[quote=Blade_Runner]You can't explain it either, payne, nor do you want an explanation.
We have posted links to dozens of scientific and engineering papers detailing the dynamics of building collapses, specifically the collapses of uniquely constructed buildings subjected to unprecedented physical violence from high speed jet impacts and massive fires; we have even posted excerpts of those papers. I, personally, have avoided referencing the NIST and FEMA reports simply because of the many errors, misrepresentations, and scientific short cuts in them.
So you admit NIST lied. NIST is a government agency controlled by the government. falsus en unum, falsis en omnibus. Instead, I have provided links to analyses by scientists and engineers at a wide variety of universities, scientific institutions, civil, fire, and demolition engineers. These analyses are the work of accomplished and highly respected scientists (MIT, UofWI, UofHA, Purdue, Implosion World, including the work of Chief Vincent Dunn, FDNY's foremost authority on fire induced building collapse, among many others). The paper are highly technical due to the mathematics involved.
Highly technical mathematics are only necessary when it is necessary to cover up the truth. Mathematics can't change what can be seen with one's eyes. Mathematics can't explain how three steel-framed skyscrapers can fall on the same day showing all the characteristics of controlled demolition and yet not be controlled demolitions. But you will not accept them, entertain them, peruse them, or even acknowledge any possible validity to them. It is apparent that you would not comprehend them even if you did attempt to read any of them. Instead, without a clue to what these papers present, you dismiss them all as lies and once again post your little comic book line drawings and meaningless captions on photographs.
Have you read what these thousands of Americans, most of them experts in their field, have said about 9/11? They contradict every lie you have told on this forum. Have you read any of their comments and analysis? I suspect you will ignore this question. http://patriotsquestion911.com/You have been given abundant opportunities to show that you are a reasonable and honest man who is willing to be objective--even for a little while--and to at least give an alternative explanation to your theories a fair chance. But you are not a reasonable and honest man, payne, you are fool trapped in the fictional universe of conspiracies.
I am honest enough to reveal my real name and show my photo. You will not do either and cannot give a valid reason for your refusal. So, what is the point of trying to explain anything to you. If you can't fit it into a line drawn on a photograph and blame it all on Zionists, Jews, Israel or George Bush, then it means nothing to you. Without your "explosives" crutch to lean on, you'd have nothing.
You have not been able to refute what I show on the photographs. Why is that?