The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 (McCarran-Walters Act - Revised and reaffirmed 1965) revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the USA if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means." This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States of America, but this law has been ignored by the White House.

Islamic immigration to the USA would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the USA government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims, who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal, subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. For the Muslims there is not other law but that of Allah, given to Muhammad and written in the Koran. All the Muslims follow the dictates of the Koran, no matter if they are fundamentalists or moderates.

Most people do not know what the Koran says and ignore how much evil it preaches to his followers, against those who do not accept the religion of the Islam, that this book proposes as the only one and compulsory religion, mandated by the god Allah; because of this lack of knowledge, the practice of this religion is accepted in Western countries, which threatens the integrity and security of the people and goes against the stability of the state in which it operates.

In fact, there are many verses in the Koran that command Islamists to kill those who do not submit to Allah and the prophet and it is the fundament of Islamic terrorists.

The laws prohibits entry of "Aliens who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe seek to enter the United States solely, principally, or incidentally to engage in activities which would be prejudicial to the public interest, or endanger the welfare, safety, or security of the United States." It also prohibits the entry of Aliens who are members of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches, the overthrow by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means of the USA or of all forms of law, and Aliens who publish, circulate and distribute materials teaching or advocating the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the USA Government or of all forms of law.

The Islam is a religious-political doctrine of totalitarian character which promote the intolerance, the imposition, the terrorism, the war, the murder, the theft, the misogyny, the pedophilia, the rape, the violations of human rights, etc., contained in the preaching of the Koran; against the same Muslims by strict Mohammedans, and against those who do not accept the religion of the Islam.

Whether the Islam is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited. It also prohibits those who distribute literature that advocates the overthrow of our country, which would include the Koran.

It is proven that the Muslims do not come to the USA to assimilate to the American Way of Life. Let's know what the Muslims leaders say: Nov. 21, 2016 <Islam is not here to integrate is here to dominate>. So said Haitham Ibn Thabait - American Chapter of Hizb Ut-Tharir. -----------------------The Dallas Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Director, Mustafa Carroll told the world at a Muslim rally on March 4, 2013 in Austin, Texas, <If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land>. Any immigration without assimilation is an INVASION by ENEMY FORCES.

The Public Law 414, Chapter 2 Section 212, does not mention the Islam by name, but describes an organization seeking the same as the Islam. So if immigration to the USA is prohibited to Aliens who belongs to that kind of organization, such organization must be prohibited to function in the USA and must be enforced the banishment of the Islam.

Manning
There is a phrase that is attributed to Einstein that he never said, but that contains a truth that cannot be challenged: "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results."
According to that phrase, socialism is a crazy thing and you know it from the experience you had in Holland.
Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland have experienced the path of socialism and had to change course, because they were headed for disaster.
Those who propose "'Democratic Socialism'" here in the USA always use those countries as an example, blatantly lying.

Milosia:
I have made a compilation of the replies that you have given to different opinions and what I have drawn in conclusion is that you make statements without any basis. For example, when you write: "That was the name of the party before he changed it to the Nazis”.
Nazi is an acronym for national-socialism, it is a term created by the left in order to hide that this ideology was also socialist, and in the same way they have used the generic term "fascism". But just as the leaders of National Socialism always renounced the label of belonging to the right wing, which they detested, Hitler always spoke of the National Socialist party or movement and not "Nazi", something that is perfectly understood from German in the speeches from him
"Fascism", or rather national-socialism, was born from uniting the revolutionary socialist fervor between the wars with the nationalism of each country, it was a third way, more moderate compared to Lenin's communism in that it did not intend to destroy the nation or it tolerated the private property of the middle classes and was focused against the capitalism of the oligopolies, but within the revolutionary socialist and anti-capitalist dialectic that sought to control the economy by the state with numerous collectivizations, and that did not renounce, like the communists (or Marxist socialists -Leninists) to control society by imposing a totalitarian dictatorship.
Curiously and amusingly, what a leftist has historically hated the most is the ideology that most resembles it and that also arose from it, but in annoying competition, and as a hated heresy with respect to the matrix of Marxist socialism in the struggle to win over the working class and the middle classes in those moments in which anti-system ideologies gain strength, that is, in periods of capitalist crisis. Some tried to carry out the world revolution and others the national revolution, and both ended up leaving millions of victims on the bloody path towards their utopia, and although the propaganda that goes back to Comintern times speaks of opposite extremes, in reality they are branches of the common stock of socialism.
As for you being a supporter of John Maynard Keynes. Keynesian economics dominated economic theory and policy after World War II until the 1970s, when many advanced economies suffered from inflation and slow growth, a condition termed "stagflation." The popularity of Keynesian theory then waned because it had no appropriate policy response to stagflation. Currently with the policies implemented by this administration we are heading towards stagflation.

A philosopher expressed in one of his aphorisms: “To act, think; and not to act, think.
Writing is acting. If you followed the advice of this philosopher, and thought before writing, you would not write so much nonsense.
In your first comment, following the mirage created by the left, without giving it much thought, you wrote that socialism was not the ideology of the Nazis, to which I responded duly, without you using the right of reply.
On that occasion I did not write clarifying about the "vehicles that Hitler used to seize the Weimar Republic" as you wrote, so now I will tell you that, surprisingly, the most important political aid that Hitler received was not from the capitalists but from the USSR, because the German communists encouraged by Stalin, led to his coming to power at the beginning of the thirties in the Weimar Republic, uniting the communists with the Nazis in parliament and; the Moscow newspaper Pravda in those years praised Nazism, stating that Nazi behavior was more proletarian (read more Marxist) than that of the Social Democrats, which is why many communist militants went over to the ranks of Nazism, that had equally Marxist workers slogans; being demonstrated that Marxist socialism in all its forms: international (Leninist communism) or national (Nazi-fascism), is the same poison with a different label on its container. It should also be emphasized that Lenin knew Mussolini since 1904 and the Russian Marxist satrap wrote about his Italian co-religionist: "with Mussolini, the socialism of the peninsula is finding its own way"; and in the same way, the genocidal communist Stalin, exalted both Hitler and Mussolini on several occasions, allowing this Russian autocrat to the Germans establish a secret base in Lipetsk, 500 kilometers from Moscow, where they could test their aircraft prototypes (Fokker DXIII), train their pilots and update combat tactics, thus circumventing the strong restrictions that the Treaty of Versailles imposed on Germany. The code name with which the Germans called this secret base was Wivupal.
In your second comment, you write again without thinking, because it is not socialism that gave them all the benefits that you mention; and if socialism triumphs, those benefits will come to an end, which will only be received by those who belong to the new class, since the Constitution will have been repealed and with it: the rule of law, the free market economy and individual freedom will have disappeared.

What you write is totally ridiculous and it shows that you do not have the slightest knowledge of what you write. I propose that you read the following words carefully: "We are socialists, we are enemies of the current capitalist economic system because it exploits those who are weak from an economic point of view, with their unequal salaries, with their indecent evaluation of a human being according to their wealth or not, instead of evaluating the responsibility and performance of the person, and we are determined to destroy this capitalist system in all its aspects.” These words may have been spoken, unsurprisingly to anyone, by young congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, a supporter of socialism, or by her guru, pro-Soviet Marxist-Leninist comrade Senator Bernie Sanders.
If you sympathize with socialism, you will surely applaud these words. If so, you would be applauding Adolf Hitler, who pronounced them on Labor Day (May 1) in the year 1927. You really have no reason to be ashamed, because Hitler was a "socialist" and a Marxist; he was a leftist, as are those who promote or accept that the Democratic party, which a few decades ago was a party with liberal and conservative wings, is being polarized to become a socialist party, with tendencies towards Nazi-Fascism.
To illustrate it, I am going to quote the most notorious Nazis and Fascists in history. Let's see what these disastrous characters say: Adolf Hitler considered himself "the authentic producer of Marxism" (H. Rauschning, in Hitler told me, De Cooperation, Paris, 1939, p. 112); and none other than Goebbels, propaganda minister of Nazi Germany, was the one who confessed that - "The national-socialist movement has only one teacher: Marxism" - (Kampf um Berlin, p. 19); and coinciding with Marxist ideologues- he affirmed that "Socialism is the conception of the world of the future that can only be realized in the Socialist State" (Die Zweite Revolution). And furthermore he expresses:-"We are socialists and mortal enemies of the capitalist economic system"-(Der Nationalsozialismus, Die Weltanschaung des 20 Jahrhunderts). For his part, and not to be less eloquent, Mussolini is pleased to affirm that Marx is his spiritual father. (Mussolini and fascism Ed. Que sais-je, p. 31). Nazism and fascism are, by definition, a version of Marxist socialism. Actually, the term Nazi is an abbreviation of the words "National Socialist", included in the name of the German Workers' Party that defines the political tendency of that party.
Socialists are expert illusionists and create mirages by repeating lies. Goebbels is credited with the phrase: "A lie repeated a thousand times becomes the truth." There are those who attribute this phrase to Lenin and say that Goebbels only picked it up. The truth is that these two promoters of the Marxist idea insisted with emphasis on the "adequate" use of lies beyond ethics and morality in order to achieve a "higher purpose."
Making believe that Nazi-fascism is an ideology of the extreme right is the greatest propaganda success of the socialist left in its entire history, with which it has created an ideological mirage in order to confuse and divert attention from its crimes, which has as a "higher purpose" to clean up his image a bit. Objectively, Nazi-fascism is a socialist (Marxist) ideology, linked to nationalist sentiment; that did not arise on the right but within the socialist movement of the left, after the event that was the Russian Revolution of 1917 and that served to propagate all kinds of revolutionary and anti-system socialism, including those we know as fascism or Nazism.

The United States House of Representatives approved on February 2, 2023 a bill presented by the Florida congresswoman, María Elvira Salazar, which denounces socialism as an ideology, to prevent it from being imposed as a practice in United States territory.
The resolution lists a series of events in various countries with totalitarian governments, to point out that it is an ideology doomed to failure if it is taken as State policy.
“Socialist ideology needs a concentration of power that time and time again has collapsed in communist regimes, totalitarian governments, and brutal dictatorships,” Salazar wrote in the bill.
Some Democratic congressmen during the debate expressed their concern that, when referring to socialist policies, social programs such as Medicare, Social Security or the low-cost housing could be included.
“There is nothing in this resolution about entitlement programs or prohibition of social services, or anything like that,” clarified Patrick McHenry, Republican congressman of North Carolina, who further said: “The resolution is simple. It states that Congress denounces socialism in all its forms and opposes the implementation of socialist policies in the United States."
Mario Diaz-Balart, a Republican congressman from Florida, argued that recent history has shown that while socialism and communism promise greater equality and "free" services, they "quickly degenerate into shared misery for all but a minority”.
The vote to approve this resolution was 328 in favor (75%), 86 against (20%) and 21 abstentions (5%). The 222 Republican congressmen voted in favor along with 106 Democratic congressmen, with the votes against and abstentions coming entirely from Democrats.
With the approval of this resolution in the House of Representatives by ¾ parts of the congressmen, the next step would be to take it to the Senate to also submit it to a vote; but Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., is unlikely to allow a vote on the legislation; although it could be the case that a number of liberal senators, not committed to the shadow power that dominates the party, could put pressure on him, supported by all the Republican senators who are surely in favor of condemning the socialist ideology.
It must be taken into account that of the 213 Democratic congressmen in the House, 50% approved the resolution against socialism and 10% abstained, which are those who, although they are not in favor of socialism, do not want to oppose the puppeteers who manage the party from the shadow.

I often read here at OPP how those who defend the ideas of the socialist left are confused with the "liberals", who really consider themselves to be leftists in the political spectrum; but they are not socialists, the liberals having become (according to historical development) moderate leftists, who tend towards centrism, sharing this tendency with moderate conservatives, who are on the right on the political spectrum. Which would serve to describe the political position of the members of the Republican and Democratic parties some decades ago.
Currently, the Democratic Party is in the process of being totally hijacked by the Marxists, who, concealing their true purposes, pose as "liberals" in order not to scare American society; although every day they distance themselves more from the liberal idea; and little by little the wolf begins to show its hairy ear, when certain personalities of that party declare to be "progressives" or frankly "socialists". The latter seek total control of the state and for this they develop clientelism, through the application of social welfare measures, the protection of privileges for minorities and multiculturalism, with a policy of open borders to immigration, in order to obtain votes to make their claims come true.
Socialism is a system totally contrary to liberal ideas. Economically, it is based on state ownership of the means of production, their collective administration and the distribution of goods; which implies a planning and organization of social life, attacking individual freedom that is sacrificed for the sake of collective well-being. "Socialism" and "totalitarianism" are synonymous with "collectivism"; and this, in turn, is an organization model incompatible with human freedom.
The socialists intend to distribute the wealth that others create, as long as they do not manage to totally control society, promoting laws to grant benefits that can only be granted as long as capitalism exists and there are those who pay taxes to cover the benefits granted; but all of the above changes when the socialists achieve totalitarian control of society, because together with capitalism wealth ceases to exist and the unequal distribution of misery begins, which does not affect the "new" ruling class.

Of course, for a useful idiot who defends the "Democratic Socialism" promoted by Mr. Bernie Sanders (who, without a doubt, was a supporter of the implementation of Soviet socialism in the USA during the Cold War), what was proposed by this politician Marxist is correct, without thinking about the end that this socialist pursues. Let's see what a useful idiot wrote (verbatim) here at OPP commenting on this politician: "He is for progressive taxes, a strong workplace where workers are respected and treated fairly and enjoy the fruits of collective bargaining. Old age pensions and universal health. Young people today are not stupid, they see that they are not getting the opportunity that their parents and grandparents had by birthright. They are sick of being hurt by corporate welfare and crony capitalism. McCarthyism's tale of the end of the world and warning of a communist behind every tree rings false when our companies and politicians are in bed with the Chinese, Russians and Arabs."
Whoever makes this comment forgets that Bernie Sanders was in bed with the Soviets, enemies of the USA whom he admired and that in the USSR there was no "paradise" for workers.

Socialism is the ideology of the Nazis and the communists, which arises from Marxism; being undeniable that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the National Socialist Party of German Workers, according to their names, in one way or another followed this ideology.
On September 19, 2019, the European Parliament approved a resolution on the importance of European historical memory for the future of Europe that equates communism and Nazism, both socialist systems.
The resolution approved by the European Parliament states that "while the crimes of the Nazi regime were evaluated and punished thanks to the Nuremberg trials, there is still an urgent need to raise awareness about the crimes perpetrated by Stalinism and other dictatorships, evaluate them morally and legally, and carry out judicial investigations on them” and recalls that “in some Member States, communist and Nazi ideologies are prohibited by law”. It also notes that "the European Union has a special responsibility to promote and protect democracy, respect for human rights and the rule of law, not only within but also outside the European Union."

The phrase "New World Order" (NWO) has been widely used in the political scene since George H. W. Bush pronounced it as president in 1990, although what that phrase implies is not something new, since it connects with the doctrine of "manifest destiny", originating in 1845; according to which, the United States of America is a nation chosen and destined to expand; and the truth is that it became a world power from 1898, reaffirming itself as such by emerging victorious from the First World War, which leads the managers of that economic power to associate, having been created for that reason in 1921 the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), a non-profit, independent and non-partisan organization, created to learn about the world order, made up of "experts", whose purpose is to influence politics by making recommendations to the presidential administration, testifying before Congress, interacting with the media and publishing those matters that are of interest to them. In May 1954 the Council extended its functions to Europe; and under the patronage of the Rockefeller family and the Dutch royal family, what is known as the Bilderberg Club was created. On November 9, 1989, peacefully, bloodlessly and without the use of weapons, the German population brought down the Berlin Wall. This event is a milestone that indicated a change in the established world order; and at that time, the possible disappearance of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was already in sight, which finally took place on December 25, 1991. Fidel Castro, making good his frequent preaching of "turning defeat into victory", worried about the fall of the Wall and alerted about the imminence of the disappearance of the USSR, understanding that such events constituted a threat to the survival of the Cuban regime, as well as for the leftist movements in Latin America, takes the initiative to reorganize the Marxist forces in the region; and for this, he uses the help of the Brazilian trade unionist, Lula da Silva. The Cuban Communist Party (CCP) and the Brazilian Workers Party called all their Latin American allies to a meeting on July 3 and 4, 1990 in the city of São Paulo, which was attended by 68 political forces belonging to 22 Latin American countries, including the Broad Front of Uruguay, the Socialist Party of Chile, the Movement for Socialism of Bolivia, the Sandinista Front of Nicaragua, and the Farabundo Martí Front of El Salvador, among others. The Colombian guerrilla groups, FARC and ELN, were also present at the meeting. The Marxist proposals were totally discredited, and the main topic of the meeting was how to continue to function without the support of Moscow. So, following Castro's guidelines, those summoned to São Paulo decided to change the Marxist approach to the class struggle that had lost traction and instead promote tendencies that were more effective; thus they determined to disguise themselves with the discourses of indigenism, racism, environmentalism, liberation theology and others, implementing the doctrines of Antonio Gramsci, to manipulate society through the control of culture and the media, in order to become to power by more persuasive methods. Although Cuba fell into a serious economic crisis with the disappearance of the USSR, which became known as the "special period", for which the Cuban people suffered all kinds of hardships; from Havana, it was continued to finance "the battle of ideas" promoted by Castro throughout the region.
This is how the São Paulo Forum (SPF) emerged, which became the spearhead of international communism, covering the void left by the USSR; and to begin a history of little more than thirty years, we can point out that at the time of its foundation the only organization that governed a country was the CCP, having had the forum its expansion when Hugo Chávez comes to power in Venezuela, for which he received help from Castro, in form of: advice, propaganda, financing and access to the media, which the Venezuelan gorilla promised to repay when he came to power. With the entry, through electoral means, of the former Lieutenant Colonel and coup leader (so a gorilla, as the left refers to the military coup leaders) in Miraflores in 1999, billions of petrodollars began to flow to the Cuban regime, which served to finance electoral campaigns throughout Latin America. The funds were delivered through subsidies, contracts with the Venezuelan oil company, service agreements that were often non-existent, or briefcases full of bills. Under the Chávez government, Venezuela became a satellite of Cuba. An oil power submitted to the mafia boss of a small impoverished country, but with deep knowledge of how to exercise social control of the population; precisely what the Venezuelan gorilla needed to take root in the government of his country. The Latin American map gradually reddened from the year 2002, when the Brazilian Lula da Silva became President, Néstor Kirchner from Argentina in 2003, as well as Tabaré Vásquez from Uruguay and the Dominican Leonel Fernández in the following year. In December 2004, at the initiative of Cuba, ALBA (Bolivarian Alternative for Latin America and the Caribbean) was born, through the signing in Havana of a Joint Declaration and the Agreement for its Application, by Hugo Chávez and Fidel Castro, as a proposal for sub-continental integration, whose principles are aimed at the socioeconomic reaffirmation of this region, in clear contradiction with the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), promoted by the United States. In 2005 Evo Morales obtained the power in Bolivia; and in that year, the Venezuelan gorilla, following the guidelines set by the Cuban capo, raised the flag of "Socialism of the 21st century" formulated in 1996 by the German sociologist Heinz Dieterich Steffan, which emerged as a product of reflection on Soviet socialism of the 20th century, pretending to succeed where Gorvachev failed, who to give it a human face, subjected Socialism to cosmetic surgery, applying glasnost and perestroika; but the failure was resounding and the patient became even uglier, producing the disappearance of the USSR. In 2006, Bolivia joined ALBA and the Latin American map turned redder, when another five Marxists came to power: Chilean Michelle Bachelet, Alan García from Peru, Rafael Correa from Ecuador, René Preval from Haiti and Nicaraguan Daniel Ortega; the latter, the following year, integrated his country into ALBA. In 2008, Fernando Lugo was elected in Paraguay, while Mauricio Funes reached the Presidency of El Salvador in the following year; in which Ecuador is integrated into ALBA. The year 2009 marked the political apogee of the SPF, fifteen Marxists were presidents and governed simultaneously in the region, including, of course, Fidel Castro and Hugo Chávez. Having managed to have as participants in ALBA the Caribbean islands: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Antigua and Barbuda, Saint Lucia and Dominica, that benefited from the acquisition of cheap Venezuelan oil. The growth of the Forum was not limited to Latin America, intending to extend to Europe, for which it used Spain as a gateway; thus, since 2003, Chávez had contracted the CEPS Foundation (embryo of the Spanish PODEMOS party) with the aim of obtaining advice on propaganda, but also to promote political changes in Spain. In this way, Pablo Iglesias, Juan Carlos Monedero and Íñigo Errejón, experts in the culture war designed by Antonio Gramsci, (who also obtained extraordinary undercover financing for their political activities), together with the electronic voting company Smartmatic (which counted the votes ), played a fundamental role in cementing Chávez firmly in power. Marxist-style governments usually end in failure, and after their heyday, the comrades of the Forum began to lose elections throughout the region, with the exception of Mexico, where Manuel López Obrador seized power in 2018, falling back from fifteen presidents they had, to only four at the end of 2019: Cuba, Nicaragua, Mexico and Venezuela; although they later regained power in Argentina and Bolivia. Understanding that the electoral options were being closed to them, the members of the SPF activated other mechanisms to gain power, basically through destabilization and violence, financed by drug trafficking, which came to replace oil when this industry came down in Venezuela due to mismanagement. In July 2019, the XXV Meeting of the SPF was held in Caracas. There, Nicolás Maduro and Diosdado Cabello did not hide that they would promote vandalism protests in other nations. In October of that year, almost simultaneously, violent disturbances broke out in Ecuador, Chile and Colombia. Maduro acknowledged that everything was going according to plan at the last meeting of the Forum; but the riots would not only be in the south of the continent, they would arrive months later in the United States, where in May 2020, after the death of the African-American George Floyd, simultaneous protests took place in numerous cities, many of them violent. The modus operandi of the protesters and the coordination suggests that there was a central command structure, with extensive funding. The similarity between the 2020 riots in the United States and the 2019 vandalism protests in Ecuador, Chile and Colombia is not accidental. In 2022, the former guerrilla Gustavo Petro obtains power in Colombia through the electoral route and through the same route other Marxists achieve it: Pedro Carrillo in Peru and Gabriel Boric in Chile. We have previously exposed how the communists in the SPF determined to apply Gramsci's doctrines to destroy the values and principles of the West; taking action when they place as many professors as possible in universities around the world, especially in the United States, the world center of capitalism; endeavor in which they have been very successful, because the conservatives were more interested in economic well-being than in education and culture.

Antonio Gramsci (1891-1973), founder of the Italian Communist Party, in his famous “Jail Notebooks”, says that orthodox socialism, based on the analysis of social phenomena, giving preference to economic factors and class struggle , could not conquer the mind of the population, while they were imbued with the values and principles of Western civilization, proposing the destruction of these values and principles, replacing them with others that would eliminate the natural resistance to Marxism; and for this, it was necessary to take control of the means of education, especially the universities, the media and culture in general. It was necessary to battle in the world of ideas, considering that winning that battle was as important as controlling the means of production. Admitting that it is a slow path, but essential to: teach, train or tame the people, instilling in them the idea of socialism before making the revolution, while they exist within a capitalist society, so that when the system is imposed; it be accepted in the most natural way, since possible resistance would be neutralized beforehand. Phenomena such as Antifa, Black Lives Matter, the LGBT Movement, the Woke or the Cancel Culture, are possible precisely because of the impact caused by the Marxist professors in North American universities who have been teaching their ideas for years, tending to the destruction of the principles and values of Western civilization, according to the doctrines of Gramsci, being able to enumerate a series of tendencies to achieve this end; such as: the critical theory of race, which confronts the races rejecting equality to impose equity and make exceptions benefiting minorities to the detriment of the majority; anthropogenic climate change, to impose rules of conduct on human beings through scientific information manipulated in an intimidating way; feminism, which, trying to eliminate patriarchy, devalues the figure of the father, leading to the crisis of the family, which is the fundamental basis of society; gender ideology and sexual liberation, to pervert the human being, making behaviors that go against nature to be accepted; identity politics, to classify people and be able to manipulate them according to the group they belong to; the dictatorship of what is politically correct, as a gag law to impose what can be expressed, which together with the cancel culture is a threat to the free expression of thought; to which we must add the totalitarian use of the media that impose these trends, censoring and condemning everything that is opposed to them. Particularly noteworthy is the socialist infiltration within the Democratic Party, whose spokespersons include well-known radicals such as Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; but this makes me think that there is some kind of alliance that goes from “real socialism”, passing through “21st century socialism” to reach “globalist progressivism”, because as David Horowitz says in his book The Shadow Party: “ Soros owns the Democratic Party, [through] his networks and it would be really impossible for any democratic politician to run for office, even one holding office, and get elected without the support of the Soros Network.” No wonder that there is collusion between George Soros and Bernie Sanders, because after reading the article 'The secret history of the shadow campaign that saved the 2020 elections', published in Time Magazine on February 4, 2021, written by Molly Ball, it would not be unreasonable to think that there may be other plots to "save democracy", where apparently contrary forces, which control the media, manipulate society, promoting the destruction of the values and principles of Western civilization, trying not to save but to "mold" democracy to the political ideas they support. The SPF, applying tactics similar to those used by the promoters of the NOW, puts into practice the Hegelian dialectic (thesis/antithesis/synthesis), in order to refloat the political entity and position itself before the different challenges of globalization; develops alliances with the European Left; forges the Puebla Group, as its executor, trying to achieve a reconversion on the transnational corruption and criminality scandals that have contaminated the political spaces that it managed to control in Latin America; it marries the UN and its Sustainable Development Program (2030 Agenda); it approaches the Davos Economic Forum, coinciding with the capitalist project of the Great Reset, under a denominator that is common to them: the alienation of democracy and the rule of law; and converges for the future in the Progressive International, born in 2020, in which Bernie Sanders and Yanis Varoufakis assume their global leadership, with their banners of: environmentalism, feminism, deliberative and participatory democracy, post-capitalism, pacifism, liberated identities, etc.. Following in the tactical strategy the teachings for the dismantling of western culture elaborated by the Italian Antonio Gramsci. The SPF has been an instrument similar to the bagpipe, that being the piper dead the bagpipe continues to play; and in this case, the piper was Fidel Castro, who when he was alive, served those who exercised power over the pre-existing world order, first as a “simple collaborator”, when he was recruited by the CIA for his participation in the Bogotazo; and later in 1955, fresh out of prison, on his trip to New York before climbing the Sierra Maestra, he was received at the CFR by David Rockefeller, who became his mentor and “helped him” in his revolutionary efforts, so he became a “pawn” in that game of chess; being received by the tycoon with all honors in 1959, after obtaining power in Cuba, becoming a " knight" in that game. In October 1995, with the USSR having disappeared, Castro visited New York for five days (to attend the celebration of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations), where he would again be invited to a meeting of the CFR, staying at the Rockefeller mansion in Westchester County, when he had already begun to cooperate (as always, from the shadow) to bring about the transition that the group he served wants to impose on the world; to which several countries are opposed, among which are those whose initial letter form BRICS’ group.
China suffered the imposition of Western powers in the nineteenth century, through the introduction of opium and later in part of the twentieth; manaing to emerge like the phoenix, placing itself in an advantageous position, thanks to the fact that it was used by the power group as a counterweight to the USSR fifty years ago; situation that five years later, Den Xiaoping took advantage of to introduce the changes that brought about the resurgence of the country, so the power group of the Asatic Giant fears that would lose the power it has achieved if accepts integration into the NOM. For its part, Russia, which dominated the former USSR, is now its executor, having remained a power due to its great armament; as well as for its territory, equal to that of China and the United States together; in which there are great economic resources, and is trying to recover the power it had under the Soviet empire. China and Russia, economically, in different ways, have developed "cronies' capitalism", as the economists called, to the application that the fascists and the national socialists gave to Marxism in the economic field, being the same thing that the Western group try to impose with its NOM; but they do not reach any tripartite agreement, although they interact, because all the parties intend to maintain hegemony. The truth is that the attempt to impose the NOM is an ambition of the elites, to the detriment of ordinary human beings, whom they try to manipulate by telling them something that is burlesque: “You will have nothing and will be happy”; implying this, that people will not have any property or what is the same: the power to use, enjoy and dispose of any good freely; they will have to depend on someone to make use of something, which is contrary to freedom. Perhaps the elite is considering that it can achieve automation of the production of goods and services; and not needing any manpower, they can do without the majority of human beings, who will find happiness in another life; that is, after death. “You can fool everyone some time. You can fool some all the time. But you can't fool everyone all the time." Abraham Lincoln.

The phrase "New World Order" (NWO) has been widely used in the political scene since George H. W. Bush pronounced it as president in 1990, although what that phrase implies is not something new, since it connects with the doctrine of "manifest destiny", originating in 1845; according to which, the United States of America is a nation chosen and destined to expand; and the truth is that it became a world power from 1898, reaffirming itself as such by emerging victorious from the First World War, which leads the managers of that economic power to associate, having been created for that reason in 1921 the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), a non-profit, independent and non-partisan organization, created to learn about the world order, made up of "experts", whose purpose is to influence politics by making recommendations to the presidential administration, testifying before Congress, interacting with the media and publishing those matters that are of interest to them. In May 1954 the Council extended its functions to Europe; and under the patronage of the Rockefeller family and the Dutch royal family, what is known as the Bilderberg Club was created. On November 9, 1989, peacefully, bloodlessly and without the use of weapons, the German population brought down the Berlin Wall. This event is a milestone that indicated a change in the established world order; and at that time, the possible disappearance of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was already in sight, which finally took place on December 25, 1991. Fidel Castro, making good his frequent preaching of "turning defeat into victory", worried about the fall of the Wall and alerted about the imminence of the disappearance of the USSR, understanding that such events constituted a threat to the survival of the Cuban regime, as well as for the leftist movements in Latin America, takes the initiative to reorganize the Marxist forces in the region; and for this, he uses the help of the Brazilian trade unionist, Lula da Silva. The Cuban Communist Party (CCP) and the Brazilian Workers Party called all their Latin American allies to a meeting on July 3 and 4, 1990 in the city of São Paulo, which was attended by 68 political forces belonging to 22 Latin American countries, including the Broad Front of Uruguay, the Socialist Party of Chile, the Movement for Socialism of Bolivia, the Sandinista Front of Nicaragua, and the Farabundo Martí Front of El Salvador, among others. The Colombian guerrilla groups, FARC and ELN, were also present at the meeting. The Marxist proposals were totally discredited, and the main topic of the meeting was how to continue to function without the support of Moscow. So, following Castro's guidelines, those summoned to São Paulo decided to change the Marxist approach to the class struggle that had lost traction and instead promote tendencies that were more effective; thus they determined to disguise themselves with the discourses of indigenism, racism, environmentalism, liberation theology and others, implementing the doctrines of Antonio Gramsci, to manipulate society through the control of culture and the media, in order to become to power by more persuasive methods. Although Cuba fell into a serious economic crisis with the disappearance of the USSR, which became known as the "special period", for which the Cuban people suffered all kinds of hardships; from Havana, it was continued to finance "the battle of ideas" promoted by Castro throughout the region.
This is how the São Paulo Forum (SPF) emerged, which became the spearhead of international communism, covering the void left by the USSR; and to begin a history of little more than thirty years, we can point out that at the time of its foundation the only organization that governed a country was the CCP, having had the forum its expansion when Hugo Chávez comes to power in Venezuela, for which he received help from Castro, in form of: advice, propaganda, financing and access to the media, which the Venezuelan gorilla promised to repay when he came to power. With the entry, through electoral means, of the former Lieutenant Colonel and coup leader (so a gorilla, as the left refers to the military coup leaders) in Miraflores in 1999, billions of petrodollars began to flow to the Cuban regime, which served to finance electoral campaigns throughout Latin America. The funds were delivered through subsidies, contracts with the Venezuelan oil company, service agreements that were often non-existent, or briefcases full of bills. Under the Chávez government, Venezuela became a satellite of Cuba. An oil power submitted to the mafia boss of a small impoverished country, but with deep knowledge of how to exercise social control of the population; precisely what the Venezuelan gorilla needed to take root in the government of his country. The Latin American map gradually reddened from the year 2002, when the Brazilian Lula da Silva became President, Néstor Kirchner from Argentina in 2003, as well as Tabaré Vásquez from Uruguay and the Dominican Leonel Fernández in the following year. In December 2004, at the initiative of Cuba, ALBA (Bolivarian Alternative for Latin America and the Caribbean) was born, through the signing in Havana of a Joint Declaration and the Agreement for its Application, by Hugo Chávez and Fidel Castro, as a proposal for sub-continental integration, whose principles are aimed at the socioeconomic reaffirmation of this region, in clear contradiction with the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), promoted by the United States. In 2005 Evo Morales obtained the power in Bolivia; and in that year, the Venezuelan gorilla, following the guidelines set by the Cuban capo, raised the flag of "Socialism of the 21st century" formulated in 1996 by the German sociologist Heinz Dieterich Steffan, which emerged as a product of reflection on Soviet socialism of the 20th century, pretending to succeed where Gorvachev failed, who to give it a human face, subjected Socialism to cosmetic surgery, applying glasnost and perestroika; but the failure was resounding and the patient became even uglier, producing the disappearance of the USSR. In 2006, Bolivia joined ALBA and the Latin American map turned redder, when another five Marxists came to power: Chilean Michelle Bachelet, Alan García from Peru, Rafael Correa from Ecuador, René Preval from Haiti and Nicaraguan Daniel Ortega; the latter, the following year, integrated his country into ALBA. In 2008, Fernando Lugo was elected in Paraguay, while Mauricio Funes reached the Presidency of El Salvador in the following year; in which Ecuador is integrated into ALBA. The year 2009 marked the political apogee of the SPF, fifteen Marxists were presidents and governed simultaneously in the region, including, of course, Fidel Castro and Hugo Chávez. Having managed to have as participants in ALBA the Caribbean islands: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Antigua and Barbuda, Saint Lucia and Dominica, that benefited from the acquisition of cheap Venezuelan oil. The growth of the Forum was not limited to Latin America, intending to extend to Europe, for which it used Spain as a gateway; thus, since 2003, Chávez had contracted the CEPS Foundation (embryo of the Spanish PODEMOS party) with the aim of obtaining advice on propaganda, but also to promote political changes in Spain. In this way, Pablo Iglesias, Juan Carlos Monedero and Íñigo Errejón, experts in the culture war designed by Antonio Gramsci, (who also obtained extraordinary undercover financing for their political activities), together with the electronic voting company Smartmatic (which counted the votes ), played a fundamental role in cementing Chávez firmly in power. Marxist-style governments usually end in failure, and after their heyday, the comrades of the Forum began to lose elections throughout the region, with the exception of Mexico, where Manuel López Obrador seized power in 2018, falling back from fifteen presidents they had, to only four at the end of 2019: Cuba, Nicaragua, Mexico and Venezuela; although they later regained power in Argentina and Bolivia. Understanding that the electoral options were being closed to them, the members of the SPF activated other mechanisms to gain power, basically through destabilization and violence, financed by drug trafficking, which came to replace oil when this industry came down in Venezuela due to mismanagement. In July 2019, the XXV Meeting of the SPF was held in Caracas. There, Nicolás Maduro and Diosdado Cabello did not hide that they would promote vandalism protests in other nations. In October of that year, almost simultaneously, violent disturbances broke out in Ecuador, Chile and Colombia. Maduro acknowledged that everything was going according to plan at the last meeting of the Forum; but the riots would not only be in the south of the continent, they would arrive months later in the United States, where in May 2020, after the death of the African-American George Floyd, simultaneous protests took place in numerous cities, many of them violent. The modus operandi of the protesters and the coordination suggests that there was a central command structure, with extensive funding. The similarity between the 2020 riots in the United States and the 2019 vandalism protests in Ecuador, Chile and Colombia is not accidental. In 2022, the former guerrilla Gustavo Petro obtains power in Colombia through the electoral route and through the same route other Marxists achieve it: Pedro Carrillo in Peru and Gabriel Boric in Chile. We have previously exposed how the communists in the SPF determined to apply Gramsci's doctrines to destroy the values and principles of the West; taking action when they place as many professors as possible in universities around the world, especially in the United States, the world center of capitalism; endeavor in which they have been very successful, because the conservatives were more interested in economic well-being than in education and culture.

What I see on those maps seems contradictory to me. It is not possible that in the months of January and February in Canada there is no snow or ice on the polar cap.

I remember the moment when ozone became popular, when the propaganda said that a hole had been created in the layer of this gas, which protects the planet from ultraviolet rays. At that time they conveniently placed that hole over Antarctica and did not dare to enlarge it. This matter is no longer discussed, since ozone in the atmosphere has very little representation among the trace gases.
Now the popularity is of Carbon Dioxide and it is not because it is lacking, but because it is too much; and blaming the human being for emitting it, money is obtained for its emission, relating that emission to the fossil fuels that supply the energy necessary for all human activities. Energy is power and controlling energy controls power.

By saying that global warming has died of natural causes and that it has become the ghost that now scares us, which is called climate change, I am not denying that the climate changes. That has always been so and will continue to be. The sun's activity on the planet is cyclical.
What I am saying is that they had to change the propaganda, because many scientists do not agree with the lies that serve as food for our minds; and it has been shown that in previous periods there have been warming and cooling of the planet without the human being having been able to influence it in any way.

Gatsby, Osca Louks, Manning5, Doctor Dave, Currahe506, Bevvy.
Your comments are very appropriate. It would have been interesting to receive the comments of those who support the whole story of climate change created by human beings, to impose the Green New Deal on us, but they seem to have no arguments.
The data used was taken from Wikipedia, which defends the entire story of CO2 as being responsible for global warming and, like Winston Smith in Orwell's novel "1984", works for the Ministry of Truth adapting reality to the convenience of Big Brother.
Among some real data extracted from NASA reports, Wikipedia places a totally false one, saying that the global average concentration of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere is currently approximately 0.04%, which in the example would be equivalent to 400 parts of the total atmosphere, when it is known that CO2 can fluctuate between 3 and 4% OF THE TOTAL QUANTITY OF TRACE GASES, which in the example can be seen amounts to 360 parts; and even if CO2 were taken to 10%, which would mean an increase of more than double, it would only reach 36 parts in a million, never 400 parts.

“Global warming” died of natural causes becoming a ghost with the name of “climate change” and the intimidation we are subjected with the appearance of this “ghost” can be considered as a form of “ecoterrorism” to intimidate or to coerce governments or civilians.
The orchestrated campaign on climate change follows the Rules for Radicals contained in the book with the same name written by Saul Alinsky (a self-professed radical, and a man of the left; mentor of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama), as follows: 1) Seeks ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty; 2) The threats tend to be more terrifying than the real consequences; 3) The main premise is the development of operations to maintain constant pressure on people; 4) The manipulation of individuals does more profound damage than that of institutions.
“Fear is the main psychological weapon behind acts of terrorism” said Daniel Antonius, director of forensic psychiatry at the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences in Buffalo, NY.
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) insists on creating insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty, maintaining constant pressure on the minds of people, using Alinky’s rules, besides she adheres to Marxism-Leninism as a good Bernie Sanders’ disciple, ideology that is based on deception by all means to achieve its purposes. Lenin said: "A repeated lie often becomes true," which was later used by another Marxist: the National Socialist Joshep Goebbels.
This congresswoman speaking about climate change stated the following: "What is not realistic is not responding to the crisis, not responding with a solution on the scale of the crisis," she said. "Because what's not realistic is Miami not existing in a few years. That's not realistic. So, we need to be realistic about the problem" (Here she adheres to Al Gore's lie that Miami would be gone in 7 years. More than twice that time has passed and such a catastrophe has not taken place).
It is true that it is not realistic that Miami and much of Florida will not exist in a few years. This is pure sensationalism tending to intimidate with a catastrophe the residents of that city urging them to support her ideas; but it seems that she does not consider that in that city are living a large number of Cubans, who had to flee from Socialism, who still have relatives in Cuba and know the scourge that is the "dictatorship of the proletariat", which she desires to implant here in the US. Miami's Cubans know that she is imbued with the ideas of her guru Bernie Sanders, who initiated her into the dogmas of Marxism-Leninism, ideology which they now intend to sell under the label of “democratic socialism”.
AOC is creating psychic problems to the children of Miami, who can say that their childhood is being stolen by sowing fear in their minds; and so, they would be saying the same thing as Greta Thunberg at the UN. In this case, with real reason not as something rehearsed as in Greta’s case, because these children are being terrorized psychologically with the menace of a false catastrophe in the city in which they live.
The best example of the outcome of this bullying campaign has taken place at a meeting of AOC with his followers. The congresswoman listened to a woman who had taken the floor, surprising the audience with the following words: "We have to start eating babies!”. It was not a joke. Her speech, which lasted more than a minute, was not wasted: "We will not be here much longer, we only have a few months left. I love that you support the Green New Deal, but if you do not get rid of fossil fuels, it's not going to solve the problem fast enough". Some of those present thought that it was a woman who sought to boycott the meeting, but it seems that it was a woman suffering from mental problems.
AOC tries to take distance from the responsibility she has on her statements; but it is indisputable that these statements can inoculate the poison of fear in some weak minds and can drive someone mad. She resolved the incident caused by that poor woman with the following email: “Hey everyone! We had a fabulous town hall tonight and I’ll be highlighting some moments from it. At one point I was concerned there was a woman in crisis and want to ensure we treat the situation compassionately. Let’s not mock or make a spectacle. And let’s work on Medicare for All!”.
None should make fun of the poor woman who said these atrocities; I think she is a victim of psychological terrorism. It has to be asked: Is she mentally obsessed by the propaganda of catastrophe that is made about global warming? Have she known about the possibility of abortions of babies when the fetus is in an advanced state of development and about the sale of parts of these babies? Would she be influenced by neo-Malthusian theories that claim that the planet is overpopulated and that the number of inhabitants must be reduced?
Of course, the useful fools (whom I qualify so, to give them the benefit of the doubt), strongly support far-fetched measures (to combat climate change), proposed by Congresswoman AOC in her Green New Deal. They do not admit that all this orchestration is a trap to implement “Democratic Socialism” and seem unaware that behind all this is Mr. George Soros, who woks in the darkness; but in plain sight is Mr. Bernie Sanders, a supporter of the former USSR, that intended the destruction of the United States. This man, undoubtedly, was in favor of the implementation of the Soviet socialism (totalitarian Marxism-Leninism) in the United States during the Cold War. Now, he is speaking about “democratic socialism” (the same dog with different collar) and some persons say that what is proposed by this Marxist-Leninist politician is correct, that he is in favor of progressive taxes and a solid labor sector where workers are respected and treated fairly and enjoy the fruits of collective bargaining, old-age and universal health pensions. Those persons forget that Bernie Sanders was in bed with the Soviets, enemies of the USA who sought the destruction of this country; and that in the USSR, there was no "paradise" but "hell" for workers. It can be added that this politician also has supported and still supports totalitarian systems such as Castro's in Cuba.
Following the guidelines of the Green New Deal, Mr. Biden signed a series of executive orders that prioritize climate change, reducing US oil production, a measure that has brought the country to the brink of recession; that if it occurs, favors the pretentions of the UN 2030 Agenda, which tend to reduce the power of the US in the world, in order to promote the New World Order and the implementation of Socialism.
In 2006, David Horowitz, wrote the book "The Shadow Party" where he states that Soros is the owner of the Democratic Party and that it would be impossible for any democratic congressman to run for office (even one who is occupying the position), and be elected without the support of the Soros Network.
It is noteworthy that AOC eliminated in the party primaries of 2018 the congressman who was occupying the position for that district, who had been elected by the Democratic Party in several occasions and seemed to have a future within the party; and how this woman, that was a bartender (an unknown person, without any political background), has been turned into a celebrity overnight with the backing of the media, which have lend themselves to propagate the fanciful ideas she proposes (as a puppet of those who are handling her), contained in the Green New Deal, practicing psychological terrorism on the people to advance this ideas.
Horowitz also says in his book: "I am a former radical, so I know how sinister, evil and malevolent is the left" and adds elsewhere: "The true motivation of Soros and the Shadow Party is to make the United States a unique party state ..."
This would be a great achievement for the implementation of the “New World Order”, a totalitarian system inheritor of the “Proletarian Internationalism” promoted by the communists.

The continuing propaganda of the media about the so-called “global warming” attributed to the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere, as a product of human actions, is of concern and it is intimidating for those people who lack the most elementary knowledge of science. It is said that thousands of scientists ensure it is real; but it is not said that another equal or greater number of scientists say it is a hoax.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a very important molecule for life on the planet itself. If CO2 is so bad, why many farmers who have greenhouses buy CO2 generators and thereby double the growth of plants. Even in aquariums they use these generators so that the marine flora grows correctly. There cannot be a world in which CO2 is eliminated because there would be no life, the vegetable kingdom would die without this molecule. Scientists who claim that the "climate change" attributed to CO2 is a hoax, say that a considerable reduction of that molecule can generate major problems for the planet and for the climate, which dissipates the idea that warming by CO2 is harmful to the atmosphere; and it can be said that the catastrophism that is imputed to this molecule, serves the organisms that live from the chimera of global warming, by means of subsidies and fines that are imposed on those who break the regulations.
Taking Spain as an example, for having signed the Kyoto treaty it had to pay between 2008 and 2012 more than 800 million euros to the various agencies, for having breached the aforementioned treaty. Car companies and airlines that fail to comply with CO2 emission regulations must pay millionaire fines. Here it is clear that everything comes down to raising money and that the objective is economic. There is a relationship of more than 30,000 scientists who oppose what Al Gore says, that politician and show man, who was the one who spread the idea of “global warming”, and was given a Nobel Peace Prize (as well as the that given to Obama, without any merit, just because of the color of his skin), having known later that much of what is stated in his documentary is not true, since the figures and data were falsified to give credibility to the forgery assembled (equal to Obama’s case and the war in Libya and the Middle East).
Antarctica does not melt, NASA says the opposite; and the number of polar bears has not decreased, as specialists and biologists in Canada have detected an increase in these bears. Al Gore is a faker, who presents himself as a champion of nature, a savior of the planet, when this millionaire contaminates it greatly, with the zinc companies he owns. He proposes that the rest of humanity do the opposite of what he does.
Now, "environmental pollution" is something different: and this is what must be fought. Fukushima radiation is worrisome, because it continues to pollute the environment and they don't know how to stop it. This nuclear plant continues to pour 300 tons of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean every day, having totally contaminated this ocean and will continue to do so indefinitely since the source of the leak cannot be sealed, because it is inaccessible to both humans and robots, due to extremely high temperatures. This could be the worst environmental disaster in the history of mankind and is hardly mentioned by politicians, conventional scientists, or the news.
There is the authentic "environmental pollution" in China, which is the first producer of items in the world (considering that almost everything that is acquired in the West comes from that country) not in Europe or in the USA, where that pollution is a thing of the past.
"Environmental pollution" is what must be fought and not the CO2 that is the basis of our biology; of course, this is not considered in the Kyoto treaty, which responds to a mafia that seeks economic performance by skillfully taking advantage of directing social claims for camouflaged lobbies as an NGO so that they can openly justify these enormous economic sanctions. Here it has to be kept track of money and see who are the ones who get the most benefit from all this deception.
As we have already said, CO2 is fundamental for life, in times like the Jurassic era the planet was a vergel of life and the carbon dioxide rates were immense, much larger than the current ones and nature was constantly growing.
In order to explain better what CO2 represents in the atmosphere, it is necessary to analyze its composition considering 100% of the atmosphere as 1,000,000 parts. With this method, Wikipedia using NASA data says that: 780,840 perts would be Nitrogen, 209,460 Oxygen, 9,340 Argon, which added would give us 999,640 (99.964%), leaving 360 parts (0.036%) that are Trace of Gases, where CO2 is a part with other gases.
Of the 360 parts corresponding to trace gases: 95% (342 parts) are Water Vapor, 3% (11 parts) are CO2, 1% (4 parts) are Neon and 1% (3 parts) are other gases (Helium, Methane, Krypton, Hydrogen, Nitrous Oxide, Zenon, Carbon Monoxide, Ammonia and Ozone) that are practically negligible.
However, Wikipedia, that publishes what suits the Ministry of Truth, says that the global average concentration of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere is currently approximately 0.04% and if this % were of what the Trace of Gases represent, it would be acceptable, since it would be between 14 or 15 parts in one million; but Wikipedia says that would be equivalent to 400 parts instead of 11, what seems to be a way to inflate the CO2 problem and because of that, it has to be given credit to the argument of skeptical scientists who says as follow: “The oceans contain 37.4 billion tons (37,400 GT) of carbon in suspension, the terrestrial biomass has 2,000-3,000 GT. The atmosphere contains 720,000 million tons of CO2 and the human being contributes only 6 GT. The oceans, land, and atmosphere continually exchange CO2, so the additional burden on humans is incredibly small. A small change in the balance between oceans and air would cause an increase much stronger than anything we could produce."
Thus, it will be possible to calculate how much CO2 is falsely attributed to human activity in the composition of the atmosphere and how many billions of dollars are collected through this deception.
After explaining all of the above, it is necessary to analyze the intimidation that we are being subjected daily through the media and how this intimidation is used to advance certain political ideas such as the New Green Deal, which will create a disastrous situation, tending to force the implementation of Socialism.
It can be said, that the story of the possible end of the world (that has been used so many times to intimidate humanity) is being told now by the leftists in a new way, using a new deception, speaking about “climate change”, because “global warming” has been discredited
It is to be thought that behind this farce of “climate change” that was originated by the communist as “global warming”, popularized by Al Gore, is Mr. Soros; and that it is very possible that the NGOs he promote, benefit in some way from the proceeds of fines for violations of the Kyoto treaty, that amount to billions.