One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Morgan
Page: <<prev 1 ... 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 ... 732 next>>
Apr 29, 2018 09:47:37   #
no propaganda please wrote:
Apparently there is no requirement as to what their major would be. Knowing who is behind this control of peoples lives I would guess that a majr in LGBTQ studies , black lives studies or any major that is against white people particularly men would be considered a great background for raising other peoples young children.


Oh you poor, poor pitiful white man, you've been so victimized... haven't you?
Go to
Apr 29, 2018 09:43:35   #
rebob14 wrote:
The US Dept of Indoctrination is losing ground at the grass roots level nationwide, so, DC is a totally captive source of new and continuing socialist serfdom.


Oh contraier, that would be corporate capitalism. If this were to happen, expect daycare to go up exponentially, to where only the very well paid can afford it, what next to single women who can barely afford childcare out of their wages as it is. Guess they will have to stay home and care for their children and be a ward of the state, or do they simply starve in the street?

Maybe they just haven't thought this out.
Go to
Apr 29, 2018 09:13:20   #
Old Dog wrote:
"THEY" say to be a good Politician you have to be a good liar.

"The Donald" is not a Politician and is not President for his own financial gain.

Hence, I believe any lie he has told he believes will ultimately be for the good of the American people.

After I get all the backlash I am sure I will receive I will post examples of what I mean.



One definition of a politician~ a person who acts in a manipulative and devious way, typically to gain advancement within an organization. I'd say he's definitely one, now being president he is unequivocally one to the nth degree. We do live in the present, do we not?

But to justify any and all lies to be righteous, because you believe it to be for the betterment of the country, builds a foundation in deception and sand and aligns itself in corruption, sad you don't see that and to believe that such a man deserves your devotion and loyalty and speaks of your own moral conviction...lacking.
Go to
Apr 28, 2018 21:09:10   #
archie bunker wrote:
Actually, I want the big money out of politics. It's a pipe dream, I know. Big money powers, and controls everything on both sides. That's why we're in the shape we're in.
You don't matter, I don't matter. What matters is power, and money.


Ok, so for the most part, we are on the same page. If you think you don't matter, you won't matter. If we stand up together, we definitely matter. Who we put in office definitely matters especially in our state representatives. The trick is to get nonpartisan people in there who as you pointed out don't put party before country, I am completely with you there Arch. I will never be a party member again...F'm.

But what does happen in Congress is what we allow to happen. Now isn't the time to throw our hands up and say fuckitall, now is when we start to stand up and say that's not happening on our watch any longer, to get more involved to see what our representatives are doing and Not vote them back in if they aren't for us.

The kids today are having this fed up attitude including my 17 year old son, with the disgusted attitude of "it doesn't matter". He's wrong Arch and so are you...it does matter...very much, otherwise you might as well give them this country on a silver platter. Isn't this country worth fighting for? Worth the hassle? I'm fairly certain it does matter to you, you're just feeling a bit disgusted...understandable, me too at times but we have to brush ourselves off and keep going.

The framers of our constitution tried to put laws and rules in place in an attempt to ward off corruption with gifts, favors, and money, we should be not only enforcing that more but extending it domestically, including and especially with a lobbyist. It isn't being put in a bill because all of them don't want to shoot the golden goose. We need people to pledge they will do it when in office. Money is a cancer to our governing, we need to pinch off, stop the flow, then it will correct itself. JMHO
Go to
Apr 28, 2018 16:20:31   #
archie bunker wrote:
Why do you only name wealthy people on one side of the aisle? Are there no rich democrats?
Party before country much?


I see them for the work that their manipulations do which is very much against our American ideology. If you want to include Soros go right ahead or whomever you see fit. But let me ask you, who do you think was behind "corporations are people too". Have you bought into that premise?

...and if anyone is party before country it is the corporate party...
Go to
Apr 28, 2018 14:30:00   #
proud republican wrote:
Maybe he needs to go back on some pills???He makes no sense what soever!!!......


It makes no sense what's so ever because he's quoting Trump, guess says it all...
Go to
Apr 28, 2018 14:23:00   #
Trump just redistributed the wealthy from the ACA and his so called tax breaks to give the tax breaks to the wealthy, giving them less tax on dividends, while we are still in debt from the Bush unpaid war. He's also done this without any incentive to be repaid to the government with moving ahead with sustainable energy and staying competitive but none of that has happened with Trump has it, that shows his true intention right there, not to improving and building the US, but the true globalists... the elite wealthy, who really have no loyalty to any country except to themselves, People as the Trumps, Koch's, Popes, Murdock's, so and so on. The only thing that motivates them is money for power.
Go to
Apr 27, 2018 14:35:50   #
son of witless wrote:
Compared to the Clintons Trump is as pure as the driven snow. Also since Mueller and the Democrats have him under constant scrutiny and as yet have zilch on him, he has to be the ethical President in decades.


No not at all, the methodical turtle wins the race, Mueller is making sure it'll be ironclad.

Pure as the driven snow, the Clintons combined don't even come close to Trump, they're not even in the same category of depravity.

Neither one, the Clintons or Obama ever came close to what Trump is doing presently and does it so arrogantly blatantly, it must be nice to rule in Congress with the majority.

son of witless wrote:
You say my boy Donald J. is actively profiting from his office and yet this topic is that Trump has lost money as a President. Contrast that with the Clintons and Barry Obummer. Look where they were before they achieved their high positions and look how rich they are now. Tell me again who profited from their office. Especially how much richer Bill and Hillary got while she was Secretary of State.


Yes they've made money through speeches and books, not as a conflict of interest with being in office.

I find my statement to be quite reasonable, if you find them strange, so be it.
Go to
Apr 27, 2018 10:18:42   #
son of witless wrote:
President Trump stealing money in the most unethical ways ? ? ? I can prove with out a doubt that has no truth behind it. Look you got Bob Mueller who for over a year has been chasing non existent Trump-Russia Collusion and is desperate to keep his meal ticket going. Great work if you can get it. Anyway Mr. Bob does not want to have to file for unemployment. He will grab at any pretext to go after my good buddy Donald J. Trump.

Now logically if Donald J. was " stealing money in the most unethical ways ", Mr. Bob would be on it like white on rice, a fly on manure, a Clinton on a Dollar Bill, or Barak Obama telling a lie.
President Trump stealing money in the most unethic... (show quote)


I'm assuming you know the difference between unethical and illegal but possibly not. This is the way of Trump and his cronies to find loopholes and manipulations they can do without being technically illegal, but they pay a lot of lawyers to get this job done so they are able to make their money by hook or by crook, hence Trump, his Presidency and his international chain of hotels.

Trump promised to divest himself — or to walk away — from his business while in office. The main reason, of course, is to avoid conflicts of interest.
The president has many business dealings which continue to earn him money in violation of the constitution. Trump is actively profiting from the presidency, which is something that the framers never intended.
They had tried to prevent this type of self-interested corruption in the Articles of Confederation. Article I, Section 9, Clause 8. They created this to prevent the very thing that Trump is doing.
He’s refused to divest — and the lawsuits have poured in.
We still have never seen his tax return, another lie of his and more covert dealings with foreign countries.

According to the Trump campaign's self-reported FEC filings, this has amounted to about $600,000 spent at Trump-owned properties in just the first six months of his presidency.

[Nearly $400,000 of that campaign money went to rent at Trump Tower, with $90,000 going to the The Trump Corporation for "legal consulting," nearly $60,000 to the Trump International Golf Club, $15,000 to the Trump International Hotel in DC, and about $1,700 to Trump-brand bottled water, among various payments. And that's just the money that went to businesses in which Trump has a personal role. The Trump campaign has spent a total of $10 million in the last six months; any shell companies and subsidiaries of other Trump-owned businesses that may have gotten a piece of that don't have to be disclosed.

What's more, this number doesn't include the more nebulous (and almost certainly larger) total spent on Trump's businesses simply by virtue of Trump being president. According to filings released last month by the Office of Government Ethics (whose director, Walter Shaub, quit earlier this month in protest of the executive branch's refusal to obey ethical norms) Trump's seen the income from his properties increase by tens of millions of dollars since he started campaigning. And the Trump family seems happy to do their part to help that along. After his election victory, Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort doubled its initiation fee to $200,000.

Not to mention the fact that any time either Trump or his family members stay at any Trump property (which they often do), the Secret Service is paying a Trump business for the privilege of accompanying them. For instance, The Washington Post reported that, of the $60 million in additional funding the Secret Service has requested for next year, $26.8 million would go toward protecting Trump's family in Trump Tower. And since the inauguration, the Secret Service has spent over $35,000 on Trump-owned golf cart rentals alone. Trump, of course, could easily choose to waive those fees if he so desired. As for the campaign front, the Republican National Committee held a $10 million re-election fund-raiser last month at the Trump International Hotel in DC—which, according to The New York Times, charged the RNC "regular prices" to use its facilities.

These sorts of expenses lining the president's own pocket is unprecedented.
Go to
Apr 26, 2018 23:45:56   #
Homestead wrote:
I think you're missing the point.

Programs were set up to help minorities that were unfairly disadvantaged. Universities and businesses were given financial advantages, like tax breaks, special privileges and other incentives as a reward for helping out minorities.

By Warren falsifying her heritage, it blocked legitimate minorities from participating in what was their due.

Since the University had its minority, by way of Warren, it didn't look any further in finding a real minority, which was the purpose of the program.

Far from helping the poor, Warren literally took a minority’s future from them, for herself.

Talk about selfish white people.
I think you're missing the point. br br Programs ... (show quote)


That's a lot of assuming as far as who was denied. She is a lawyer, their jobs is finding loopholes, that is why we're in such a mess all over the place, from the courts to an iPhone "agreement". ha.
Go to
Apr 26, 2018 23:41:15   #
bahmer wrote:
If she were to do that, she would move heads and shoulders above the other Indian from India, and she would really have a chance at running for the presidency, but if she continues on her present course, she also takes a chance on losing her seat in the senate as well.


Let there be light, eh
Go to
Apr 26, 2018 23:26:03   #
son of witless wrote:
No kidding. In spite of what Democrats preach to their voters, America is a Capitalist country with an economy that responds to Capitalist friendly government policies. Working Americans are seeing bigger paychecks because of a cut in their federal payroll taxes. They are also seeing bigger paychecks because employers are hiring more full time and less part time and also because as the rich Capitalist-Pig-Dogs are seeing a better investment environment they are bidding up the price of skilled labor.

As far as dividends, I bet you are richer than me, and I am an investor who collects dividends. In the modern world many many many people of modest means dare to invest in the stock market. I know it is, as Count Floyd used to say, " Spooky Scary " to invest in the stock market, but for a lot of us what is good for Wall Street is good for us.

" corporate fascist capitalism, "
No kidding. In spite of what Democrats preach to t... (show quote)


Riiiiight, I'm just gonna sit back and wait for the next crash the GOP is going to put us in...again. I'd like to say he who laughs last, laughs the loudest, but I'm afraid we'll all be crying in our beer...
Go to
Apr 26, 2018 23:18:17   #
archie bunker wrote:
How am I off topic? Aren't you basically saying that this tax bill will ruin us all?

I like the way you twist, and turn trying to manipulate the discussion too. You remind me of my ex wife. A simple discussion about where to plant a tree could possibly lead to the time I failed to tell her that her jeans didn't make her but look fat.
I finally had to tell her that it wasn't the pants.


Off topic was insinuating I was all gloom and doom and unhappy, that's off topic. As far as the twist and turn, really, please clarify. Where did I say the bill will ruin us all, I would say that is your twist not mine, on the contrary, I said the elite will definitely benefit, I guess you must've missed that part. As far as the bill... we'll see won't we, time will tell.

Oh and as far as your wife's butt, ouch, btw you get more bees with honey, not vinegar. No sugar for you.
Go to
Apr 26, 2018 13:11:17   #
archie bunker wrote:
You plainly stated that it would eliminate the medical deduction when it doesnt. Pure leftist fear mongering that you appear to have purchased hook, line, sinker, and rod and reel.

And I like parts, but not all of it. Not that it matters what I like, and dont. Those slime balls in Douche City are gonna do what they want no matter what I think.

But I don't sweat it because speculating just leads to stress, and I don't do stress. I'm a happy guy! You on the other hand.............


Getting back to those deductions, it wasn't left parroting but simply what I had last recalled, my bad. They had made some adjustments to the final bill, which included some deductions.
Go to
Apr 26, 2018 13:02:41   #
archie bunker wrote:
You plainly stated that it would eliminate the medical deduction when it doesnt. Pure leftist fear mongering that you appear to have purchased hook, line, sinker, and rod and reel.

And I like parts, but not all of it. Not that it matters what I like, and dont. Those slime balls in Douche City are gonna do what they want no matter what I think.

But I don't sweat it because speculating just leads to stress, and I don't do stress. I'm a happy guy! You on the other hand.............



Hardly, I'm not about gloom and doom, more about responsibility, you know the junk the right spews but never does. You must be referring to the old global warming topic, and that is only one topic out of many. Once again you guys can never stay on topic, it always has to get personal huh, call me crazy but that doesn't sound very laid back to me.

Guess that's where we're different, again...speculating doesn't stress me out, it's not a problem, simply an issue that needs attention, unless of course, we choose NOT to remedy it.

You assume to know me from Opp...now that is funny...no hilarius
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 ... 732 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.