One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
2.7-Million-Year-Old Ice Exposes Al Gore as Complete Fraud
Page 1 of 2 next>
Aug 18, 2017 16:42:02   #
teaman
 
Well, it would do my heart a lot of good if all "GLOBAL WARMING IDIOTS"" were convicted of their lies and jailed!!!!

It hasn’t been a great summer for Al Gore. First, his “An Inconvenient Sequel” flopped so hard at the box office that it pretty much became the “The Mummy” of global warming documentaries. (Among a small sample size, I must admit.) Now, a piece of 2.7-million-year-old ice is exposing his agenda as a complete fraud.

According to Science Daily, it was announced earlier this week “that a core drilled in Antarctica has yielded 2.7-million-year-old ice, an astonishing find 1.7 million years older than the previous record-holder.

“Bubbles in the ice contain greenhouse gases from Earth’s atmosphere at a time when the planet’s cycles of glacial advance and retreat were just beginning, potentially offering clues to what triggered the ice ages,” the article reads.

And what caused those ice ages? Low carbon dioxide levels.

Science Daily reports that the data was presented to the Goldschmidt Conference in Paris in a paper by Princeton University graduate student Yuzhen Yan. The paper revealed that carbon dioxide levels during the era in question “did not exceed 300 parts per million, well below today’s levels.” That would be a necessary precondition to cause a series of ice ages.

The carbon dioxide levels inside the block of ice — from a core drilled in Antarctica, according to Science News — shattered previous science that gleaned carbon dioxide levels from the fossils of animals living in shallow oceans. If the results are true, “We have some work to do,” said Texas A&M paleoclimatologist Yige Zhang, according to Science Daily.

Since that ice age, of course, the world has become more arable; places that would have been unlivable have been turned into thriving cities. Nobody wants to see another ice age — and it seems unlikely that we’ll get there, even though some climate scientists warned us one was imminent back in the 1970s.

It’s time that we just admit that the science simply isn’t settled and that doomsday is not right around the corner. Liberals like Al Gore can’t have it both ways. Either the science is settled or it’s fluid — and the evidence seems to suggest that it’s likely the latter.

That means all of the hysterics are nothing more than fraud.

http://conservativetribune.com/2-7-million-al-gore/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=romulus&utm_campaign=can&utm_content=2017-08-18

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 16:57:53   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
teaman wrote:
Well, it would do my heart a lot of good if all "GLOBAL WARMING IDIOTS"" were convicted of their lies and jailed!!!!

It hasn’t been a great summer for Al Gore. First, his “An Inconvenient Sequel” flopped so hard at the box office that it pretty much became the “The Mummy” of global warming documentaries. (Among a small sample size, I must admit.) Now, a piece of 2.7-million-year-old ice is exposing his agenda as a complete fraud.

According to Science Daily, it was announced earlier this week “that a core drilled in Antarctica has yielded 2.7-million-year-old ice, an astonishing find 1.7 million years older than the previous record-holder.

“Bubbles in the ice contain greenhouse gases from Earth’s atmosphere at a time when the planet’s cycles of glacial advance and retreat were just beginning, potentially offering clues to what triggered the ice ages,” the article reads.

And what caused those ice ages? Low carbon dioxide levels.

Science Daily reports that the data was presented to the Goldschmidt Conference in Paris in a paper by Princeton University graduate student Yuzhen Yan. The paper revealed that carbon dioxide levels during the era in question “did not exceed 300 parts per million, well below today’s levels.” That would be a necessary precondition to cause a series of ice ages.

The carbon dioxide levels inside the block of ice — from a core drilled in Antarctica, according to Science News — shattered previous science that gleaned carbon dioxide levels from the fossils of animals living in shallow oceans. If the results are true, “We have some work to do,” said Texas A&M paleoclimatologist Yige Zhang, according to Science Daily.

Since that ice age, of course, the world has become more arable; places that would have been unlivable have been turned into thriving cities. Nobody wants to see another ice age — and it seems unlikely that we’ll get there, even though some climate scientists warned us one was imminent back in the 1970s.

It’s time that we just admit that the science simply isn’t settled and that doomsday is not right around the corner. Liberals like Al Gore can’t have it both ways. Either the science is settled or it’s fluid — and the evidence seems to suggest that it’s likely the latter.

That means all of the hysterics are nothing more than fraud.

http://conservativetribune.com/2-7-million-al-gore/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=romulus&utm_campaign=can&utm_content=2017-08-18
Well, it would do my heart a lot of good if all &q... (show quote)





Yea, teaman, an intended $10 trillion, with a "T," 10 TRILLION DOLLAR$ A YEAR, "scandal," that has Guru Al "the earth is millions of degrees just below the surface" Gore (D), flying with his fleets of SUV's, in his super-(D)ooper jumbo-jets to properties on the oceans he owns in paradise communities around-the-globe; many of which hold "Global Warming Conventions." Hummmmmm. What makes you think it's a "fraud?" Sure, some little stupid piece of atmosphere in some stupid little piece of ice may seem convincing to no-nothings, but when you can produce movies... hummmmmmmmmm, one more time.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 17:43:30   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
teaman wrote:
Well, it would do my heart a lot of good if all "GLOBAL WARMING IDIOTS"" were convicted of their lies and jailed!!!!

It hasn’t been a great summer for Al Gore. First, his “An Inconvenient Sequel” flopped so hard at the box office that it pretty much became the “The Mummy” of global warming documentaries. (Among a small sample size, I must admit.) Now, a piece of 2.7-million-year-old ice is exposing his agenda as a complete fraud.

According to Science Daily, it was announced earlier this week “that a core drilled in Antarctica has yielded 2.7-million-year-old ice, an astonishing find 1.7 million years older than the previous record-holder.

“Bubbles in the ice contain greenhouse gases from Earth’s atmosphere at a time when the planet’s cycles of glacial advance and retreat were just beginning, potentially offering clues to what triggered the ice ages,” the article reads.

And what caused those ice ages? Low carbon dioxide levels.

Science Daily reports that the data was presented to the Goldschmidt Conference in Paris in a paper by Princeton University graduate student Yuzhen Yan. The paper revealed that carbon dioxide levels during the era in question “did not exceed 300 parts per million, well below today’s levels.” That would be a necessary precondition to cause a series of ice ages.

The carbon dioxide levels inside the block of ice — from a core drilled in Antarctica, according to Science News — shattered previous science that gleaned carbon dioxide levels from the fossils of animals living in shallow oceans. If the results are true, “We have some work to do,” said Texas A&M paleoclimatologist Yige Zhang, according to Science Daily.

Since that ice age, of course, the world has become more arable; places that would have been unlivable have been turned into thriving cities. Nobody wants to see another ice age — and it seems unlikely that we’ll get there, even though some climate scientists warned us one was imminent back in the 1970s.

It’s time that we just admit that the science simply isn’t settled and that doomsday is not right around the corner. Liberals like Al Gore can’t have it both ways. Either the science is settled or it’s fluid — and the evidence seems to suggest that it’s likely the latter.

That means all of the hysterics are nothing more than fraud.

http://conservativetribune.com/2-7-million-al-gore/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=romulus&utm_campaign=can&utm_content=2017-08-18
Well, it would do my heart a lot of good if all &q... (show quote)


You idiot. There were no humans 2.7 million years ago, but there were other creatures...........that died off. There have been FIVE extinction events in Earths history, all caused by dramatic climate changes. Some of the climate changes were precipitated by volcanic activity, some by asteroids or other extraterrestrial objects and some of unknown origins...........and the jury is STILL out on whether humans themselves will precipitate the next one.

It is CLIMATE CHANGE that is the issue, not Global warming, which is just ONE of the symptoms.

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2017 19:00:22   #
Mr Bombastic
 
Global warming is nothing but a cash cow for those who are pushing it. Look at the politicians, actors...etc who do support it. Are any of them poor? The answer is no. They all got rich, or richer, off of it. All you have to do is follow the money.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 19:35:25   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Mr Bombastic wrote:
Global warming is nothing but a cash cow for those who are pushing it. Look at the politicians, actors...etc who do support it. Are any of them poor? The answer is no. They all got rich, or richer, off of it. All you have to do is follow the money.




Look at the filthy rich fossil fuel people who are paying the bills for the lies that you absorb on this subject..

The Kochs are the most well known but all those who have skin in the game of oil and coal, contribute to keeping the day of renewable delayed as long as possible..

Remember the tobacco wars??

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 19:43:29   #
Mr Bombastic
 
permafrost wrote:
Look at the filthy rich fossil fuel people who are paying the bills for the lies that you absorb on this subject..

The Kochs are the most well known but all those who have skin in the game of oil and coal, contribute to keeping the day of renewable delayed as long as possible..

Remember the tobacco wars??


What lies? Name one. The only lies are coming from those who support man made global warming. There is a long list of them. Look it up.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 20:22:59   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Mr Bombastic wrote:
What lies? Name one. The only lies are coming from those who support man made global warming. There is a long list of them. Look it up.




The lie is so all encompassing that the very fact that you do not recognize CC or GW is the effect of the lies that collectively are making you believe the problem does not exist..

You can not understand that, yet it is so obvious that the world has joined together to combat these events and you will not even follow. At least you could stay out of the way..

Do you want one lie? How about that volcanoes have a larger effect then all of humanity in the course of a year..

That lie seems to be one of the favorites on OPP. Yet the truth is that it is not remotely close.. Humans produce over 100 times as much co2 in any year then volcanoes

..









Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2017 21:21:21   #
Mr Bombastic
 
permafrost wrote:
The lie is so all encompassing that the very fact that you do not recognize CC or GW is the effect of the lies that collectively are making you believe the problem does not exist..

You can not understand that, yet it is so obvious that the world has joined together to combat these events and you will not even follow. At least you could stay out of the way..

Do you want one lie? How about that volcanoes have a larger effect then all of humanity in the course of a year..

That lie seems to be one of the favorites on OPP. Yet the truth is that it is not remotely close.. Humans produce over 100 times as much co2 in any year then volcanoes

..
The lie is so all encompassing that the very fact ... (show quote)


First of all, C02 has not been proven to be a greenhouse gas. Second, volcanos do emit more greenhouse gases than humans do. These include sulfur dioxide and other proven greenhouse gasses. C02 is not a problem. Plants eat the stuff and grow faster as a result. The climate regulates itself. It doesn't need our help. You idiots have labled C02 a toxic substance, in spite of the fact that it is required for life to exist. There was also a period of time when C02 was increasing at the same time that temperatures were dropping. Explain that.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 22:03:53   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
lpnmajor wrote:
You idiot. There were no humans 2.7 million years ago, but there were other creatures...........that died off. There have been FIVE extinction events in Earths history, all caused by dramatic climate changes. Some of the climate changes were precipitated by volcanic activity, some by asteroids or other extraterrestrial objects and some of unknown origins...........and the jury is STILL out on whether humans themselves will precipitate the next one.

It is CLIMATE CHANGE that is the issue, not Global warming, which is just ONE of the symptoms.
You idiot. There were no humans 2.7 million years ... (show quote)


To begin with, did you miss the part that said the science is unsettled? That was a very honest comment and it appears that you missed it. The implication is that you CC supporters want to act as if science is completely settled. That is disingenuous because it is not.

Now, what does your comment about no humans back then have to do with anything? The point of the paper is that the ice core sample shows that during that ice age the CO2 atmospheric pp was low, not high. The presence or absence of humans is irrelevant. The CO2 level is the point, not the cause of it so don't be so quick with your name calling because you aren't looking too bright yourself.

Finally, get off your soapbox about CC vs GW. Your idol Gore started the GW rhetoric and kept it up until it was totally disproven, upon which he accepted the findings that the earth is cooling...which was completely counter to his GW mantra...and he shifted gears into CC because he can milk that regardless of which way it goes. So now out with GW and in with CC.

Your problem is that you were as adamant regarding GW as you now are about CC. You were totally wrong about your "scientists" proving GW and now you use the same "scientists" to prove your current doomsday CC theory.

If you cannot be consistent and you allow your scientists to change their opinions like people change sox, why should anyone pay attention to you?

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 22:05:03   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Mr Bombastic wrote:
First of all, C02 has not been proven to be a greenhouse gas. Second, volcanos do emit more greenhouse gases than humans do. These include sulfur dioxide and other proven greenhouse gasses. C02 is not a problem. Plants eat the stuff and grow faster as a result. The climate regulates itself. It doesn't need our help. You idiots have labled C02 a toxic substance, in spite of the fact that it is required for life to exist. There was also a period of time when C02 was increasing at the same time that temperatures were dropping. Explain that.
First of all, C02 has not been proven to be a gree... (show quote)


Simple. CO2 does not drive climate.

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 22:19:55   #
Mr Bombastic
 
Docadhoc wrote:
To begin with, did you miss the part that said the science is unsettled? That was a very honest comment and it appears that you missed it. The implication is that you CC supporters want to act as if science is completely settled. That is disingenuous because it is not.

Now, what does your comment about no humans back then have to do with anything? The point of the paper is that the ice core sample shows that during that ice age the CO2 atmospheric pp was low, not high. The presence or absence of humans is irrelevant. The CO2 level is the point, not the cause of it so don't be so quick with your name calling because you aren't looking too bright yourself.

Finally, get off your soapbox about CC vs GW. Your idol Gore started the GW rhetoric and kept it up until it was totally disproven, upon which he accepted the findings that the earth is cooling...which was completely counter to his GW mantra...and he shifted gears into CC because he can milk that regardless of which way it goes. So now out with GW and in with CC.

Your problem is that you were as adamant regarding GW as you now are about CC. You were totally wrong about your "scientists" proving GW and now you use the same "scientists" to prove your current doomsday CC theory.

If you cannot be consistent and you allow your scientists to change their opinions like people change sox, why should anyone pay attention to you?

Lastlt
To begin with, did you miss the part that said the... (show quote)


There is also the simple FACT that not one single catastrophic prediction of climate has ever come true. So why should we listen to these clowns? I mean, according to Al Gore New York City should be underwater and the ice caps completely gone. LOL! And why should we panic if the ice caps are really melting. They weren't always there. At one time there were no ice caps, and life did not end. In fact, it flourished.

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2017 23:08:25   #
Betta
 
permafrost wrote:
The lie is so all encompassing that the very fact that you do not recognize CC or GW is the effect of the lies that collectively are making you believe the problem does not exist..

You can not understand that, yet it is so obvious that the world has joined together to combat these events and you will not even follow. At least you could stay out of the way..

Do you want one lie? How about that volcanoes have a larger effect then all of humanity in the course of a year..

That lie seems to be one of the favorites on OPP. Yet the truth is that it is not remotely close.. Humans produce over 100 times as much co2 in any year then volcanoes

..
The lie is so all encompassing that the very fact ... (show quote)


You do know that planet earth and humans are all carbon based, right? FACT!

Reply
Aug 18, 2017 23:40:02   #
Mr Bombastic
 
Betta wrote:
You do know that planet earth and humans are all carbon based, right? FACT!


and if he would stop flapping his gums there would be less c02 to worry about.

Reply
Aug 19, 2017 04:04:47   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Mr Bombastic wrote:
There is also the simple FACT that not one single catastrophic prediction of climate has ever come true. So why should we listen to these clowns? I mean, according to Al Gore New York City should be underwater and the ice caps completely gone. LOL! And why should we panic if the ice caps are really melting. They weren't always there. At one time there were no ice caps, and life did not end. In fact, it flourished.


Gore is just making money on the fear he spreads and the CC people are hysterical about it.

As I told LPN, the same scientists who were proven totally wrong regarding GW are now pushing CC.

If they could be so convinced that GW was true, and offered their science to support it, the moment they were proven wrong...everyone including the GW/CC people should have realized these"scientists" don"t know their ass from a glacier and should have stopped paying them any attention.

These people believe because they want to believe.

Another item is concerning those who say ice cores have shown higher CO2 in fossilized animal tissue and say that proves these animals were breathing a higher CO2 saturated atmosphere.

2 comments.
2. For many years CO2 has been used to stimulate breathing in the ER because it causes deeper inhalation.

2. As an animal is dieing it is not uncommon for the animal's respiration to become more shallow and slower. This results in less CO2 being respired out which in turn increases tissue saturation of CO2 to rise due to the excess in the blood. It makes sense for higher CO2 sat to be higher in a deceased air breather especially if the death was slow as in a prolonged illness

Reply
Aug 19, 2017 08:53:42   #
Chocura750
 
Doesn't the finding support the argument that CO2 makes the world warmer. If the ice ages began when CO2 was 300 PPM, why is it not reasonable to conclude that global warming is occurring because global CO2 has reached 407 PPM?

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.