Will it be the 'New Progressive FOX'?
Apr 21, 2017 13:45:27 #
Back to the real issue of this thread: I have had an email which posited the argument that O'Reilly has always been a scrapper, is now quite wealthy, and thus he'll come back into the fight sooner or later.
Maybe, maybe not but whatever happens, we are all just about convinced, are we not, that FOX is likely doomed. Doomed to suffer the ignominious fall into the failures suffered by all- ALL-- leftie 'shows'.
Maybe, maybe not but whatever happens, we are all just about convinced, are we not, that FOX is likely doomed. Doomed to suffer the ignominious fall into the failures suffered by all- ALL-- leftie 'shows'.
Apr 21, 2017 14:25:22 #
eagleye13 wrote:
Nope; Keystone is beer. Colt45 is embalming fluid. Almost 50 years, and I still remember it. Try it 
You make streams of Colt45 daily, why buy it?
Apr 21, 2017 19:29:07 #
S. Maturin wrote:
Back to the real issue of this thread: I have had an email which posited the argument that O'Reilly has always been a scrapper, is now quite wealthy, and thus he'll come back into the fight sooner or later.
Maybe, maybe not but whatever happens, we are all just about convinced, are we not, that FOX is likely doomed. Doomed to suffer the ignominious fall into the failures suffered by all- ALL-- leftie 'shows'.
Maybe, maybe not but whatever happens, we are all just about convinced, are we not, that FOX is likely doomed. Doomed to suffer the ignominious fall into the failures suffered by all- ALL-- leftie 'shows'.
Unlikely.
They are on for a while.
Apr 21, 2017 21:03:09 #
S. Maturin wrote:
"PUNDITFACT"?!-- cute. Stupid, but cute.
"It has been proven.."-- pure BS by any measure.
"It has been proven.."-- pure BS by any measure.
It's best just to ignore Raylan. Sooner or later he'll get the message. Well, maybe.
Apr 21, 2017 21:04:38 #
Mr Bombastic wrote:
The Murdoch boys are going to burn in Hell.
I wonder is "someone" was pressured by "someone else".
Apr 21, 2017 21:23:34 #
Armagh wrote:
It's best just to ignore Raylan. Sooner or later he'll get the message. Well, maybe.
I think he he likes to post to himself.
Some kind of postal masturbation.
Apr 21, 2017 21:46:13 #
Super Dave wrote:
I think he he likes to post to himself.
Some kind of postal masturbation.
Some kind of postal masturbation.
You might be interested in my new topic: "The Case For The Democratic Party":
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-100647-1.html#1962762
Apr 21, 2017 22:56:19 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
Armagh wrote:
I wonder is "someone" was pressured by "someone else".
You ask a meaningful question.
Apr 21, 2017 22:57:34 #
Apr 21, 2017 23:47:47 #
S. Maturin wrote:
The kid is in charge... tic,toc... it's just a mat... (show quote)
I like Tucker and Watters and have more than a great deal of respect for Hannity. OReilly is being punished for holding Trump up.
Apr 22, 2017 01:13:27 #
Carol Kelly wrote:
I like Tucker and Watters and have more than a great deal of respect for Hannity. OReilly is being punished for holding Trump up.
The left has wanted a Fox scalp since Fox started.
O'Reilly was targeted for going after Democrats, not Trump.
Apr 22, 2017 09:06:12 #
Super Dave wrote:
Or worse....
Warm Old Milwaukee's Best.
Warm Old Milwaukee's Best.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
YUCK!!!!!!
Apr 22, 2017 09:46:11 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
You ask a meaningful question.
I believe that's how The Swamp works. So it is very meaningful.
Apr 22, 2017 09:47:11 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
Without liberalism, would conservatism become weak, reverting back to feminism?
Didn't know Conservatism ever had a feminist outlook.
Apr 22, 2017 09:49:47 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.