The author had to use 240 references to research a two and a half page paper. That's a bit of overkill don't you think?
PeterS wrote:
The author had to use 240 references to research a two and a half page paper. That's a bit of overkill don't you think?
.
When it comes to people like you, there is no such thing as overkill. You will resort to anything to discredit something you don't agree with.
PeterS wrote:
The author had to use 240 references to research a two and a half page paper. That's a bit of overkill don't you think?
It was a lot longer than two and a half pages, and he only used 48 references. Don't know where you got 240 from. Try to pay attention. Here's the link again, since it's painfully obvious that you did not read it.
http://www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.