One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why The Protests Occured In Virginia
Page <<first <prev 11 of 14 next> last>>
Aug 15, 2017 23:32:37   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
kankune wrote:
Oh my friend, please don't be so naive about voter fraud. Do you actually believe the dems are voted back into power in their states that are drowning in debt, filled with murder and mayhem legally??

Here's what you need to understand... In the more liberal regions (which is to the point of being synonymous with urban regions) the people most affected by the "murder and mayhem" are those at the bottom 10%. The rest of us drive overhead without even noticing as we listen to sports radio on the way home from work. And the debt fixation makes for great drama but any economist will tell you... debt is only half the story.

The point (I almost forgot) is that this 10% that suffer the most... They don't care about politics. They don't vote. They don't register. They don't count. They're busy trying to find food, or a place to urinate, or a place that's safe. You focus on the worst possible examples as if they represent the centerpiece of our political culture. That's a false impression my friend.

The reason why Democrats continue to win elections in these places is because of the largest demographic, the middle class people who commute between the office and home. They merge with a lot of culture and learn how to deal with population density. These are variables of mind-blowing proportions, kankune. Small town politics simply cannot solve big city problems and big business fast talkers can't so easily fool city slickers. So... that pretty much rules out the Republicans.

Or if you like, think about this... if the Democrats ARE diabolical pre-communists... would it be so unbelievable that they could just brain wash the voters?

However way you prefer to look at this... circumstantial or sentimental, the bottom line is no evidence has been found to support the claim that ANYONE voted illegally. That's all I'm saying.

kankune wrote:

It worked with Obama's 2nd term. We got smarter and it didn't work in the race between Clinton and Trump. She got smacked into the gutter where she belongs.

OK, so you have a problem with Hilary.

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 01:36:39   #
Jack2014
 
[quote=2tap]Thanks for all the support you all. Even the Repugnut Twits who responded. All they did and do is just........my positions as well as yours. So thanks again.

Since Frumpfass has now declared his nazism and white supremacy Morals. The choices referred too, do not represent Real Americans shown below, who soundly defeated Nazism and Fascism, Would slap you to hell, dumbshit.

lremember what this means? And we are in now a NAZI CRISIS IN THIS COUNTRY
lremember what this means? And we are in now a NAZ...

They took out the NAZIS TOO.! Creeps
They took out the NAZIS TOO.! Creeps...

MAKE AMERICA REALLY GREAT AGAI?
MAKE AMERICA REALLY GREAT AGAI?...

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 03:31:13   #
Steve700
 
straightUp wrote:
OK, so you have a problem with Hilary.

No, if you are listening to sports radio. I am listening to political talk radio. No wonder I am 20 times more politically aware and a astute than you. And most of the rest of the time I am involved in learning more from the Internet and trying to educate you crackpots and save you from your selves.

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2017 08:53:39   #
Jack2014
 
Steve700 wrote:
No, if you are listening to sports radio. I am listening to political talk radio. No wonder I am 20 times more politically aware and a astute than you. And most of the rest of the time I am involved in learning more from the Internet and trying to educate you crackpots and save you from your selves.


Wow, Stevie runt,
So you and FRUMPFASS are Nazis!

Cute Nazi , isn't he runt
Cute Nazi , isn't he runt...

Your leader is a self proclaimed Nazi, oh stupid one
Your leader is a self proclaimed Nazi, oh stupid o...

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 09:19:06   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Tom Salinger wrote:
See a good therapist, one who deals with deep-rooted phobias. You are a very sick person and need help.


tommy;
Are you a George Soros fan?

https://www.youtube.com/embed/EUzMPlQb2G4


George Soros: Evil Zionist Puppet Master Exposed
https://youtu.be/1eRFTHD2CTg

SOROS ROTHSCHILD RACE WAR PROPAGANDA EXPOSED
https://youtu.be/4NqESQLsD3U

George Soros Owns Hillary Clinton: Why We Need Trump (FULL SHOW)
https://youtu.be/ATgLwSCrjUk

Anyone else want that wrinkled scum bag running things?

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 09:20:18   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Steve700 wrote:
No, if you are listening to sports radio. I am listening to political talk radio. No wonder I am 20 times more politically aware and a astute than you. And most of the rest of the time I am involved in learning more from the Internet and trying to educate you crackpots and save you from your selves.

Some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time Steve. I know that must be a mind blowing concept to someone like you being so fixated on political misinformation. Also if you think listening to right-wing radio (because there is no political moderation on the radio and I KNOW you aren't listening to NPR) then you are more likely 20 times more ignorant than I am, which might explain why I have systematically destroyed every idiot claim you've made. Right-wing radio is where fake news originated.

I read Steve... It's just not something I do when I'm driving. But I read papers and journals from all sides... from conservative Wall Street to liberal New York Times and I've been studying politics and economics since college... about 30 years. This is why it's so easy for me to see the fallacies in your arguments, even when you can't see them yourself because of your blind rush to propagate whatever your channels are lying about.

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 09:24:29   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Jack2014 wrote:
Wow, Stevie runt,
So you and FRUMPFASS are Nazis!


Jack; How blind are you ? Do you just refuse to hear ? Wake Up; this is not that hard.
The NWO plan goes back to at least the late 1800's:

Your lesson for today,Jackie:

Behind Communism (condensed)

Communism is always a loser for those not on the inside, Morgan.

It took the Russians 100 years to throw out the oligarchs.


BEHIND COMMUNISM
by Frank L Britton. Probably published in 1952.
( The whole booklet is downloadable for free) Behind Communism By Frank L. Britton : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
******* (I make one qualification to 'Behind Communism'. Frank Britton does not differentiate the different factions of Jews/Judah, including the non-Hebrews, or Torah followers and Talmudic followers) *******

The text is complete and unaltered (apart from tiny but irritating errors, which we have tried to correct, book titles, which are italicized, and the full cover blurb. Where pictures are omitted, also omitted are their captions). Britton's 96-page booklet is undated, but, judging by internal evidence—Korean War, but Stalin still alive—was published about 1952, in the USA (The Americanised English spelling has been left unchanged). Britton gives no autobiographical information, and we know nothing about him, not even whether Britton was his actual name. (Could he have been a frank Briton?) His booklet is not very well produced, with spelling errors, slightly inept typography, and badly-reproduced monochrome illustrations.
There are 120 or so of these, including a few maps
and pictures relating to pre-20th century times, some photos from the Revolution, and many 'mug shots' of contemporary American Jews. All are uncredited, but appear to be from encyclopediasand newspapers. Just a few of these pictures are scanned in, and two h
ave been added from other sources. His blurb says: '... Unfortunately, any deep-
down discussion of communism and Marxism involves the Jewish question. We cannot honestly discuss the subject without revealing—and commenting on—the fact that the founders of Russian communism were Jewish. Neither can we ignore the fact that all but a few top
leadership of the American communist party—including the recently convicted spys [sic]—are of the same race. ... Historical writers have been understandably reluctant to hold forth on the subject for fear of marking themselves as "race haters" and bigots." [sic] For this reason the entire subject has been placed beyond the pale of discussion. One simply does not use the word [sic] "Jew" and "Communism" together.
The result is, of course, censorship. ...'
This booklet deals mostly with Russia and the Russian Revolution, then the USA of about 1950; there's a huge gap, missing the entire period of the 1930s and Second World War. Possibly Britton had the main part of his text ready before the 1930s, and tacked on the final part, on Iron Curtain dictators, atom spies and Hollywood, later.


Contents
THE PERSECUTION MYTH
RETURN TO THE EAST
THE RENAISSANCE
THE TERROR SECTION
HISTORY OF BOLSHEVISM
STALIN'S PAST

THE PERSECUTION MYTH

With Shrill Insistence
We cannot undertake even this brief history of the modern Jew without taking note of a phenomenon which has confounded gentile societies for twenty centuries. This is the ability of the Jewish people to collectively retain
their identity despite centuries of exposure to Christian civilization. To any student of Judaism, or to the Jews themselves, this phenomenon is partly explained by the fact that Judaism is neither mainly a religion nor mainly a racial matter, nor yet is it simply a matter of nationality. Rather it is all three; it is a kind of trinity. Judaism is best described as a nationality built on the twin
pillars of race and religion. All this is closely related to another aspect
of Judaism, namely, the persecution myth.
Since first appearing in history we find the Jews propagating the idea that they are an abused and persecuted people, and this idea is, and has always been, central in Jewish thinking. The myth of persecution is the adhesive and cement of Judaism; without it Jews would have long since ceased to exist, their racial -religious nationality notwithstanding. Jews do not always agree among themselves, and it is only in the presence of their enemies—real or imagined—that Jewish thinking crystallizes into unanimity. In this respect they differ not at all from other peoples:
Adolph Hitler solidified German opinion around the idea that Germany was wronged at Versailles, that the German people were abused and victimized by the Allies, and that only by holding together could they prevail against the overwhelming might of their enemies ...
For twenty-five centuries the Jewish mind has
been conditioned by the same appeal. Through all Jewish thinking and all Jewish history the refrain of persecution has sounded with shrill insistence. Thus we find every accident of fortune being chronicled, enhanced,
and passed on to succeeding generations as another
example of gentile cruelty to the chosen race. And almost inevitably we find oppositi
on to Jewish aspirations and ambitions being translated into these same terms of
persecution, and all Jewish shortcomings being excused on the same basis.
Now it is a fact that the Jewish people have suffered numerous hardships in the
course of their history, but this is true of other peoples too. The chief difference is that the Jews have kept score—they have made a tradition of
persecution. A casual slaughter of Christians is remembered by no one in 50 years, but a disability visited upon a few Jews
is preserved forever in Jewish histories. And they tell their woes not only to themselves, but to a sympathetic world as well ...
THE JEW IN EUROPE
Even The Coins Were Jewish. We find the first Jews filtering into Europe some time before the Christian era, particularly in the region of Greece. The ancient Greeks spoke of these Asiatic invaders with considerable bitterness. Very quickly they spread throughout the Roman Empire and into Europe proper. The Jewish merchant, artisan, and slave trader appear on the Roman scene with increasing frequency after the second century A.D. and there can be no doubt that their position in the Roman world was one of growing importance even as the
Empire drifted to destruction. Under Justinian, says the
Jewish Encyclopedia
,
"They enjoyed full religious liberty, in return for which they assumed all a citizen's duty toward the state; minor offices were also open to them. Only the synagogues were exempt from the duty of quartering soldiers. The trade in slaves constituted the main source of livelihood for the Roman Jews, and decrees against this traffic were issued in 335, 336, 339, 384, etc."
[Funk & Wagnall's Jewish Encyclopedia, page 460, vol. 10]
Seneca, in his writings, bitterly assailed the Romans of his day for aping the Jews, and some historians (notably Gibbon in his monument
al Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) have ascribed the downfall of Rome to their corrupting influence. Nero's wife, Poppaea, was a converted Jewess. As Rome reeled into decline and final collapse, and as the Dark Ages descended over Western civilization, we find the Jew taking a strangle-hold over what remained of European commerce. Says Encyclopedia Britannica:
". . . there was an inevitable tendency for him to specialize in commerce, for which his acumen and ubiquity gave him special qualifications. In the dark ages the commerce of western Europe was largely in his hands, in particular the slave trade. and in Carolingian cartularies Jew and merchant are used as almost interchangeableterms."
[Encyclopedia Britannica, page 57, vol. 13—1947.] This hold over European commerce finally became so utterly complete that few gentiles engaged in trade at all; it had become almost entirely a Jewish monopoly. In Poland and Hungary, the coins bore Jewish inscriptions ...

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2017 09:24:57   #
Big Bass
 
eagleye13 wrote:
tommy;
Are you a George Soros fan?

https://www.youtube.com/embed/EUzMPlQb2G4


George Soros: Evil Zionist Puppet Master Exposed
https://youtu.be/1eRFTHD2CTg

SOROS ROTHSCHILD RACE WAR PROPAGANDA EXPOSED
https://youtu.be/4NqESQLsD3U

George Soros Owns Hillary Clinton: Why We Need Trump (FULL SHOW)
https://youtu.be/ATgLwSCrjUk

Anyone else want that wrinkled scum bag running things?

We need Soros dead.

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 09:36:56   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
At some point earlier in the discussion, I explained why people were upset at Trump's initial response to the slaughter at Charlottesvile. Although I think my explanation still stands, I just wanted to share that I've changed my personal position on his reaction since watching some coverage on Fox News. (I know... I've often called Fox News, fake news but sometimes I like to view their perspective on Trump, on the chance they have a point that more left-leaning media won't consider.)

In this case, I just decided to take a higher road. I KNOW that people are upset about Trump's apparent alignment with White Nationalists and I'm not going to dispute that, but when he said the violence needs to stop "on all sides"... maybe we should just accept that at face value. Worry less about the past and who did what and about Trump's history or even if he "really means it". Everything else aside, it's a good statement. They say it takes two to make a fight... so maybe calling for peace on all sides is the best approach after all.

So there's my olive branch.

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 09:42:29   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
straightUp wrote:
At some point earlier in the discussion, I explained why people were upset at Trump's initial response to the slaughter at Charlottesvile. Although I think my explanation still stands, I just wanted to share that I've changed my personal position on his reaction since watching some coverage on Fox News. (I know... I've often called Fox News, fake news but sometimes I like to view their perspective on Trump, on the chance they have a point that more left-leaning media won't consider.)

In this case, I just decided to take a higher road. I KNOW that people are upset about Trump's apparent alignment with White Nationalists and I'm not going to dispute that, but when he said the violence needs to stop "on all sides"... maybe we should just accept that at face value. Worry less about the past and who did what and about Trump's history or even if he "really means it". Everything else aside, it's a good statement. They say it takes two to make a fight... so maybe calling for peace on all sides is the best approach after all.

So there's my olive branch.
At some point earlier in the discussion, I explain... (show quote)


nice that you have come to that realization, straightUp.
Do you think George Soros will be changing his tactics or his funding?

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 09:54:50   #
Big Bass
 
straightUp wrote:
At some point earlier in the discussion, I explained why people were upset at Trump's initial response to the slaughter at Charlottesvile. Although I think my explanation still stands, I just wanted to share that I've changed my personal position on his reaction since watching some coverage on Fox News. (I know... I've often called Fox News, fake news but sometimes I like to view their perspective on Trump, on the chance they have a point that more left-leaning media won't consider.)

In this case, I just decided to take a higher road. I KNOW that people are upset about Trump's apparent alignment with White Nationalists and I'm not going to dispute that, but when he said the violence needs to stop "on all sides"... maybe we should just accept that at face value. Worry less about the past and who did what and about Trump's history or even if he "really means it". Everything else aside, it's a good statement. They say it takes two to make a fight... so maybe calling for peace on all sides is the best approach after all.


From my perspective: the Trayvon Martin event, obumbum said, Trayvon could have been his son. Mistake! Obumbum reacted before the facts were in. The Michael Brown event, obumbum found the cop guilty before the facts were in. Mistake! Facts proved the cop acted properly. Trump did not make a definitive statement until he had the facts. The mistake made was with the media. They erroneously took Donald's slow reaction to be acquiescence for the alt right. A lie, designed to inspire hatred from the alt left. Media owned by Soros. Soros's ability to live is the biggest mistake of all.
So there's my olive branch.
At some point earlier in the discussion, I explain... (show quote)
Mine, too! This country is worth it. ( I screwed up my comments. Open the full statement by straightUp. My comment is the 3rd paragraph.)

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2017 10:21:58   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
straightUp wrote:
OK, so you have a problem with Hilary.


Yes....I have a major problem with the Don of a cartel trying to run for president of this country. As for your post....its gobildy gook. There's a ton of voter fraud and we all know it. Could be on both sides, but the majority is on the Dem side. Just sayin

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 12:22:17   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Big Bass wrote:
Mine, too! This country is worth it. ( I screwed up my comments. Open the full statement by straightUp. My comment is the 3rd paragraph.)

No offense Bass, but that doesn't look much like an olive branch... My whole point was to take the high road and FORGET what the "other side" is guilty of. I could fill pages with counter-arguments to your statement Bass, but for now, I'm trying to rise above that, if even for a fleeting moment.

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 12:23:25   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
straightUp wrote:
At some point earlier in the discussion, I explained why people were upset at Trump's initial response to the slaughter at Charlottesvile. Although I think my explanation still stands, I just wanted to share that I've changed my personal position on his reaction since watching some coverage on Fox News. (I know... I've often called Fox News, fake news but sometimes I like to view their perspective on Trump, on the chance they have a point that more left-leaning media won't consider.)

In this case, I just decided to take a higher road. I KNOW that people are upset about Trump's apparent alignment with White Nationalists and I'm not going to dispute that, but when he said the violence needs to stop "on all sides"... maybe we should just accept that at face value. Worry less about the past and who did what and about Trump's history or even if he "really means it". Everything else aside, it's a good statement. They say it takes two to make a fight... so maybe calling for peace on all sides is the best approach after all.

So there's my olive branch.
At some point earlier in the discussion, I explain... (show quote)


I'll take that olive branch. Great post. : )

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 12:33:01   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
kankune wrote:
I'll take that olive branch. Great post. : )


https://archive.org/details/BehindCommunism_201502

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.