One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
NIST whistleblower furious about NIST's lies denying explosives in the WTC towers.
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 10, 2017 09:11:57   #
payne1000
 
http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/new-nist-whistleblower-speaks-out-on-911/
Wow!
The mainstream media will surely jump all over this.



Reply
Feb 10, 2017 09:17:57   #
Rivers
 
payne1000 wrote:
http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/new-nist-whistleblower-speaks-out-on-911/
Wow!
The mainstream media will surely jump all over this.


You need to be committed to a mental institution. You're insane.

Reply
Feb 10, 2017 09:39:14   #
payne1000
 
Rivers wrote:
You need to be committed to a mental institution. You're insane.


You haven't had time to watch the video.
By what standards do you judge my sanity?

Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2017 09:44:57   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
payne1000 wrote:
http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/new-nist-whistleblower-speaks-out-on-911/
Wow!
The mainstream media will surely jump all over this.


Sure they will. Just like they have every other time someone with 'new' information speaks up. They all get together and report about this 'tinfoil-hat wearing crazy' who is telling everyone about how 9/11 was an 'inside job'. Most people will just shrug their shoulders and 'move along'. A few will stop to look into the pertinent facts as presented, see the truth of it, shrug their shoulders and 'move along'. One or two will dig deeper, see that there's a real basis in fact behind all of this 'theorizing', maybe even say a few words of condemnation about the whole affair, and 'move along'.

Bottom line. It's been over 15 years since the twin towers fell. The narrative was in place long before this happened and has been hammered into place at every opportunity, coining such slogans as 'support the troops', 'never forget', 'thank you for your service', etc. As for me; I know what 'Thermate' is, I've read the testimonies where the survivors tell of 'massive explosions' before, during and after impact. I've even seen the video where the explosion takes place a split second before the second plane impacts. Then there's the 'pancake effect'. How was it possible that a solid steel frame, designed to support the weight of everything attached to it, and some, just completely collapse like that? One word: Thermate. But nobody's listening. Nobody wants to listen. It's just too horrible to contemplate. and so they 'move along'.

Reply
Feb 10, 2017 10:09:45   #
payne1000
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Sure they will. Just like they have every other time someone with 'new' information speaks up. They all get together and report about this 'tinfoil-hat wearing crazy' who is telling everyone about how 9/11 was an 'inside job'. Most people will just shrug their shoulders and 'move along'. A few will stop to look into the pertinent facts as presented, see the truth of it, shrug their shoulders and 'move along'. One or two will dig deeper, see that there's a real basis in fact behind all of this 'theorizing', maybe even say a few words of condemnation about the whole affair, and 'move along'.

Bottom line. It's been over 15 years since the twin towers fell. The narrative was in place long before this happened and has been hammered into place at every opportunity, coining such slogans as 'support the troops', 'never forget', 'thank you for your service', etc. As for me; I know what 'Thermate' is, I've read the testimonies where the survivors tell of 'massive explosions' before, during and after impact. I've even seen the video where the explosion takes place a split second before the second plane impacts. Then there's the 'pancake effect'. How was it possible that a solid steel frame, designed to support the weight of everything attached to it, and some, just completely collapse like that? One word: Thermate. But nobody's listening. Nobody wants to listen. It's just too horrible to contemplate. and so they 'move along'.
Sure they will. Just like they have every other t... (show quote)


Yes, they move along because if they admit our government was and is corrupt enough to mass murder Americans, then they would be obligated to take action to fight that corruption.
The majority of Americans I have had conversations with would rather live in a fantasy world where they are not obligated to take any action.
As William S. Lederer wrote in the lead up to the Vietnam war, the U.S. is "A Nation of Sheep."

Reply
Feb 11, 2017 11:22:15   #
payne1000
 
This is another in the long list of whistleblowers who have come forward to expose the lies of 9/11.
The mainstream media totally ignores these brave truth tellers. This is a deliberate cover-up of a monumental crime.
Every owner and CEO of the major news corporations should be indicted as accomplices to mass murder.
Here are some of those who are lying to us:











Reply
Feb 11, 2017 11:26:38   #
Rivers
 
payne1000 wrote:
This is another in the long list of whistleblowers who have come forward to expose the lies of 9/11.
The mainstream media totally ignores these brave truth tellers. This is a deliberate cover-up of a monumental crime.
Every owner and CEO of the major news corporations should be indicted as accomplices to mass murder.
Here are some of those who are lying to us:


You towelhead goatf**ker get a life! You should be deported, or institutionalized!

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2017 12:23:06   #
payne1000
 
Rivers wrote:
You towelhead goatf**ker get a life! You should be deported, or institutionalized!


I should be deported for being an American patriot?
I suspect America would be much better off without the belligerent Zionist ignorance you display.

Reply
Feb 11, 2017 12:27:28   #
Rivers
 
payne1000 wrote:
I should be deported for being an American patriot?
I suspect America would be much better off without the belligerent Zionist ignorance you display.


You're NOT an American patriot....you're an anti-Semite towelhead goatf**ker conspiracy theorist MORON! One has to be completely brain dead to believe one iota of anything you post...pure garbage.

Reply
Feb 11, 2017 14:26:32   #
payne1000
 
Rivers wrote:
You're NOT an American patriot....you're an anti-Semite towelhead goatf**ker conspiracy theorist MORON! One has to be completely brain dead to believe one iota of anything you post...pure garbage.


There you go, using that Zionist trick word instead of attempting to rebut anything the very brave and patriotic Mr. Ketcham says.



Reply
Feb 11, 2017 15:46:14   #
Rivers
 
payne1000 wrote:
There you go, using that Zionist trick word instead of attempting to rebut anything the very brave and patriotic Mr. Ketcham says.


Go play with your goat girlfriend, Muhammad.

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2017 16:29:18   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
This is another in the long list of whistleblowers who have come forward to expose the lies of 9/11.
The mainstream media totally ignores these brave truth tellers. This is a deliberate cover-up of a monumental crime.
Every owner and CEO of the major news corporations should be indicted as accomplices to mass murder.
Here are some of those who are lying to us:




Number one on your list disagrees with you putz ...

On Saturday, Murdoch had wondered aloud why, in his opinion, the “Jewish owned press” seemed so anti-Israel. Earlier, he had criticized the Associated Press and CNN — neither of which is “Jewish owned” — for what he saw as their bias in covering the Israel-Gaza conflict. Some speculated that Murdoch may have been referring to the New York Times, which is run by the Jewish Sulzberger family.
After receiving feedback alerting him to the fact that phrases like “Jewish owned press” carry a certain unpleasant whiff about them, Murdoch retreated

Reply
Feb 11, 2017 18:17:40   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Sure they will. Just like they have every other time someone with 'new' information speaks up. They all get together and report about this 'tinfoil-hat wearing crazy' who is telling everyone about how 9/11 was an 'inside job'. Most people will just shrug their shoulders and 'move along'. A few will stop to look into the pertinent facts as presented, see the truth of it, shrug their shoulders and 'move along'. One or two will dig deeper, see that there's a real basis in fact behind all of this 'theorizing', maybe even say a few words of condemnation about the whole affair, and 'move along'.

Bottom line. It's been over 15 years since the twin towers fell. The narrative was in place long before this happened and has been hammered into place at every opportunity, coining such slogans as 'support the troops', 'never forget', 'thank you for your service', etc. As for me; I know what 'Thermate' is, I've read the testimonies where the survivors tell of 'massive explosions' before, during and after impact. I've even seen the video where the explosion takes place a split second before the second plane impacts. Then there's the 'pancake effect'. How was it possible that a solid steel frame, designed to support the weight of everything attached to it, and some, just completely collapse like that? One word: Thermate. But nobody's listening. Nobody wants to listen. It's just too horrible to contemplate. and so they 'move along'.
Sure they will. Just like they have every other t... (show quote)
"Thermate"? Naw, couldn't have been thermate. Thermate is a pyrotechnic composition that can generate short bursts of very high temperatures focused on a small area for a short period of time. It is used primarily in incendiary grenades.

If thermate was used in the 9/11 trutherized scenario where charges were installed on every floor, the amount necessary to do the job would have been enormous. The installers would have had to remove a hell of a lot of dry wall, elevator shaft walls, air duct walls and electrical shaft walls just to gain access to the core columns. Moreover, because TH3 burns so fast, the failure rate of the charges to cut completely through the core columns would have been quite high. In any case, if thermate charges were going off in the building, before, during or after the collapse, they would have started fires at every point they discharged.. Not a feasible scenario.

Let's get this out of the way first: The so-called whistleblower and FORMER employee of NIST, Peter Ketchem WAS NOT INVOLVED in the 9/11 investigation. He's just another disgruntled numbers cruncher with a bone to pick. Little guy just needed some attention so he joined the trutherized conspiracy.

Here's what really happened:

Bush and Cheney conspired with Rumsfeld to work up a plan to destroy the WTC, hit the Pentagon, and the WH or Capitol building so they could justify going after Saddam Hussein. Rumsfeld contacted a top Mossad agent and they worked out a plan to smuggle two Israeli tactical nukes into the US. (Israeli nukes are untraceable so the Bush/Cheney cabal would have plausible deniability). They chose nukes because, in 1993, when Ramzi Yousef tried to bring down WTC 1 with a conventional explosive, it failed to do so. To complete the plan, Rumsfeld contracted a movie special effects company to develop a mobile laser holograph system.

On September 11, 2001 (They picked the date because of its significance in the history of Islam), two operatives hired by Rumsfeld drove utitlity vans, each loaded with an active Israel nuke, into the underground parking garages of WTC 1 & 2. The two operatives activated the cell phones set up to receive the detonation codes, then they hauled ass out of the basements. Meanwhile, 3 specially engineered vehicles, each containing a sophiscated holographic generator, moved into postitions where they would each have a line of sight on the towers and the Pentagon. One was located with a clear view of the north face of WTC 1, one was located with a clear view of the south face of WTC 2, and one was located across the street from the Pentagon. They had a fouth FX crew somewhere near the WH and Capitol building, but this crew had a major malfunction.

At 8:46am, the special effects crew north ot WTC 1 generated a holographic image of a Boeing 767 and flew it into the north face of WTC 1, centered on the 96th floor. At 9:03am, the special effects crew south of WTC 2 did the same, centering the hologram on the 81st floor. And, at 9:37am, the special effects crew near the Pentagon cranked out a hologram of a Boeing 757 and flew it into the Pentagon. Rumsfeld was pissed that the fourth special effects crew screwed the pooch in Pennsylvania.

There was one thing that the FX crews never counted on--why the holograms were so freaking hot they blew big holes in the buildings and started massive fires.

Then, at 9:59am, Rumsfeld's operative phoned the nuke in the WTC 2 garage and it blew the foundation all to hell and the tower came down. At 10:28am, the other killer phoned the nuke in WTC 1 and BOOM, that tower came down.

It was a fairly efficient job. Using thermate or high explosives on every floor on the towers was far too difficult a project, it would have cost too much and taken to long to set up. Besides, they couldn't have possibly accomplished such a project without raising some eyebrows.

Now, about that WTC 7 thing. That was a tough one for the Bush/Cheney cabal, but Rumsfeld solved the problem. He contacted the CEO of ConEd. Seems ConEd was having some problems with their sub station under WTC 7, it was obsolete and was losing money. They worked out a plan to blow it up after the twin towers came down, and they used enough explosives so that the whole building would fall, like a controlled demolition. Worked pretty good, don't you think?

Rumsfeld made out like a bandit, he got away with one hell of a chunk of money.

BTW: The information available on these two sites will overwhelm any trutherized individual, so I advise you all to stick with AE911Truth. Those guys really have their shit together.

The Black Vault

World Trade Center Evidence Based Research

Reply
Feb 11, 2017 18:50:23   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
payne1000 wrote:
http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/new-nist-whistleblower-speaks-out-on-911/
Wow!
The mainstream media will surely jump all over this.


I see that you are trying to start a new discussion that is close to your heart. You have lost at every step of the way. No need to keep replying to your illiterate and Jihadists thinking. Have fun with yourself.

Reply
Feb 11, 2017 18:58:08   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
Number one on your list disagrees with you putz ...

On Saturday, Murdoch had wondered aloud why, in his opinion, the “Jewish owned press” seemed so anti-Israel. Earlier, he had criticized the Associated Press and CNN — neither of which is “Jewish owned” — for what he saw as their bias in covering the Israel-Gaza conflict. Some speculated that Murdoch may have been referring to the New York Times, which is run by the Jewish Sulzberger family.
After receiving feedback alerting him to the fact that phrases like “Jewish owned press” carry a certain unpleasant whiff about them, Murdoch retreated
Number one on your list disagrees with you putz ..... (show quote)


Why don't you show examples of the Jewish-owned press showing bias in covering the Israel's mass bombing in Gaza?
That would be much more effective than what the owner of lying Fox News says.
Truth does sometimes have an unpleasant whiff about it to those who are allergic to truth--such as yourself.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.