One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Home | Political Digest | Active Topics | Newest Pictures | Search | Login | Register | Help
Posts for: Larry the Legend
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 249 next>>
Nov 23, 2017 20:42:49   #
lindajoy wrote:
Coincidental it is not..

Linda, have you been hanging out with Yoda again? You know how he rubs off on you...

lindajoy wrote:
They can’t beat their opponent so they revert to smear tactics.. Speaks volumes.....

Smear tactics is all they have. Sadly, in many instances, it's all they need. Looks like it might not work this time...

lindajoy wrote:
They must be pretty scared or they haven’t learned a thing in the hillary debacle

Or both. I'm betting on both. They're not smart enough to look at what Hillary did and learn from it. After all, everyone knows the Russians did it... Right? As for being scared, their guy was getting hammered in the polls, they had to do something to keep the ball rolling.
 
Nov 23, 2017 10:28:45   #
Singularity wrote:
Immiscible.


Don't mix well, eh? Oh well, we'll think of something to do with that huge bag of pot on the kitchen counter....
Nov 23, 2017 10:21:55   #
buffalo wrote:
So, you believe there was no kickbacks, bribery and other criminal involvement in the Uranium One deal even though Campbell exposed such? You believe that bitch clinton, as SoS and obammy had NO influence in the sale being approved? Hmmm...

Do you also not think that the $500,000 slick willie was paid to give a "speech" to the Russian bank that was pushing the deal or that the $145 MILLION donated to the clinton criminal slush fund had any connection to the deal? How utterly naive of you and indicative of the public attitude that allows these criminal politicians to get away with what they do. Hmmm...
So, you believe there was no kickbacks, bribery an... (show quote)


And that's why I swore I wouldn't get into this. There is a procedure that was followed and it involves a lot more than Hillary Clinton 'rubber stamping' some shady uranium deal. That's the whole story. You can point to millions of dollars, you can expose as much as you want, the truth is that Clinton never had a hand in the approvals of this deal. Now that's an indisputable fact. So by all means, rail at me, rail at what- or whoever you want. Facts are facts.
Nov 23, 2017 09:48:08   #
buffalo wrote:
Americans continuing to vote only for either the left or right arm of the corporate party is the definition of insanity.


The first step in curing insanity is for the subject to see that he is insane, only then can the healing begin. Just like the psychologist changing the light bulb, where first that light bulb must want to change. In wish you luck in convincing millions of people that they all suffer the same mental deficiency, because they all act in support of each other. They do not want to change.
Nov 23, 2017 09:28:10   #
OldGlory1951 wrote:
Left-wingers DEMAND ‘change the racist National Anthem!’

November 22, 2017


“On the Holmes Front, with Frank Holmes”

The California chapter of the NAACP has demanded that the National Anthem be replaced, because it’s racist – and they want an entire U.S. state to pass a law condemning it.

California NAACP President Alice Huffman said the Star Spangled Banner is “one of the most racist, pro-slavery, anti-black songs in the American lexicon.”

“It’s racist!” she told local KOVR-TV. “It’s anti-black people!”

Blood pressure breakthrough: why chicken salad may be the secret to healthier numbers [Sponsored]

The NAACP chapter will try to get California legislators to pass a law saying the National Anthem is filthy, racist hate speech when the legislature is back in session next January.

“The song is wrong!” Huffman said in Jesse Jackson-style rhyme.

They want politicians to pass another law honoring former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick for starting the “take a knee” trend. GQ Magazine named him “Citizen of the Year” for starting the “take a knee” trend that sank the NFL’s ratings.

He might as well get awards from fashion magazines. He’s not getting any awards on the field.

The NAACP also wants California to reprimand Donald Trump for saying he’d like to see the NFL fire any “son of a b*tch” who doesn’t stand for the flag and the anthem.

The worst thing isn’t the NAACP’s display of pure hatred for their own country. It’s that people are already being fired for defending the U.S.A.

Sponsored: Two drops. 45 seconds. Zero pain.

The Left has ramped up its assault on every patriotic symbol in America, like –

The Pledge of Allegiance.

In March, a public school district fired a teacher for telling one of his students to stand up for the pledge to the flag.

Vince Ziebarth, a driver’s ed teacher at Eisenhower High School in a suburb on the south-side of Chicago, saw one of his students sitting through the Pledge. He told the student, Shemar Cooper, he should stand – or not ride in his car for driver’s ed.

Kids at the high school get to choose which of the 8 driver’s ed cars they want to ride in. So, if Shemar wanted to disrespect the Pledge, he could have chosen any of the other 7 cars.

Instead, Shemar went home and told his mommy. “That’s bullying!” said his mad mother, Kelley Porter Turner. “He violated my son’s First Amendment rights.”

….Which exist because of the men who died for the flag.

BREAKING: Cancer’s “Kill Switch” Discovered [Sponsored]

The school fired the patriot teacher on the spot.

It turns out they suspended another teacher for telling Shemar to stand for the Pledge earlier in the school year.

That’s pretty ironic for a school that’s named for the president who added the words “under God” to the Pledge of Allegiance.

But the fake news media is constantly ginning up fake history to make people hate America.

The Washington Post recently ran an article saying the Pledge of Allegiance is racist – because its author wanted immigrants to love America!

Francis “Bellamy’s pledge advanced the goal of assimilation,” the Post complained in an article on “The Ugly History of the Pledge of Allegiance.”

Sponsored: Big Tobacco Pays National Retribution

Bellamy said he wrote the Pledge to “mobilize the masses to support primary American doctrines” and “true Americanism.”

How deplorable!

“Bellamy’s Pledge of Allegiance was, at its core, designed as an instrument of white nationalism,” the Post said.

Really? White nationalism against white immigrants from Italy, Greece, and Poland? (Are there any paler people than the Polish??)

But when the George Soros-funded haters aren’t hating the Pledge, they’re hating –

The American Flag.

Since the 2016 election:

Hampshire College in Massachusetts removed the American flag from campus after the election of Donald Trump.
Students agitated the University of California, Irvine to ban the U.S. flag from a campus office. A letter supporting them has almost 2,000 signatures, including dozens of professors.
Students at American University burned American flags while chanting “F— white America!” the day after the election.
Last Veteran’s Day, students at Brown University grabbed flags flying to honor vets and tore them, ripped them in half, or threw them in the trash.
Students at St. Mary’s College of Maryland shredded an American flag two days after the election.

As President Trump might say, this is “sad.” But these people don’t just hate our patriotic symbols – they hate

America itself.

Sponsored: An American Prophecy the mainstream media is not reporting on

Kanye West said last November, “We live in a racist country – that is a fact.” That’s exactly how a lot of Americans see this country – racist, sexist, evil, not worth defending.

This is just plain wrong, and every patriotic American had better stand up against it, no matter how corny it looks to some people.

Rise for the anthem and the pledge. Salute when you see the flag.

Teach your kids, and grandkids, the true history of America, the land of liberty.

Tell them about how patriots created the finest, freest country in the world.

Tell them how we fought with ourselves to free the slaves and to give that freedom to more and more people through our history.
http://www.thehornnews.com
These Left-wingers are out of their minds!!!!TOTALLY!!!! What drugs are they on?The National Anthem will live forever and ever.This is an American Vet speaking up for our Country and it's National Anthem. What do y'all think of this insane Leftist remark?
Left-wingers DEMAND ‘change the racist National An... (show quote)


That explains why all those black NFL players kneel when it's played. Guess they know their place after all!
Nov 23, 2017 09:23:51   #
son of witless wrote:
More Polar Bears than normal in an area because of a dead whale and this is evidence of Global Freaking Warming. The propaganda never ever stops.

http://www.yahoo.com/news/polar-bears-crowd-russian-island-sign-arctic-change-032053451.html


"This autumn, the number of bears observed was 589, far exceeding previous estimates of 200-300, he said, calling it "anomalously high"."

Just like the idea that it's getting colder, therefore it's getting warmer; there's more bears, therefore the population is being decimated. Don't pay any attention to the facts, just listen to what we say. Hogwash.
 
Nov 23, 2017 09:18:33   #
Singularity wrote:
If you forgot to get those fancy black peppercorns to put into your stuffing recipe this year, it is now considered totally acceptable to substitute Xanax for them.

May be apportioned liberally or conservatively!


And I suppose it would be acceptable to substitute pot for sage? Hmm. I wonder what happens if you mix Xanax and pot...
Nov 23, 2017 09:14:35   #
According to estimates by the National Turkey Foundation, 46 million turkeys are consumed on Thanksgiving. In a country of 326 million Americans, that figure comes out to one turkey for roughly every group of seven. Nearly 88 percent of Americans surveyed by the National Turkey Federation eat turkey at Thanksgiving. The average weight of turkeys purchased for Thanksgiving is 16 pounds, meaning that approximately 736 million pounds of turkey were consumed in the United States during Thanksgiving last year. That's a lot of turkey!

So now you know.

HAPPY THANKSGIVING!

Now go eat some turkey...
Nov 23, 2017 09:10:56   #
Dummy Boy wrote:
Why don't you explain it, you wrote it. Praise G*d!


Why are you censoring the name 'God'? Are you 'afraid' someone might get offended by your simple invocation of the name 'God'? Does it bother you that God is in every nook and cranny of your life and you can't shut Him out? That God is omniscient and you cannot hide from Him? That He can read your mind? That God is all-powerful and could turn you to dust with a simple thought? Or roast you like a chicken for eternity? Better be nice to God, He created you with a wave of His hand and he can destroy you just as easily. He is the eye in the sky, and He is looking directly at... you!
Nov 23, 2017 09:02:52   #
2wheeljunkie wrote:
You mean like montana? Where the men are men and the sheep are scared?


Well, maybe a little 'nervous'...
Nov 23, 2017 08:58:53   #
buffalo wrote:
Corruption: Shortly after the Uranium One story broke, various news reports claimed that it was much ado about nothing. But a review of a huge cache of newly available documents shows that, if anything, it was worse than previously thought.

The Hill broke the bombshell story last month, which summed up goes like this: While the Obama administration was approving the controversial 2010 sale of Uranium One to a state-owned Russian energy giant — which gave it control of one-fifth of U.S. uranium supplies — the FBI was actively investigating that company for extensive criminal activity designed to expand Russia's footprint in the U.S. uranium business.

This raised questions about who in the Obama administration was aware of the FBI's evidence — which included bribery, extortion and racketeering — before greenlighting the sale. Officials involved denied knowing anything about the investigation at the time.

Now a cache of documents 5,000 pages long, which were reviewed by The Hill, sheds new and more troubling light on this story.

The documents detail work done by undercover informant Douglas Campbell, who was paid nearly $200,000 for his cooperation with the FBI while he was working as a lobbyist on behalf of a Russian company. The Justice Department had previously barred Campbell from telling anyone about his work, a gag order it lifted only after the initial Hill story ran.

Among the revelations contained in these documents:

Campbell had documented a bribery/kickback scheme by Russian officials in the U.S. more than a year before Obama approved the Uranium One sale.

He also "relayed detailed information about criminal conduct throughout 2010."

Campbell was directly solicited by Russian officials to help overcome political opposition from Republicans to the Uranium One sale.

He regularly told his FBI handlers about what The Hill describes only as a "Washington entity with close ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton," which was paid millions to help expand Russia's U.S. uranium business and "began increasing its financial support" to the Clinton Foundation.

Russia saw the Uranium One purchase as part of a long-term strategy to dominate energy markets and make the U.S. more dependent on Russia's nuclear fuel.

Russians used "racially tinged insults to boast about how easy they found it to win uranium business under Obama."

It's important to note that all this transpired while Obama was embarking on his ill-fated Russian "reset" — in which he tried to make nice with Russia, and during which his administration not only approved the Uranium One sale but made other rulings favorable to Russian energy interests.

Adding further intrigue to the story is the fact that not only did the FBI keep a lid on its investigation for years, officials at Justice tried to downplay Campbell's significance as an informant and dispute that he had any information about the Uranium One deal after the initial story broke last month. As The Hill notes, the documents it reviewed directly contradict those claims.

One can only speculate why Justice officials would be doing this now.

Despite its potentially far-reaching ramifications, the Uranium One story has so far barely registered with the public, thanks to a near total news blackout from the mainstream press.

When the IBD/TIPP Poll asked about the Uranium One scandal in the latest monthly survey, only 48% said they had been following it closely.

But with investigations underway in the House and Senate, and with Campbell free to talk to lawmakers about what he knew, even the liberal press might not be able to ignore this story for much longer.

http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/russia-scandal-uranium-one-clinton-foundation/
Corruption: Shortly after the Uranium One story br... (show quote)


I swore I wouldn't get into this when it first became a 'thing', but here I am...

The Committee on Foreign Investments (CFIUS), a panel of nine government agencies, including the State Department, reviewed the deal. It was approved by the CFIUS and then by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Clinton was not personally involved, and the State Department has no power to approve or veto a transaction.

CIFUS is Chaired by Secretary of the Treasury.
Members are:
DOJ
Homeland Security
Commerce
Defense
State
Energy
Office of the US Trade Representative
Office of Science and Technology Policy

The sale was approved unanimously. If one member had objected, the President would have made the final decision. Once CIFUS approved, the deal was then passed to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which also approved.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved the deal on the understanding that no uranium produced would be exported. It is sold to civilian reactors in the US as fuel for the production of electricity.

The accusation is predicated on the charge that then Secretary Clinton approved the sale. She clearly did not.

The sale was evaluated by CIFUS, approved by then President Obama, permits were issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and none of the uranium mined leaves the US. Now, will someone please tell me how this could even be considered 'shady' let alone a scandal?

Be assured, I am no fan of Hillary Clinton, her husband or her 'friends', but this is a non-starter in terms of scandal. If I were Hillary Clinton, I'd be pleased that this is taking up so much attention since there are real scandals and crimes going unremarked while this is a 'thing'. Maybe that's the point? Is this another of those 'misdirections'?

Things that make you go 'hmmm'.
 
Nov 23, 2017 08:22:27   #
Kevyn wrote:
However, for Americans who view the Pequot massacre as the origin of Thanksgiving


I don't. Have a nice day.
Nov 23, 2017 08:08:59   #
S. Maturin wrote:
Just look at the 'bedfellows'!

"On July 13, 2017, Infowars.com reported that a coalition formed by George Soros, including Internet giants Google, Facebook, Amazon, as well as the salacious extreme-and-abusive-sex website PornHub, had flooded the FCC with thousands of “citizen comments,” coming from Russia, of all places, opposing the FCC’s planned repeal of the Obama-era “Net Neutrality” rules."

Obama's boot coming off the neck of your news networks and entertainment.

Since when does a government dictate what the civilians can and cannot watch!?

http://www.infowars.com/fcc-to-free-internet-from-obamas-net-neutrality-rules/
Just look at the 'bedfellows'! br br "On Jul... (show quote)


"By making the order to repeal “Net Neutrality” public in advance of the vote, Chairman Pai has instituted a new transparency initiative at the FCC that reverses the policy of the previous chairman, Obama administration FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler who typically refused to make draft orders public prior to the full FCC commission final vote." Gee. We don't have to 'pass it to see what's in it' anymore.

Who was it said he'd have 'the most transparent administration ever'? His name's on the tip of my tongue... Oh, it'll come to me... Just gimme a minute... I know it, just can't seem to... Oh, well.
Nov 23, 2017 08:02:18   #
E wrote:
I think that if you bring up Epstein, you really need to start with Bill Clinton. Just saying.


Every time I see misdirection from you, I'm going to highlight it.


Nov 23, 2017 07:53:51   #
lindajoy wrote:
Well AmericanTexan, I would appreciate your gestures and see them for exactly that so I say no sir you would not be guilty of anything other than kindness....

I understand the confusion tho.. I have seen men open a door for a women only to be told she can open it herself or make some expression on her face of contempt..etc..

I will tell you I appreciate a man opening the door for me and allowing me to enter first.. I would do and have done the same for a man just out of respect shown to he as well....I’m not offended I appreciate it and always make eye contact saying Thank You...

Men are confused because women, usually the ones lacking self esteem or self confidence find the need to be rude as a defense in challenging that man.. I personally believe some women, those as described here have pushed the limit on it too...Some things are just the man’s responsibility as some things are the women's and mutual respect is key to how we treat others..

Certain aspects of a gentlemen need not be forgone because of some woman that wants to prove herself..

I appreciate a man that pulls my chair out, allows me to enter first, or opens my car door for me etc and I ask you to remain just as you are...

Don’t walk around on egg shells because you are a man of respect and honor.. If a woman is offended by it then so be it, that’s her problem, not yours!!!!
Well AmericanTexan, I would appreciate your gestur... (show quote)


And there's the difference. You, Linda, are a lady of class. It is a pleasure for a man to hold the door for you, or give up his seat for you. Or to pay for your drink. And you accept those considerations with grace and poise. You have an understanding of the rules of etiquette.

Then there are those 'others' who I won't even mention in the same paragraph as you. Maybe we should make the psychos wear a label or a badge or something saying 'Warning, approach with caution', or 'Interact at your peril'. They irritate me with their feigned victimhood. Stupid fools did it to themselves then they want to blame those among us who still maintain at least a facade of decency.

Hold the door for a lady? You're a weakling. Buy a lady a drink? You're a sexual predator. Stand up on a crowded bus to allow a lady to sit? You're a sissy. In each of those instances, you're simply a gentleman; but what you assumed to be a lady is no 'lady'.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 249 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2016 IDF International Technologies, Inc.