One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump is the Biggest Failure in History As His Disapproval Rating Skyrockets to 58%
Page <<first <prev 29 of 59 next> last>>
Mar 27, 2017 01:28:01   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
eagleye13 wrote:
I am sticking to Progressive One; like stink on a skunk:
In PO's own words:
To see the phony, "Progressive One" is; these quotes and questions have been presented;
"You can tell that this is the wakeup call to action many needed.....you can see the new level of mobilization, awareness and consciousness. the freeways have been blocked with thousands out here in LA.....Trump has his work cut out for him and his racist supporters in the sticks got him there.....will not be of any help to him…" - "Progressive?" One
So Progressive One; denounce anarchy. ______________
Denounce Marxism. _______________
No wonder the professor has avoided responding to these questions!
PO; do you believe this should be what guides America? _______________
This system to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.
- Insider, Professor Carroll Quigley – ‘Tragedy and Hope’,( p. 324)
Still waiting for "Progressive" One, to back up his beliefs.
Why does any liberal/progressive align with the likes of a Billionaire elitist like George "Giorgi" Soros?
10 Things You Didn't Know About Nazi collaborator. "Giorgi" George Soros
https://youtu.be/tfBHYxEojZk
I am sticking to Progressive One; like stink on a... (show quote)


And once again the eagle has failed to land, her ignorance is proven by every word she types!



Reply
Mar 27, 2017 01:52:57   #
Progressive One
 
Nice....looks real aerodynamic...literally.....

Reply
Mar 27, 2017 08:10:52   #
PeterS
 
Ranger7374 wrote:
No proof of collusion has been found, however, a Watergate scandal is developing as I write this. Now, what we do know is this:

#1. Surveillance was done on the Trump Campaign.

#2. Surveillance was done legally, that is gathering information about foreign nationals(the Russian Probe)

#3. Surveillance was done incidentally on American citizens. Procedures are clear when this intelligence is gathered. The American citizen's privacy, based upon the 1973 Privacy Act must be upheld.

#4. Certain persons being under Surveillance, were "unmasked". This included General Flynn, an American Citizen.

#5. Most of the intelligence, if not all of it, that was collected by the Surveillance had nothing to do with foreign nationals, and the leaks were used for political reasons.

Now, Pete, and the rest of you, before you start arguing back and forth on who should go to jail, Obama or Trump, we must follow the facts here. Remember the "rule of Law", and the "Law" itself. The Law is clear on this, any intelligence gathered on an American citizen, that is incidental because the American just happens to be present when the foreign person is communicating, and intelligence is being gathered, the intelligence is confidential and cannot by Law be leaked, or released to the public. Since, the intelligence gathered had nothing to do with the collusion between the foreign persons, and the American citizens, but rather was an eve's dropping incident, for the purpose of political reasons, the authorities at the time broke the law. Then further broke the law when they unmasked, the subjects.

The question here is, Who authorized the unmasking, of these subjects of the intelligence gathered for political reasons?

This is the question that needs to be answered.

When concerning the pompous ass, Donald Trump, all of us here, who preaches "fairness" must embrace a true fact. Donald Trump is a lot of things but one thing he is not is a politician. It has been a long time since we have had a president who is not a politician. Since Donald Trump, love him--hate him, since he has been president, he has tried to keep his word. That should be acknowledged. No man will be perfect in the job he has to do. Sound familiar, many said to me back in '14 give Obama a chance. Well I did and by July of '14 I was calling for his impeachment. Obamacare, Fast and Furious, Benghazi, ISIS, and the deserter that was traded for terrorists, were some of the failures of the Obama Administration. These failures led to a distrust of the people to the Federal Government. No law should be blanketed that all states must follow when concerning social issues. But what must be followed is the rule of Law. There is a difference.

There is no evidence suggesting that Donald Trump ever engaged in an act of treason.
There was evidence to suggest that Obama, Bill Clinton and Hilary Clinton did engage in treason. Most of this evidence was dismissed due to the circumstantial evidence.
Same was held true for the Reagan and Bush, and Bush Jr, administrations. But Donald Trump has not been in long enough to do any action.

There is however evidence, that Donald Trump is not a traitor, the executive order concerning immigration is an example. Donald Trump pushed for the banning of enemies of the United States from entering into the country under the disguise of being an immigrant. Legal immigrants are always welcome into this country, but illegal immigrants have always been discouraged. There is cause for this discouragement. This is an act of not only duty, but also of patriotism.

If you are of the mind to stop once and for all discrimination, and racism or any other ism, you must practice what you preach. I have seen very threatening words against Trump without proper evidence. I think Trump is a pompous asshole, personally, however being an asshole is not illegal or traitorous. But let's face it, if you want to be fair, look at the forum in which we write, how many of us are pompous assholes.

Now, present evidence that can be verified and is concrete evidence rather than arguing in fear. That is a major problem with this forum, is that we rely on the media for our facts. We have condemned all media outlets, as if we the people don't trust the media. That is fine, I don't trust the media, whether it is Fox News, CNN, ABC, NBC, or CBS since all these networks could not announce the president in November of 2000, let alone today.

However, some reporters in the Press do, do good fact reporting. We, the people, have got to stop attacking Trump for a bit. If Trump is as bad as our friends on the Left suggest it will be shown in time. If Trump is as good as our friends on the right suggest, it will be shown in time. But I think Trump is just a common man, just like you and me. He will fail in somethings, and in some issues, but will succeed in other things and issues. Be patient. Too many people are jumping the gun. Let's watch how it plays out then let's judge. I say, as I'm trying to be fair, its too early to tell.

Do we have a deal?
No proof of collusion has been found, however, a W... (show quote)


Does no proof of collusion mean that no collusion has taken place? Why so many people in one organization having contacts with Russia? Hell, even as president one wouldn't have that many contacts. Do you think it's just incidental? And Trump did have the RNC platform changed to the more friendlier version to Russia. Are we suppose to assume there was no quid pro quo?

You got your man it so you see nothing wrong and suspicion of those who are curious. Well what we know is that Trumps minions connections to Russia are being investigated. Whether those connections are tentacles is what we are going to find out.

And believe it or not I hope Trump has done nothing wrong. As bad as Trump is, Pence is a thousand times worse and will be hard to defeat in 8 years. Trump however, is only going to be a one term president and the preferable "conservative" to have in power...

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2017 08:14:16   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Progressive One wrote:
Nice....looks real aerodynamic...literally.....


The Beatles-Blackbird w/Lyrics!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qokMu7BMv_8

Reply
Mar 27, 2017 08:25:12   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
PeterS wrote:
Does no proof of collusion mean that no collusion has taken place? Why so many people in one organization having contacts with Russia? Hell, even as president one wouldn't have that many contacts. Do you think it's just incidental? And Trump did have the RNC platform changed to the more friendlier version to Russia. Are we suppose to assume there was no quid pro quo?

You got your man it so you see nothing wrong and suspicion of those who are curious. Well what we know is that Trumps minions connections to Russia are being investigated. Whether those connections are tentacles is what we are going to find out.

And believe it or not I hope Trump has done nothing wrong. As bad as Trump is, Pence is a thousand times worse and will be hard to defeat in 8 years. Trump however, is only going to be a one term president and the preferable "conservative" to have in power...
Does no proof of collusion mean that no collusion ... (show quote)


So what? Trump is a businessman, and Russia is an untapped market. You bitch constantly about Putin, and his alleged 'trail of bodies,'' yet you support Hillary the Harridan and ignore her alleged "trail of bodies" which is ten times longer. You bitch about a locker room-type comment Trump made ten years ago in what was supposed to be a private conversation and ignore decades of philandering and rape accusations against Slick Willie. You give your stamp of approval to eight years of Obama lies and decades of Hillary lies. You bitch about Trump's tax returns and ignore Hillary's felonious security breaches and blatant lies to congress. You harp on Trump's supposed Russian ties, and ignore the 25 million dollars that the Saudis contributed to Hillary, and the $500,000 paid to said Slick Willie for one speech as a quid pro quo for the uranium sale. (Not to mention all the money that Rosacom donated to the Clintoon Foundation during the Uranium sale scam.) You say Trump is a misogynist, yet ignore Hillary's support of repressive regimes that have rape victims publicly whipped for their "immodesty."
Liberals are such hypocrites. Are you people actually this cynical, or are you so stupid you can't tell the difference?

Reply
Mar 27, 2017 08:34:26   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
PeterS wrote:
Does no proof of collusion mean that no collusion has taken place? Why so many people in one organization having contacts with Russia? Hell, even as president one wouldn't have that many contacts. Do you think it's just incidental? And Trump did have the RNC platform changed to the more friendlier version to Russia. Are we suppose to assume there was no quid pro quo?

You got your man it so you see nothing wrong and suspicion of those who are curious. Well what we know is that Trumps minions connections to Russia are being investigated. Whether those connections are tentacles is what we are going to find out.

And believe it or not I hope Trump has done nothing wrong. As bad as Trump is, Pence is a thousand times worse and will be hard to defeat in 8 years. Trump however, is only going to be a one term president and the preferable "conservative" to have in power...
Does no proof of collusion mean that no collusion ... (show quote)


"Are we suppose to assume there was no quid pro quo?" - Peter S

Time for you to quit assuming;

Try this one on,Petey:
Why did it take Russia to put ISIS on the run???? AND it did!!!
Why was Israel aiding ISIS and their wounded???
Try figuring out who is fighting who.
This is a good start:
The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told
https://youtu.be/dkamZg68jpk

Reply
Mar 27, 2017 13:53:31   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
eagleye13 wrote:
"Are we suppose to assume there was no quid pro quo?" - Peter S

Time for you to quit assuming;

Try this one on,Petey:
Why did it take Russia to put ISIS on the run???? AND it did!!!
Why was Israel aiding ISIS and their wounded???
Try figuring out who is fighting who.
This is a good start:
The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told
https://youtu.be/dkamZg68jpk


Only complete morons or children attempt use youtube as valid source for anything!

Eagle 13 the youtube child!
Eagle 13 the youtube child!...

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2017 16:56:27   #
Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ
 
PeterS wrote:
Does no proof of collusion mean that no collusion has taken place? Why so many people in one organization having contacts with Russia? Hell, even as president one wouldn't have that many contacts. Do you think it's just incidental? And Trump did have the RNC platform changed to the more friendlier version to Russia. Are we suppose to assume there was no quid pro quo?

You got your man it so you see nothing wrong and suspicion of those who are curious. Well what we know is that Trumps minions connections to Russia are being investigated. Whether those connections are tentacles is what we are going to find out.

And believe it or not I hope Trump has done nothing wrong. As bad as Trump is, Pence is a thousand times worse and will be hard to defeat in 8 years. Trump however, is only going to be a one term president and the preferable "conservative" to have in power...
Does no proof of collusion mean that no collusion ... (show quote)


PeteS think of it as a murder trial, does no proof of collusion mean that the accused is guilty of conspiracy to commit murder? Or how about a theft case, or even a case of rape? The burden of proof is placed upon the accuser. If there is no collusion, then there is no case. That's step one.

Step two, did Russian interference effect the election? This is the next step. Already the FBI, CIA, NSA and the department of Homeland Security, all point to no or very little involvement. You must realize that the accused is innocent until proven guilty if there is no proof, a crime has not been committed with the players involved.

Step three, is did the government agencies follow the law when conducting the investigation? Everything that I have read points to the fact that governmental regulation was followed except one. That is, the unmasking of American citizens which is a direct violation of the Third and fourth amendments, as well as the Privacy Act of 1973. Again, this taints the evidence that could have been used in a court of law, to seek prosecution.

All of this is due to fear. Fear of the Russians, which should be dead because the Soviet Socialist Republic is no longer a threat. Fear of what Donald Trump can do for the conservatives, liberals, and progressives, and the rest of America. This Fear is the driving force of what has been called the conspiracy theorists.

This is the rule of law, the accused is innocent until proven guilty. No proof no guilt. This is what I had to endure with the Clinton and Obama administrations, as well as the Bush administrations, and we must deal with this during the Trump administration. Are you intolerant and believe in gossip, or are you searching for the truth? The truth may or may not destroy Trump, but like I have been saying for years, we cannot abridge the constitution just because we don't like someone. We must come up with substantial concrete evidence for a conviction. Without it, all we are doing is spreading rumors. If there is anything we all must do, that is democrat, progressive, republican, and conservative is be intolerant to rumors. Rumors prove nothing. Until we as a nation can re-embrace this principle, no one will get anywhere. They use to call Robert Kennedy, ruthless because he would follow all leads until fact was separated from rumors.

Therefore before we prejudge President Trump, we all must learn the lesson that prejudice does not work. Find the evidence, present the evidence, and get justice. However if the evidence proves Trump innocent, we must let him go, if the evidence proves Trump guilty, we must punish him.

Do you take rumors to be true, or facts to be true? A fact is an undeniable truth, a rumor is a suspicion of the truth. Which do you subscribe to?

Reply
Mar 28, 2017 08:38:06   #
Bevos
 
Loki wrote:
So what? Trump is a businessman, and Russia is an untapped market. You bitch constantly about Putin, and his alleged 'trail of bodies,'' yet you support Hillary the Harridan and ignore her alleged "trail of bodies" which is ten times longer. You bitch about a locker room-type comment Trump made ten years ago in what was supposed to be a private conversation and ignore decades of philandering and rape accusations against Slick Willie. You give your stamp of approval to eight years of Obama lies and decades of Hillary lies. You bitch about Trump's tax returns and ignore Hillary's felonious security breaches and blatant lies to congress. You harp on Trump's supposed Russian ties, and ignore the 25 million dollars that the Saudis contributed to Hillary, and the $500,000 paid to said Slick Willie for one speech as a quid pro quo for the uranium sale. (Not to mention all the money that Rosacom donated to the Clintoon Foundation during the Uranium sale scam.) You say Trump is a misogynist, yet ignore Hillary's support of repressive regimes that have rape victims publicly whipped for their "immodesty."
Liberals are such hypocrites. Are you people actually this cynical, or are you so stupid you can't tell the difference?
So what? Trump is a businessman, and Russia is an ... (show quote)


WELL SAID, LOKI!!! The IDIOTS will NEVER answer that one!!! ALL TRUE and they can NEVER dispute a word of it!!!

Reply
Mar 28, 2017 08:51:27   #
Bevos
 
PeterS wrote:
Does no proof of collusion mean that no collusion has taken place? Why so many people in one organization having contacts with Russia? Hell, even as president one wouldn't have that many contacts. Do you think it's just incidental? And Trump did have the RNC platform changed to the more friendlier version to Russia. Are we suppose to assume there was no quid pro quo?

You got your man it so you see nothing wrong and suspicion of those who are curious. Well what we know is that Trumps minions connections to Russia are being investigated. Whether those connections are tentacles is what we are going to find out.

And believe it or not I hope Trump has done nothing wrong. As bad as Trump is, Pence is a thousand times worse and will be hard to defeat in 8 years. Trump however, is only going to be a one term president and the preferable "conservative" to have in power...
Does no proof of collusion mean that no collusion ... (show quote)

I know you will NOT answer this because you Libs. don't answer POINT-BLANK questions. Every one of the Dems I have seen on the news has not answered ONE question asked of them. They sidestep every single one of them. I watched Tucker the other night ask one question 5 different ways and the Dem Pundit on there NEVER answered it. SIDESTEP, SIDESTEP, SIDESTEP!!! Alynski 101 !!!!

Why did Chuck Schumer have relations with Russia. Why did HilLIARy have relations with Russia? Why did Podesta have relations with Russia? Why did BILL Clinton have relations with Russia? Why did Pelosi have relations with Russia? Why do MANY MANY MORE Dems. have relations with Russia? Why are there 80+ Democrat Congressmen that belong to the COMMUNIST PARTY??
Your last statement has me confused. You say in 8 yrs. it will be hard to defeat Pence. But your next sentence you say Trump will be a one term President. WHO will be running the country, in the 4 yrs after Trump is no longer POTUS??? YOU?

Reply
Mar 28, 2017 11:15:49   #
Progressive One
 
Trump is the only one with business interests and is hiding his dealings/taxes.....they are investigating possible cover-up issues next............Sally Yates was not allowed to testify by the trump admin....to be continued...........

Reply
 
 
Mar 28, 2017 11:55:11   #
Progressive One
 
Hard right reemerges as a force
After healthcare bill fight, House Freedom Caucus becomes a challenge for Trump.
REP. MARK MEADOWS and his Freedom Caucus have never been popular among other GOP lawmakers. “If you’re going to drain the swamp, these are the guys who are going to do it,” one conservative activist said. (Mark Wilson Getty Images)
By Lisa Mascaro
WASHINGTON — When House Speaker Paul D. Ryan pulled the plug on the GOP’s Obamcacare overhaul, lawmakers spilled out of the Capitol basement, angry, frustrated and stunned.
But Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), leader of the conservative and rebellious House Freedom Caucus that led the fight against the bill, was uncharacteristically quiet, downplaying his political victory and mulling over the next move.
After coming together to battle President Obama and becoming a driving force in the Republican Party, this 30-member-plus bloc of deficit hawks and right-flank conservatives had appeared for a while to be pushed aside by the movement that swept President Trump into office.
But after helping defeat the GOP healthcare overhaul, the Freedom Caucus has roared back to relevance as a political power in the Trump era. It has reasserted itself as not just a renegade assemblage of mostly back-bench lawmakers, but as a core bloc of votes that Trump will need to push past the healthcare debacle to tax reform, budget battles and other issues.
“These guys saved the Republicans,” said Adam Brandon, president of FreedomWorks, a group that organized a North Carolina rally on Monday in honor of Meadows. “As beaten and battered as they are, we’ve got a group that’s willing to take the hard decisions. If you’re going to drain the swamp, these are the guys who are going to do it.”
Perhaps unintentionally, the White House opened the door for the group’s resurgence by allowing the Freedom Caucus to bypass Ryan and negotiate directly with Trump on the healthcare bill, even though the president in the end failed to close the deal with them.
Fellow GOP lawmakers — accustomed to battling the caucus over spending bills, the debt ceiling and the ouster of former House Speaker John A. Boehner — are now blaming the group for botching the party’s best chance to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.
The blowback reached a peak over the weekend as Trump tweeted critically about the group, essentially accusing them of helping Democrats.
For some members, the fallout has been difficult, especially because, as the most conservative lawmakers, they largely come from red districts Trump won handily.
It was one thing to confront a Democratic president or even to defy GOP leaders in Washington. But as shown by Meadows’ reluctance to take a victory lap, going head-to-head with Trump carries greater risk.
Already one member, Rep. Ted Poe (R-Texas), has quit the group in the aftermath of the health fight, complaining that the caucus knows only how to oppose initiatives, not to build them.
Other Republicans and some in the White House have wondered whether it is time to leave the right flank behind and start working with Democrats to advance shared goals.
Caucus members have been careful not to gloat since the healthcare clash, blaming the bill’s failure on GOP moderates and the party’s leaders, but never Trump, despite his missives against them.
Rep. Dave Brat (R-Va.) was careful to praise Trump repeatedly during an interview Monday on CNN. Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio said he would welcome Trump to visit his district. Meadows and others say they still want to work with the president to craft a healthcare bill.
They may have their chance. “We still have a promise to keep, so the speaker wants members to continue discussing this issue until we can find a path ahead,” Ryan spokeswoman AshLee Strong said Monday after the speaker visited the White House.
The return of the Freedom Caucus has forced some soul-searching among the Republican majority that controls the House and Senate, and it has left the White House to wonder whether Trump should continue to negotiate with them or look elsewhere for votes.
Some Republicans have suggested they start working more closely with moderate Democrats, a case made by Rep. Tom Reed (R-N.Y.), a Trump ally who is co-chairman of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, during a weekend interview on National Public Radio.
White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Monday the administration’s strategy and future alliances would “depend on the legislation.”
“We’re going to work with anybody who wants to work with us on achieving the goals the president set out,” Spicer said.
Of course it wasn’t just the caucus that doomed the healthcare overhaul, the American Health Care Act, which was also panned by centrist Republicans.
But after Republicans’ repeated battles with the rebellious caucus over the years, patience has grown thin. There is a growing realization that the group’s unwillingness to bend on conservative principles often leaves it unable to compromise to pass legislation.
“They’d vote ‘no’ against the Ten Commandments if it came up for a vote,” Poe said on CNN. “So I’m angry about that. I think it’s time we lead and continue not to say ‘no’ on everything that takes place when bills come forward.”
The White House also appears to have gained some experience in dealing with the bloc. Administration officials came to see the members as moving the goal post during final hours of negotiations and making new demands. “They understand what they’re working with now,” one GOP source said.
The caucus has never been popular among rank-and-file Republicans, and slipped from prominence after they forced Boehner into early retirement in late 2015.
Ryan for a time had been able to work around the restive bloc, in part because Congress undertook few serious legislative lifts that required direct confrontation with the most conservative among them.
But as Ryan and the White House watched their hopes of quickly overhauling Obamacare slip amid Republican infighting, they brought Meadows and others to the bargaining table.
Meadows and his allies took on starring roles in talks over the American Health Care Act, at one point whisking off to Mar-a-Lago, the president’s Florida resort, where he had retired for the weekend, to work directly with White House aides on the bill.
To many, the ability of the Freedom Caucus to leave the sidelines and negotiate directly with the president “changed the status quo,” said a GOP aide familiar with the group who requested anonymity to assess the situation. “Negotiating with the president? That’s a game changer.... That’s a huge, huge symbolic and strategic victory.… I think they’re stronger than ever coming out of this.”
But whether Trump will continue to court the group as he pursues a tax deal and his budget remains to be seen. A clue will come next month when Congress will need to pass a spending bill to avert a government shutdown after April 28.
As Republicans begin to tackle the next big agenda item — tax reform — Meadows appeared to offer an overture toward compromise when he suggested that tax cuts would not need to be strictly “revenue-neutral,” or fully offset with spending reductions elsewhere.
But the chairman’s offer is not one that all members of the caucus share, so his ability to bring along about 30 votes on that would not be guaranteed.
After the healthcare battle, rank-and-file Republicans have little patience with the caucus.
“A handful of ideologues are locking up the will of most of the country,” Rep. Steve Russell (R-Okla.) said. “They have a propensity for ‘no’ and they find a way to get to ‘no.’ ”
lisa.mascaro@latimes.com
Twitter: @LisaMascaro
Times staff writer Brian Bennett contributed to this report.

Reply
Mar 28, 2017 12:01:50   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
Ranger7374 wrote:
PeteS think of it as a murder trial, does no proof of collusion mean that the accused is guilty of conspiracy to commit murder? Or how about a theft case, or even a case of rape? The burden of proof is placed upon the accuser. If there is no collusion, then there is no case. That's step one.

Step two, did Russian interference effect the election? This is the next step. Already the FBI, CIA, NSA and the department of Homeland Security, all point to no or very little involvement. You must realize that the accused is innocent until proven guilty if there is no proof, a crime has not been committed with the players involved.

Step three, is did the government agencies follow the law when conducting the investigation? Everything that I have read points to the fact that governmental regulation was followed except one. That is, the unmasking of American citizens which is a direct violation of the Third and fourth amendments, as well as the Privacy Act of 1973. Again, this taints the evidence that could have been used in a court of law, to seek prosecution.

All of this is due to fear. Fear of the Russians, which should be dead because the Soviet Socialist Republic is no longer a threat. Fear of what Donald Trump can do for the conservatives, liberals, and progressives, and the rest of America. This Fear is the driving force of what has been called the conspiracy theorists.

This is the rule of law, the accused is innocent until proven guilty. No proof no guilt. This is what I had to endure with the Clinton and Obama administrations, as well as the Bush administrations, and we must deal with this during the Trump administration. Are you intolerant and believe in gossip, or are you searching for the truth? The truth may or may not destroy Trump, but like I have been saying for years, we cannot abridge the constitution just because we don't like someone. We must come up with substantial concrete evidence for a conviction. Without it, all we are doing is spreading rumors. If there is anything we all must do, that is democrat, progressive, republican, and conservative is be intolerant to rumors. Rumors prove nothing. Until we as a nation can re-embrace this principle, no one will get anywhere. They use to call Robert Kennedy, ruthless because he would follow all leads until fact was separated from rumors.

Therefore before we prejudge President Trump, we all must learn the lesson that prejudice does not work. Find the evidence, present the evidence, and get justice. However if the evidence proves Trump innocent, we must let him go, if the evidence proves Trump guilty, we must punish him.

Do you take rumors to be true, or facts to be true? A fact is an undeniable truth, a rumor is a suspicion of the truth. Which do you subscribe to?
PeteS think of it as a murder trial, does no proof... (show quote)


And once again you are confused!

3/20/17

FBI is Investigating Trump's Russian Ties; James Comey!

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/us/politics/fbi-investigation-trump-russia-comey.html?_r=0


Fact: no intelligence has made a decision or commented on the outcome of the Trump Russia investigation!



Reply
Mar 28, 2017 12:19:19   #
Bevos
 
Progressive One wrote:
Trump is the only one with business interests and is hiding his dealings/taxes.....they are investigating possible cover-up issues next............Sally Yates was not allowed to testify by the trump admin....to be continued...........


His taxes are NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS!!!The LAW says he does NOT EVER have to show his taxes if he does not want to!!! He filled out and sent in his Financial Disclosure and THAT is ALL he has to do!!! And WHY has Obama spent so much money to HIDE his College Transcripts, for all of these years??? Is it because he wants to HIDE the fact that he was an FOREIGN EXCHANGE STUDENT??? And HOW did he acquire that status IF he is an American Citizen?????

Reply
Mar 28, 2017 12:26:04   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
Bevos wrote:
His taxes are NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS!!!The LAW says he does NOT EVER have to show his taxes if he does not want to!!! He filled out and sent in his Financial Disclosure and THAT is ALL he has to do!!! And WHY has Obama spent so much money to HIDE his College Transcripts, for all of these years??? Is it because he wants to HIDE the fact that he was an FOREIGN EXCHANGE STUDENT??? And HOW did he acquire that status IF he is an American Citizen?????


Damn you people are stupid!

Fact debunked many times! Obama did not hide any of his college records! Just more propaganda for the right wing simpletons!

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/obamas-sealed-records/

Bevos proves she is as stupid as Trump!
Bevos proves she is as stupid as Trump!...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 29 of 59 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.