One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Morgan
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 732 next>>
Jun 25, 2019 09:00:21   #
The Critical Critic wrote:
Once upon a time, there was a king who tried that here ... it didn’t work out well for him or his men.


Right, unfortunately, we're heading into 2020, things have changed as far as weaponry
Go to
Jun 25, 2019 08:56:11   #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Seen this? It's one of my favorites. Guess why.


Bam you're dead
Go to
Jun 25, 2019 08:55:19   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
You're paranoid. The government does not have the manpower or resources to confiscate 330 million guns from 137 million armed Americans.


You really think the most powerful country in the world could not, under martial law, confiscate all the guns from the people "with a fight"? Really, that's some amazing reasoning.
Go to
Jun 25, 2019 08:52:25   #
lpnmajor wrote:
Look at the difference between population numbers. Besides, the perpetrator in the New Zealand massacre was Australian. Banning/confiscating firearms in America is a fantasy.

Even if, by some miracle, firearm possession became a felony........................there'd be 300,000,000 new felons. Who's gonna lock them up and where would they keep them?


The army of the new right.
Go to
Jun 25, 2019 08:49:45   #
Morgan wrote:
I've heard of this, it's outrageous and how can he do it by our laws, we have freedom of speech as our constitutional right which it would infringe upon?

Just as Trump has blocked new research on the environment from being blocked to the public, how is he able to do this if they are government paid offices by our taxes? Moves of a dictator.


http://www.sej.org/headlines/white-house-blocked-agency-s-written-testimony-climate-change
Go to
Jun 25, 2019 08:40:06   #
eagleye13 wrote:
Once again, morgan shows her ignorance on another subject.
Man Made CO2 is a ludicrous reason for global warming/climate change.

Fortunately, there's a book by Mark Steyn that helps sort out the truth from the fiction. It's called A Disgrace to the Profession and features short essays and articles by scientists who speak out against the global warming / climate change hoax being perpetrated on the world.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/052317_climate_change_scientific_consensus_fraudulent_science_survey.html#ixzz4JLQI0Rxa The '97% consensus' of scientists on climate change is complete bunk... fraudulent statistic repeated everywhere is based on blatant scientific FRAUD
****************************************************************



NaturalNews) The brain-dead leftist media isn't really in the news business anymore. It's actually in the business of zombie control... with the zombies being, of course, the leftist libtard obedient propaganda swallowers who are easily fooled by sleight-of-hand trickery being paraded as science. (Then again, there are also CONtards on the right who are easily fooled by fraudulent "GMO science," so the criticism deserves to be equally distributed across the political establishment...)

If you've ever has the misfortune of listening to the libtard leftist media, you've probably heard the claim -- repeated like a mantra chant to Gaia -- that "97% of scientists believe in man-made climate change" (or some similar paraphrased version of this fraudulent claim).

Fortunately, there's a book by Mark Steyn that helps sort out the truth from the fiction. It's called A Disgrace to the Profession and features short essays and articles by scientists who speak out against the global warming / climate change hoax being perpetrated on the world.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/052317_climate_change_scientific_consensus_fraudulent_science_survey.html#ixzz4JLQI0Rxa

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/052317_climate_change_scientific_consensus_fraudulent_science_survey.html#ixzz4JLPs9xQq

PASADENA, CA, July 21, 2015 – Arguing with people who have already come to a conclusion based on a loose understanding of half the story is difficult. Large amounts of misinformation are unfortunately common in today’s political arena thanks to social media, shoddy journalism, millennial ambivalence and a generally apathetic view toward data and public policy. Nowhere in today’s society is this idea more prevalent than the climate change debate, formally known as global warming.

Global warming was the hot topic about 10 years ago when Al Gore’s documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth”, hit theaters and almost instantly scared millions of people into believing the Earth was hanging on by a string thanks to irresponsible Americans filling up their gas tanks one two many times.

The green energy lobby took charge and didn’t look back, raising hundreds of millions of dollars and sponsoring regulation after regulation with the intent of eliminating fossil fuels and ignoring the unintended consequence of killing jobs and destroying livelihoods. Day after day, the mainstream media spread the word that temperatures were soaring, the oceans were rising, and natural disasters were growing deadlier all because of man made global warming’s detrimental effect on the earth’s atmosphere.

After a few years of hysteria, something happened that brought the global warming train to a screeching halt. Scientists began to realize that the earth’s temperature wasn’t rising. In fact, we now know that the average global temperature hasn’t gone up in at least 15 years. Try as they might, and they did try, environmentalists could not cover up this contradictory piece of evidence, so they decided to change the name of their movement to “climate change”.

Man made climate change supporters, primarily on the left, have attempted to gloss over these glaring holes in their argument by creating the illusion that the scientific community is completely on their side and that any questioning of that science is a waste of time. They did that by coming up with the false narrative that 97% of all scientists agree with them and continued to repeat it over and over until people who weren’t really paying attention started to accept it as fact.

It’s not a fact but yet for some reason, everyone from the guy in line next to you at Starbucks all the way up to the President of the United States tout this statistic as indisputable evidence. The only truth regarding this statement is that it was dubiously manufactured in order to dilute the reality that scientists have not coalesced around one position one way or the other.

The 97% number was created by meticulously selecting certain surveys using murky terminology to formulate a specific narrative.

Termites emit ten times more CO2 than humans. Should we cap-and-tax them?
http://www.iloveco2.com/2009/04/termites-emit-ten-times-more-co2-than.html

Global Warming; Alias Climate Change
http://www.skepticalscience.com/OISM-Petition-Project.htm
Over 31,000 scientists signed the OISM Petition Project
The Petition Project features over 31,000 scientists signing the petition stating "there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will, in the forseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere". (OISM)
There are several claims that large numbers of scientists do not agree with the theory of climate change, the best known of which is a petition organised by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (the OISM petition). This petition now appears to be signed by over 32,000 people with a BSc or higher qualification. The signatories agree with these statements:
• The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.
• There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate.
No evidence has ever been offered to support the first statement, and the second statement is in flat contradiction with the scientists who study climate change. There are also valid issues regarding the methodology:
• The organisers have never revealed how many people they canvassed (so the response rate is unknown) nor have they revealed the sampling methodology, an ironic omission considering how much fuss is made about scientists being candid and making public their methods and data.
• The petition is, in terms of climate change science, rather out of date.

That’s only the tip of the “melting” iceberg of scams the IPCC is involved in using the greatest scamster of all, Al Gore, as their figurehead who then makes squillions insider-trading carbon credits through his own bank of carbon credit companies.

The scam will continue as long as people like Bob Brown can beguile opportunistic crooks like Julia Gillard.

The IPCC rejects any report that doesn’t claim anthropogenic warming, and always throws in a few goodies like its recently discredited, “the Himalayas will soon be devoid of snow” nonsense.

Figures are massaged, graphs are inverted and reports are altered in an attempt to convince the gullible of their expertise in “climate science”. “Climate” can be a science but these charlatans are certainly not scientists!

Long lunches are spent inventing emotive doomsday phrases designed for you to elect Green-sympathetic governments, like Julia Gillard’s, that will happily give them billions more of your taxes.

There is no global warming, it would be good if there was, but both ice-caps have increased in area, Europe and the US have just recorded three years of record cold conditions, atmospheric CO2 levels have continued to vary by the normal 0.1 per cent, US “Tornado Alley” had 30 per cent fewer tornados last season, there are no tidal increases anywhere and the climate is still changing normally in its own erratic way, as it always has.

The only regulators of the world’s CO2 levels, the oceans, the sun and volcanos, are the only regulators IPCC reports don’t account for.

Thank God the Abbott Government only pays lip service to this global warming myth.

Reading between their lines you can see they don’t have their hearts in it.”

NASA is not sending rockets to the moon anymore. The front page on their website is a graph about global warming. When did NASA switch from space research/travel to progressive propaganda? Was the Obama Administration the one who changed the purpose of NASA?

In an article here, former NASA Director Charles Bolden says that Obama told him that Muslim Outreach was his priority, “… inspire children to learn math and science, expand international relationships and “perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science … and math and engineering.”

NASA lists the IPCC as one of its scientific sources proving human-caused global warming. Knowing that the IPCC is a phony organization makes the entire website and NASA itself untrustworthy and irrelevant.

In conclusion,

“The CO2-induced global warming extinction hypothesis claims that as the world warms in response to the ongoing rise in the air’s CO2 content, many species of plants and animals will not be able to migrate either poleward in latitude or upward in elevation fast enough to avoid extinction as they try to escape the stress imposed by the rising temperature. With respect to plants, however, we have shown that as long as the atmosphere’s CO2 concentration rises in tandem with its temperature, most of them will not “feel the heat,” as their physiology will change in ways that make them better adapted to warmer conditions. Hence, although earth’s plants will likely spread poleward and upward at the cold-limited boundaries of their ranges in response to a warming-induced opportunity to do so, their heat-limited boundaries will probably remain pretty much as they are now or shift only slightly.

Consequently, in a world of rising atmospheric CO2 concentration, the ranges of most of earth’s plants will likely expand if the planet continues to warm, making plant extinctions even less likely than they are currently.
Animals should react much the same way. In response to concurrent increases in atmospheric temperature and CO2 concentration, they will likely migrate poleward and upward, where cold temperatures prevented them from going in the past, as they follow earth’s plants. Also as with earth’s plants, the heat-limited boundaries of their ranges should in many cases be little affected, as has been observed in several of the real-world studies that have been wrongly cited as providing evidence for impending species extinctions, or their entire ranges may simply shift with the rising temperature, as has been observed in many real-world studies of marine ecosystems.

To summarize, both theory and observation paint the same picture. A goodly portion of earth’s plants and animals should actually expand their ranges and gain a stronger foothold on the planet as the atmosphere’s temperature and CO2 concentration continue to rise. If the air’s CO2 content were suddenly to stop increasing, however, the biosphere could find itself facing a significant challenge, as the world’s plants would cease acquiring the extra physiological protection against heat stress that is afforded them by rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Consequently, the end result of curtailing anthropogenic CO2 emissions might well be just the opposite of what many people are hoping to accomplish by encouraging that policy, i.e., many species might actually be driven to extinction, rather than being saved from such a fate.”

Read more at http://victoriajackson.com/10960/global-warming
Once again, morgan shows her ignorance on another ... (show quote)


After all this BS I'll repeat myself

That is only thought by people who refuse to acknowledge what impact humans have on the earth what so ever, which is not only completely irresponsible but could be considered criminal, it is so blatantly disrespectful, especially of Christians.

AND every government office that has been changed under Trump has been corrupted, he is crooked president!!! No doubts there especially on the environment.

White House officials barred a State Department intelligence agency from submitting written testimony warning that human-caused climate change.https://www.sej.org/headlines/white-house-blocked-agency-s-written-testimony-climate-change
Go to
Jun 25, 2019 08:36:17   #
lindajoy wrote:
She proves it everytime she opens her mouth~~~


Well now, that's a lie.
Go to
Jun 25, 2019 08:29:51   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
AOC made the right choice. That airhead moron wouldn't survive a visit to Auschwitz.

Afraid of her? You gotta be kidding. Her approval rating in her own district (Queens and Bronx) is down the crapper. 42% are unfamiliar with AOC. 51% have an unfavorable view of her. 33% are ready to vote against her, and only 13% would vote for her.


Then why is your party's propaganda machine doing nothing but focusing on tearing her down, because they want to squash her before she builds up any momentum, you should really take note how you're being manipulated and used as a tool by getting behind their pure BS, as in this lame twisted story.
Go to
Jun 25, 2019 08:22:15   #
Iliamna1 wrote:
Morgan, Are you as stupid and as vapid as you come across or are you just unable to look at the facts? The Holocaust DID occur, over 6 million Jews were slaughtered in dozens of Nazi death camps along with about another 6 million civilians who opposed Hitler. They were starved and forced to slave labor and when their usefulness has expired, they were marched into the showers where they were gassed with Zyclon B and then their bodies were either burned to ashes or dumped into mass graves. ILLEGAL immigrants are being detained at the border (as they should be). Hundreds have been deported for crimes against Americans already. They are fed and many services are provided, paid for by the tax payers of America. Children are trafficked, but I guess that's O.K. by you and your ilk. A few have died due to their exposure to the harsh country they were marched thousands of miles over. Have you ever been to the southwestern part of America? It's deadly. Every living thing out there has fangs, spines and/or venom, both plant and animal.
My sincere belief is if you don't want to stay in a detention center or have your child taken from you . . . stay home.
Morgan, Are you as stupid and as vapid as you come... (show quote)


Where did I mention anywhere my personal awareness of the Holocaust, nowhere, I was referring to her AOC 100%. Your lack of comprehension is only surpassed by your limited outlook of what I wrote, this is not a surprise to us from the center to left. Reason for the right... has left the room long ago, as seen by your insulting post, nothing new here, if you want to talk about being vapid and stupid, take a look in the mirror buddy.

I'm married to a Jewish man and have been completely accepted into the fold of the family, known by many Jews as a Shiksa, as I am not Jewish, I was raised Catholic, so you're preaching to the quire here I know fully what they went through as some were and are my children's relatives.

Now if you'd like me to, I am perfectly capable to fling insults, I am happy to oblige and can administer them quite well though I do try and avoid that type of dialog.

These people, especially the children are not all criminals, but it is the only way the right likes to view them as, in reality, they are refugees along with their families that have traveled hundreds if not thousands of miles for sanctuary, seeking asylum who are then trapped into unacceptable conditions to the point where children have died and that simply shouldn't be. I have never heard of that happening before in the US even after WWII with Japanese Camps.

It appears children being trafficked has occurred in both administrations and that you cannot deny, but it is Pence who made the instruction to purposely separate and that is a huge difference from accidentally..
Go to
Jun 25, 2019 07:35:54   #
proud republican wrote:
Bash wagon my ass..You Lefties are waaaay more guiltier of bashing people on the right...Besides film cant compare to the real thing..When you actually see it in person....Besides the reason she didn go,she didnt like the person who invited her....Awee poor baby!!!


She didn't say she didn't like them, she said she didn't agree with them. Why have the expense to travel all the way to another country for that, when all you have to do is look at pictures and talk to people here? Not to mention like other politicians, she not made of money to travel the world. It's logical not t go.

And not true, the right bashes half of American, the left has focused on getting rid of one person. What they've questioned as I have is why they follow such a person, you must have been deaf to his last beautiful and inspiring campaign speech in Florida.
Go to
Jun 24, 2019 19:46:25   #
proud republican wrote:
FAKE NEWS!!!!


Bahaha yeah to him!!!!
Go to
Jun 24, 2019 19:43:54   #
America 1 wrote:
And, that would be how Morgan?
Could that be an honest opinion from a liberal?
More likely BS, you don't know me.


Right, and you don't know me, it's a two-way street.
Go to
Jun 24, 2019 19:42:33   #
proud republican wrote:
If she is not dumb then why does refused invitation to visit Auschwitz???


During 2017, the U.S. experienced a historic year of weather and climate disasters. In total, the U.S. was impacted by 16 separate billion-dollar disaster events including: three tropical cyclones, eight severe storms, two inland floods, a crop freeze, drought and wildfires.

Yes, thank you from the others who asked.

Why should she go all the way there for that? If she doesn't realize the depth of suffering, maybe some can show here a documentary. her only sin is that she didn't realize the severity, that doesn't make her bad person, it makes her simply naive as many other Americans are. But the righty's are so quick to climb onto the Bash wagon.

Tell me, what has this young lady ever done to deserve such ugly verbiage from the right, shame on them, as for Trump, he deserves every bit of it, he created it with his lies.
Go to
Jun 24, 2019 19:32:08   #
proud republican wrote:
President who outsmarted 16 Republicans,Hillary,Hollywood and Dems...I call him my President!!!!


Outsmarted...p l e a s e. I call it working with our enemies.
Go to
Jun 24, 2019 19:27:19   #
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
What a shame your bias doesn't extend to any Liberal liars.


Who says I don't...?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 732 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.