One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Home | Political Digest | Active Topics | Search | Login | Register | Help
Posts for: payne1000
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 998 next>>
Feb 26, 2017 18:09:41   #
emarine wrote:
So is that all you take away from that link putz?... you should start digging into the 680 boxes of German information captured by the ally's & start educating yourself putz... the Swiss link mostly reference's from the end of the war on to today...


I did get one other interesting fact from the article. The Swiss were similar to the U.S. in refusing to take Jewish refugees during the war. I wonder if Rabbi Stephen Wise got to them as he did FDR?
Zionist Rabbi Wise thought Jews in Europe should die rather than go anywhere other than Palestine. They probably would have gone to Palestine if Rabbi Wise had persuaded the World Jewish Congress to pay the high entry fee charged by the Brits. The Zionist plan to be awarded Palestine depended on a lot of Jews dying in Europe. Nowhere near 6 million died, but Zionists were allowed to tally up the numbers at Nuremberg.
 
Feb 26, 2017 15:58:34   #
emarine wrote:
I'm not implying...I'm stating fact putz... maybe it's time you came up to speed Adolf... you should read it so you do not remain ignorant & post stupid shit... so http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/nazis/readings/sinister.html


Your article says the Nazis didn't get to use the billions the Germans took from Jews. The Swiss did . . . and they still have a lot of it.
Feb 26, 2017 15:51:56   #
Louie27 wrote:
Hey Putz. My wife's uncle went into the German concentration camps when the Americans entered them. He saw the boxcars full of bodies and the ovens where there were just bones and fragments.


That's what your wife's uncle was told to say.
The Allies couldn't have the world know the truth . . . that they had bombed the German supply lines
to the work camps . . . that most of the prisoners starved because of Allied actions.
Feb 26, 2017 15:48:17   #
amadjuster wrote:
Larry, Will Rogers never met you.


If he had met you, his most famous quote would be proven wrong.
Feb 26, 2017 15:22:06   #
emarine wrote:
Fact is the Germans kept excellent records... in those 680 boxes of German records is a very comprehensive tally of dental gold shipped from the death camps to the Swiss ... these records prove that you & all Holocaust deniers lie... plain & simple the math provided by the Nazis ... fact is with the current price of gold the Nazis made the billons putz...


You're implying that the Swiss have held the alleged Nazi gold until the present.
Since the Nazis are all dead, who gets the alleged gold?
Were the alleged billions given to Holocaust survivors who appear to outnumber those who didn't survive.
Feb 26, 2017 14:13:45   #
emarine wrote:
If you break this all down to the lowest common denominator you would realize that massive wealth & control is not a Jewish only issue... but that's who you choose to blame... your transparency is pathetic as well as your anti Semitism... you can now post your Aloni Jewish Lady propaganda photo... proof that you research nothing... when one deflects they jump from one issue to another rather than defend the issue at hand... So you defend your conspiracy's with conspiracy's & that make you a propaganda putz...
If you break this all down to the lowest common de... (show quote)


When one deflects, they avoid answering the questions asked, as you have done.

Here's a question you totally ignored:
World Almanac statistics show the Jewish population at the end of WWII to be almost the same as before the war began.
Jews don't usually breed like rabbits. What's with that?

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=85432
 
Feb 26, 2017 12:48:30   #
emarine wrote:
So now you choose to deflect to the Bolshevik Revolution Conspiracy from the holocaust denial conspiracy ... what's next the protocols of the Elders of Zion conspiracy or the International Jewish conspiracy... Maybe you should save some time & research both sides before jumping to your usual anti Semitic conclusions...


Since I have researched everything you mention, I'm able to ask questions which you can't answer so it is you who is deflecting.
Feb 26, 2017 11:18:44   #
emarine wrote:
"He is a "doubter," not a "denier"... Interesting... so you're are saying that douche bag fits better than putz ... in reality you are both... same as the Nazis... I provided a link from Harvard law that will let you read for yourself what was in those 680 boxes of Nazi files ...I have been asked not to repeat the fucking unbelievable atrocities from fellow members who had loved ones involved... so with respect I will honor their request... but as far as you go... there is no denying or doubt that you are a Nazi douche bag ... putz ... war is one thing... but the extermination of an entire people is another... that's the whole point of ..."never forget"...
"He is a "doubter," not a "den... (show quote)


Somewhere around 6 million Ukrainians were starved in the "holodomor."
Why aren't Ukrainians demanding payment for the murder of their ancestors?
Why haven't Ukrainians turned the Holodomor into a lucrative industry?

World Almanac statistics show the Jewish population at the end of WWII to be almost the same as before the war began.
Jews don't usually breed like rabbits. What's with that?


Feb 26, 2017 08:47:27   #
emarine wrote:
More bullshit from mark Webber... The guy selling that the holocaust ever happened... the trails were a first where international law & the laws from 4 different country's were combined as well as a military court & a civil court... The Nazis broke every law on the books from everywhere never seen before ... the Russians wanted to just shoot them all and call it a day... there were lots of angry Jews there... they were the only people set up for total extinction & had tons of evidence to prove it... wouldn't you be seeking a little revenge for the murder of your family putz?
More bullshit from mark Webber... The guy selling ... (show quote)


Webber is like most who doubt the official story of the German labor camps during WWII.
He is a "doubter," not a "denier".
The name "Holocaust" refers to death by fire, so that name is used to give a false impression of what really happened.
The name "Holodomor" would be more accurate since many of the deaths in the work camps were from starvation.
The Allied Forces sought to cover up all the atrocities they committed during WWII.
Demonizing the German military is the path they chose.


Feb 26, 2017 08:27:27   #
HedgeHog wrote:
Oh. Couldn't figure that out from the context. There was no context.


Snakes aren't good at context either.
Feb 26, 2017 08:26:00   #
amadjuster wrote:
Meant example.


Snakes aren't good at assembling letters.
 
Feb 25, 2017 21:46:07   #
HedgeHog wrote:
Huh?


The snakes in amadjuster's head can't hold their booze.
Feb 25, 2017 19:24:04   #
amadjuster wrote:
You don'tave to notify anyone about Larry. He is under investigation by just about every agency there is, including the Texas Department of Pubic Safety.


.
amadjuster--aka David Parsons

Feb 25, 2017 18:16:41   #
emarine wrote:
Try this one if you're bored... 680 boxes of trial docs...http://www.fpp.co.uk/History/Nuremberg/Harvard_site170803.html


680 boxes of lies and fabrication which paid off Jews billions in reparations from European countries.
Feb 25, 2017 18:14:43   #


Better than that:

"The World Jewish Congress also played an important but less obvious role in the day to day proceedings. Above all, the powerful but secretive organization made sure that Germany's persecution of the Jews was a primary focus of the trials, and that the defendants were punished for their involvement in that process.

Two Jewish officers in the US Army -- Lieutenant Colonel Murray Bernays and Colonel David "Mickey" Marcus -- played key roles in the Nuremberg enterprise. In the words of historian Robert Conot, Bernays was "the guiding spirit leading the way to Nuremberg." Bernays, a successful New York attorney, persuaded US War Secretary Henry Stimson and others to accept the idea of putting the defeated German leaders on trial.

Marcus, a fervent Zionist, became the "number three man in making American policy" in occupied Germany. As chief of the US government's War Crimes Branch in 1946 and 1947, he selected almost all of the judges, prosecutors and lawyers for the Nuremberg NMT Trials. (He later became a commander of Zionist "Haganah" military forces in Palestine.)

Some of the Americans who participated in the Nuremberg trials became disillusioned with the entire business. One of the few to make public his feelings was Charles F. Wennerstrum, an Iowa Supreme Court justice who served as presiding judge in the Nuremberg trial of German generals. "If I had known seven months ago what I know today, I would never have come here," he declared immediately after sentences were pronounced. "The high ideals announced as the motives for creating these tribunals have not been evident," he added.

Wennerstrum cautiously referred to the extensive Jewish involvement in the Nuremberg process. "The entire atmosphere here is unwholesome ... Lawyers, clerks, interpreters and researchers were employed who became Americans only in recent years, whose backgrounds were imbedded in Europe's hatreds and prejudices." He criticized the one-sided handling of evidence. "Most of the evidence in the trials was documentary, selected from the large tonnage of captured records. The selection was made by the prosecution. The defense had access only to those documents which the prosecution considered material to the case." He concluded that "the trials were to have convinced the Germans of the guilt of their leaders. They convinced the Germans merely that their leaders lost the war to tough conquerors." Wennerstrum left Nuremberg "with a feeling that justice has been denied."

America's leading jurist was dismayed by the Nuremberg process. US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone remarked with irritation: "[Chief US prosecutor] Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg. I don't mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas." In a private letter he wrote: "... I wonder how some of those who preside at the trials would justify some of the acts of their own governments if they were placed in the status of the accused." On another occasion Stone specifically wondered "whether, under this new [Nuremberg] doctrine of international law, if we had been defeated, the victors could plausibly assert that our supplying Britain with fifty destroyers [in 1940] was an act of aggression ..."

In Congress, US Representative Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin declared: "The Nuremberg trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history ... The Nuremberg farce represents a revenge policy at its worst." /14 Another Congressman, John Rankin of Mississippi, stated: "As a representative of the American people I desire to say that what is taking place in Nuremberg, Germany, is a disgrace to the United States... A racial minority, two and a half years after the war closed, are in Nuremberg not only hanging German soldiers but trying German businessmen in the name of the United States."

Probably the most courageous condemnation was by US Senator Robert A. Taft, widely regarded as the "conscience of the Republican party." At considerable risk to his political career, he denounced the Nuremberg enterprise in an October 1946 speech. "The trial of the vanquished by the victors cannot be impartial no matter how it is hedged about with the forms of justice," he said. Taft went on:

About this whole judgment there is the spirit of vengeance, and vengeance is seldom justice. The hanging of the eleven men convicted will be a blot on the American record which we will long regret. In these trials we have accepted the Russian idea of the purpose of trials -- government policy and not justice -- with little relation to Anglo-Saxon heritage. By clothing policy in the forms of legal procedure, we many discredit the whole idea of justice in Europe for years to come.

Milton R. Konvitz, a Jewish specialist of law and public administration who taught at New York University, warned at the time that the Nuremberg Tribunal "defies many of the most basic assumptions of the judicial process." He went on: "Our policy with respect to the Nazis is consistent with neither international law nor our own State Department's policy... The Nuremberg trial constitutes a real threat to the basic conceptions of justice which it has taken mankind thousands of years to establish."

In the years since, distinguished figures in both the United States and other countries have expressed similar views. US Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas wrote: "I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled. Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time."

US Rear Admiral H. Lamont Pugh, former Navy Surgeon General and Commanding Officer of the National Naval Medical Center, wrote: "I thought the trials in general bordered upon international lunacy. I thought it particularly unfortunate, inappropriate, ill-conceived and dupably injudicious that the United States should have been cast in the leading role as prosecutors and implementators of the trials of German participants or principals."

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_Webera.html
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 998 next>>
          
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2016 IDF International Technologies, Inc.