Watch: Liberals Are Panicking After This Fine Display By Nancy Pelosi on Live TV
Mar 20, 2017 20:43:33 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Nah, he was just an entry-level candidate. Never should have been hired.
That's what I mean.
Mar 21, 2017 09:53:54 #
America Only wrote:
Geez...she needs the golden wheel chair already? Hahah!
Riigghhttt!!!
Mar 21, 2017 11:19:09 #
In all the "comments" posted, not one of you makes even a feeble attempt to meet Pelosi's argument. That means A) you don't have a clue what she said, especially those who heard it or read it, or B) her arguments infuriate you because they point to your irrelevance.
Decent people think you're all self-persuaded sods because you act like self-persuaded sods.
Decent people think you're all self-persuaded sods because you act like self-persuaded sods.
Mar 21, 2017 11:25:08 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
theotts wrote:
In all the "comments" posted, not one of you makes even a feeble attempt to meet Pelosi's argument. That means A) you don't have a clue what she said, especially those who heard it or read it, or B) her arguments infuriate you because they point to your irrelevance.
Decent people think you're all self-persuaded sods because you act like self-persuaded sods.
Decent people think you're all self-persuaded sods because you act like self-persuaded sods.
You missed my comment apparently.
Mar 21, 2017 11:25:47 #
theotts wrote:
In all the "comments" posted, not one of you makes even a feeble attempt to meet Pelosi's argument. That means A) you don't have a clue what she said, especially those who heard it or read it, or B) her arguments infuriate you because they point to your irrelevance.
Decent people think you're all self-persuaded sods because you act like self-persuaded sods.
Decent people think you're all self-persuaded sods because you act like self-persuaded sods.
Pelosi has become an incoherent moonbat desperately trying to maintain some sort of relevancy. She is a blathering idiot with NO argument.
Mar 21, 2017 11:26:52 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
buffalo wrote:
Pelosi has become an incoherent moonbat desperately trying to maintain some sort of relevancy. She is a blathering idiot with NO argument.
She reminds me of Buchanon.
Mar 21, 2017 11:28:43 #
Mar 21, 2017 11:28:52 #
theotts wrote:
In all the "comments" posted, not one of you makes even a feeble attempt to meet Pelosi's argument. That means A) you don't have a clue what she said, especially those who heard it or read it, or B) her arguments infuriate you because they point to your irrelevance.
Decent people think you're all self-persuaded sods because you act like self-persuaded sods.
Decent people think you're all self-persuaded sods because you act like self-persuaded sods.
She was more "incoherent" than usual (which only tells me she has a good drug dealer). What she said made no sense....even to those on the Left who adore her.
Mar 21, 2017 11:35:13 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
Big Bass wrote:
Here's another Pelosi-ism:-
If she actually said that, I'd have to agree with her on that too, loony as she is. However, I have no doubt she doesn't know natural gas is a fossil fuel. But, she might be using the term loosely, the same way Trump used the term "wiretapping" loosely.
Not trying to argue. Just throwing a little monkey into the wrench, or something like that.
Mar 21, 2017 11:42:57 #
jer48
Loc: perris ca
JFlorio wrote:
Wow ! The sad part about this is not the fact she gets elected year after year by a highly Democrat population. The sad thing is they obviously pay no attention. If they did they would at least primary the demented bitch.
the people who vote her in are just like her they need a law to prevent these clowns from voting
Mar 21, 2017 11:49:57 #
buffalo wrote:
Pelosi has become an incoherent moonbat desperately trying to maintain some sort of relevancy. She is a blathering idiot with NO argument.
See.
Mar 21, 2017 11:52:32 #
fullspinzoo wrote:
She was more "incoherent" than usual (which only tells me she has a good drug dealer). What she said made no sense....even to those on the Left who adore her.
You don't know what 'those on left...' think about her remarks.
I doubt you know what she said
Mar 21, 2017 12:00:48 #
theotts wrote:
In all the "comments" posted, not one of you makes even a feeble attempt to meet Pelosi's argument. That means A) you don't have a clue what she said, especially those who heard it or read it, or B) her arguments infuriate you because they point to your irrelevance.
Decent people think you're all self-persuaded sods because you act like self-persuaded sods.
Decent people think you're all self-persuaded sods because you act like self-persuaded sods.
Or what she has to say is irrelevant.. Heck even she doesn't know what she says...
Mar 21, 2017 12:15:24 #
lindajoy wrote:
Or what she has to say is irrelevant.. Heck even she doesn't know what she says...
Those are neither facts nor logical arguments. They are speculation in a fact-free vacuum.
Mar 21, 2017 13:06:51 #
theotts wrote:
Those are neither facts nor logical arguments. They are speculation in a fact-free vacuum.
Correction~~ they are fact, have you watched her any lately??
She's a 76 year old, done, "politician" in its truest sense...House speaker, Representative, whatever, she needs to retire...
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/nancy-pelosi-sergey-kislyak-meeting-235653
https://youtu.be/Hy0aMY2-tYE
https://youtu.be/DfVNadETUx4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.