One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
HUGE: Mark Levin LEAKED SECRET Obama Scandal Everyone’s Missing – OBAMA LIVID
Page <<first <prev 4 of 24 next> last>>
Mar 5, 2017 17:43:07   #
TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!
 
ycnan wrote:
She looks like an everyday grandma. Nothing wrong with that as stated by a grandma and word to the wise grandmas can always get even


If she is a everyday grandma, I'd hate to see the everyday grandchild!

Reply
Mar 5, 2017 17:58:52   #
Owl32 Loc: ARK
 
are the fbi pants on fire, today they are saying this is not so? but how did they (the NEWS) have transcrip of Mike Flynn's conversation with the Russian Ambassador. As for Sessions, the OBWH made that appointment so they always knew about it. With OB's troglodykes everywhere in the intel agencies him and his team could always run around the FISHA COURT and have his own private taps, no ? asked.

Reply
Mar 5, 2017 21:43:20   #
ycnan
 
You are simply evil as I am sure you are someone's grandchild and not sure how proud one can be of behavior like this. You need a time out

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2017 22:46:48   #
Carol Kelly
 
eagleye13 wrote:
HUGE: Mark Levin LEAKED SECRET Obama Scandal Everyone’s Missing – OBAMA LIVID
http://envnewsdaily.com/huge-mark-levin-leaked-secret-obama-scandal-everyones-missing-obama-livid/



Last night on his radio show, Mark Levin excoriated the Republicans in Congress for focusing on the non-story that exists over Sessions and the Russians instead of investigating the “silent coup” being carried out by Obama!

Using source material from the Washington Post, New York Times and other sources, Levin put together a time line that shows how Obama used the resources of the Federal government to illegally spy on Trump!

Heres a portion of what he said:

“This is crucially important. Everybody’s missing the point. The incredible scandal here is the Obama administration was investigating top officials in the Trump campaign, maybe even Trump himself during the course of the election!

Listen to this from the WSJ today. ‘U.S. investigators have examined contacts Attorney General Jeff Sessions had with Russian officials during the time he was advising Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, according to people familiar with the matter.’...
HUGE: Mark Levin LEAKED SECRET Obama Scandal Every... (show quote)


We need to turn everything back on the Democrats. That's where the guilt lies. The more they call out Trump and his people on supposed crimes, the more we should see where we need to investigate them. They had more to do with the Russians than Trump had time for and over a longer period of time. And what about this pizza thing that Hillary is behind and the way it sounds should be of interest to that pervert Bill Clinton. Satanism and pediphilia and everything sinful and filthy. This is what happens in a Godless world.

Reply
Mar 6, 2017 01:01:19   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
We need to turn everything back on the Democrats. That's where the guilt lies. The more they call out Trump and his people on supposed crimes, the more we should see where we need to investigate them. They had more to do with the Russians than Trump had time for and over a longer period of time. And what about this pizza thing that Hillary is behind and the way it sounds should be of interest to that pervert Bill Clinton. Satanism and pediphilia and everything sinful and filthy. This is what happens in a Godless world.
We need to turn everything back on the Democrats. ... (show quote)


Why is it that no one is talking about Russia getting 20% of our uranium through Hillary, that soon after her husband the letch had a big payday for mumbling a few minutes in Russia, and that Obama had to know about it, yet the left wants to throw a hissy fit about a conversation that their fearless leader engineered?

If we know all this, please explain why the Trump team hasn't used it to pound the D.C. left into jelly.

Reply
Mar 6, 2017 01:21:16   #
Progressive One
 
Get an AK.....since you people are so damn paranoid and now want to blame trumps fk ups on Obama...........hilarious ideed..

Reply
Mar 6, 2017 01:36:52   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Who are you talking to coward?

Me?

Read this stooge: Obama caught.



http://www.angrypatriotmovement.com/obama-wiretapped-trump/

quote=Progressive One]Get an AK.....since you people are so damn paranoid and now want to blame trumps fk ups on

Obama...........hilarious ideed..[/quote]

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2017 01:47:36   #
Progressive One
 
Docadhoc wrote:
Who are you talking to coward?

Me?

Read this stooge: Obama caught.



http://www.angrypatriotmovement.com/obama-wiretapped-trump/

quote=Progressive One]Get an AK.....since you people are so damn paranoid and now want to blame trumps fk ups on

Obama...........hilarious ideed..
[/quote]




gotdamn dumbass liars:

Distribution: Website
http://www.fakenewschecker.com/fake-news-source/angry-patriot
www.angrypatriotmovement.com
Bias: conspiratorialpolitical
Angry Patriot publishes information that cannot be validated and that is anti scientific fact. The information provided should be regarded as speculative opinion or propaganda and cannot be substantiated by fact or evidence. It is among the most untrustworthy sources in the media.

Reply
Mar 6, 2017 02:05:26   #
Mr Bombastic
 
Progressive One wrote:
gotdamn dumbass liars:

Distribution: Website
http://www.fakenewschecker.com/fake-news-source/angry-patriot
www.angrypatriotmovement.com
Bias: conspiratorialpolitical
Angry Patriot publishes information that cannot be validated and that is anti scientific fact. The information provided should be regarded as speculative opinion or propaganda and cannot be substantiated by fact or evidence. It is among the most untrustworthy sources in the media.


And just who made this accusation? Some liberal website? LOL!

Reply
Mar 6, 2017 02:08:12   #
Progressive One
 
Mr Bombastic wrote:
And just who made this accusation? Some liberal website? LOL!


trump did.....hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Mar 6, 2017 02:11:04   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Progressive One wrote:
gotdamn dumbass liars:

Distribution: Website
http://www.fakenewschecker.com/fake-news-source/angry-patriot
www.angrypatriotmovement.com
Bias: conspiratorialpolitical
Angry Patriot publishes information that cannot be validated and that is anti scientific fact. The information provided should be regarded as speculative opinion or propaganda and cannot be substantiated by fact or evidence. It is among the most untrustworthy sources in the media.
Hate to burst your bubble, buttercup, but the word is out. Obama's attempt at a silent coup first raised its ugly head in October 2016. Angry patriot is just one of many bloggers and internet media sites that are passing along what is now being revealed through diligent investigation. Even sources within the government are leaking details.

Your snarky sniveling is just another lemming's attempt to protect your commie king. Ain't gonna work, buckaroo.

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2017 02:12:27   #
Progressive One
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Hate to burst your bubble, buttercup, but the word is out. Obama's attempt at a silent coup first raised its ugly head in October 2016. Angry patriot is just one of many bloggers and internet media sites that are passing along what is now being revealed through diligent investigation. Even sources within the government are leaking details.

Your snarky sniveling is just another lemming's attempt to protect your commie king. Ain't gonna work, buckaroo.


yeah...more stupid ass rightwing bullshit...like birther............if you see a buttercup.....suck on it..........

Reply
Mar 6, 2017 02:15:54   #
Mr Bombastic
 
Progressive One wrote:
trump did.....hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!


I was talking about this.

"Angry Patriot publishes information that cannot be validated and that is anti scientific fact. The information provided should be regarded as speculative opinion or propaganda and cannot be substantiated by fact or evidence. It is among the most untrustworthy sources in the media."

Idiot. Who made this claim, and why should we believe it? Better yet, how about refuting the information you claim is speculation and propaganda? Don't copy and paste. Use your own words, backed by factual data. I bet you can't do it.

Reply
Mar 6, 2017 02:24:57   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Progressive One wrote:
yeah...more stupid ass rightwing bullshit...like birther............if you see a buttercup.....suck on it..........
I am always amazed at the number of slaves Obama rounded up during his 8 years in office. He could start his own nation with all the fools he has snared.

Obama's silent coup timeline:

1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request, uncharacteristically, is denied.

2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing emails, joking: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.

3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton campaign blames Trump and the Russians.

4. October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.

5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier” compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and that it had been circulating in Washington.

6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes, and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly or leaked.

7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports, on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian ties. Other news outlets also report the exisentence of “a multiagency working group to coordinate investigations across the government,” though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would have been secret and involved classified information.

8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was part of routine spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them. Sally Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.

9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials. The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the “dossier” of ongoing contacts. The New York Times, in covering the story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve” intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as well.

Reply
Mar 6, 2017 02:49:09   #
Progressive One
 
Mr Bombastic wrote:
I was talking about this.

"Angry Patriot publishes information that cannot be validated and that is anti scientific fact. The information provided should be regarded as speculative opinion or propaganda and cannot be substantiated by fact or evidence. It is among the most untrustworthy sources in the media."

Idiot. Who made this claim, and why should we believe it? Better yet, how about refuting the information you claim is speculation and propaganda? Don't copy and paste. Use your own words, backed by factual data. I bet you can't do it.
I was talking about this. br br "Angry Patri... (show quote)


Go ahead with alternative facts...find a college degree you can get with that shit....the anti-intellectual right and their own truths..........'sigh'...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 24 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.