One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Obamas Birth Certificate
Page <<first <prev 13 of 45 next> last>>
Dec 17, 2017 13:20:57   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
jSmitty45 wrote:
You are so nuts, Bob!


Open a history book. We stole their land.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 13:22:34   #
S. Maturin
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Bull S*** is not clear.


OK, so, you are entering the In-coherency Competition?

Or, maybe, you were just coughing up some furball?

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 13:27:15   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
kankune wrote:
Dang it Smitty. He's back in the funny home doing the thorzine shuffle. 🤣🤣



Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2017 13:55:03   #
Paybacktimeishere
 
Badbob: To The Victor, goes The Spoil's! Even
CEASAR stated: "I Came, I Saw, I Conquered"!
"BB F***-WAD", along with all of his Traitorous,
Leftist, Anti-American, "Friend's", have already
surrendered to Mexico, as has The former State
of "MEXIFORNIA"!!! Generally,Traitor's, Earn their Own Firing Squad. Even those "brave" psychopath's, still snorting Reddi-Whip!!! The
Coming Civil War, will finally decide, who get's
Shot, Hung, or Gassed!? Only The Winner, will
determine the Outcome!?

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 13:57:17   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
Bad Bob wrote:


Dance girlie bull...dance. 😉😉

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 13:59:56   #
S. Maturin
 
kankune wrote:
Dance girlie bull...dance. 😉😉




Perfect.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 14:56:23   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
2bltap wrote:
HI all. Look this video is a bit of old news. However, it was just recently that Jerome Corrsi, a well respected news journalist came out with information stating that those in the CIA at the time had been found to have CREATED THE FORGED long form birth certificate as well as having groomed Hussien Obama, aka Barry Soetero who had put out that he was in fact a foreign student in order to get into college. This is fact and its readily available on the internet. The long form birth certificate was investigated for years by not only by those in the United Stes wo have unrefutable reputations but those over in Europe who are of the same caliber and are experts in the field that it was in fact a completely false and forged document. Now Im sure that many here will at least from the progressive left will say its all BS and thats fine. SO SUE ME!!!!! My only real question here is why was this fraud allowed to ocurr to this country? What in fact was the bottom line purpose for this to have continued? In any event, I still believe that Soetero/Obama should have never been allowed to stain The Peoples House. Im like what in the hell would happen if the right people of power in our government would actually have the balls and courage to go ahead truly look into this? I mean for crying out loud, just look at all of the subversive things hew has done not only during his time in office but all of the Seditious and yes I would say Treasonous things that he has been doing since leaving The Peoples House. Why is is allowed to do these things and on the peoples dime at that? I cant and wont speak for anyone else but I have been and still are extremely angry over this issue. Thats just how I feel.
Semper Fi

https://youtu.be/2MyY3ZqtrQ8
HI all. Look this video is a bit of old news. Ho... (show quote)


That was telling wasn't it?
Electing the Manchurian Candidate, twice.
The dumbing down in America has gone on for decades.

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2017 14:58:49   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Paybacktimeishere wrote:
Rlockwood: The Radical, Communist, Muslim, NonCitizen, former Community Organizer, did
absolutely nothing, without Financial Help, from
His friend's, & supporter's, fellow radical's, &
especially, many of the Leftist, "Stargazing",
anti-American, Multi-Billionaire, "Fellow Traveler's"(Communist Comrades). Old, George
Soros(actually, now the World's first Trillionaire,
& of course, a Kosher collaborator, with The Nazis). He had been protected by false ID'S, &
a well respected, non-Jewish, New StepFather,
& Friend,of Soros Real Father. To put OBAMA into the White House, the End, would justify the
Mean's, & It was very successful. Remember, The Media, & Hollywood, are the "Propaganda Arm" of The New Left, & the young, white, Millennial's, were already "Brainwashed", & "Brain dead", & believed ALL of The Progressive
Left's, lies & "BS"!!! Black "Minder's" kept the
white Millennial's, under control, quite easily. They were terrified of being called a Racist, or
Physical Violence. Don't forget, 95% of American Black's, voted for OBAMA, which of course is Racist! It is the same reality, if 95% of
White People, voted for former Klansman, Dr. David Duke(White Nationalist). I also believe,
Voter Fraud, was rampant, in virtually every State. Eight year's of the "OBAMA REGIME", has very nearly, led to the complete Destruction of
The United States. His "Plant's", and/or "boobytrap's", & Seditious, hidden Traitor's, are
still in affect, designed to weaken, & destroy, The Trump Presidency, & the effect's are still ongoing!!!
Rlockwood: The Radical, Communist, Muslim, NonCiti... (show quote)


The PTB/Big Money/MSM got Hussein elected.
Most people have not figured that out.
For those that have; who wonders why?

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 15:24:19   #
JohnCorrespondent
 
According to https://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/studentid.asp " :

that ID card:

(a) is "not a real Columbia University student ID issued to Barack Obama (under any name) in 1981; it’s simply an altered version of a Columbia University ID card issued to another student in 1998" ;

(b) "couldn’t possibly have have been a Columbia University student ID issued to Barack Obama in 1981, as the digital ID card format it uses wasn’t introduced at Columbia until 1996" ;

and:

(c) "is obviously a forgery, as the photograph it bears is not a picture of a 20-year-old Barack Obama from 1981; it’s a picture taken several years later, during or shortly after Barack Obama’s time at Harvard Law School (1988-1991)".

Also: The matter of Obama's birth or citizenship has been put to the courts many times. Here's one of the results, which I think is probably a typical result of those cases:

'Hollister v. Soetoro

'On March 5, 2009, a lawsuit filed by Philip Berg on behalf of Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force colonel, against Barack Obama (referenced as "Barry Soetoro", the name given at the time of his enrollment in an Indonesian elementary school). The suit was dismissed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The presiding judge, James Robertson, said the case was a waste of the court's time, calling Berg and another lawyer "agents provocateurs" and their local counsel, John Hemenway, "a foot soldier in their crusade." He ordered Hemenway to show cause why he should not pay the legal fees for Obama's attorney as a penalty for filing a complaint "for an improper purpose such as to harass".[43] The district court ultimately reprimanded Hemenway for his actions, and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the dismissal of the case and Hemenway's reprimand.[26] On January 18, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court declined, without comment, to hear the case.[44]'

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_presidential_eligibility_litigation for that and other such cases.

I'm more interested in the philosophy, ideas, and manner of a politician. Why would I even care where a president or candidate was _born_, while some such candidates or presidents are provocative to start unnecessary wars (Bush II and Trump), or administratively responsible for covert operations to overthrow governments and arm foreign governments (Reagan and the Iran-Contra scandal)? Alongside such things, circumstances of birth are much less significant. Regarding Obama, the man was obviously very involved in the United States for a long time (that's true, even if your claim were true, that he'd been born somewhere else). Even if he _had_ been born somewhere else, I'm more interested in his ideas than where he was born. Here is what Obama said: "Surely you can question my policies without questioning my faith. Or for that matter my citizenship." (That was at the February 2010 National Prayer Breakfast, according to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories#Barack_Obama%27s_response ).

Some posters on this topic (but not you in this post) have called Obama a Muslim as though that were a derogatory term or even relevant to anything. That's one of the reasons I haven't paid much attention to this topic in the past. I haven't paid much attention to this topic of Obama's birth and citizenship, firstly because I don't think birth and citizenship are as important as involvement and ideas, and secondly because I see many of the people who argue against Obama's birth and citizenship are the same people who spout a lot of ethnocentric, xenophobic nonsense, such as opposition to Muslims or Islam in a way which is merely stereotyping. It would be just as easy to oppose Christians, who as a group have sponsored as much violence, torture, and other terrorism as anybody. But we should not oppose Christians as a whole in that shallow way, just as we should not oppose Muslims in that way: it's a wrong kind of generalizing: a stereotyping.

Your post was better than theirs, I think, but still doesn't pass muster with things like snopes and wikipedia, and, even if you were right, it would still be about mere citizenship, of a person who obviously is more involved in the U.S. than most common citizens are. So find something wrong with his ideas or his philosophy or his policies: those are the more significant topics.

The person who says an idea is often less important than the idea itself. That's particularly true when the person is President, whose ideas have far-reaching effects. Argue the ideas.

-John, Dec. 17, 2017

Steve700 wrote:
To Liberals: ---- Overwelming Proof you can't Refute:

Trump only said that yes, Obama was born in the United States, only for political expediency. He actually knows better and eventually that will be proven after a few years when Trump finally completes the dismantling of the deep state and its shadow government. Obama's own grandmother soon met a suspicious death joining Obama's Deadpool after she went around telling people she was there at the hospital in Kenya when Barack was born. That birth certificate has been thoroughly investigated and found to be a computer composite with mistakes in it like naming the hospital the change to name, rather than the name it was at the time of Obama's birth. Obama's father's nationality was also listed as African when in 1961 a black man's race was listed as Negro, Not African. The case went to court and the judge immediately threw it out, obviously because the case was just too hot and he didn't want to have to render a decision that would result in him joining Obama's Deadpool of suspicious deaths along with his own grandmother, 3 gay lovers of Obama from Jeremiah Wright's church, Joan Rivers, Loretta Fuddy, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Scolia (Now there is a provable assassination) and the scores of others who were a threat and/or uncooperative to Obama. Also, I'm sure not quite so coincidentally, a friend and fellow Sabud cult cult member of Obama's mother just happened to be recently appointed to the Hawaii Department of Health shortly before that birth certificate was issued by her all. Within a month after it was issued, this Loretta Fuddy met her untimely suspicious death when her small between the islands plane ditched into the ocean. It's time for you liberal dummies to wake up and do a little research from other than left-wing sources, so that you can know what you're talking about instead of blindly accepting whatever your dishonest, corrupt, totalitarian globalist/leftist hierarchy tells you.

Of course if you did that you would end up joining the party that holds Truth, Honesty & Integrity as their prime values, but then of course those old Christian values are just a little too repugnant to you. And of course, lies are just fine with you as long as it furthers your leftist agenda.

Very recent video on this fraud with New Information --- But don't bother to look liberals 'cuz you wouldn't want to spoil your delusion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Rs23W3YkJA
.
b To Liberals: /b ---- u Overwelming Proof yo... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 15:24:49   #
Mikeyavelli
 
eagleye13 wrote:
The PTB/Big Money/MSM got Hussein elected.
Most people have not figured that out.
For those that have; who wonders why?


The coup began when obama slithered into the Whitehouse. All of Washington DC considers Trump as intruder into their government. Ousting Trump is the right thing to do. After all, it's the obama clinton cabal's government. Everything was set. But we screwed it up by electing Trump. Don't worry, the obama clinton cabal will fix it. Like they fixed everything else.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 15:34:42   #
Crayons Loc: St Jo, Texas
 
JohnCorrespondent wrote:
sorry sir; in case you haven't heard "Snopes can't be trusted", you can run that
up the flag pole yourself. And as far as Wicca'pedia goes; anyone can edit it anytime at their own will.

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2017 15:37:09   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
JohnCorrespondent wrote:
According to https://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/studentid.asp " :

that ID card:

(a) is "not a real Columbia University student ID issued to Barack Obama (under any name) in 1981; it’s simply an altered version of a Columbia University ID card issued to another student in 1998" ;

(b) "couldn’t possibly have have been a Columbia University student ID issued to Barack Obama in 1981, as the digital ID card format it uses wasn’t introduced at Columbia until 1996" ;

and:

(c) "is obviously a forgery, as the photograph it bears is not a picture of a 20-year-old Barack Obama from 1981; it’s a picture taken several years later, during or shortly after Barack Obama’s time at Harvard Law School (1988-1991)".

Also: The matter of Obama's birth or citizenship has been put to the courts many times. Here's one of the results, which I think is probably a typical result of those cases:

'Hollister v. Soetoro

'On March 5, 2009, a lawsuit filed by Philip Berg on behalf of Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force colonel, against Barack Obama (referenced as "Barry Soetoro", the name given at the time of his enrollment in an Indonesian elementary school). The suit was dismissed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The presiding judge, James Robertson, said the case was a waste of the court's time, calling Berg and another lawyer "agents provocateurs" and their local counsel, John Hemenway, "a foot soldier in their crusade." He ordered Hemenway to show cause why he should not pay the legal fees for Obama's attorney as a penalty for filing a complaint "for an improper purpose such as to harass".[43] The district court ultimately reprimanded Hemenway for his actions, and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the dismissal of the case and Hemenway's reprimand.[26] On January 18, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court declined, without comment, to hear the case.[44]'

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_presidential_eligibility_litigation for that and other such cases.

I'm more interested in the philosophy, ideas, and manner of a politician. Why would I even care where a president or candidate was _born_, while some such candidates or presidents are provocative to start unnecessary wars (Bush II and Trump), or administratively responsible for covert operations to overthrow governments and arm foreign governments (Reagan and the Iran-Contra scandal)? Alongside such things, circumstances of birth are much less significant. Regarding Obama, the man was obviously very involved in the United States for a long time (that's true, even if your claim were true, that he'd been born somewhere else). Even if he _had_ been born somewhere else, I'm more interested in his ideas than where he was born. Here is what Obama said: "Surely you can question my policies without questioning my faith. Or for that matter my citizenship." (That was at the February 2010 National Prayer Breakfast, according to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories#Barack_Obama%27s_response ).

Some posters on this topic (but not you in this post) have called Obama a Muslim as though that were a derogatory term or even relevant to anything. That's one of the reasons I haven't paid much attention to this topic in the past. I haven't paid much attention to this topic of Obama's birth and citizenship, firstly because I don't think birth and citizenship are as important as involvement and ideas, and secondly because I see many of the people who argue against Obama's birth and citizenship are the same people who spout a lot of ethnocentric, xenophobic nonsense, such as opposition to Muslims or Islam in a way which is merely stereotyping. It would be just as easy to oppose Christians, who as a group have sponsored as much violence, torture, and other terrorism as anybody. But we should not oppose Christians as a whole in that shallow way, just as we should not oppose Muslims in that way: it's a wrong kind of generalizing: a stereotyping.

Your post was better than theirs, I think, but still doesn't pass muster with things like snopes and wikipedia, and, even if you were right, it would still be about mere citizenship, of a person who obviously is more involved in the U.S. than most common citizens are. So find something wrong with his ideas or his philosophy or his policies: those are the more significant topics.

The person who says an idea is often less important than the idea itself. That's particularly true when the person is President, whose ideas have far-reaching effects. Argue the ideas.

-John, Dec. 17, 2017
According to https://www.snopes.com/politics/obama... (show quote)


johny; so to you the Constituion is not as important as; "I haven't paid much attention to this topic of Obama's birth and citizenship, firstly because I don't think birth and citizenship are as important as involvement and ideas, and secondly because I see many of the people who argue against Obama's birth and citizenship are the same people who spout a lot of ethnocentric, xenophobic nonsense,... "

"The person who says an idea is often less important than the idea itself. That's particularly true when the person is President, whose ideas have far-reaching effects. Argue the ideas." - JohnCorrespondent

Here is the argument; Communism/socialism never works long term. It never will.
Not to mention the fact that Communists and Fascists want to take this country down.

George Soros: Evil Zionist Puppet Master Exposed
https://youtu.be/1eRFTHD2CTg

10 Things You Didn't Know About George Soros
https://youtu.be/tfBHYxEojZk

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 16:12:51   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
Kankune, you are so right!

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 17:01:01   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
JohnCorrespondent wrote:
According to https://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/studentid.asp " :

that ID card:

(a) is "not a real Columbia University student ID issued to Barack Obama (under any name) in 1981; it’s simply an altered version of a Columbia University ID card issued to another student in 1998" ;

(b) "couldn’t possibly have have been a Columbia University student ID issued to Barack Obama in 1981, as the digital ID card format it uses wasn’t introduced at Columbia until 1996" ;

and:

(c) "is obviously a forgery, as the photograph it bears is not a picture of a 20-year-old Barack Obama from 1981; it’s a picture taken several years later, during or shortly after Barack Obama’s time at Harvard Law School (1988-1991)".

Also: The matter of Obama's birth or citizenship has been put to the courts many times. Here's one of the results, which I think is probably a typical result of those cases:

'Hollister v. Soetoro

'On March 5, 2009, a lawsuit filed by Philip Berg on behalf of Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force colonel, against Barack Obama (referenced as "Barry Soetoro", the name given at the time of his enrollment in an Indonesian elementary school). The suit was dismissed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The presiding judge, James Robertson, said the case was a waste of the court's time, calling Berg and another lawyer "agents provocateurs" and their local counsel, John Hemenway, "a foot soldier in their crusade." He ordered Hemenway to show cause why he should not pay the legal fees for Obama's attorney as a penalty for filing a complaint "for an improper purpose such as to harass".[43] The district court ultimately reprimanded Hemenway for his actions, and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the dismissal of the case and Hemenway's reprimand.[26] On January 18, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court declined, without comment, to hear the case.[44]'

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_presidential_eligibility_litigation for that and other such cases.

I'm more interested in the philosophy, ideas, and manner of a politician. Why would I even care where a president or candidate was _born_, while some such candidates or presidents are provocative to start unnecessary wars (Bush II and Trump), or administratively responsible for covert operations to overthrow governments and arm foreign governments (Reagan and the Iran-Contra scandal)? Alongside such things, circumstances of birth are much less significant. Regarding Obama, the man was obviously very involved in the United States for a long time (that's true, even if your claim were true, that he'd been born somewhere else). Even if he _had_ been born somewhere else, I'm more interested in his ideas than where he was born. Here is what Obama said: "Surely you can question my policies without questioning my faith. Or for that matter my citizenship." (That was at the February 2010 National Prayer Breakfast, according to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories#Barack_Obama%27s_response ).

Some posters on this topic (but not you in this post) have called Obama a Muslim as though that were a derogatory term or even relevant to anything. That's one of the reasons I haven't paid much attention to this topic in the past. I haven't paid much attention to this topic of Obama's birth and citizenship, firstly because I don't think birth and citizenship are as important as involvement and ideas, and secondly because I see many of the people who argue against Obama's birth and citizenship are the same people who spout a lot of ethnocentric, xenophobic nonsense, such as opposition to Muslims or Islam in a way which is merely stereotyping. It would be just as easy to oppose Christians, who as a group have sponsored as much violence, torture, and other terrorism as anybody. But we should not oppose Christians as a whole in that shallow way, just as we should not oppose Muslims in that way: it's a wrong kind of generalizing: a stereotyping.

Your post was better than theirs, I think, but still doesn't pass muster with things like snopes and wikipedia, and, even if you were right, it would still be about mere citizenship, of a person who obviously is more involved in the U.S. than most common citizens are. So find something wrong with his ideas or his philosophy or his policies: those are the more significant topics.

The person who says an idea is often less important than the idea itself. That's particularly true when the person is President, whose ideas have far-reaching effects. Argue the ideas.

-John, Dec. 17, 2017
According to https://www.snopes.com/politics/obama... (show quote)




John,

A fine post, thank you...

Now you know that all these right wingers will hate you for the duration of your time on OPP.

Which I hope is extensive..

The few of us on the liberal side welcome you..

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 17:12:26   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
S. Maturin wrote:
"I am a true Christian.. And I proudly stand for all that means.." Yeah, riiiight.

Your actions and attitudes belie your claim. No Christian would be as boastful, proud, arrogant, or as less generous and intolerant as you.

You lie. You are definitely not a Christian no matter what you swear.

C'mon, put down the word that means " muslims are instructed to lie to infidels.." T-something, isn't it?
i "I am a true Christian.. And I proudly sta... (show quote)




Your belief of what a Christian would do or not do are very different from mine..

To my a Christian would not suppress the lives of other people, nor support a sinful and evil predator of children.

Nor would he support the concentration of power into a small select group of people while suppressing the rights of other groups..

A Christian would not repeat lies which he can not support as truth. He would not accuse others if he had no proof that his own statements were correct.

He would not be insulted when his opinion was challenged and demand proof when he has none..

Intolerance is the tool of the devil and never something that Jesus would do..

As to what you think about Muslims and all the other groups which you defame, Nearly every word I have seen printed about them by you and your fellow right wingers is false..

The orange man may have ended the Johnson act for you. But When you become political, you leave your religious shelter in the minds of most Americans,..

You can not, with integrity, then shelter behind your religious standing to defend yourself..

Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 45 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.