One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: "We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11"
This topic is locked to prevent further replies.
This discussion is continued in a new topic. You can find it here.
Page <<first <prev 38 of 99 next> last>>
 
This topic was split up because it has reached high page count.
You can find the follow-up topic here.
 
Jul 27, 2017 15:32:43   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
That fat little throw back in NK is a psychopath. He is one year away from obtaining ICBM capability. Army Gen. Vincent Brooks, the commander of U.S. Forces South Korea said NK's recent ICBM test was a "Game Changer

Moreover, it is increasingly certain that NK is assisting Iran in its nuclear weapons development program.

You have to ask yourself why Japan and India in particular are very concerned about this.

It is foolish to think that some sort of "false flag" event is necessary to shut that crazy little bastard down.

You certainly have a major hate on for the United States, don't you, payne?
That fat little throw back in NK is a psychopath. ... (show quote)


I love my country. That does not mean I am required to love the assholes on Capitol Hill installed by AIPAC.
North Korea's leaders are not suicidal. They know if they attack the U.S. they would be annihilated entirely.
Lying propagandists such as yourself are employed to fan the flames of war.
9/11 was necessary to falsely demonize Muslims which persuaded Americans to agree to wars in the Middle East.
Those same Americans are tired of those wars which have had huge negative effect on national debt while creating thousands of American widows and orphans.
Wars or the threat of wars are necessary to keep the Pentagon budget padded with excess. Another 9/11 type false flag might be deemed necessary to
satisfy the needs of the psychopaths in control of our government and military.

Reply
Jul 27, 2017 15:54:15   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
payne1000 wrote:
I love my country.....
Which country is that? Pakistan or Iran?

Reply
Jul 27, 2017 15:56:45   #
payne1000
 
Super Dave wrote:
LOL.

So where did they take off from?

What happened to the real airplanes OJ?


The drones took off from the former Stewart AFB, which had been privatized. In 2000, National express took over management of the airport. National express is an international corporation. I suspect some of the board members are members of "Deep State." Both Flight 11 and Flight 175 flight paths converged over Stewart on 9/11. That would be when the airliners were switched to drones. As far as what happened to the real airliners, it could be the same as what happened to Malaysian Flight 370.
Ronald Lauder is president of the World Jewish Congress.





Reply
 
 
Jul 27, 2017 15:58:03   #
payne1000
 
Super Dave wrote:
Which country is that? Pakistan or Iran?


Note my avatar.

Here's an avatar for you:



Reply
Jul 27, 2017 16:00:06   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
[quote=payne1000]The drones took off from the former Stewart AFB, which had been privatized. In 2000, National express took over management of the airport. National express is an international corporation. I suspect some of the board members are members of "Deep State." Both Flight 11 and Flight 175 flight paths converged over Stewart on 9/11. That would be when the airliners were switched to drones. As far as what happened to the real airliners, it could be the same as what happened to Malaysian Flight 370.
Ronald Lauder is president of the World Jewish Congress.[/quoe] I was wondering the Nut Burgers wanted you to think about that.

Reply
Jul 27, 2017 16:05:54   #
payne1000
 
[quote=Super Dave]
payne1000 wrote:
The drones took off from the former Stewart AFB, which had been privatized. In 2000, National express took over management of the airport. National express is an international corporation. I suspect some of the board members are members of "Deep State." Both Flight 11 and Flight 175 flight paths converged over Stewart on 9/11. That would be when the airliners were switched to drones. As far as what happened to the real airliners, it could be the same as what happened to Malaysian Flight 370.
Ronald Lauder is president of the World Jewish Congress.[/quoe] I was wondering the Nut Burgers wanted you to think about that.
The drones took off from the former Stewart AFB, w... (show quote)


Why is it that you never have a valid rebuttal?
Are you as vacuous as you appear to be?

Reply
Jul 27, 2017 18:53:59   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
The drones took off from the former Stewart AFB, which had been privatized. In 2000, National express took over management of the airport. National express is an international corporation. I suspect some of the board members are members of "Deep State." Both Flight 11 and Flight 175 flight paths converged over Stewart on 9/11. That would be when the airliners were switched to drones. As far as what happened to the real airliners, it could be the same as what happened to Malaysian Flight 370.
Ronald Lauder is president of the World Jewish Congress.
The drones took off from the former Stewart AFB, w... (show quote)
Flight 11 departed Boston Logan at 07:59, 15 minutes later, at at 08:13:47, the pilots stopped responding to requests from the Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center.

At 08:16, the aircraft leveled off at 29,000 feet and shortly thereafter deviated from its scheduled path. Boston ARTCC made multiple attempts to talk to Flight 11 without reply.

At 08:21, the flight stopped transmitting its Mode-C transponder signal and the aircraft climbed to 30.400 feet.

At 08:24:38, Atta tried to make an announcement to the passengers, but pressed the wrong button and sent the message to Boston ARTCC. Air traffic controllers heard Atta announce, "We have some planes. Just stay quiet and you'll be O.K. We are returning to the airport."

At 08:24:56, he announced "Nobody move. Everything will be okay. If you try to make any moves, you'll endanger yourself and the airplane. Just stay quiet."

At 08:26, Flight 11 made a near 90 degree turn to the south,

At 08:29, the aircraft made a slight turn south/southeast and descended to 29.000 feet.

At 08:37:30, the aircraft turned right to the south and began a 3200 ft/min descent.

At 08:43:30, Flight 11 turned slightly right on a direct course for the World Trade Center.

At 08:46:40, Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower.



At at 08:14 (about the same time Flight 11 stopped responding to ATC), Flight 175 departed Boston Logan.

At 08:33, the aircraft reached cruising altitude of 31,000 feet.

At 08:37, air traffic controllers asked the pilots of Flight 175 whether they could see American Airlines Flight 11. The crew responded that they saw Flight 11 and it was at 29,000 feet

At 08:39, Controllers ordered Flight 175 to turn to avoid the aircraft. The pilots reported that they had heard a suspicious transmission from Flight 11 as they were climbing after takeoff--about 08:25am.

Between 08:42 and 08:46, the hijacking of Flight 175 began and no further radio transmissions were made---Flight 11 was just minutes away from hitting the North Tower.

at 08:47, Flight 175's transponder signal changed twice within the span of one minute, and the aircraft began deviating from its assigned course.

At 08:51, the aircraft deviated from its assigned altitude and began turning to the southeast. A minute later, NYATC attempted to contact the aircraft. It continued to climb during the turn, reaching 33,500 feet. Then it immediately began to descend toward the southeast.

At 08:57, the plane was over New Jersey at 28,500 feet, and began a turn to the northeast, heading directly toward NYC. The final radar return at JFK indicated the aircraft at 1000 feet in close proximity to the World Trade Center.

At 09:02:40, Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower.

Stewart Airport is located near the city of Newburgh on the Hudson River 60 miles north of NYC. New York City and environs is a high density air traffic region, thousands of aircraft flying in that area. Both ATCR and military radar stations monitor and control traffic in that region.

Had there been any kind of "switch" of aircraft, as in commercial jet to drone, ATC and military radar would not have missed that. Radar would have detected the anomalies. I know from experience, both in military aviation and civilian, that rendezvous maneuvers, such as those for formation flights, do not happen instantly, it takes some skilled airmanship and DIRECT COMMUNICATION with the other aircraft to manage such a thing.

The big question is, if Flights 11 and 175 had been replaced by drone aircraft, then who the hell was flying the two commercial jets? These two aircraft did, in fact, depart Boston Logan with a load of passengers, the pilots' names are known, yet whoever was flying them shut down communications with ATC and turned off the transponders. Why the hell would they do that?

Did the two commercial jets just disappear? It would have been a marvel of aircraft stealth technology along with superb coordination for two big jets to just disappear into thin air and two drone aircraft to instantly appear in their place without a trip in the radar blips.

How far do you think you can stretch the thin string of your theories before they become so idiotic that they are just plays in the Theater of the Absurd?

Reply
 
 
Jul 27, 2017 19:08:19   #
whole2th
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
How far do you think you can stretch the thin string of your theories before they become so idiotic that they are just plays in the Theater of the Absurd?


Controlled demolition fits the observations completely--no stretch at all.

The case for controlled demolition has been so solid that "Theater of the Absurd" efforts intended to link detractors of the 9-11 official narratives to wacko ideas are spewed around. The absurd comes, for example, when disinfo agents claim "no planes", "nukes", and "directed energy weapons". More lately, a 'flat earth' cover-up conspiracy is floating around--and the flat earth disinfo people adopted an effective FB avatar campaign in efforts to like their wacko idea of a flat earth to the 9-11 truth movement.

OPP maintenance workers are at a lack for cogent rebuttal as the truth continues to be realized.



Reply
Jul 27, 2017 19:16:01   #
Steve700
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Are you really of such low intellect that you can't figure out that the word kite implies that the planes were remote-controlled. (The 2 that Hit)
Speaking of low intellect, how in the hell did you make the leap from "kite" to "2 remote controlled planes? That's one hell of a stretch, but it certainly explains just how corrupt the conspiratorial mind can be.
Super Dave wrote:
To believe your childish stupidity you would first have to believe in God didn't know the difference in a kite and an aircraft.

Then you'd have to think God would impose some kind of demonic possession to this group of children for no purpose other than to rabble-rouse a bunch of idiots in nutbag websites.

Then you'd have to believe all this idiotic chanting would only be figured out by the stupidest people on the planet.

Well, it is obvious that the godless truth suppressors think alike. You see the same problems which don't exist to the spiritually discerning. Only a demonically controlled secular person would see what the children said as some kind of demonic chant. And what did you want?, for God to make it so blatantly obvious as to give you a vision of Jesus coming down from the clouds all glowing in white robes and tell you not to be fooled, that 9/11 was an inside job ??? He is not trying to convince the godless heathens who reject him. He is giving subtle proof to His people who have Spiritual Discernment. Proof in the improbability of such things happening through mere coincidence.

I find it hard to believe how simpleminded you guys are that neither of you can get the connection between a kite and a remote-controlled plane. It was immediately quite apparent to me that God included that word to inform us that those planes were remotely controlled. Just like a kite is remotely controlled by its string. (Only in this case the string is radiofrequency waves) . How simple minded does one have to be to not be able to put that together in their minds and to interpret the words of those children as a Satanic chant. Sure does look like the demons controlling your mind are doing what the Bibles says they do --- Turn everything upside down and backwards, call evil, good and good, evil -- and call intelligence stupidity

What I have just told you is No bull Shit, but please don't reply. I'm not interested in your simplistic thoughts from your Godless degenerate excuse for a minds
What I have just told you is No bull Shit, but ple...

Reply
Jul 27, 2017 19:44:25   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
payne1000 wrote:
Why is it that you never have a valid rebuttal?
Are you as vacuous as you appear to be?


A valid rebuttal requires a reasonable argument.

But I'll give a rebuttal equal to your argument:

A Muslim Unicorn stuck her horn so far up your butt, it made you imagine this Jewish/American conspiracy. .

There.... Now prove me wrong if you can.

Reply
Jul 27, 2017 19:51:07   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
whole2th wrote:
Controlled demolition fits the observations completely--no stretch at all.
Observations do not qualify as definitive proof of anything. Anyone can make an observation and be totally f*cked in perceptions. Perceptions are subjective and are always influenced by an individual's psychological state. It's like the Rorschach test, show ten people individually the same ink blot and you will get 10 completely difference perceptions of what they see. We have a pretty good idea of where your perceptions are.

To plan, prepare, and rig 225 floors in the accumulated height of 3340 feet of three buildings would have been virtually impossible under any circumstances, under any conditions, and at every level. It never happened.

If 9/11 conspirators ever come up with any physical evidence of compound explosives found at the WTC site, you might have something to crow about. That will never happen either. But, crow away anyway, blackbird. If anything, you fools are morbidly entertaining.

Reply
 
 
Jul 27, 2017 19:54:29   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Observations do not qualify as definitive proof of anything. Anyone can make an observation and be totally f*cked in perceptions. Perceptions are subjective and are always influenced by an individual's psychological state. It's like the Rorschach test, show ten people individually the same ink blot and you will get 10 completely difference perceptions of what they see. We have a pretty good idea of where your perceptions are.

To plan, prepare, and rig 225 floors in the accumulated height of 3340 feet of three buildings would have been virtually impossible under any circumstances, under any conditions, and at every level. It never happened.

If 9/11 conspirators ever come up with any physical evidence of compound explosives found at the WTC site, you might have something to crow about. That will never happen either. But, crow away anyway, blackbird. If anything, you fools are morbidly entertaining.
Observations do not qualify as definitive proof of... (show quote)

I'm going with the Muslim Unicorn theory.

Reply
Jul 27, 2017 20:00:38   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Steve700 wrote:
Well, it is obvious that the godless truth suppressors think alike. You see the same problems which don't exist to the spiritually discerning. Only a demonically controlled secular person would see what the children said as some kind of demonic chant. And what did you want?, for God to make it so blatantly obvious as to give you a vision of Jesus coming down from the clouds all glowing in white robes and tell you not to be fooled, that 9/11 was an inside job ??? He is not trying to convince the godless heathens who reject him. He is giving subtle proof to His people who have Spiritual Discernment. Proof in the improbability of such things happening through mere coincidence.

I find it hard to believe how simpleminded you guys are that neither of you can get the connection between a kite and a remote-controlled plane. It was immediately quite apparent to me that God included that word to inform us that those planes were remotely controlled. Just like a kite is remotely controlled by its string. (Only in this case the string is radiofrequency waves) . How simple minded does one have to be to not be able to put that together in their minds and to interpret the words of those children as a Satanic chant. Sure does look like the demons controlling your mind are doing what the Bibles says they do --- Turn everything upside down and backwards, call evil, good and good, evil -- and call intelligence stupidity
Well, it is obvious that the godless truth suppres... (show quote)
There is no possible response to this sort of metaphysical psychobabble. Kite = Radio controlled airplane. How f*cking absurd is that?

Reply
Jul 27, 2017 20:04:19   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
There is no possible response to this sort of metaphysical psychobabble. Kite = Radio controlled airplane. How f*cking absurd is that?


The Star Spangled Banner is really a Muslim prayer if you just change all the words.

Reply
Jul 27, 2017 20:11:41   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Super Dave wrote:
I'm going with the Muslim Unicorn theory.
Works for me.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 38 of 99 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.