payne1000

Why don't you prove you're not a Zionist shill?
The only way you can do that is to reveal your identity.
You can't give any valid reason to be in hiding.
Your refusal proves you are a shill.

emarine

We know you have no argument for any rational debate so you deflect to my identity again... so explain exactly how my picture & video proof of the center core VS the outer frame work has anything to do with anything concerning my identity?... your reply should prove entertaining at best...

payne1000

You are saying you have more credibility in recognizing the center core of the collapsing tower than news reporter Aaron Brown who was an eyewitness and me, who spent most of my life making a living by recording what I saw. In order for you to have more credibility than Brown or myself, you would have to identify yourself and state your background.
Until you do that, you have much less credibility than either of us.

emarine

yes that's exactly what I'm saying... Brown was in a studio as credible as anyone with a TV set & we know you're not credible... you prove it was the outer frame & not the core which everyone but you already knows... good luck with your fiction...

payne1000

Here's some outer frame still standing. Where's the Center core?
What is your identity?
Are you afraid to put your real name on the lies you post?

emarine

Only a lying fraud could confuse the core from the outer framework regardless what Arron Brown said given the evidence...

bdamage Loc: My Bunker

In your case Blade, the "b" stands for "bring" forth the vid that shows an actual plane did the "damage"!!!

You continue to avoid the fact that no vids are available from the most monitored building in DC.

Why can't you seem to find that odd?

payne1000

I hadn't seen this video. The narrator makes sense about what is happening.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjhzZHUYn_c

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Why are you truthers so fixated on surveillance video recordings? You seem to think the video camera is a superintelligent entity capable of observations and determinations far above the capabilities of human beings. IOW, if the omniscient eye did not "see" it, it didn't happen, if the eye didn't see them, the hijackers didn't board the planes, if the eye didn't catch it, the jet didn't hit the Pentagon.

In the real world, the surveillance video camera is a passive electronic device that simply processes light wave data, it makes no distinctions between one wave and another, it makes no decisions about what data it processes. Some video surveillance cameras are positioned to monitor a fixed FOV, others are set to scan a preset area, some cameras provide a video feed to TV screens monitored by human beings, others simply send the data to a memory chip or tape for later analysis should it be necessary.

The surveillance cameras around the Pentagon were passive monitors, fixed to one POV, they were equipped with wide angle (fisheye) lenses, which causes some geometric distortion and renders distant objects at very low spacial resolution, they recorded at one frame per second, and at this low FPS, any fast moving object would be blurred. The jet that hit the Pentagon was traveling at 806 feet per second, the two cameras that captured the event recorded a single frame, and that image was blurred.

How could I possibly "bring forth" anything other than the only two or three seconds of video that is available for all to see?

Yes, I would imagine that the Pentagon is one of the most "monitored" buildings in DC. But, I can guarantee that a video camera won't stop anyone from trying to enter the building. The first thing you will encounter at the door is guards with guns who will determine if you have legitimate business and are authorized to enter. If you try to breach this checkpoint without authorization, you will end up in chains or dead.

OTH, over 130 human beings saw the jet hit the Pentagon, unlike the video cameras, they were able to articulate as best they could what they saw. All of them saw a big jet, some identified it as a commercial jetliner, some identified it as an American Airlines jet, and a several (one of them a pilot) identified it as a Boeing 757.

Then, of course, there is the FDR that was recovered inside the Pentagon. This FDR was installed on a Boeing 757-200, registration #N644AA, assigned to AA Flight 77.

emarine

The narrator thinks that some secret weapon turned the steel into dust... that secret weapon is called "gravity"... its the stuff that makes shit fall down instead of up... maybe you troofers should check it out...

The steel turned to dust

whole2th

In addition to repeating denials (emarine and Blade), another tactic is to make ridiculous claims about energy weapons, nukes, no planes and holograms. This is to cover-up the obvious pre-arranged explosive demolitions and to discredit those who are exposing the big lies about 9-11.

In other words, cohorts of emarine and Blade are the disinfo proponents of the wacko ideas.

emarine

Nice try A-Whole... do you project much?... check this loon out... he's just like you...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjhzZHUYn_c

whole2th

Start at 10 minutes.

I'm more like Jeff Rense. You, emaring, are like the description in John 8:44; Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=19&v=euw7Lh6XrxM

bdamage Loc: My Bunker

Dude.....if "they" can record you going through an intersection when the light turns red and capture your tag number to look up and send you a citation in the mail to pay a fine, then I believe "they" can capture a GIANT plane hitting a building.

C'mon man......think!!!

emarine

Yes you are like Jeff Rense... I find this your first real statement to date... thanks fort this self admission about who you are... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Rense