One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Iranian Protesters Explosion Of Truth.
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jan 4, 2018 00:00:09   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
weewee,

I thought you weren't talking to me anymore.

Really, your church pre-dates the Christian Catholic Church Faith ? Can't see how, with your fictitious lie . . .

And what denomination is your church ?

That pre-date's the One True Church Catholic Church, that Jesus Christ has founded, for one thousand nine hundred and eighty six years 1,986 years and the apostle succession from Peter to Frances and the Early Church Fathers confirming the Catholic faith ?


Stop, please stop, pulling my leg, please I can't stop laughing !

Show me the biblical, scriptural and historical evidence. That proves your religious Protestant theory ? . . .

Crickets, . . . Crickets, . . . Crickets. . . . Thought so. . . .


Now is the time to "Put-up or shut-up," weewee . . . Cant wait to blow holes through your religious logic. . .

The "truth" is the synonym for your red and blue pills.

No weewee, it's your propaganda that distorts the truth of Jesus Christ teaching.

Just remember the Bible was not codified until the late Fourth Century, everything was oral tradition.

So show me and provide your churches historical documentation ?

Crickets, . . . Crickets, . . . Crickets. . . . Thought so. . . .

Your talk is all compost . . .


you don't speak for the other OPP forum 99 % members.

On what exactly what Jesus Christ actually spoke and taught his one and true church, and what His Apostles actually said, Catholic Sacred Oral Traditions were before the Bible was completed in 404 A.D., What The Catholic Magisterium has said for 1,985 years, What the Doctors of the Catholic Church say about Christianity and Catholicism and factual Biblical historical and Religious historical TRUTH's say.

You can't argue with Catholic Apologetic's, its truthfully definitive, and It's Biblically final.


Care to take a stab and counter these "Twenty One Reasons to Reject Sola Scriptura" ? Why Protestantism is not Biblical. . .

http://www.catholicapologetics.info/apologetics/protestantism/sola.htm
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-119691-1.html


Peewee wrote:


Wow, you speak for everyone on OPP, you're starting to sound like the Pope.

The red pill means you want the truth, a blue pill means you buy the propaganda which seems to mean I want you to see the truth and you want me to believe lies.

Keep hiding behind your so called superior knowledge and religious traditions which prevent you from seeing the simple truth of scripture without having it translated by the powerful rich elite who corrupt and monetize everything.

Also, my Christian faith predates your catholic church faith and every other protestant sect because it's all and only based on Jesus.

Wish we could have found some common ground.
br br Wow, you speak for everyone on OPP, you're... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 4, 2018 01:48:37   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Doc110 wrote:
weewee,

I thought you weren't talking to me anymore.

Really, your church pre-dates the Christian Catholic Church Faith ? Can't see how, with your fictitious lie . . .

And what denomination is your church ?

That pre-date's the One True Church Catholic Church, that Jesus Christ has founded, for one thousand nine hundred and eighty six years 1,986 years and the apostle succession from Peter to Frances and the Early Church Fathers confirming the Catholic faith ?


Stop, please stop, pulling my leg, please I can't stop laughing !

Show me the biblical, scriptural and historical evidence. That proves your religious Protestant theory ? . . .

Crickets, . . . Crickets, . . . Crickets. . . . Thought so. . . .


Now is the time to "Put-up or shut-up," weewee . . . Cant wait to blow holes through your religious logic. . .

The "truth" is the synonym for your red and blue pills.

No weewee, it's your propaganda that distorts the truth of Jesus Christ teaching.

Just remember the Bible was not codified until the late Fourth Century, everything was oral tradition.

So show me and provide your churches historical documentation ?

Crickets, . . . Crickets, . . . Crickets. . . . Thought so. . . .

Your talk is all compost . . .


you don't speak for the other OPP forum 99 % members.

On what exactly what Jesus Christ actually spoke and taught his one and true church, and what His Apostles actually said, Catholic Sacred Oral Traditions were before the Bible was completed in 404 A.D., What The Catholic Magisterium has said for 1,985 years, What the Doctors of the Catholic Church say about Christianity and Catholicism and factual Biblical historical and Religious historical TRUTH's say.

You can't argue with Catholic Apologetic's, its truthfully definitive, and It's Biblically final.


Care to take a stab and counter these "Twenty One Reasons to Reject Sola Scriptura" ? Why Protestantism is not Biblical. . .

http://www.catholicapologetics.info/apologetics/protestantism/sola.htm
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-119691-1.html
weewee, br br I thought you weren't talking to me... (show quote)


Gee Doc, you ask and answer a question... are you related to the Great Oz, can you do a vulcan mind meld, do you know what is in my heart?

If you are a serious student of the faith (and I'm not speaking of the catholic or protestant faiths overall or their institutions/church's) you know that the original church was a house church. A group of believers of Jesus, as the Messiah, would gather together and study and pray. That's my church Doc. Maybe one had a copy of a portion of the writings of one of the disciples, or stories they had heard of in their travels.

An informal gathering of people who believe in Jesus. The people who believe are the "true church". Not any organization or buildings. Not the catholics or any of the many protestant denominations. They came together because of their faith and love of Jesus. Whatever portion of the Torah they had or had memorized they shared and whoever could write, wrote down the stories passed on by the disciples of Christ.

Your a catholic and I'm a baptist, big frigging deal, so what, who cares. Do we follow Jesus or man made doctrine and rules? I left the baptist church when they began to preach "name it and claim it" or "Jesus wants you to be rich" or "we need to combine all religions into one" some call it Christlam. No we don't.

What we need to do is try and become more like Christ. Not our favorite priest or pastor. I can go on the computer and find just about anything I'm looking for. I can go on You Tube and listen to men and women from different denominations/perspectives and hear something new and accept or reject it. I, the individual am responsible for my walk and the fruit I bear and my eternal soul. Being a catholic or baptist won't save a soul. Sincerely asking Jesus to come into our hearts and live within us is how one is saved. There is no other way.

Now, let me try and read your mind. You know your church has some serious problems, in it's theology and it's leadership. You know as well as I do that infant baptism won't and can't save a soul; ten hail Mary's doesn't get your sin/s forgiven, being married won't cause a priest to be less effective in tending the flock and winning souls and might keep him away from altar boys. I could go on but you've heard it all before.

So Doc, which is more important to you, being a member in good standing with the catholic church or being a follower of Christ. Your church is making it harder every year you live, to be both.

Reply
Jan 4, 2018 03:59:05   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
You see peewee,

I want both, and that is what the Catholic church does for me, it gives me both options, as for you and your church there is no and or.

Interpret the Holy Bible, your own way, Thats not what Jesus, the Apostles and the early church fathers taught.

It's your religious problem not mine. You just seem too not get the big picture, yours is a myopic religious viewpoint.

Being a bullsh-ter and telling religious fairy-tails is just common practice for you.

Later peewee, since you don't know how to answer a retort question, our conversation is over.



Peewee wrote:
Gee Doc, you ask and answer a question... are you related to the Great Oz, can you do a vulcan mind meld, do you know what is in my heart?

If you are a serious student of the faith (and I'm not speaking of the catholic or protestant faiths overall or their institutions/church's) you know that the original church was a house church. A group of believers of Jesus, as the Messiah, would gather together and study and pray. That's my church Doc. Maybe one had a copy of a portion of the writings of one of the disciples, or stories they had heard of in their travels.

An informal gathering of people who believe in Jesus. The people who believe are the "true church". Not any organization or buildings. Not the catholics or any of the many protestant denominations. They came together because of their faith and love of Jesus. Whatever portion of the Torah they had or had memorized they shared and whoever could write, wrote down the stories passed on by the disciples of Christ.

Your a catholic and I'm a baptist, big frigging deal, so what, who cares. Do we follow Jesus or man made doctrine and rules? I left the baptist church when they began to preach "name it and claim it" or "Jesus wants you to be rich" or "we need to combine all religions into one" some call it Christlam. No we don't.

What we need to do is try and become more like Christ. Not our favorite priest or pastor. I can go on the computer and find just about anything I'm looking for. I can go on You Tube and listen to men and women from different denominations/perspectives and hear something new and accept or reject it. I, the individual am responsible for my walk and the fruit I bear and my eternal soul. Being a catholic or baptist won't save a soul. Sincerely asking Jesus to come into our hearts and live within us is how one is saved. There is no other way.

Now, let me try and read your mind. You know your church has some serious problems, in it's theology and it's leadership. You know as well as I do that infant baptism won't and can't save a soul; ten hail Mary's doesn't get your sin/s forgiven, being married won't cause a priest to be less effective in tending the flock and winning souls and might keep him away from altar boys. I could go on but you've heard it all before.

So Doc, which is more important to you, being a member in good standing with the catholic church or being a follower of Christ. Your church is making it harder every year you live, to be both.
Gee Doc, you ask and answer a question... are you ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2018 05:35:34   #
samtheyank
 
Doc110 wrote:
01/02/2018 The Iranian Explosion of Truth. There are many reasons to fear that the protests will fail to achieve their goal of overthrowing the regime.

Caroline Glick
https://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/glick-iranian-explosion-truth

If the Iranian regime is unable to brutally stomp out the countrywide protests raging through the country, and if the protesters achieve their goal of bringing down the regime, they will go down in history as the saviors of millions of people not just in Iran but throughout the world.

Given the earth shattering potential of the protests it is extraordinary to see the liberal media in the US and Europe struggle to downplay their significance.

Aside from a lukewarm statement on Twitter from British Foreign Minister Boris Johnson, as of Monday morning – five days into the protests – no senior European official had spoken in favor of the hundreds of thousands of Iranians marching throughout their country demanding freedom.

In the US, former members of the Obama administration and the liberal media have determinedly downplayed the importance of the protests.

They have insisted that President Donald Trump should stop openly supporting the protesters and so adopt former president Barack Obama’s policy of effectively siding with the Iranian regime against the Iranian people who seek its overthrow.

These talking points have been pushed out into the media echo chamber by Obama’s former deputy national security adviser and strategic communications chief Ben Rhodes, his former national security adviser Susan Rice and former secretary of state John Kerry.

Obama’s Middle East coordinator Philip Gordon stated them outright in an op-ed in The New York Times on Saturday. Gordon called on Trump “to keep quiet and do nothing” in response to the protests.


In Gordon’s view, no matter how big their beef with the regime, the protesters hate the US more. And they really hate Trump.

Gordon wrote, “Whatever Iranians think of their own government, they are unlikely to want as a voice for their grievances an American president who has relentlessly opposed economic relief for their country and banned them from traveling to the United States.”

Just as Obama’s surrogates have repeated Gordon’s claims, so the Obama-supporting liberal media have gone out of their way to diminish the importance of the protests in their coverage of them and use Obama’s surrogates as their “expert” analysts to explain what is happening (or rather, distort what is happening) to their audiences.

Obama administration officials have been so outspoken in their defense of the Iranian regime because they rightly view the prospect that the protesters will succeed in overthrowing the regime as a mortal threat to their legacy.

Obama’s foreign policy rested on the assumption that the US was a colonialist, aggressive and immoral superpower.

By their telling, the Iranians – like the Cubans and the Russians – were right to oppose the US due to its legacy of meddling in the internal affairs of other countries.

This anti-American worldview informed the Obama administration’s conviction that it was incumbent on the US to make amends for its previous decades of foreign policy.

Hence, Obama traveled the globe in 2009 and 2010 apologizing for the policies of his predecessors.

Hence, Obama believed that the US had no moral right to stand with the Iranian people against the regime in the 2009 Green Revolution.

As he saw it, anyone who stood with the US was no better than an Uncle Tom.

Truly authentic foreign regimes were be definition anti-American.

Since the Green Revolutionaries were begging for his support, by definition, they didn’t deserve it.

Since the current wave on anti-regime protests began last Thursday, the liberal media have parroted the Obama alumni’s talking points because they feel that their war against Trump requires them to embrace Obama’s legacy.

Just as they embraced his talking points and policies for eight years.


After all, if Obama is not entirely infallible, then Trump cannot be entirely fallible.

And if Trump may be partially right and Obama partially wrong, then their dispute may be a substantive rather than existential one.

And so, the New York Times’ coverage of the most significant story in the world has deliberately distorted and downplayed events on the ground in Iran.

The protests are potentially so important because the Iranian regime is so dangerous.

Thanks to Obama, the regime is on a glide path to a nuclear arsenal.

Its proxy armies in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iraq possess sophisticated armaments most militaries can only dream of.

Its tentacles spread throughout the globe.

The longer the Iranian regime remains in power, the greater the likelihood humanity will soon face a global conflagration that will dwarf World War II.

Nothing any single state does against Iran’s proxies will end Iran’s continued ability to cause mayhem and death on multiple fronts.

Every day the Iranian regime remains in place, it will use its power to continue its direct and indirect wars against its enemies in the Middle East and throughout the world.

Gordon argued that Trump’s pro-Israel and pro-Saudi policies since taking office have made him less credible with the Iranian people.

All you have to do to understand that this is nonsense is listen to what the protesters are chanting. They insist that they want their country’s money spent at home, on them.

They do not want their money used to underwrite Hezbollah, the Assad regime in Syria and Hamas’s regime in Gaza.

In other words, they don’t want to make war with Israel – or, presumably Saudi Arabia.

Their criticism is on point.

In 2016, flush with cash from Obama’s nuclear deal, Iran quadrupled its support of Hezbollah from $200 million to $800m. per year.

In 2012 Iran cut off its funding to Hamas in retaliation for Hamas’s support for the Muslim Brotherhood against Iran’s Syrian proxy President Bashar Assad.

In the wake of Obama’s nuclear deal, Iran became Hamas’s largest financier.

Last August, Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar said that Iran is Hamas’s “largest backer financially and militarily.”

The $100 billion in sanctions relief Iran received in the wake of the nuclear deal enabled the regime to give hundreds of millions of additional dollars each year to its proxy militias and armies in Iraq, Yemen and Syria.

It is self-evident that if the protesters get their way and the ayatollahs are overthrown, that money would stop flowing to Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis and the Shi’ite militias in Iraq.

Instead, that money, and billions more, would be spent developing Iran.

There are many ways that the nations of the world can help the protesters in Iran.

The US and Iran’s other targets can expose the financial corruption in the Islamic Republic, including the bank account information of everyone from Supreme Dictator Ayatollah Ali Khamenei down to local Basij commanders.

They can broadcast anti-regime information into Iran through multiple platforms outside the regime’s control.

They can bypass the regime and unblock Twitter, Facebook, Telegraph and other social media platforms.

Aside from that, the Trump administration can take immediate steps to constrain even further the regime’s access to the international monetary system and force European and US firms to cancel their multi-billion dollar deals with the regime.

There are many reasons to fear that the protests will fail to achieve their goal of overthrowing the regime.

The regime is already sending its forces out to repress the protesters through killing and mass arrests.

But even if the protesters’ prospects of success are small, there is no excuse for not supporting them, as constructively, enthusiastically and unconditionally as possible.

There is certainly no excuse for working to preserve Obama’s foreign policy legacy at the expense of a popular uprising that has the potential to avert a world war.
01/02/2018 The Iranian Explosion of Truth. There a... (show quote)


This is one they can’t blame on the United States, The Great Satan. I would love nothing more than to see those bastards end up on the chopping block and sent to hell. As my Mom said when she was living what goes around comes around and the chickens always come home to roost.

Reply
Jan 4, 2018 06:04:21   #
PeterS
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
The Shah was our puppet. That's why they got rid of him.

My point is that they had the most educated populace in the Middle East (even women were educated and given equal status) and they chose a Muslim theology over a democracy. The Iranians are less educated now so why would we think they would be any wiser in their choices for government?

Reply
Jan 4, 2018 06:41:41   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
PeterS wrote:
That's what happens when all groups don't share in the countries economic wealth.


There you go. They're in upheaval because they're not socialist enough.

Reply
Jan 4, 2018 06:49:08   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Doc110 wrote:
You see peewee,

I want both, and that is what the Catholic church does for me, it gives me both options, as for you and your church there is no and or.

Interpret the Holy Bible, your own way, Thats not what Jesus, the Apostles and the early church fathers taught.

It's your religious problem not mine. You just seem too not get the big picture, yours is a myopic religious viewpoint.

Being a bullsh-ter and telling religious fairy-tails is just common practice for you.

Later peewee, since you don't know how to answer a retort question, our conversation is over.
You see peewee, br br I want both, and that is wh... (show quote)


Well, at least I tried. Your church means more to you than being a follower of Christ. It's all in your head and not in your heart.

Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2018 10:16:07   #
PZG1225 Loc: Florida
 
Peewee wrote:
Wow, you speak for everyone on OPP, you're starting to sound like the Pope. The red pill means you want the truth, a blue pill means you buy the propaganda which seems to mean I want you to see the truth and you want me to believe lies.

Keep hiding behind your so called superior knowledge and religious traditions which prevent you from seeing the simple truth of scripture without having it translated by the powerful rich elite who corrupt and monetize everything. Also, my Christian faith predates your catholic church faith and every other protestant sect because it's all and only based on Jesus.

Wish we could have found some common ground.
Wow, you speak for everyone on OPP, you're startin... (show quote)


Peewee you are right on all counts....I have come to highly respect your opinions and especially when you get into Biblical doctrine, etc., We are like minded. As for common ground with Doc110.....there is none. Catholicism is a cult. End of story.

Reply
Jan 4, 2018 11:04:52   #
PeterS
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
There you go. They're in upheaval because they're not socialist enough.

That's exactly why they are in rebellion which is why you cons better plan ahead otherwise you don't know what you are releasing...

Reply
Jan 4, 2018 11:06:03   #
PeterS
 
Peewee wrote:
Well, at least I tried. Your church means more to you than being a follower of Christ. It's all in your head and not in your heart.


I have new's for you Peewee, all religion is in ones head and not in ones heart...

Reply
Jan 4, 2018 23:42:08   #
Doc110 Loc: York PA
 
Peewee,

You didn't even begin to try . . . .

All right, so you putting out your touchy-felly side of Baptist-Calvinism to me and you tried to reached out. So what ?

Religion Library, Baptist:
http://www.patheos.com/library/baptist

a. Overview, http://www.patheos.com/library/baptist
b. Origins, John Smyth http://www.patheos.com/library/baptist/origins
c. History, http://www.patheos.com/library/baptist/historical-development
d. Beliefs, http://www.patheos.com/library/baptist/beliefs
e. Rituals And Worship, http://www.patheos.com/library/baptist/ritual-worship-devotion-symbolism
f. Ethics And Community, http://www.patheos.com/library/baptist/ethics-morality-community

And you tried to sound so religiously monogamous. Ever heard of wolf's in sheep's clothing's . . . so don't be so naive . . . Peewee.

Really, you have to stop playing your Baptist-Calvinistic religious games on the OPP thread.

Apparently you really don't want a true Christian discussion on our theological differences.

This is your attempt of Baptist-Calvinistic anti-Catholic bigotry.

Yes I said, Calvinistic anti-Catholic bigotry, your not saving anyone, and especially not me.

From your tomfoolery attempt on being religious cordiality.

I'm not playing your belittling guilt game.


So Peewee, Big deal, hasn't gotten you anywhere, so stop playing to the crowd on the OPP forum. e.g. Baptist or reformed Baptist or Southern Baptists.

So far their are thousands of present day division in Protestantism, and It continues. e.g. over 33,000 thousand sects, and growing some say as high as 51,000 world wide.

Within The Baptist community their have been several schisms, divisions, sect's, "denominations" and independence local congregations.
Because Baptist ecclesiology (that is, doctrine of the church) is anchored in the local church.

Their are now 18 sect's, "denominations" and divisions and on going self-interpretation Baptists.

a. Particular Baptists
b. Anabaptist
c. Separatist church or "Dissenters"
d. General Baptists
e. Seventh Day Baptists
f. Sabbatarians Baptists
g. Baptist with Calvinistic beliefs
h. Dutch Anabaptists (Mennonites)
i. Baptist tradition and the emerging "American spirit Baptist."
j. Two distinct Baptist theological traditions -- Arminian and Calvinist -- within the Baptist tradition.
k. Southern Baptists
l. Reformed Baptists
m. African-American Baptists
n. Conservative Baptists
o. Northern Baptists
p. Baptists "fundamentalist/modernist" controversies e.g. inspiration and authority of the Bible
q. Progressive National Baptist
r. Baptist soul competence, or Baptist freedom of conscience, and the self autonomy of Baptist churches and institutions
s. The supreme Baptist authority, religious self-interpretation, the Bible.

And Jesus asked us to remain as one:

Who are you kidding and when will this self-interpretation believers stop . . . .?

John 17:11 I will remain in the world no longer, but they are still in the world, and I am coming to you.
Holy Father, protect them by the power of your name, the name you gave me, so that they may be one as we are one.

It's called religious self-interpretation of the bible for a reason, and flawed self-interpretation theology.



Peewee, So lets get into the heart of the discussion or the cliché: The meat and the potatoes e.g.


What really are your personal religious Baptist vendetta's and anti-catholic undertones against the Catholic Christian Church ?

And why you think your Calvinistic-Baptist Cult and heretical implications of your theology is superior to the Christian Catholic Church? ?

Does that get to the point of your argumentation and retort statements and anti-Catholic opinion's ?


I'll start with a few Religious Subject:
And URL website's that back up my statements on Catholicism the One True Church Founded by Jesus Christ.

1. The Catholic Church
http://www.patheos.com/library/roman-catholicism

◦ The Church is the “Pillar of the Truth”
The Magisterium or Teaching Authority of the Church
https://www.ewtn.com/faith/teachings/chura4.htm
http://www.cuf.org/2002/11/pillar-and-bulwark-of-the-truth-the-infallibility-magisterium-of-the-catholic-church/

• The Binding Authority of Councils, Led by the Holy Spirit Papal Encyclicals Online, Papal and other official documents of the Catholic Church
Papal Encyclicals http://www.papalencyclicals.net
Church Councils: http://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils

• The Authority of Oral Tradition
 Bible, Tradition, Canon, & “Sola Scriptura” (Index Page)
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2006/11/bible-church-tradition-canon-index.html

2. Divisions and Denominationalism
◦ Christians Ought to Be One, as Jesus and His Father Are One
• A Multiplicity of Divisions Is a Bad Thing
• Dissensions and Denominationalism Forbidden by St. Paul
 
3. Bible and Tradition
◦ The Necessity of Authoritative Interpretation
www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2004/04/problem-of-authority-luther-calvin.html
• The Binding Authority of Tradition, According to St. Paul
• Oral and Extrabiblical Tradition in the New Testament
 
4. The Papacy
◦ St. Peter as the Rock and Possessor of the Keys of the Kingdom
 
5. Justification and Salvation
◦ Faith and Works: Two Sides of One Coin
• The Rich Young Ruler’s Question About Salvation
• God’s Fellow Workers?
• St. Paul’s Plea: “Work Out Your Salvation”
• Obedience Necessary for Salvation
• Disobedience Led to Death, Obedience to Justification
• St. Paul on Falling Away from the Faith and Salvation
• Other Biblical Writers on Apostasy
 
6. Judgment and Good Works
◦ The Crucial Role of Works (and Absence of Faith) in Judgment Day Accounts
• St. Paul: “Doers of the Law” Will Be Justified
 
7. Baptism
◦ Baptism of Entire Households (Implying the Baptism of Children) .
• Baptismal Regeneration
 
8. The Eucharist
◦ The Last Supper: “This Is My Body”
• “He Who Eats My Flesh and Drinks My Blood Has Eternal Life”
• “Participation” in the Body and Blood of Christ
• Profaning the Body and Blood of the Lord
 
9. Penance
◦ Sharing in Christ’s Sufferings
• Carrying Christ’s Afflictions in Our Bodies
 
10. The Communion of the Saints
◦ The Imitation of Paul and the Veneration of the Saints
• Saints in Heaven as a “Cloud of Witnesses” Watching Those on Earth
• The Intercession of the Saints and Their Connection with the Earth
 
11. Relics and Sacramentals
◦ Elisha’s Bones Raise a Man from the Dead
• More Biblical Relics: Elijah’s Mantle, Peter’s Shadow, and Paul’s Handkerchief
 
12. Purgatory and Prayers for the Dead
◦ A Fairly Explicit Biblical Argument for Purgatory 1
• Baptism for the Dead: the Most “Un-Protestant” Verse in the Bible
• The Case of Onesiphorus: Did St. Paul Pray for a Dead Man?
• Prayers for the Dead When the Dead Are Raised
www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2004/02/new-biblical-argument-re-prayers-for.html
 
13. The Blessed Virgin Mary
◦ Full of Grace: The Blessed Virgin Mary’s Sinlessness and Immaculate Conception
www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2006/07/luke-128-full-of-grace-immaculate.html
 
14. Clerical Celibacy
◦ Voluntary Eunuchs for the Sake of the Kingdom of Heaven
• “Each Has His Own Special Gift”; “Undivided Devotion to the Lord”
 
15. Divorce
◦ Our Lord Jesus’ “Strict” Stance on Divorce
 
16. Contraception
◦ The Sin of Onan [online excerpt is from the first draft,]

Peewee, Choose your topic and provide scriptural passages.
. . .

While your at it, Try answering these questions:

You can't argue with Catholic Apologetic's, its truthfully definitive, and It's Biblically final.


Care to take a stab and counter these "Twenty One Reasons to Reject Sola Scriptura" ? Why Protestantism is not Biblical. . .

http://www.catholicapologetics.info/apologetics/protestantism/sola.htm
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-119691-1.html [/b]

[quote=Peewee

Well, at least I tried.

Your church means more to you than being a follower of Christ. It's all in your head and not in your heart.[/quote]

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.