One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Home | Political Digest | Active Topics | Search | Login | Register | Help
Posts for: payne1000
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 939 next>>
Jan 18, 2017 18:58:23   #
emarine wrote:
How ignorant can you still be at this point...The NIST only studied the initial failure not the collapse... the initial failure was from plane impact damage & heat... the main collapse of the majority of the structure came from the overload of truss connections ... You want technical putz... the truss support plates failed In the HAZ area on over 90% of the structure below the plane impact zone from shear overload... case closed... no truss supports in a tube in tube structure = no structure
How ignorant can you still be at this point...The ... (show quote)


NIST stopped their analysis at the initiation of collapse because to go any further, they would have to admit that explosives were involved.
You've failed to give your resume so your credibility can be validated.
Maybe you should study up on the subject some more.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnnjIzamnJo
 
Jan 18, 2017 17:43:00   #
emarine wrote:
The 20 floors fell straight down peeling the lower floors outward as seen In your photo... the top floors weighed over 1300 tons and the force of gravity pulls straight down... the top floors fell inside the bottom floors shearing the outer floor connections allowing the outer floors to "peel" outward... you cant fit two pounds of shit in a one pound baggie but I'm sure you will still try...putz


NIST says the truss connections did not fail and the floors did not pancake.
Show readers your resume which gives you more credibility than NIST.
Show us your resume which gives you more credibility than this Aeronautical engineer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_4X8OVL5vo
Jan 18, 2017 17:34:41   #
amadjuster wrote:
If I am such a small person, why not ignore me? Or are you just unable to respond in script? Living in your head is really getting to you, isn't it?


You really are obsessed with me aren't you? So much so that you have used my photo for your avatar.
You are even more twisted than I thought. I just put you on my ignore list.
Jan 18, 2017 17:21:16   #
emarine wrote:
I make his a bit easier for you... the top floors that you Photo shopped in the left photo weigh more than 1300 tons...the overload capacity of the next floor below it... the operative word here putz is ""overload" from the welding report... Summary
Analysis of the connections supporting the composite floor system of the WTC towers showed that at and below the impact floors, the greater majority (above 90%) of the floor truss connections were either bent downward or completely removed from the exterior column. This was probably related to the overloading of the floors below the impact region after collapse initiation. Depending upon weld joint geometry, detachment of the main load-bearing seats was a result of either fracture in the heat affected zone of the base material (standoff plate detached from spandrel) or through the weld metal (seat angle detached from standoff plate). Failure in both cases was assumed to be a result of a shear mechanism as a result of overloading from floors above impacting those below. There did not appear to be a significant change in distribution of failure modes of the floor truss connections when comparing those connections inside vs. outside of the impact region or those exposed to pre-collapse fires and those that were not... this is very straight forward ... unlike your argument on how to fit two pounds of shit In a one pound baggie... it just doesn't work...
I make his a bit easier for you... the top floors ... (show quote)


You fail to explain what happened to the 20 floors which you claim caused "overload." They certainly disappeared in a matter of seconds. The photos show the debris from those floors being pulverized and flung hundreds of feet outward. The lower floors were undamaged structurally so as soon as your alleged "overload" was gone, the collapse should have stopped. The only force which could keep it going was explosives sequenced to travel down the Tower all the way to the base. The explosives can be seen clearly in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUDoGuLpirc




Jan 18, 2017 16:14:57   #
Noraa wrote:
Any trash he can pull off the internet.


How do you define "trash"?
Jan 18, 2017 16:13:47   #
mouset783 wrote:
Read your posts. How about that? BTW exactly what is your definition of "evidence"?


I could call you a liar and claim that reading your posts proves it. Reading the posts proves nothing.

The "evidence" would be the lie that was alleged to have been told and then to supply "more valid evidence" that it was a lie.
 
Jan 18, 2017 16:04:50   #
bilordinary wrote:
Now that is what I call class!






You consider liars to be classy?
Jan 18, 2017 16:03:39   #
mouset783 wrote:
Identifications and insults are not synonyms. Calling you a moron is the same as calling and elephant an elephant Nes pah!


He called me a liar without showing any evidence to back up his false claim.
Can you show any valid evidence that I'm a liar?
Jan 18, 2017 14:13:46   #
Noraa wrote:
Nice photo shops!


Not so nice non-rebuttal.
Jan 18, 2017 14:12:45   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
US Jews? About 20% of American Jews practice Judaism, the rest don't really give a shit. Like all liberals, they obviously don't even know what Zionism really is.


That's why I'm spending so much time telling them what Zionism really is.


Jan 18, 2017 13:41:57   #
Big Bass wrote:
You hate them, liar!


Insults are not rebuttal.
 
Jan 18, 2017 13:40:15   #
Big Bass wrote:
for that rebuttal.


What rebuttal?
Why don't you attempt to refute what Trump said?
Why don't you attempt to rebut this?




Jan 18, 2017 13:37:26   #
Noraa wrote:
I didn't forget. The thumbs down is for you and you know it. Jew hater.


I respect Jews. It's Zionists such as yourself I can't tolerate.
Now will you attempt to refute what Trump said about the Twin Towers?
Jan 18, 2017 13:34:33   #
.


Jan 18, 2017 13:28:59   #
Noraa wrote:


Nora, you forgot to refute what Trump said.
Is your thumbsdown for Trump or is it because you have no rebuttal?
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 939 next>>
          
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2016 IDF International Technologies, Inc.