One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
NRA is against the constitution and second amendment
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 17, 2018 05:18:04   #
Kevyn
 
In 1991, former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Republican appointee, explained why the text of the Second Amendment affirms the importance of gun regulation. The first words of the amendment, Burger pointed out, are “a well regulated Militia.” This language presupposes the idea that the militias should be regulated. So, Burger reasoned, if the amendment rests on the assumption that well-trained state armies could be regulated, then it is sensible to think it also allows Congress to regulate guns among the general citizenry.

The constitutional argument for gun regulation also goes beyond the Second Amendment. The Constitution’s preamble speaks of the need to “insure domestic Tranquility”—a fundamental task of any government that can be aided by regulating deadly weapons. The recent tragedy in Florida—merely the newest in a line of one numbing bloodbath after another, a crisis that no other developed country on earth suffers from—has made it clear that our schools, hospitals, and military are anything but tranquil. In places where they once would have thought themselves safe, citizens fear another attack.

This is not only unacceptable, but it also demonstrates how far our country has strayed from a central constitutional principle. The preamble’s call for “domestic Tranquility” and the Second Amendment’s embrace of regulation do not merely allow Congress to act to regulate guns; they impel Congress to do so.

What about the worry that some forms of regulation still violate the second amendment? As Burger said in 1991, the idea that the second amendment prohibits gun regulation is “one of the greatest pieces of fraud – I repeat the word fraud – on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.” And Burger’s view of the amendment squares with what the supreme court has said more recently

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 05:49:35   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
Kevyn wrote:
In 1991, former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Republican appointee, explained why the text of the Second Amendment affirms the importance of gun regulation. The first words of the amendment, Burger pointed out, are “a well regulated Militia.” This language presupposes the idea that the militias should be regulated. So, Burger reasoned, if the amendment rests on the assumption that well-trained state armies could be regulated, then it is sensible to think it also allows Congress to regulate guns among the general citizenry.

The constitutional argument for gun regulation also goes beyond the Second Amendment. The Constitution’s preamble speaks of the need to “insure domestic Tranquility”—a fundamental task of any government that can be aided by regulating deadly weapons. The recent tragedy in Florida—merely the newest in a line of one numbing bloodbath after another, a crisis that no other developed country on earth suffers from—has made it clear that our schools, hospitals, and military are anything but tranquil. In places where they once would have thought themselves safe, citizens fear another attack.

This is not only unacceptable, but it also demonstrates how far our country has strayed from a central constitutional principle. The preamble’s call for “domestic Tranquility” and the Second Amendment’s embrace of regulation do not merely allow Congress to act to regulate guns; they impel Congress to do so.

What about the worry that some forms of regulation still violate the second amendment? As Burger said in 1991, the idea that the second amendment prohibits gun regulation is “one of the greatest pieces of fraud – I repeat the word fraud – on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.” And Burger’s view of the amendment squares with what the supreme court has said more recently
In 1991, former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Rep... (show quote)


Apparently you aren’t following what is going on in South Africa,you may want to check it out particularly if you are white.It is a little late for those folks they are in the process of being butchered and because the government has taken most of the weapons they have no way to defend themselves.This is what happens when a corrupt government takes hold and then proceeds to kill the people they deem necessary to eliminate.The savage blacks are doing the work now with a reported 500,000 whites killed and 1,500,000 missing.After this genocide is complete the blacks will start killing each other.BTW a report by former citizens say there are thousands of liberal whites that remained in S.A. Feeling safe because they worked against control of the country by whites.The government has now amended the constitution so it’s within the law to hunt down Whites and confiscate their property and then kill the former owners.
So yeah let’s get rid of the second amendment and make it easier for a corrupt government ,it’s always worked so well for them in all the other country’s where it’s been done.When it happens here and you get a midnight visit Kevvy make sure you act surprised.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 06:08:26   #
Kevyn
 
Hemiman wrote:
Apparently you aren’t following what is going on in South Africa,you may want to check it out particularly if you are white.It is a little late for those folks they are in the process of being butchered and because the government has taken most of the weapons they have no way to defend themselves.This is what happens when a corrupt government takes hold and then proceeds to kill the people they deem necessary to eliminate.The savage blacks are doing the work now with a reported 500,000 whites killed and 1,500,000 missing.After this genocide is complete the blacks will start killing each other.BTW a report by former citizens say there are thousands of liberal whites that remained in S.A. Feeling safe because they worked against control of the country by whites.The government has now amended the constitution so it’s within the law to hunt down Whites and confiscate their property and then kill the former owners.
So yeah let’s get rid of the second amendment and make it easier for a corrupt government ,it’s always worked so well for them in all the other country’s where it’s been done.When it happens here and you get a midnight visit Kevvy make sure you act surprised.
Apparently you aren’t following what is going on i... (show quote)

There is a particularly vile medical condition known as fecal vomiting, it is more and more obvious from your posts that you suffer from this condition. Take a minute to look it up on web MD as they offer treatment options. I don’t know the source that fills you with this crap. South Africa has had a murder rate that is high at roughly 10,000 a year in a nation of nearly sixty million. The majority of victims are black as is the majority of the population, there simply are not a half million white people murdered or a million and a half missing this is pure rubbish. Not to mention it has nothing to do with my post which simply points out the constitutional duty of congress to regulate, not confiscate firearms. By the way isn’t it time for you to drive your red penis prosthetic down to the circle k and do some burnouts and doughnuts to impress the knuckleheads hanging out in the parking lot?

Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2018 06:33:51   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Kevyn wrote:
There is a particularly vile medical condition known as fecal vomiting, it is more and more obvious from your posts that you suffer from this condition. Take a minute to look it up on web MD as they offer treatment options. I don’t know the source that fills you with this crap. South Africa has had a murder rate that is high at roughly 10,000 a year in a nation of nearly sixty million. The majority of victims are black as is the majority of the population, there simply are not a half million white people murdered or a million and a half missing this is pure rubbish. Not to mention it has nothing to do with my post which simply points out the constitutional duty of congress to regulate, not confiscate firearms. By the way isn’t it time for you to drive your red penis prosthetic down to the circle k and do some burnouts and doughnuts to impress the knuckleheads hanging out in the parking lot?
There is a particularly vile medical condition kno... (show quote)




As a physician, I am far more qualified than you to diagnose fecal vomiting and it far more applies to what you post than Heniman or just about anyone on OPP.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 06:55:02   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
Kevyn wrote:
There is a particularly vile medical condition known as fecal vomiting, it is more and more obvious from your posts that you suffer from this condition. Take a minute to look it up on web MD as they offer treatment options. I don’t know the source that fills you with this crap. South Africa has had a murder rate that is high at roughly 10,000 a year in a nation of nearly sixty million. The majority of victims are black as is the majority of the population, there simply are not a half million white people murdered or a million and a half missing this is pure rubbish. Not to mention it has nothing to do with my post which simply points out the constitutional duty of congress to regulate, not confiscate firearms. By the way isn’t it time for you to drive your red penis prosthetic down to the circle k and do some burnouts and doughnuts to impress the knuckleheads hanging out in the parking lot?
There is a particularly vile medical condition kno... (show quote)


In one post you show penis envy car envy and having friends envy,it nice to know you would like to be me.If you would stop being sock a huge A hole you may have friends ,a nice new car and a super huge penis,well check the penis if you are small and inadequate there isn’t much you can do about it,you have my condolences,you will never know the joy of being a real man.A suggestion for you just cut the little thing off and go all the way and become the woman you were born to be.lol😂

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 06:55:05   #
Kevyn
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
As a physician, I am far more qualified than you to diagnose fecal vomiting and it far more applies to what you post than Heniman or just about anyone on OPP.
Luke 4:23 And he said unto them, Ye will surely say unto me this proverb, Physician, heal thyself: whatsoever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in thy country. At least you know what is causing the foul taste in your mouth.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 07:02:14   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
As a physician, I am far more qualified than you to diagnose fecal vomiting and it far more applies to what you post than Heniman or just about anyone on OPP.


I guess you hit a nerve and it’s the only one the little fella has,good for you.Good advice for you Kevvy.

Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2018 07:07:30   #
rjoeholl
 
Kevyn wrote:
There is a particularly vile medical condition known as fecal vomiting, it is more and more obvious from your posts that you suffer from this condition. Take a minute to look it up on web MD as they offer treatment options. I don’t know the source that fills you with this crap. South Africa has had a murder rate that is high at roughly 10,000 a year in a nation of nearly sixty million. The majority of victims are black as is the majority of the population, there simply are not a half million white people murdered or a million and a half missing this is pure rubbish. Not to mention it has nothing to do with my post which simply points out the constitutional duty of congress to regulate, not confiscate firearms. By the way isn’t it time for you to drive your red penis prosthetic down to the circle k and do some burnouts and doughnuts to impress the knuckleheads hanging out in the parking lot?
There is a particularly vile medical condition kno... (show quote)


Don't you realize, oh learned one, that confiscation would be a form of regulation? Or that the wee little comma after the word militia constitutes the start of a new and different idea? Tell me, what kind of car do you drive? From your avatar it looks like a Volkswagon "Thing".

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 07:14:16   #
plainlogic
 
Kevyn wrote:
In 1991, former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Republican appointee, explained why the text of the Second Amendment affirms the importance of gun regulation. The first words of the amendment, Burger pointed out, are “a well regulated Militia.” This language presupposes the idea that the militias should be regulated. So, Burger reasoned, if the amendment rests on the assumption that well-trained state armies could be regulated, then it is sensible to think it also allows Congress to regulate guns among the general citizenry.

The constitutional argument for gun regulation also goes beyond the Second Amendment. The Constitution’s preamble speaks of the need to “insure domestic Tranquility”—a fundamental task of any government that can be aided by regulating deadly weapons. The recent tragedy in Florida—merely the newest in a line of one numbing bloodbath after another, a crisis that no other developed country on earth suffers from—has made it clear that our schools, hospitals, and military are anything but tranquil. In places where they once would have thought themselves safe, citizens fear another attack.

This is not only unacceptable, but it also demonstrates how far our country has strayed from a central constitutional principle. The preamble’s call for “domestic Tranquility” and the Second Amendment’s embrace of regulation do not merely allow Congress to act to regulate guns; they impel Congress to do so.

What about the worry that some forms of regulation still violate the second amendment? As Burger said in 1991, the idea that the second amendment prohibits gun regulation is “one of the greatest pieces of fraud – I repeat the word fraud – on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.” And Burger’s view of the amendment squares with what the supreme court has said more recently
In 1991, former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Rep... (show quote)



Don't have to read it. If you Kevin, mouthed it, it's upside down backward garbage; straight from the liberal fake crap.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 07:21:50   #
plainlogic
 
Kevyn wrote:
Luke 4:23 And he said unto them, Ye will surely say unto me this proverb, Physician, heal thyself: whatsoever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in thy country. At least you know what is causing the foul taste in your mouth.



Having known how you think of this Nation, you of all people bring scriptures? You and the rest of your ilk Hate this Nation.

WHY THE LEFT HATES AMERICA
Christianity, the flag, free speech, being white – when did they become problems?

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 07:23:19   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Troll much?

Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2018 07:34:46   #
Texas Truth Loc: Behind Enemy Lines
 
Kevyn wrote:
In 1991, former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Republican appointee, explained why the text of the Second Amendment affirms the importance of gun regulation. The first words of the amendment, Burger pointed out, are “a well regulated Militia.” This language presupposes the idea that the militias should be regulated. So, Burger reasoned, if the amendment rests on the assumption that well-trained state armies could be regulated, then it is sensible to think it also allows Congress to regulate guns among the general citizenry.

The constitutional argument for gun regulation also goes beyond the Second Amendment. The Constitution’s preamble speaks of the need to “insure domestic Tranquility”—a fundamental task of any government that can be aided by regulating deadly weapons. The recent tragedy in Florida—merely the newest in a line of one numbing bloodbath after another, a crisis that no other developed country on earth suffers from—has made it clear that our schools, hospitals, and military are anything but tranquil. In places where they once would have thought themselves safe, citizens fear another attack.

This is not only unacceptable, but it also demonstrates how far our country has strayed from a central constitutional principle. The preamble’s call for “domestic Tranquility” and the Second Amendment’s embrace of regulation do not merely allow Congress to act to regulate guns; they impel Congress to do so.

What about the worry that some forms of regulation still violate the second amendment? As Burger said in 1991, the idea that the second amendment prohibits gun regulation is “one of the greatest pieces of fraud – I repeat the word fraud – on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.” And Burger’s view of the amendment squares with what the supreme court has said more recently
In 1991, former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Rep... (show quote)



I suggest you go stick your head back under the couch.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 07:46:38   #
Liberty Tree
 
Kevyn wrote:
In 1991, former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Republican appointee, explained why the text of the Second Amendment affirms the importance of gun regulation. The first words of the amendment, Burger pointed out, are “a well regulated Militia.” This language presupposes the idea that the militias should be regulated. So, Burger reasoned, if the amendment rests on the assumption that well-trained state armies could be regulated, then it is sensible to think it also allows Congress to regulate guns among the general citizenry.

The constitutional argument for gun regulation also goes beyond the Second Amendment. The Constitution’s preamble speaks of the need to “insure domestic Tranquility”—a fundamental task of any government that can be aided by regulating deadly weapons. The recent tragedy in Florida—merely the newest in a line of one numbing bloodbath after another, a crisis that no other developed country on earth suffers from—has made it clear that our schools, hospitals, and military are anything but tranquil. In places where they once would have thought themselves safe, citizens fear another attack.

This is not only unacceptable, but it also demonstrates how far our country has strayed from a central constitutional principle. The preamble’s call for “domestic Tranquility” and the Second Amendment’s embrace of regulation do not merely allow Congress to act to regulate guns; they impel Congress to do so.

What about the worry that some forms of regulation still violate the second amendment? As Burger said in 1991, the idea that the second amendment prohibits gun regulation is “one of the greatest pieces of fraud – I repeat the word fraud – on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.” And Burger’s view of the amendment squares with what the supreme court has said more recently
In 1991, former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Rep... (show quote)


Selecting one person's opinion does not prove your point. There are many Justices who would disagree with him.

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 07:56:29   #
Snoopy
 
Kevyn wrote:
There is a particularly vile medical condition known as fecal vomiting, it is more and more obvious from your posts that you suffer from this condition. Take a minute to look it up on web MD as they offer treatment options. I don’t know the source that fills you with this crap. South Africa has had a murder rate that is high at roughly 10,000 a year in a nation of nearly sixty million. The majority of victims are black as is the majority of the population, there simply are not a half million white people murdered or a million and a half missing this is pure rubbish. Not to mention it has nothing to do with my post which simply points out the constitutional duty of congress to regulate, not confiscate firearms. By the way isn’t it time for you to drive your red penis prosthetic down to the circle k and do some burnouts and doughnuts to impress the knuckleheads hanging out in the parking lot?
There is a particularly vile medical condition kno... (show quote)



Kevin:

When you resort to insulting dialogue it is difficult to have a positive discussion.

The original purpose of the Second Amendment was to have a militia larger than a standing army to protect citizens from big government abuses.

Try reading the Federalist Papers, I think 49, a more detailed answer.

Snoopy

Reply
Mar 17, 2018 08:00:53   #
Snoopy
 
Kevyn wrote:
In 1991, former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Republican appointee, explained why the text of the Second Amendment affirms the importance of gun regulation. The first words of the amendment, Burger pointed out, are “a well regulated Militia.” This language presupposes the idea that the militias should be regulated. So, Burger reasoned, if the amendment rests on the assumption that well-trained state armies could be regulated, then it is sensible to think it also allows Congress to regulate guns among the general citizenry.

The constitutional argument for gun regulation also goes beyond the Second Amendment. The Constitution’s preamble speaks of the need to “insure domestic Tranquility”—a fundamental task of any government that can be aided by regulating deadly weapons. The recent tragedy in Florida—merely the newest in a line of one numbing bloodbath after another, a crisis that no other developed country on earth suffers from—has made it clear that our schools, hospitals, and military are anything but tranquil. In places where they once would have thought themselves safe, citizens fear another attack.

This is not only unacceptable, but it also demonstrates how far our country has strayed from a central constitutional principle. The preamble’s call for “domestic Tranquility” and the Second Amendment’s embrace of regulation do not merely allow Congress to act to regulate guns; they impel Congress to do so.

What about the worry that some forms of regulation still violate the second amendment? As Burger said in 1991, the idea that the second amendment prohibits gun regulation is “one of the greatest pieces of fraud – I repeat the word fraud – on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.” And Burger’s view of the amendment squares with what the supreme court has said more recently
In 1991, former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Rep... (show quote)



Kevin:

Correction: Federalist Paper 46. It is a good read for you.

Snoopy

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.