One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The idea of "entitlement" carries with it for many a perjorative definition: "scammers," "bottom-feeders," and "Welfare queens"
Page <prev 2 of 2
May 28, 2017 16:35:50   #
EmilyStrode
 
confused one wrote:
They say that unemployment is around 5%. They say too, that there are between 45 to 50 million on food stamps. Something doesn't add up.
Could it be that there never was a recovery and that the true unemployment is closer to 20%? All that QE failed to spur anything except the stock market.
All I was saying is that this isn't the right time to impose draconian measures in an attempt to get our fiscal house in order. As much as conservatives would like to see the President's budget passed I'm saying that the timing is not right. I think that doing so now would backfire and lead to much bigger problems.
They say that unemployment is around 5%. They say ... (show quote)


Are you that unfamiliar with low income people? Almost all fast-food employees, working at minimum wage, cannot afford basic survival and depend on the government for help.

Reply
May 28, 2017 16:37:29   #
Zombiefarmer23 Loc: Bull Hills
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
Are you that unfamiliar with low income people? Almost all fast-food employees, working at minimum wage, cannot afford basic survival and depend on the government for help.


Once again, moron!

Reply
May 28, 2017 16:38:26   #
EmilyStrode
 
Zombiefarmer23 wrote:
Once again, moron!


It is just a fact. Sorry if reality offends you.

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2017 16:43:23   #
Zombiefarmer23 Loc: Bull Hills
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
It is just a fact. Sorry if reality offends you.


Your inability to understand economic reality offends me.

Reply
May 28, 2017 16:59:55   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Very well could. Doesn't matter if Trump wanted to fund the Clinton Foundation liberals would bitch.
confused one wrote:
They say that unemployment is around 5%. They say too, that there are between 45 to 50 million on food stamps. Something doesn't add up.
Could it be that there never was a recovery and that the true unemployment is closer to 20%? All that QE failed to spur anything except the stock market.
All I was saying is that this isn't the right time to impose draconian measures in an attempt to get our fiscal house in order. As much as conservatives would like to see the President's budget passed I'm saying that the timing is not right. I think that doing so now would backfire and lead to much bigger problems.
They say that unemployment is around 5%. They say ... (show quote)

Reply
May 28, 2017 17:01:03   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Amazing isn't it. When liberals aren't paying (Federal Taxes) they think everything's free.
Zombiefarmer23 wrote:
Your inability to understand economic reality offends me.

Reply
May 28, 2017 17:23:03   #
EmilyStrode
 
Zombiefarmer23 wrote:
Your inability to understand economic reality offends me.


Then explain.

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2017 17:24:12   #
EmilyStrode
 
JFlorio wrote:
Amazing isn't it. When liberals aren't paying (Federal Taxes) they think everything's free.


What on earth does that mean?

Reply
May 28, 2017 17:31:52   #
Zombiefarmer23 Loc: Bull Hills
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
Then explain.


No. You trolls would not understand if the explanation were shoved past your sphincter.

Reply
May 28, 2017 17:44:08   #
EmilyStrode
 
Zombiefarmer23 wrote:
No. You trolls would not understand if the explanation were shoved past your sphincter.


Too funny and too typical. Pressed to be intelligent, you demure to insult. Both sides have such trolls. Here is the definition of Troll (see how cozy you are): "a person who rarely, if ever, gives a substantive reply to the topic but always looks to disrupt or corrupt the ongoing conversation with inflammatory statements, insults, or useless deflections." This is a mirror for you.

Reply
May 28, 2017 17:46:04   #
Zombiefarmer23 Loc: Bull Hills
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
Too funny and too typical. Pressed to be intelligent, you demure to insult. Both sides have such trolls. Here is the definition of Troll (see how cozy you are): "a person who rarely, if ever, gives a substantive reply to the topic but always looks to disrupt or corrupt the ongoing conversation with inflammatory statements, insults, or useless deflections." This is a mirror for you.


And for you.

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2017 17:56:01   #
EmilyStrode
 
Zombiefarmer23 wrote:
And for you.


No. I use reasonable arguments, sources, and stay on topic, my topic BTW so the term Troll is not applicable.

Reply
May 28, 2017 18:01:54   #
Zombiefarmer23 Loc: Bull Hills
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
No. I use reasonable arguments, sources, and stay on topic, my topic BTW so the term Troll is not applicable.


I pity you.

Reply
May 28, 2017 19:53:48   #
EmilyStrode
 
Zombiefarmer23 wrote:
I pity you.


At least you opted for an honest name to describe yourself.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.