Lonewolf wrote:
Ok baby talk if you have evidence why don't you prosecute
Who are you responding too, and about what?
One of the favorite lines of you right wingers is after 18 (or whatever) month and no results..
For lady Hillary, it was 20 years, 8 investigations and 11 hrs grilling by congress.. Well it is you calculations, but you do seem a pretty strange group if you look at logic..
So what has Muller accomplished to date.??? As you can see from above, very early yet, but he has 19 indictments, It that correct?. 2 arrests, one in protective custody.
Think a couple other things, help me out now.. States evidence? agree to talk..
By June or so, some juicy information may come out.. Looking so interesting..
Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, no friend of Trump, has said there is no indication of any Trump involvement, and that there is no indication that the involvement of Russian nationals, NOT the Russian government, had any effect whatsoever on the election.
like i said the investigation is still going on watch how Trump is acting he sure as hell guilty of something big
Loki wrote:
Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, no friend of Trump, has said there is no indication of any Trump involvement, and that there is no indication that the involvement of Russian nationals, NOT the Russian government, had any effect whatsoever on the election.
permafrost wrote:
One of the favorite lines of you right wingers is after 18 (or whatever) month and no results..
For lady Hillary, it was 20 years, 8 investigations and 11 hrs grilling by congress.. Well it is you calculations, but you do seem a pretty strange group if you look at logic..
So what has Muller accomplished to date.??? As you can see from above, very early yet, but he has 19 indictments, It that correct?. 2 arrests, one in protective custody.
Think a couple other things, help me out now.. States evidence? agree to talk..
By June or so, some juicy information may come out.. Looking so interesting..
One of the favorite lines of you right wingers is... (
show quote)
There's a "poster" I could love!
It clearly points out you liberals are still beneath Putin's spell. Beautiful, just beautiful.
No matter that Hillary was in his pocket, you guys still cannot know because Hillary's HQ will not tell you that you should know such awful truths.
Beautiful.
PoppaGringo wrote:
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (
show quote)
Poppa,
We are not in a rage because Lady Hillary is not sitting in the white house..
we are in a rage because some orange man who is the very lowest of all the examples of American values is taking up space in the white house..
S. Maturin wrote:
There's a "poster" I could love!
It clearly points out you liberals are still beneath Putin's spell. Beautiful, just beautiful.
No matter that Hillary was in his pocket, you guys still cannot know because Hillary's HQ will not tell you that you should know such awful truths.
Beautiful.
Excerpt from Quora....
What I think Trump actually expected, and what he ultimately wanted, was not to be President. He wanted to narrowly lose to Clinton and then go start Trump TV and spend all his time going on about how much better things would have been if he were in charge. Then he would be making money hand over fist and be surrounded by yesmen in a solely-self-created-media-franchise. Whether you like Trump or not, you’re probably aware he tends to be at home telling people that they’re fired and being able to control his camera angles and photo-ops. He’s basically a “hype man” of the media. “You’re fired!” “Birth certificate!” “Lock her up!” “Build a wall!” “Rigged!” He’s a master of the bit statement.
As President, he can’t do this. I believe that this is the core source of his “fake news” diatribes. He is not in control of how his image is being projected or interpreted. He can’t curate it. This, in his mind, makes it “fake.”
In terms of Putin, it’s pretty well documented that he doesn’t like Hillary Clinton. And if Trump had narrowly lost, it would have caused a destabilization in her administration. While I still think a Clinton presidency would be better than the loop-de-loop we’ve got going on now, it would definitely still be rife with its own problems; this would be one of them.
Plus, if Clinton had won the presidency… do you think that the FBI would be going after all this so doggedly? Would Russian interference in the US elections ever even really come up? I mean, maybe. But maybe not. It would have been water under the bridge. In terms of the interference being at the behest of Hillary, I doubt this. There’s no evidence to corrobrate it at the moment and the evidence that we do have, circumstantial and as yet-incomplete as it is, doesn’t support such a theory.
And I actually think that Putin is rather clever. He’s not a likable character, but the man’s not dumb. If Clinton had won, it’s more likely that the connections between the Trump campaign and Russian influence either a) wouldn’t have gone detected, or b) wouldn’t have been considered as important, or at least c) may have been discovered at a later date.
It would benefit Russian operatives more for their actions to be uncovered like, 10 years after the fact, it seems to me, rather than right away.
permafrost wrote:
Poppa,
We are not in a rage because Lady Hillary is not sitting in the white house..
we are in a rage because some orange man who is the very lowest of all the examples of American values is taking up space in the white house..
No, he beat the lowest example in the general election.
BLAH BLAH BLAH same old crap from the dems. go get those swamp (people)
4430
Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
Loki wrote:
No, he beat the lowest example in the general election.
Not to mention she lost because of a rigged election she rigged !
permafrost wrote:
Poppa,
We are not in a rage because Lady Hillary is not sitting in the white house..
we are in a rage because some orange man who is the very lowest of all the examples of American values is taking up space in the white house..
Riiiight.
Your rage comes from knowing that even though your 'queen' rigged the election, BOUGHT! the election, and had Russian help...
she still LOST!
S. Maturin wrote:
Riiiight.
Your rage comes from knowing that even though your 'queen' rigged the election, BOUGHT! the election, and had Russian help...
she still LOST! Gee Mat... As usual you say the dumbest things..
we have 19 indictments to date.. Now the are looking at the orange man son in law.. we are moving right along..
trump will not enforce the sanctions congress voted for because his buddy Putin told him not to..
In the first two weeks of office he overturned the sanctions Obama initiated over the election meddling..
what the hell is a shit-gibbon??? this PC talk sure is weird. I think it means he is draining the swamp. maybe not.
[quote=permafrost]
You show us a photo of 5 men who you want to honor ?
I’d honor each of them hanging from a noose.
Several of them are pedophiles.
Several of them hate America.
All of them sold all of us down the river.
Several of them would sell his mother for more power.
Nice job of photoshopping President Trumps head on your body there old dirt.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.