One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Semi-Elect President, Donald John Trump
Page <<first <prev 3 of 84 next> last>>
Jan 17, 2017 05:28:42   #
Progressive One
 
To Defeat ‘Disgusting Donald,’ We Must Understand How He Won

http://www.nationalmemo.com/to-defeat-disgusting-donald-we-must-understand-how-he-won/?utm_campaign=website&utm_source=sd&utm_medium=email

Betting on Donald Trump to win in the summer of 2015 had some pretty obvious upside if you were, say, Vladimir Putin.

For Russia’s dictator-in-chief, a Trump victory would mean you’d defeated Hillary Clinton, the person you blame for, among other things, the huge protests that raged against you in 2011. And there’s also the small matter of half a trillion dollars or so you could gain with sanctions “relief.”

For Scott Adams, creator of the cartoon Dilbert, betting on Trump when few serious observers gave him a chance had less obvious rewards.


But now the payoff seems pretty clear. Adams proved that Trump won because the businessman is a “master persuader.” And by being the most prominent adult to make this argument, he proved the same was true about about Adams himself. At least, that’s what Adams is saying. And in the world of persuasion, suggestion creates reality.

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 05:32:47   #
Progressive One
 
Adams notes that Trump’s truest “superpower” was his audacity. He bet everything on winning and was willing to untether himself from reality and decency to savage his opponents in ways no other adult would dare.

He’s the most unpopular person elected president on record, but we can’t assume that makes him easy to beat — because his willingness to act as rhetorical suicide bomber casts doubt on anyone he opposes.

So how do you defeat a man with no reputation to lose?

You have to find ways to match and exceed his persuasion. And Adams believes Clinton did that during the summer. He doesn’t believe Comey cost Clinton the election; he thinks the Access Hollywood tape did because it distracted from the Clinton team’s effective framing of the GOP nominee as a nuclear threat.

I’ve been studying Adams and trying to figure out how “persuasion” works, and I’m finding it has a lot in common with the way that brain scientist George Lakoff sees politics. It all sort of comes together in a new field I’m calling “Behavioral Politics.”

The world we’re in is not rational and accepting that requires abandoning the heights of rhetoric that made President Obama and American patriots before him so revered. But it’s the only way to save his legacy and 80 years of progress.

For now, I’m calling Trump “Disgusting Donald” and not because of his reported passion for pee play. His plan to repeal Obamacare will make millions of Americans sick and thus uninsurable. That — like much of our current political environment — is disgusting. So it’s worth a try — especially if thousands of American lives depend on it.

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 05:53:48   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Progressive One wrote:
Adams notes that Trump’s truest “superpower” was his audacity. He bet everything on winning and was willing to untether himself from reality and decency to savage his opponents in ways no other adult would dare.

He’s the most unpopular person elected president on record, but we can’t assume that makes him easy to beat — because his willingness to act as rhetorical suicide bomber casts doubt on anyone he opposes.

So how do you defeat a man with no reputation to lose?

You have to find ways to match and exceed his persuasion. And Adams believes Clinton did that during the summer. He doesn’t believe Comey cost Clinton the election; he thinks the Access Hollywood tape did because it distracted from the Clinton team’s effective framing of the GOP nominee as a nuclear threat.

I’ve been studying Adams and trying to figure out how “persuasion” works, and I’m finding it has a lot in common with the way that brain scientist George Lakoff sees politics. It all sort of comes together in a new field I’m calling “Behavioral Politics.”

The world we’re in is not rational and accepting that requires abandoning the heights of rhetoric that made President Obama and American patriots before him so revered. But it’s the only way to save his legacy and 80 years of progress.

For now, I’m calling Trump “Disgusting Donald” and not because of his reported passion for pee play. His plan to repeal Obamacare will make millions of Americans sick and thus uninsurable. That — like much of our current political environment — is disgusting. So it’s worth a try — especially if thousands of American lives depend on it.
Adams notes that Trump’s truest “superpower” was h... (show quote)

Trump won because he won the most electoral votes. US Constitution. Article I section 1. He won the most states, and the states electors voted how their states wished, NOT how California wanted them to. Trump had won the Electoral College and was leading in the popular vote until the California returns came in. If you buthurt Liberal Hobbit Dancers don't like the Constitution, you have a number of options. Firstly, (and my personal favorite,) you can move somewhere with a form of government more to your liking. Another choice is a Constitutional Amendment; both compllicated and time consuming so you'd best get busy if that is your option. Third and most likely, you will sit and whine and complain like little butthurt bitches.

Reply
 
 
Jan 17, 2017 06:06:57   #
Progressive One
 
For Trump, Three Decades of Chasing Deals in Russia
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/16/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-business.html?emc=edit_th_20170117&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=51247735&_r=0

It was 2005, and Felix Sater, a Russian immigrant, was back in Moscow pursuing an ambitious plan to build a Trump tower on the site of an old pencil factory along the Moscow River that would offer hotel rooms, condominiums and commercial office space.

Letters of intent had been signed and square footage was being analyzed. “There was an opportunity to explore building Trump towers internationally,” said Mr. Sater, who worked for a New York-based development company that was a partner with Donald J. Trump on a variety of deals during that decade. “And Russia was one of those countries.”

The president-elect’s favorable comments about President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and the conclusion of United States intelligence officials that Moscow acted to help Mr. Trump’s campaign have focused attention on Mr. Trump’s business interests in Russia. Asked about the issue at his news conference last week, Mr. Trump was emphatic on one point: “I have no dealings with Russia.” And he repeated, “I have no deals that could happen in Russia because we’ve stayed away.”

The project on the old pencil factory site ultimately fizzled. And by the time Mr. Trump entered the presidential race, he had failed to get any real estate development off the ground in Russia. But it was not for lack of trying.

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 06:10:53   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Progressive One wrote:
For Trump, Three Decades of Chasing Deals in Russia
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/16/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-business.html?emc=edit_th_20170117&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=51247735&_r=0

It was 2005, and Felix Sater, a Russian immigrant, was back in Moscow pursuing an ambitious plan to build a Trump tower on the site of an old pencil factory along the Moscow River that would offer hotel rooms, condominiums and commercial office space.

Letters of intent had been signed and square footage was being analyzed. “There was an opportunity to explore building Trump towers internationally,” said Mr. Sater, who worked for a New York-based development company that was a partner with Donald J. Trump on a variety of deals during that decade. “And Russia was one of those countries.”

The president-elect’s favorable comments about President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and the conclusion of United States intelligence officials that Moscow acted to help Mr. Trump’s campaign have focused attention on Mr. Trump’s business interests in Russia. Asked about the issue at his news conference last week, Mr. Trump was emphatic on one point: “I have no dealings with Russia.” And he repeated, “I have no deals that could happen in Russia because we’ve stayed away.”

The project on the old pencil factory site ultimately fizzled. And by the time Mr. Trump entered the presidential race, he had failed to get any real estate development off the ground in Russia. But it was not for lack of trying.
For Trump, Three Decades of Chasing Deals in Russi... (show quote)




ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ........

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 06:21:11   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
PeterS wrote:
Well if I am, it's not going to have to be something I've made up just so I could feel a success...





Sooooooooooo......are saying you went pro yrs ago? I see in your avitar you wear a crown, i had no idea there was crown awarded for glory hole excellence, or did you get that for participation and all liberals received one?

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 08:01:51   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
In a few days, barring unforeseen circumstances, DJT will become the 45th president of the United States and have the opportunity to prove that the minority opinion of Americans was right. I have very little faith that he can do the job but great hope that he can. These are very turbulent times, wars and rumors of war. No one can envy his position. What I find most troubling is his seeming inability to control himself at 3AM on twitter. This bizarre disposition to use tweets as policy and forum for the world's most powerful leader of the world should give anyone pause. Be that as it may, and perhaps just put it down as an innocent or even planned quirk, it is time to give him a chance. Out of respect for the office and the future of America.

On 1/20, Inauguration Day, we are not directly celebrating Trump's (marginal) victory but our Democratic Process. Although he lost the popular vote by the widest margin in our nation's history, he won by OUR process and is OUR president. He is due respect and honor along with our process. His election is undisputed. And that brings me to the reason for this thread. Despite the fact that I have been on OPP one of his worst and most consistent critics, it was more like fun for me. I definitely believed there was a just and true cause behind my words, no fake news or game playing, but this is just OPP and not a world stage. The Left's behavior about attending the Inauguration has me a little sick and, yes, ashamed. I know I did not have any influence over people attending or not, yet my attacks denote the same attitude as those who refuse to attend. Seriously, if I were invited or could afford it, I would cheer and applaud for Trump. There is the 1st Amendment and I am not saying those who refused to attend or will be protesting are exactly wrong, however, America is the melting pot and has always been the symbol of hope for the world. Disagree, sure, but do not dismember that hope for us or the planet with a start in divisiveness. For my part in that, I apologize.
In a few days, barring unforeseen circumstances, D... (show quote)


A reasonable and decent post from an unabashed American citizen.

Reply
 
 
Jan 17, 2017 08:06:10   #
snowbear37 Loc: MA.
 
PeterS wrote:
What I think is if the Russian's hadn't hacked the election Hillary would be president. And what does any truth in the e-mails have to do with anything? Is that you logic for supporting the Russians tampering with our election--they reveled the worst of Hillary so what they did was okay? Do you really think they have nothing on Donald? Oh come on, Trump is at war with everyone except they Russians. Why would that be if they weren't able to pull his strings?

Hobbit Dancer my ass. More like Manchurian Candidate and you still support him--you're just a god damn traitor and nothing more...
What I think is if the Russian's hadn't hacked the... (show quote)


"What does any truth in the emails have to do with anything?...." Are you serious?? If the emails indicated that Hillary dyed her hair, do you seriously think they would have had the same effect? You refuse to understand that it was the substance of the emails and not the fact that they were hacked. You liberals live in a fantasy world of your own making. You concentrate on the "hacking" to divert attention from the exposure to the truth. Face it, Hillary got caught (several times), but you would rather blather on about HOW she got caught. Like a lot of criminals, you want her "released on a technicality". She did the crime, but wasn't read her rights. Typical liberal thinking.

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 08:33:46   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
In a few days, barring unforeseen circumstances, DJT will become the 45th president of the United States and have the opportunity to prove that the minority opinion of Americans was right. I have very little faith that he can do the job but great hope that he can. These are very turbulent times, wars and rumors of war. No one can envy his position. What I find most troubling is his seeming inability to control himself at 3AM on twitter. This bizarre disposition to use tweets as policy and forum for the world's most powerful leader of the world should give anyone pause. Be that as it may, and perhaps just put it down as an innocent or even planned quirk, it is time to give him a chance. Out of respect for the office and the future of America.

On 1/20, Inauguration Day, we are not directly celebrating Trump's (marginal) victory but our Democratic Process. Although he lost the popular vote by the widest margin in our nation's history, he won by OUR process and is OUR president. He is due respect and honor along with our process. His election is undisputed. And that brings me to the reason for this thread. Despite the fact that I have been on OPP one of his worst and most consistent critics, it was more like fun for me. I definitely believed there was a just and true cause behind my words, no fake news or game playing, but this is just OPP and not a world stage. The Left's behavior about attending the Inauguration has me a little sick and, yes, ashamed. I know I did not have any influence over people attending or not, yet my attacks denote the same attitude as those who refuse to attend. Seriously, if I were invited or could afford it, I would cheer and applaud for Trump. There is the 1st Amendment and I am not saying those who refused to attend or will be protesting are exactly wrong, however, America is the melting pot and has always been the symbol of hope for the world. Disagree, sure, but do not dismember that hope for us or the planet with a start in divisiveness. For my part in that, I apologize.
In a few days, barring unforeseen circumstances, D... (show quote)


Our "democratic process" undergoes constant change, depending on which party controls each State's legislature, such as gerrymandering and other shenanigans. The majority of American citizens remain victims - of their own democratic process. If one wishes to have even a modicum of influence over this process, one must join the ruling party and even then, unless one is on a State party committee, a major donor, or an elected official - the average citizen still has little influence. Once a year, we get to vote - according to the process outlined by the ruling party and for candidates approved by same. The US Congress, POTUS, the DNC and RNC, State legislatures and most citizens, believe we are a two party system, and ignore almost everyone NOT a member of the two major party's.

This past year, American voters were given a choice between two unwanted candidates, or a handful of unknown candidates, for the office of President. Who picked these two? It was not the American people who chose them, as the majority of citizens were banned from voting in the primaries, leaving a minority of people making this choice, the few who are registered Democrats or Republicans. Who allows non dem/repub candidates to run? Each states Sec. of State, who is either a dem or a repub. - who place many more obstacles then they do for members of their own party, or even the other party. Is this really a democratic process, or does it just pay lip service to the democratic process?

The majority of citizens are unaffiliated with either major party and therefor have no voice and no say in their own Government. Of course, Republicans and Democrats are quick to point out that these folk merely need to join one party or the other - and they'll join in the political process. This is neither Constitutional, nor ethical, but we have accepted it as fact, tradition if you will, and see no reason to change anything. Then again, if it were to change, it would have to be democrats and republicans doing the changing, since they control every aspect of our democratic process and the Government.

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 08:36:07   #
snowbear37 Loc: MA.
 
Progressive One wrote:
For Trump, Three Decades of Chasing Deals in Russia
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/16/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-business.html?emc=edit_th_20170117&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=51247735&_r=0

It was 2005, and Felix Sater, a Russian immigrant, was back in Moscow pursuing an ambitious plan to build a Trump tower on the site of an old pencil factory along the Moscow River that would offer hotel rooms, condominiums and commercial office space.

Letters of intent had been signed and square footage was being analyzed. “There was an opportunity to explore building Trump towers internationally,” said Mr. Sater, who worked for a New York-based development company that was a partner with Donald J. Trump on a variety of deals during that decade. “And Russia was one of those countries.”

The president-elect’s favorable comments about President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and the conclusion of United States intelligence officials that Moscow acted to help Mr. Trump’s campaign have focused attention on Mr. Trump’s business interests in Russia. Asked about the issue at his news conference last week, Mr. Trump was emphatic on one point: “I have no dealings with Russia.” And he repeated, “I have no deals that could happen in Russia because we’ve stayed away.”

The project on the old pencil factory site ultimately fizzled. And by the time Mr. Trump entered the presidential race, he had failed to get any real estate development off the ground in Russia. But it was not for lack of trying.
For Trump, Three Decades of Chasing Deals in Russi... (show quote)


There were and are NO PERFECT candidates for anything. Everyone has done something wrong if you want to look hard enough for it. Most people don't live their lives preparing to run for President (and even if they did, everyone screws up sometime). That being said, liberals think that whatever they do is right and perfect with no thought to how others feel. I find this kind of weird considering that most of what they do is based on "feelings" and "fairness". It becomes a situation of "least worse alternative" in many elections. When compared to Hillary, Trump was definitely the least worse alternative. Liberals blindly support liberal candidates no matter what their character is. I would say that a lot of democrats and even liberals voted for Trump based on Hillary's character. They may not admit it, and they may even pretend to participate in the ongoing demonstrations, violence, etc., but they're around.

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 10:52:57   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
In a few days, barring unforeseen circumstances, DJT will become the 45th president of the United States and have the opportunity to prove that the minority opinion of Americans was right. I have very little faith that he can do the job but great hope that he can. These are very turbulent times, wars and rumors of war. No one can envy his position. What I find most troubling is his seeming inability to control himself at 3AM on twitter. This bizarre disposition to use tweets as policy and forum for the world's most powerful leader of the world should give anyone pause. Be that as it may, and perhaps just put it down as an innocent or even planned quirk, it is time to give him a chance. Out of respect for the office and the future of America.

On 1/20, Inauguration Day, we are not directly celebrating Trump's (marginal) victory but our Democratic Process. Although he lost the popular vote by the widest margin in our nation's history, he won by OUR process and is OUR president. He is due respect and honor along with our process. His election is undisputed. And that brings me to the reason for this thread. Despite the fact that I have been on OPP one of his worst and most consistent critics, it was more like fun for me. I definitely believed there was a just and true cause behind my words, no fake news or game playing, but this is just OPP and not a world stage. The Left's behavior about attending the Inauguration has me a little sick and, yes, ashamed. I know I did not have any influence over people attending or not, yet my attacks denote the same attitude as those who refuse to attend. Seriously, if I were invited or could afford it, I would cheer and applaud for Trump. There is the 1st Amendment and I am not saying those who refused to attend or will be protesting are exactly wrong, however, America is the melting pot and has always been the symbol of hope for the world. Disagree, sure, but do not dismember that hope for us or the planet with a start in divisiveness. For my part in that, I apologize.
In a few days, barring unforeseen circumstances, D... (show quote)


If you're more concerned about Trump twittering and not the world that Obama has thoroughly screwed up, then you've proven conclusively that you were spending far too much time loaping your olde mule and growing hairy palms the entire time Rome burned to the ground and you've obviously gone totally blind. Did anyone tell you that Obama surrendered over one thousand elected Democrat positions to Conservatives since 2010 in favor of his personal failed agenda? Maybe your grasp of the obvious is up and functioning this morning? If so, it ought to inform you that your sacred Marxist Progressive moral relativistic philosophy sucks. What do ya think snowflake? One more thing. Lewis is a self-serving, racist and lying ass. Who cares that he and his fellow Marxist party members are staying home.

Reply
 
 
Jan 17, 2017 11:52:04   #
JimMe
 
Suggesting that GW Bush was a GOP businessman running for the Presidency shows either ignorance or arrogance...

GW Bush was elected twice to the Texas Governorship... And his being a successful politician was what propelled him to become a twice elected President...

And the GOP Elite - spearheaded by Former Pres GW Bush - did not support Donald Trump... The frustrated GOP Voters supported him in 30 of the 50 States... These Voters looked at the horrendous condition their Nation is in and decided to put a Non-Politician Businessman in the Presidency rather than another Cookie-Cutter Establishment Politician...

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 12:26:40   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
HILLARY FOR PRISON 2016 CAMPAIGN THEME SONG
https://youtu.be/lwl56DeNK0Q

We still have a Constitutional Republic. America dodged a lethal bullet.
The Left will resort to anything. Beware of amoral Communist bastards.

Dr.Dross wrote:
In a few days, barring unforeseen circumstances, DJT will become the 45th president of the United States and have the opportunity to prove that the minority opinion of Americans was right. I have very little faith that he can do the job but great hope that he can. These are very turbulent times, wars and rumors of war. No one can envy his position. What I find most troubling is his seeming inability to control himself at 3AM on twitter. This bizarre disposition to use tweets as policy and forum for the world's most powerful leader of the world should give anyone pause. Be that as it may, and perhaps just put it down as an innocent or even planned quirk, it is time to give him a chance. Out of respect for the office and the future of America.

On 1/20, Inauguration Day, we are not directly celebrating Trump's (marginal) victory but our Democratic Process. Although he lost the popular vote by the widest margin in our nation's history, he won by OUR process and is OUR president. He is due respect and honor along with our process. His election is undisputed. And that brings me to the reason for this thread. Despite the fact that I have been on OPP one of his worst and most consistent critics, it was more like fun for me. I definitely believed there was a just and true cause behind my words, no fake news or game playing, but this is just OPP and not a world stage. The Left's behavior about attending the Inauguration has me a little sick and, yes, ashamed. I know I did not have any influence over people attending or not, yet my attacks denote the same attitude as those who refuse to attend. Seriously, if I were invited or could afford it, I would cheer and applaud for Trump. There is the 1st Amendment and I am not saying those who refused to attend or will be protesting are exactly wrong, however, America is the melting pot and has always been the symbol of hope for the world. Disagree, sure, but do not dismember that hope for us or the planet with a start in divisiveness. For my part in that, I apologize.
In a few days, barring unforeseen circumstances, D... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 12:31:28   #
Progressive One
 
Still divided and angry
Jonah Goldberg
“F or many years,” Donald Trump tweeted Sunday afternoon, “our country has been divided, angry and untrusting. Many say it will never change, the hatred is too deep. IT WILL CHANGE!!!!”
As persuasive as the ALL CAPS are, I have my doubts.
Put aside Trump’s specific shortcomings for the moment. The presidency has become ill-suited to the task of unifying the country, because the presidency has become the biggest prize and totem in the culture war. Like the religious wars between Catholics and Protestants in England, if one side controls the throne, it is seen as an insult and threat to the other. And whoever holds the throne is seen as a kind of personal Protector of the Realm.
The political parties have been complicit in the process. Exploiting social media and other technologies, Republicans and Democrats shape their messages around the assumption that they — and they alone — have legitimate ownership of America’s best self. That’s why whichever party is out of power promises to “take back America” — as if the other side were foreign invaders.
Barack Obama was elected in 2008 in no small part to fulfill the promise of his 2004 Democratic Convention address: to stop the “slicing and dicing” of America into red states and blue states.
The colors of the electoral map may have been smudged and scrambled over the last eight years, but the underlying polarization Obama inherited from George W. Bush only intensified on his watch. Trump will be the third president in a row to promise to unite the country, and he will almost certainly be the third in a row to fail.
The ugly squabble between the president-elect and Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) over the weekend offers a glimpse into how bad things will get.
Lewis earned his icon status on the Edmund Pettus Bridge on Bloody Sunday in Selma, Ala. But over the years, he’s traded some of his moral capital for partisan chips, insinuating that only the Democratic Party has ownership of the civil rights era and its victories, despite the fact that more congressional Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act than Democrats. Indeed, the goons who cracked Lewis’ skull on the Edmund Pettus Bridge were acting at the behest of a Democratic governor and Democratic local officials. Even the bridge was named after a Democrat.
In 2008, Lewis saw nothing wrong with comparing Sen. John McCain to the segregationist Alabama Gov. George Wallace, adding: “Sen. McCain and Gov. [Sarah] Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division.” He did it again in 2012, insinuating that voting for Mitt Romney might lead America to “go back” to the days of fire hoses, police dogs and church bombings.
This was not idealism, but poisonous cynicism, and it helped contribute to the feelings of resentment that were so essential to Trump’s victory. Now Lewis is going further still, refusing to attend Trump’s inauguration and arguing that Trump cannot be a legitimate president because of Russian meddling. Lewis may have reason to believe that Trump did not win fair and square, but questioning Trump’s legitimacy is exactly what the Russians probably wanted from the beginning: to undermine Western and American faith and confidence in democracy.
Of course Trump made things worse. He attacked Lewis, saying the congressman “should finally focus on the burning and crime-infested inner cities of the U.S.” instead of “falsely complaining about the election results.” Democrats rallied behind Lewis, who’s basically the party’s living saint, and they’re already fundraising off the spectacle.
The Democrats will stop baiting Trump when he shows he can refuse the bait. Which means they won’t stop.
There’s an almost literary quality to Trump’s insecurities; he craves respect more than almost anything else and yet respect remains agonizingly elusive — in part because he takes everything too personally.
The presidency, normally a job for people with thick skins and a nose for insincere flattery, promises to only heighten Trump’s sense of entitlement to respect and exacerbate his inevitable resentment when he doesn’t receive it. So we’ll continue on divided, angry and untrusting.
jgoldberg@latimescolumnists.com

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 13:07:02   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
snowbear37 wrote:
"What does any truth in the emails have to do with anything?...." Are you serious?? If the emails indicated that Hillary dyed her hair, do you seriously think they would have had the same effect? You refuse to understand that it was the substance of the emails and not the fact that they were hacked. You liberals live in a fantasy world of your own making. You concentrate on the "hacking" to divert attention from the exposure to the truth. Face it, Hillary got caught (several times), but you would rather blather on about HOW she got caught. Like a lot of criminals, you want her "released on a technicality". She did the crime, but wasn't read her rights. Typical liberal thinking.
"What does any truth in the emails have to do... (show quote)


Yep; She did the crime. She needs to do the time!!!
Federal Prison Blues
https://youtu.be/MjdPx8cJ27Y


HILLARY FOR PRISON 2016 CAMPAIGN THEME SONG
https://youtu.be/lwl56DeNK0Q

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 84 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.