Former President Donald Trump and his allies are saying that a recent court filing by Justice Department special counsel John Durham is proof that he was being spied on as a candidate in 2016 and later as president by people involved with Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
The 13-page filing lays out new evidence that Durham collected about the lengths to which Democratic partisans went to push the narrative to the FBI and the CIA that Trump was engaged in improper secret communications with the Kremlin while he was running for president.
But according to a leading cybersecurity expert, the highly technical filing — while raising some potentially troubling questions about the use of nonpublic government data for political purposes — does little to support Trump’s claim that his allegations of spying have been vindicated.
The filing was made by Durham on Friday in a case involving Michael Sussmann, a cybersecurity lawyer who has been charged with lying to the FBI by failing to disclose that he was working for Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign during a key meeting that September with a senior bureau official.
Prosecutors allege that in September 2016, Sussmann brought then-FBI general counsel James Baker since-debunked allegations about a secret communications channel between the Trump Organization and the Alfa Bank, a Russian financial institution owned by cronies of Vladimir Putin. Durham alleges that Sussmann told Baker he was not working on behalf of any client when he provided Baker with material about the supposed secret channel, when, according to the special counsel, he actually billed his work on the matter to Clinton's campaign. (Sussmann has denied the charges, and the case is scheduled to go to trial in federal court in Washington, D.C., this spring.)
The allegations about a secret channel were widely discussed in the media before the 2016 election and touted by the Clinton campaign. But the FBI and Robert Mueller's investigation later concluded that no such secret channel had existed.
In his filing, Durham said that an unnamed tech executive with government cybersecurity contracts exploited access to computer data at the Trump White House to find “derogatory information” about the president.
The tech executive — whom the New York Times identified as Rodney Joffe — used his access to domain-name system data to compile information about which computers and servers the White House servers were communicating with.
According to the filing, Joffe gave Sussmann data from computer servers at the Executive Office of the President, two Trump-owned buildings in New York and an unrelated medical firm in Michigan, and claimed the servers had connected with internet addresses “affiliated with a Russian mobile phone provider.”
Sussmann then gave the information to an unnamed federal agency — identified by the Times as the CIA — at a meeting on Feb. 9, 2017, less than a month after Trump took office. He claimed to the agency that the data “demonstrated that Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations.” But Durham said his office “has identified no support for these allegations.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/durham-special-counsel-filing-trump-spying-clinton-campaign-215335145.html