So, you do not believe that people are living on the streets, that people are food insecure, and people are not dying from no heat or AC in their homes right here in the USA? Or perhaps you are taking a narrower view and only looking at your own individual household, whereas I see all Americans belonging to a single house, that of the United States.
Now regarding my "logic" and the King James Bible. No part of the bible, in my opinion, is
irreverent or or more precisely irrelevant as each word should be studied for wisdom. As for the age of the world, there are many ways to account for time... time from creation, of which no one can really give a definitive date or time from man's realization that there is only one G*d. From the Bible, we can pretty much count the years from generation to generation, by using recorded history in relation to biblical events. Also, keep in mind that the calendars used in modern day is not the same as in the bible. We typically use a 12 month calendar and add a day to February every 4 years (look up Gregorian calendar) which replaced the Julian calendar, which replaced the solar calendar, which replaced the Roman, which replaced Biblical Lunar. Your may be able to use commonsense to figure out that we really do not know what day it is let alone what year. We know, by use of the current method that from 753 BCE, we have been ticking off the days and years on a set time frame going from midnight to midnight for 365 intervals and adding a day as necessary. With this, one can only guess or use carbon dating, using a best guess of C (the period of time after which half of a given sample will have decayed) is about 5,730 years, but there is no way to prove or disprove the decay...in 3,000 years, yes it can be proven but not today, to garner the age of any organic material (inorganic; such as rocks can not be carbon dated, making their age unknown). So, how old is the world... your guess is as good as any scientist.
Now your last question. Is the Bible the word of G*d. Yes, with a caveat. Many words where incorrectly translated. .... let us look at Revelations and the "end of the word." The word in particular is “aion” which is Greek, John Wycliffe who did the translation, thought it meant "word" but in actuality it means "age." Wycliffe’s error was copied by Luther and Tyndale and then the scholars who produced the KJV, and the Douay-Rheims. For hundreds of years we have developed end-time or end of the world scenarios that are based on that bad translation. Starting about fifty years ago, the NKJV, the NIV, the ESV, and the NASB all corrected the error; but it is not so easy to retract the futurist end-times dogma that we preached for hundreds of years. This is just one example, and there are thousands.
Simply believing the bible is the word of G*d is not sufficient, this is actually acknowledged in the bible. People are humans, therefore they make mistakes. Eighteenth-century English poet Alexander Pope succinctly noted in “An Essay on Criticism” what every rational person knows all to well—“to err is human” (1709). Even though we may set high standards for ourselves and learn all that we can, and even though we may put as many safeguards in place as is humanly possible, mistakes will be made; ignorance will be revealed; errors will occur. As great of a historian as Herodotus was, he sometimes erred. As brilliant of a man as Aristotle was, he was terribly incorrect at times (see Jackson, 1997). As accomplished a writer as was the eighth-century B.C. Greek poet Homer, sometimes “even good old Homer nods” (Horace, 1.359). It simply is humanly impossible to be correct about everything a person says or writes. “With G*d,” however, “all things are possible” (Mark 10:27).
Jeremiah wrote: “Who is he who speaks, and it comes to pass, when the Lord has not commanded it?” (Lamentations 3:37). The prophet’s point was clear: no one accurately foretells the future unless G*d informs him of it. Therefore, if the Bible accurately predicts the future, we can know that it is from G*d. How many things written in the Bible has come to fruition? Let me give you just a few examples; According to history, the Phoenician city of Tyre stood as one of the most ancient and prosperous cities in history. During a visit to the temple of Heracles in Tyre in the fifth century B.C., the historian Herodotus inquired about the age of the temple, to which the inhabits replied that the temple was as old as “Tyre itself, and that Tyre had already stood for two thousand three hundred years” (Herodotus, 2:44). According to the early 20th-century Hebrew and Greek scholar, Wallace Fleming, in his book The History of Tyre, “As early as 1400 B.C., Tyre was not only a great city but was considered impregnable” (1966, p. 8).
In the early sixth century B.C., however, the prophet Ezekiel mentioned several events that were to occur in Tyre as punishment for the city’s arrogance and merciless actions (26:1-14,19-21). The prophet predicted: (1) Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, would build a siege mound against the city; (2) many nations would come against Tyre; (3) the city would be broken down, scraped like the top of a rock, and the stones, timber, and soil would be thrown in “the midst of the water;” (4) the city would become a “place for spreading nets;” and (5) the city would never be rebuilt.
All the prophecies of Ezekiel are historical facts; Nebuchadnezzar “besieged Tyre for thirteen years in the days of Ithobal, their king” (Josephus, 1.21). The king of Babylon severely damaged the mainland as Ezekiel predicted, but the island city remained primarily unaffected.
Regarding the prediction that “many nations” would come against Tyre, in 392 B.C., “Tyre was involved in the war which arose between the Persians and Evagorus of Cyprus” in which the king of Egypt “took Tyre by assault” (Fleming, p. 52). Sixty years later, in 332, Alexander the Great besieged Tyre and crushed it. In fact, Tyre was contested by so many foreign forces that Fleming wrote: “It seemed ever the fate of the Phoenician cities to be between an upper and a nether millstone” (p. 66). Thus, Ezekiel’s prophecy about “many nations” remains as a historical reality that cannot be successfully gainsaid. By 333 B.C., Ezekiel’s 250-plus-year-old prophecy that Tyre would be destroyed and its building material cast into the midst of the waters had yet to materialize. But that situation was soon altered. Ancient historian Diodorus Siculus, who lived from approximately 80-20 B.C., wrote extensively of Alexander the Great’s dealing with Tyre (see Siculus, 17.40-46). Secular history details Alexander’s destruction of Tyre, which coincides precisely with Ezekiel’s prophecy concerning what would happen to the city’s building materials. As Ezekiel had predicted, the stones, timber, and soil of the mainland city were thrown into the midst of the sea in an unprecedented military maneuver (Fleming, p. 56), which allowed Alexander to create a land bridge upon which his army could come across to defeat the island city of Tyre. For Ezekiel to have accurately “guessed” this situation would be to stretch the law of probability beyond the limits of absurdity. Ultimately, in A.D. 1291, the Sultan Halil massacred the inhabitants of Tyre and subjected the city to utter ruin. “Houses, factories, temples, everything in the city was consigned to the sword, flame and ruin” (Fleming, p. 122). After this major defeat in 1291, Fleming cites several travel logs in which visitors to the city mention that citizens of the area in 1697 were “only a few poor wretches...subsisting chiefly upon fishing” (p. 124). Taking these accounts into consideration, it is obvious that many nations continued to come against the island city, that it was destroyed on numerous occasions, and that it became a place for fishing, fulfilling Ezekiel’s prediction about the spreading of nets. Furthermore, it is evident that the multiple periods of destruction and rebuilding of the city have long since buried the Phoenician city that came under the condemnation of Ezekiel. The Columbia Encyclopedia, under its entry for Tyre, noted: “The principal ruins of the city today are those of buildings erected by the Crusaders. There are some Greco-Roman remains, but any left by the Phoenicians lie underneath the present town” (“Tyre,” 2006).
Another example; The Fall of Babylon and the Rise of Cyrus. In the eighth century B.C., Isaiah vividly described how G*d would destroy the powerful kingdom of Babylon, “the glory of kingdoms” (13:19). Writing as if it had already occurred (commonly known as the “prophetic perfect,” frequently employed in the Old Testament to stress the absolute certainty of fulfillment), Isaiah declared Babylon would fall (21:9). He then prophesied that Babylon would fall to the Medes and Persians (Isaiah 13; 21:1-10). Later, he proclaimed that the “golden city” (Babylon) would be conquered by a man named Cyrus (44:28; 45:1-7). (This prophecy is remarkable, especially since Cyrus was not even born until almost 150 years after Isaiah penned these words.) Not only did Isaiah predict that Cyrus would overthrow Babylon, he also wrote that Cyrus, serving as Jehovah’s “anointed” and “shepherd,” would release the Jews from captivity and assist them in their return to Jerusalem for the purpose of rebuilding the Temple. All of this was written almost two centuries before Cyrus conquered Babylon (539 B.C.).
Amazingly, secular history verifies that all of these events came true. There really was a man named Cyrus who ruled the Medo-Persian Empire. He did conquer Babylon. And just as Isaiah prophesied, he assisted the Jews in their return to Jerusalem and in the rebuilding of the Temple.
Jeremiah also predicted the destruction of Babylon, the most powerful nation in the world at the time the predictions were made (Jeremiah 50-51). He predicted that Babylon’s water would be dried up, and her soldiers would be drunken and sleep a perpetual sleep. The precision of his predictions was remarkably verified when Cyrus redirected the Euphrates River and entered Babylon through the opening where the river usually entered. The entrance was left unattended because the Babylonians were getting drunk during a festival celebration.
I could go on, but I think you get my drift.
Cool Breeze wrote:
Could you be more specific! Name a group of people who you know that haven't provided for their households.
One can assume by your logic that the Bible which is the King James Version of scripture is irreverent! Do you believe that the Earth is only 6000 years old? You can't have it both ways! Is the Bible the word of God?