at41

Why don't you take your proof of these allegations and go to the authorities and Fox news to start an investigation?

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

I am sure you have a variety fit for all occasions including the grand finale...
What is your favorite?

Believe it or not I like an occasional puff from the Romeo Julieta.. its flavor extraordinary...Usually enjoyed with a cognac while sipping..Hypnotic is a nice smooth blend of cognac and brandy that I find tastes very good usually my sipper if out..

I’m not much of a drinker.. Never at home but do when I go out.. Well wait, I do enjoy a nice red wine with dinner sometimes or when in here while listening to music and reading this or that..

It’s sleeting here right now so I’m sipping baileys n cream in my coffee..Francesca another smooth blend liquor in coffee is also good.. ..

2bltap Loc: Move to the Mainland

Here is another video pretty much stating the same thing as the others but the difference here is that this is coming from a pretty much no bullshit YouTube channel that uses other verified sources of information. Im telling you my friends and those that are not here on OPP that I wouldnt be the least bit surprised that this information is being spread around like wild fire and before to long it may actually hit the MSM who of course will start soing their misinformation campaign as they normally do as they push their ANTI AMERICAN PROPAGANDA. I sincerely hope this actually does become an issue for the MSM to start their BS on this. Because if thgis information were to start becoming an issue for the progressive left you know for damn sure their concerned about it. Just sayin.
Semper Fi

Steve700

Never to the extent of liberals. More often he exaggerates or state something as true, that he feels is probably true, but is really not so sure of. Quite different from the corruption he is trying to end end the constant ongoing decietful manipulation of thought and opinion by the left. For instance your political correctness which is censorship, suppression of truth and a war on truth is also a dirty tactic of making false accusations to stifle discomforting facts, avoid debate and walk away feeling as though you have won.

Steve700

Full investigations have already been done and the facts indicating that longform birth certificates are absolutely overwhelming. It has also been taken to court and the judge immediately threw it out, refusing to hear it. (Just like the coroner refused to come out to the scene of Supreme Court justice Scolia's death. These people understand the power of the deep state and shadow government, and the lengths to which they will go. I'm sure the judge didn't want to end up on Obama's Deadpool list of suspicious deaths of the people who were a threat to him Like his own grandmother (who She Was There and Obama's Birth in Kenya), 3 gay lovers from Jeremiah Wright's church, Loretta Fuddy, the friend and fellow cult member of Obama's mother who mysteriously got appointed to the Hawaii Department of Health and who issued that birth certificate (dead within a month after that), Judge Scolia, Joan Rivers and scores of others.

Also, Fox ain't going to say nothing. They are deep state controlled also and are limited in what they can't say. And that's a fact
Look at my post, 4th one down from the top on page!

boofhead

In fact this was about suffrage, not citizenship. Mrs Minor was never doubted to be a citizen and was also natural born but the definition or clarification of the meaning of the words was not part of the case and not subject to legal opinion. If you actually read it you will see that the most acceptable definition of natural born is by having a citizen father at the time of the birth. The location is not important; the child can be born anywhere in the world and still be natural born if his/her father was a citizen. Being born in the US can make one a citizen, sure, although that is not the complete story because the 14th amendment adds a condition "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" which means that anchor babies cannot be citizens, contrary to how that amendment is being interpreted nowadays. A person born in the US and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, which means that the mother or father were in the country legally, would be native born and a citizen. Also natural born if the father was a citizen.

The citizens of each state constituted the citizens of the United States when the Constitution was adopted. ... ... Supreme Court Justice Peter Vivian Daniel disagreed with this position and considered natural born citizen as every person born of citizen parents within the United States.

IRREFUTABLE AUTHORITY HAS SPOKEN

(Oct. 18, 2009) — The Post & Email has in several articles mentioned that the Supreme Court of the United States has given the definition of what a “natural born citizen” is. Since being a natural born citizen is an objective qualification and requirement of office for the U.S. President, it is important for all U.S. Citizens to understand what this term means.

Let’s cut through all the opinion and speculation, all the “he says”, “she says”, fluff, and go right to the irrefutable, constitutional authority on all terms and phrases mentioned in the U.S. Constitution: the Supreme Court of the United States.

First, let me note that there are 4 such cases which speak of the notion of “natural born citizenship”.

Each of these cases will cite or apply the definition of this term, as given in a book entitled, The Law of Nations, written by Emmerich de Vattel, a Swiss-German philosopher of law. In that book, the following definition of a “natural born citizen” appears, in Book I, Chapter 19, § 212, of the English translation of 1797 (p. 110):

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. . . .

The French original of 1757, on that same passage read thus:

Les naturels, ou indigenes, sont ceux qui sont nes dans le pays de parents citoyens, . . .

The terms “natives” and “natural born citizens” are obviously English terms; used to render the idea convyed by the French phrase “les naturels, ou indigenes”: but both refered to the same category of citizen: one born in the country, of parents who were citizens of that country.

In the political philosophy of Vattel, the term “naturels” refers to citizens who are such by the Law of Nature, that is by the natural cirumstances of their birth — which they did not choose; the term “indigenes” is from the Latin, indigenes, which like the English, “indigenous”, means “begotten from within” (inde-genes), as in the phrase “the indigenous natives are the peoples who have been born and lived there for generations.” Hence the meaning the the term, “natural born citizen”, or “naturels ou indigenes” is the same: born in the country of two parents who are citizens of that country.

Vattel did not invent the notion “natural born citizen”; he was merely applying the Law of Nature to questions of citizenship. In fact the term first appears in a letter of the future Supreme Court Justice, John Jay, to George Washington during the Constitutional Convention, where the Framers were consulting 3 copies Vattel’s book to complete their work (according to the testimony of Benjamin Franklin).

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

In this case, Wong Kim Ark, the son of 2 resident Chinese aliens, claimed U.S. Citizenship and was vindicated by the court on the basis of the 14th Amendment. In this case the Justice Gray gave the opinion of the court. On p. 168-9 of the record, He cites approvingly the decision in Minor vs. Happersett:

At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

On the basis of the 14th Amendment, however, the majority opinion coined a new definition for “native citizen”, as anyone who was born in the U.S.A., under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Court gave a novel interpretation to jurisdiction, and thus extended citizenship to all born in the country (excepting those born of ambassadors and foreign armies etc.); but it did not extend the meaning of the term “natural born citizen.”

Finally it should be noted, that to define a term is to indicate the category or class of things which it signifies. In this sense, the Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

Hence every U.S. Citizen must accept this definition or categorical designation, and fulfil his constitutional duties accordingly. No member of Congress, no judge of the Federal Judiciary, no elected or appointed official in Federal or State government has the right to use any other definition; and if he does, he is acting unlawfully, because unconstitutionally.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/

jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana

Steve, they are all afraid of being killed, like so many others that tried to bring things to light.
He had Soros backing him at every turn. People were paid handsomely, or the fear of being killed.
Fox has too many liberal views too. They used to be better than now. Nothing will ever be done to him.
He is the reason we are in this racial division now. It has always been bad, but now worse than ever. Like the Trevon Martin thing, him saying what he did about him and a son. He deceived so many. He is not the antichrist, but I believe he is helping to usher him in.
We are in a mess, for sure, just going to get worse!

Mikeyavelli

You see, for the media, a Trump lie is that he said he arrived at noon when the media clocked him in at 12 :15. That's a lie.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

"I believe he is helping to usher him in." He did that's how we got Trump.

rlockwood

Judges have really deep pockets so paying them off would be easy, that is why Obama got away with all the shit he did. He just paid off everyone so it would be swept under the rug.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Yeah and Soros gave him the money.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Right and Mexico is going to pay for the wall.

kankune Loc: Iowa

YEP!!

kankune Loc: Iowa

YEP!!

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia