One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Russia gives FBI phony document that swayed the Clinton investigation.
May 24, 2017 18:27:47   #
PeterS
 
Current and former officials have said that Comey relied on the document in making his July decision to announce on his own, without Justice Department involvement, that the investigation was over. That public announcement — in which he criticized Clinton and made extensive comments about the evidence — set in motion a chain of other FBI moves that Democrats now say helped Trump win the presidential election.

But according to the FBI’s own assessment, the document was bad intelligence — and according to people familiar with its contents, possibly even a fake sent to confuse the bureau. The Americans mentioned in the Russian document insist they do not know each other, do not speak to each other and never had any conversations remotely like the ones described in the document. Investigators have long doubted its veracity, and by August the FBI had concluded it was unreliable.

FBI Director James B. Comey makes a statement at FBI headquarters on July 5. (Cliff Owen/AP)
The document, obtained by the FBI, was a piece of purported analysis by Russian intelligence, the people said. It referred to an email supposedly written by the then-chair of the Democratic National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), and sent to Leonard Benardo, an official with the Open Society Foundations, an organization founded by billionaire George Soros and dedicated to promoting democracy.

The Russian document did not contain a copy of the email, but it described some of the contents of the purported message.

[From Clinton emails to alleged Russian meddling in election: The events leading up to Comey’s firing]

In the supposed email, Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in private communication with a senior Clinton campaign staffer named Amanda Renteria during the campaign. The document indicated Lynch had told Renteria that she would not let the FBI investigation into Clinton go too far, according to people familiar with it.

Current and former officials have argued that the secret document gave Comey good reason to take the extraordinary step over the summer of announcing the findings of the Clinton investigation himself without Justice Department involvement.

Comey had little choice, these people have said, because he feared that if Lynch announced no charges against Clinton, and then the secret document leaked, the legitimacy of the entire case would be questioned.

From the moment the bureau received the document from a source in early March 2016, its veracity was the subject of an internal debate at the FBI. Several people familiar with the matter said the bureau’s doubts about the document hardened in August when officials became more certain that there was nothing to substantiate the claims in the Russian document. FBI officials knew the bureau never had the underlying email with the explosive allegation, if it ever existed.

Amanda Renteria in Washington in April 2014. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
Yet senior officials at the bureau continued to rely on the document before and after the election as part of their justification for how they handled the case.

Wasserman Schultz and Benardo said in separate interviews with The Washington Post that they do not know each other and have never communicated. Renteria, in an interview, and people familiar with Lynch’s account said the two also do not know each other and have never communicated. Lynch declined to comment for this article....

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/how-a-dubious-russian-document-influenced-the-fbis-handling-of-the-clinton-probe/2017/05/24/f375c07c-3a95-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?utm_term=.2f70bd2f3ad9

This just gets stranger and stranger and only goes to show just how susceptible to fake news that everyone is...

Reply
May 24, 2017 18:30:58   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
PeterS wrote:
Current and former officials have said that Comey relied on the document in making his July decision to announce on his own, without Justice Department involvement, that the investigation was over. That public announcement — in which he criticized Clinton and made extensive comments about the evidence — set in motion a chain of other FBI moves that Democrats now say helped Trump win the presidential election.

But according to the FBI’s own assessment, the document was bad intelligence — and according to people familiar with its contents, possibly even a fake sent to confuse the bureau. The Americans mentioned in the Russian document insist they do not know each other, do not speak to each other and never had any conversations remotely like the ones described in the document. Investigators have long doubted its veracity, and by August the FBI had concluded it was unreliable.

FBI Director James B. Comey makes a statement at FBI headquarters on July 5. (Cliff Owen/AP)
The document, obtained by the FBI, was a piece of purported analysis by Russian intelligence, the people said. It referred to an email supposedly written by the then-chair of the Democratic National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), and sent to Leonard Benardo, an official with the Open Society Foundations, an organization founded by billionaire George Soros and dedicated to promoting democracy.

The Russian document did not contain a copy of the email, but it described some of the contents of the purported message.

[From Clinton emails to alleged Russian meddling in election: The events leading up to Comey’s firing]

In the supposed email, Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in private communication with a senior Clinton campaign staffer named Amanda Renteria during the campaign. The document indicated Lynch had told Renteria that she would not let the FBI investigation into Clinton go too far, according to people familiar with it.

Current and former officials have argued that the secret document gave Comey good reason to take the extraordinary step over the summer of announcing the findings of the Clinton investigation himself without Justice Department involvement.

Comey had little choice, these people have said, because he feared that if Lynch announced no charges against Clinton, and then the secret document leaked, the legitimacy of the entire case would be questioned.

From the moment the bureau received the document from a source in early March 2016, its veracity was the subject of an internal debate at the FBI. Several people familiar with the matter said the bureau’s doubts about the document hardened in August when officials became more certain that there was nothing to substantiate the claims in the Russian document. FBI officials knew the bureau never had the underlying email with the explosive allegation, if it ever existed.

Amanda Renteria in Washington in April 2014. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
Yet senior officials at the bureau continued to rely on the document before and after the election as part of their justification for how they handled the case.

Wasserman Schultz and Benardo said in separate interviews with The Washington Post that they do not know each other and have never communicated. Renteria, in an interview, and people familiar with Lynch’s account said the two also do not know each other and have never communicated. Lynch declined to comment for this article....

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/how-a-dubious-russian-document-influenced-the-fbis-handling-of-the-clinton-probe/2017/05/24/f375c07c-3a95-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?utm_term=.2f70bd2f3ad9

This just gets stranger and stranger and only goes to show just how susceptible to fake news that everyone is...
Current and former officials have said that Comey ... (show quote)


This "document" sounds a lot like the many CNN sources; bogus. How people make decisions based upon so little these days is astounding.

Reply
May 24, 2017 18:54:11   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Well those clever Russians! Imagine, knowing how to make an email look like it came from Debbie Wasserman Schultz to a Soros operative to Renteria, a Clinton campaign advisor second to none. And to think that the Russians had the gall to plant the seeds of a FIX by the impeccable obama administration FBI and DOJ!
Well then, no wonder Comey had to end the Clinton investigation with no indictments because the Russians interfered. What an honorable man!

Reply
 
 
May 24, 2017 19:06:19   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
PeterS wrote:
Current and former officials have said that Comey relied on the document in making his July decision to announce on his own, without Justice Department involvement, that the investigation was over. That public announcement — in which he criticized Clinton and made extensive comments about the evidence — set in motion a chain of other FBI moves that Democrats now say helped Trump win the presidential election.

But according to the FBI’s own assessment, the document was bad intelligence — and according to people familiar with its contents, possibly even a fake sent to confuse the bureau. The Americans mentioned in the Russian document insist they do not know each other, do not speak to each other and never had any conversations remotely like the ones described in the document. Investigators have long doubted its veracity, and by August the FBI had concluded it was unreliable.

FBI Director James B. Comey makes a statement at FBI headquarters on July 5. (Cliff Owen/AP)
The document, obtained by the FBI, was a piece of purported analysis by Russian intelligence, the people said. It referred to an email supposedly written by the then-chair of the Democratic National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), and sent to Leonard Benardo, an official with the Open Society Foundations, an organization founded by billionaire George Soros and dedicated to promoting democracy.

The Russian document did not contain a copy of the email, but it described some of the contents of the purported message.

[From Clinton emails to alleged Russian meddling in election: The events leading up to Comey’s firing]

In the supposed email, Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in private communication with a senior Clinton campaign staffer named Amanda Renteria during the campaign. The document indicated Lynch had told Renteria that she would not let the FBI investigation into Clinton go too far, according to people familiar with it.

Current and former officials have argued that the secret document gave Comey good reason to take the extraordinary step over the summer of announcing the findings of the Clinton investigation himself without Justice Department involvement.

Comey had little choice, these people have said, because he feared that if Lynch announced no charges against Clinton, and then the secret document leaked, the legitimacy of the entire case would be questioned.

From the moment the bureau received the document from a source in early March 2016, its veracity was the subject of an internal debate at the FBI. Several people familiar with the matter said the bureau’s doubts about the document hardened in August when officials became more certain that there was nothing to substantiate the claims in the Russian document. FBI officials knew the bureau never had the underlying email with the explosive allegation, if it ever existed.

Amanda Renteria in Washington in April 2014. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
Yet senior officials at the bureau continued to rely on the document before and after the election as part of their justification for how they handled the case.

Wasserman Schultz and Benardo said in separate interviews with The Washington Post that they do not know each other and have never communicated. Renteria, in an interview, and people familiar with Lynch’s account said the two also do not know each other and have never communicated. Lynch declined to comment for this article....

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/how-a-dubious-russian-document-influenced-the-fbis-handling-of-the-clinton-probe/2017/05/24/f375c07c-3a95-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?utm_term=.2f70bd2f3ad9

This just gets stranger and stranger and only goes to show just how susceptible to fake news that everyone is...
Current and former officials have said that Comey ... (show quote)


It also goes to show how desperate some are to establish a phony narrative.

Reply
May 24, 2017 21:03:22   #
Bug58
 
Wonder if THIS was the Russian connection they were referring to??

I feel sorry for the man, someone wanted him out of the way..and I don't think it was Trump OR the Russians.

Reply
May 24, 2017 21:22:00   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Bug58 wrote:
Wonder if THIS was the Russian connection they were referring to??

I feel sorry for the man, someone wanted him out of the way..and I don't think it was Trump OR the Russians.

Are you referring to Seth Rich?

Reply
May 24, 2017 21:35:32   #
Bug58
 
There was also this

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/justice-department-denied-fbi-requests-to-investig/

Reply
 
 
May 24, 2017 21:38:00   #
Bug58
 
No, the article claiming the Russians interfered w/ the election---but Why do they believe it was the Russians who provided the 'fake document'??

Reply
May 24, 2017 22:02:34   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Maddowshit, no Russians. They got caught with email evidence that Illiar wasn't going to be prosecuted. This is the elaborate lie to get them out of it.

Reply
May 25, 2017 00:13:21   #
Bug58
 
If it came out in the wikileaks, it might be there. Often times they have attachments to the e-mails but you have to click on a different section to find the attachment.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/2/justice-department-official-tipped-off-hillary-cli/

Reply
May 25, 2017 06:31:10   #
flagit001
 
Go go inspector gadget, can you say bulshit, with all the crap those people did in the office, Obama and Clinton they should be in prison right now, ya I would say the fake news is out there all right for there benefit.

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 17:05:39   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Gosharooties capn Comey, wouldn't it seem that information like that would intensify the Illiar investigations and include Lynch and obama too?

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.