payne1000

You don't seem to understand that the new Superthermite developed by LLNL is capable of pulverizing concrete to dust.
That is exactly what is happening in this photo:

saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina

eagleye, Assad would gas his own people to terrorize the Syrian population into submission! Other dictators in the Middle East have gassed their own people long before Assad. He is not an idiot, he is a monster.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

You spout the Zionist BS; "Assad would gas his own people to terrorize the Syrian population into submission!"
HE DIDN"T HAVE TO.
saltwind; apparently we need to delve into you a bit more:

saltwind 78 wrote:
DennisDee, I'm one of those liberal Jews. I can tell you that not all Zionists are liberal Democrats. My uncle was Treasure of the Zionist Organization of America and he was a staunch Republican. That trend is a lot more common today. (NeoCONS) Everybody knows that the Republican Party is much more sympathetic towards Israel (NeoCONS) than the Democrats, especially with Obama as POTUS. More and more Jews are switching to the GOP. (NeoCONS/fake Republicans)

BINGO!
"I can tell you that not all Zionists are liberal Democrats. My uncle was Treasure of the Zionist Organization of America and he was a staunch Republican." - Saltwind - (NeoCON)

Eagleye - What have I tried to get through to people?
Zionists are in both parties. They run them. Follow the money.
Follow the Big money.
NeoCONS are X- Democrats. Fascist War Mongers.
Not true Conservatives.

A recap for OPP and Saltwind78:
Well salty; at least you are somewhat honest.
Have you any idea on who financed the Nazi's and the Bolsheviks?
The Zionist Banksters did.
As far as you being a "liberal Jew", you appear to be of the NeoCON/fascist variety.
As always; you use the "anti-Semitic" smear and that is not working as much anymore.
Being an Ashkenazi, you are not even Semitic. Arabs and Western Europeans of 10 tribed Israel are Semitic. This has been discussed in detail many times already.

I am against any form of totalitarianism. The things America used to stand for.” - Eagleye

"I am an Ashkenazi, Zionist, Conservative Jew. Politically I am a liberal/ progressive. Eagleye, I won't ask you what you are, I already know. You are an antisemetic nazi. I've read your postings before, and I know what an anti semite is. IT'S YOU!” - saltwind 78
Salty; so which is it? You stated above you are a liberal Jew.
Choose the poison you wish to support: Communism or Fascism.
Again; I am against any form of totalitarianism. The things America used to stand for.

payne1000

Eagleye, have you noticed that the emails you get from OPP are sent by IDF International Technologies, Inc.?
Is that name a coincidence or does it reveal why there are so many Zionist cover-up agents working here?

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

Please show that in the LLNL document. You are still using someone else's assumptions that are not based on facts.

There is no such thing as "Supertermite".

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Interesting. There are many Israeli promo types, with not much else to do here. They keep long hours. I wonder how well they are paid?

payne1000

You still can't get it that laboratories controlled by the government perpetrators of 9/11 can't be judged as credible sources for anything.
This goes back to what I said earlier. You weren't blessed with common sense.

Even Wikipedia knows super-thermite exists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nano-thermite
And "Supertermites" do exist . . . in Florida. http://www.livescience.com/50290-hybrid-termite-pests.html
Are they anti-Semitic?

payne1000

They may be members of the IDF.

Their hatred for Palestinians certainly matches the psychopathic mindset of this IDF T-shirt . . .

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

I thought you were up to speed on all this truther bullshit. Apparently not.

The following is posted on a truther website. Ask nicely and I'll post the link.

According to the FBI, there were 85 video surveillance cameras in the vicinity of the Pentagon that might have captured some parts of the Pentagon event on 9/11. The FBI confiscated some of the recordings from those cameras very shortly after the event, and the rest over the following days. This act by the government fueled the suspicions of those questioning a large plane impact into the Pentagon. It is known that the FBI confiscated much 9/11 evidence, including evidence at all four crash sites; thus their confiscations at the Pentagon were typical, not unusual. However, since the two videos that were released do appear to contain useful information about what hit the Pentagon, we should not automatically assume the FBI is being dishonest here.

Why very few cameras captured the impact event

There are a number of valid reasons why only 4 of the 85 videos were released by the FBI in response to a FOIA (Freedom Of Information Act) request filed in 2004, which was fulfilled in 2006. Because of a number of factors (listed below and detailed in the footnotes) only 2 of the 85 cameras captured any useful footage of the plane-impact event.

Most of those 85 cameras were not aimed in the direction of the Pentagon and/or at the part of the Pentagon in question.

Most cameras were located a considerable distance from the impact event, and virtually all surveillance cameras had wide-angle (fisheye) lenses which cause some geometric distortion and render distant objects at very low resolution.

Many cameras had obstructed views of the Pentagon impact area.

In 2001, virtually all surveillance cameras had low spacial resolution.

In 2001, most or all surveillance cameras recorded at low frame rates (low temporal resolution), generally at one frame per second.

The high speed of the plane, accelerating to over 550 mph, caused some image blurring and offered a low chance of catching more than a single frame of the plane, given the low-recorded frame rate (one frame/sec).

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

THE NEW SUPERTHERMITE WAS NOT IN PRODUCTION IN 2001--it was in the R&D stage. Do you even read the stuff you post?

In 2002, the production of nano-sized aluminium particles required considerable effort, and commercial sources for the material were limited.

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

This stuff is really bad! Here's a direct quote, "Siegert believes that the success of this system to reduce the sensitivity of the nanothermite, could lead to civilian applications such as airbags in vehicles. ’When triggered the nanothermite could be combined with a gas generating compound to inflate the airbag,’ he says.". If it can set off an airbag, it can knock down a building!

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

So as long as you can somehow use a publication to support your position, it is fine. If that same publication is used to show you didn't even read it, it is then suspect because the government was behind it. That sure shows your level headedness. And this superdooper stuff may be strong enough to inflate airbags! Wow!

You'd better call Terminex because those Supertermites might go after the wood between your ears.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

A hundred bucks an hour to man the phones. Idiot.

The Enemies of Israel — Their Ultimate End

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

This is hilarious. The same Gen. Partin whome you quote as being against the government version of the Oklahoma City bombing is totally supportive of the airliner flying into the Pentegon.

"Some have discounted Kilsheimer's testimony because as a contractor for the Defense Department he is considered a "tainted" witness. However, it's difficult to discount on similar grounds Brig. Gen. Benton K. Partin, USAF (retired), an expert witness who has proven his independence and willingness to challenge coverups in the past. One of the world's leading missile and military explosives experts, Gen. Partin was director of the U.S. Air Force Armaments Technology Laboratory, where he designed and tested many types of missiles, warheads, and ordnance against various building structures and armor.

Partin did not personally witness the crash, but he lives near the Pentagon, is very familiar with the building's structure, and began studying the evidence immediately after the event. Does he see any problems with the official Flight 77 crash scenario? "No, not at all," he told The New American. "I've seen the videos claiming that it was a missile, not a 757, that hit the Pentagon," he says, angrily dismissing the claim in scatological terms."

Oh well.

payne1000

You don't have to tell me where you got those lies and disinformation.
There are many who have infiltrated the truth movement in order to weaken the truth movement.
Ken Jenkins is a cover-up agent.
The one frame per second on Pentagon surveillance cameras is a lie. The average frames per second is 7.5 to 15 frames per second on convenience store surveillance cameras. Considering the Pentagon's budget there would be no reason for them to use anything less than 30 frames per second on their surveillance cameras.
Since Jenkins deliberately lied about that, he most likely lied about everything.
Look at this page of Jenkin's website.
http://www.9-11tv.org/the-pentagon-plane-puzzle/why-not-use-a-plane-2
He tries to convince readers a 757 hit the Pentagon.
Jenkins lies just like you do.
No wonder you like him.