitted it, but it is the TRUE!

Then, going to North Korea, it is obvious that even though, the policy from Trump has been very different, and even if the North Korean dictator is “sincere” about his negotiations, there should probably be some concerns from Mr. Kim Jong-un of what might happen to him once Trump is gone, the same as Gaddafi?

Thank you very much,

Héctor Bayate
...continue reading this topic >>
For more, check out Active Topics page.
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use - Forum
Copyright 2012-2018 IDF International Technologies, Inc.