One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
No wonder Donald Tweet did not want to release his tax statements
Page <<first <prev 6 of 8 next> last>>
Jan 12, 2017 23:55:12   #
Dr.Dross
 
Loki wrote:
You can drag that bastard Paul Ryan behind your truck down a dirt road and I'll buy the gas. He's a Democrat in all but name anyway.


Explain, please? What makes Paul Ryan, ready to either cut or slash every social program in his budget a Democrat?

Reply
Jan 12, 2017 23:58:51   #
Dr.Dross
 
Randy131 wrote:
They are having congressional hearings, on Russia's influence in the elections, again without an ounce of evidence that would prove the accusations, but it's a good excuse for the liberals, progressives, and Democrats to blame Hillary's election loss on.

JOKE OF THE YEAR - Question: What did Russia do to Influence the Election? Answer: They helped the Democrats finally Deliver on their Promises of Transparency!

The joke of the year is the only thing that any investigation will find evidence of the accusations that Russia helped Donald Trump win the election. And this is even untrue, for Julian Assange has already said many times that Russia had nothing to do with the DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails that Wikileaks was given by a leaker who worked for the DNC. Julian Assange even implied the leaker was Seth Rich, who was mysteriously murdered a short time after Wikileaks started releasing those e-mails, and Wikileaks, for the first time ever, offered a reward of $20,000.00 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of any of those involved in the murder of Seth Rich.

In the short 6 week period after the murder of Seth Rich, another 4 mysterious murders occurred, whose victims were also either DNC employees or Clinton associates scheduled to testify by deposition about crimes committed by the Clintons through their charitable foundation. No suspects have been found for any of these mysterious murders, nor has even a motive for them been discovered, and like all the other hundreds of mysterious murders linked to the Clintons, I'll bet that none of these 5 murders will ever be solved either.

What should be investigated by the FBI, is the connection between these 5 murders with the DNC and the Clinton campaign, but alas, with Obama controlling all the federal government law enforcement agencies, creating a double standard dual justice system that protects Obama and all his Democratic cronies and cohorts, the FBI will investigate not one of these mysterious murders, that are obviously connected with the Clintons, the DNC, and this election.
They are having congressional hearings, on Russia'... (show quote)


Good joke, seriously. But you have no proof of exoneration to claim the charges false. But too funny is, after protesting the "groundless allegations against Russia and Trump, you make even more exorbitant groundless accusations against Clinton. But you can't see that, can you?

Reply
Jan 13, 2017 00:16:55   #
Dr.Dross
 
Rosech wrote:
I find those who still can't accept their Hillary lost so it must be the fault of us, Putin and Lord knows who else. She shot herself in the foot and lost fair and square. But the dying on the vine as we write are doing all they can to send false stories, complaints, and casting all the "dark" nonsense they can because they are now completely irrelevant as "news" and "reporters" as they are not to be believed and hate the fact that Trump will deal with American citizens in an open manner and not cloaked in communism and stupidity. They just keep trying to convince the brainless that there is a connection with Putin which is completely ludicrous. They continue to cover up the traitors such as Soros, many in Congress, and definitely Obama and his crew of mostly muslims. They hate it now that we are more aware and informed than ever before and will not put up with their garbage and lies and the fact that most of MSM is owned by Soros and invested in by many muslims and have been for decades. They think if they repeat the same things 100 times, they will have credence. No way, Jose! Your day has come and gone and we the deplorables have taken over. AND AMAZINGLY NO PRESIDENT HAS TO SHOW HIS INCOME TAX RETURNS WE DID NOT SEE OBAMA'S NOR CLINTON'S DID WE. It started as a voluntary thing back in the time of Nixon and hence they can or cannot show their income tax returns. I have yet to see Hillary's or Obama's or anyone else's for some time. Have you shown yours to anyone or the country? Of course not, so that train left the station a long time ago. If and when Trump wants you to see his return, maybe he will do it but IT IS NOT A LAW NOR A REGULATION but considered a gesture, pure and simple. Time to stop believing MSM trash and really do your research and get informed because, frankly, you are danger to our freedom with your brainlessness and lack of knowing truths.
I find those who still can't accept their Hillary ... (show quote)


I love this. Perfect. But before I get to your blindness, your wrongness first: we saw both Obama's and Clinton's Tax Statements. Every president in the modern era (since Federal Income Tax) has show their Tax Statements. No president HAS to show their Tax Statements but all have by decency and transparency, except Trump did so. All have divested their assets into blind trust, but Trump. Your saying showing it is a gesture: a gesture of what? If you refuse to show it, what is that a gesture of? That you would side against our and ally Nation's Intelligence Agencies, as well as against our press, as being untrustworthy in order to side with a foreign country that may have ACTUALLY ATTACKED the US, all to keep Trump from a bruised ego or perpetuate the lie the election was not only unaffected but a "resounding victory" (not even close) is funny.

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2017 00:18:24   #
Dr.Dross
 
Loki wrote:
Kind of like Vince Foster's "suicide." When one shoots oneself in the head, the gun does not remain in one's hand. The recoil throws it away.


Untrue. Personal experience. The dynamics are different by caliber and angle and placement. What extremist blog did you get that false bit of information you swallowed hook, line, and sinker in order to make a false case?

Reply
Jan 13, 2017 04:22:52   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
The rabbits are in for it now. How many of those does it take to kill a deer or squirrel? Even a home invasion. How many arms and trigger fingers do you have? Or is it a blood-sport for the whole family and special neighbors? I am sorry. To you guys such a plethora of guns is normal, even something to hold with some pride. Mocking that is wrong. In my circle it is abhorrent. I call that a cultural clash. Wish there was some way to determine a common ground or the truth on the matter.


In your circle, coffee Klatches about the demise of Barbie Dolls is a hot topic.

Reply
Jan 13, 2017 10:24:31   #
Singularity
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
"Not all pussy grabbers are hindered by small hands....": who on earth can you be talking about?


At my mother's funeral last month, I had to evade three "funny uncle's". (Actually, one was a cousin.)

Before the jokes start, my family is NOT unusual except for its volume. Paternal granny had ten kids and adopted a couple more. Maternal relatives displayed even more fecundity! One hundred fifty three first cousins all together (and I don't have a count for their progeny,) over 600 relatives attended and it wasn't even catered except by volunteer church ladies. They filled three large tables with tasty offerings. Friends and male spouses were relagated to standing outside in the rain for the service.

Reply
Jan 13, 2017 10:26:57   #
Singularity
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
The Bible speaks of a two-edged sword: it is talking to itself. Even to quote Scripture to another person is such a weak response to humanity. It is uncomely. Speak only from the heart out of love, for God is love and we must trust that is enough. Am I close, Singularity?


As the story goes, Satan was a favorite until he "saw the light"....

Love speaks silently, heart to heart.

Pride and the lust for power more often use spoken (or written) language.

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2017 10:30:20   #
Big Bass
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
(Caution: what you will read below are unsubstantiated--as yet--allegations against Trump's possible collusion with Putin in the cyber-attack on our government to sway the election in his favor. Even if the allegations turn out to be totally false, Tweety could have obviated any such questions with a full disclosure of his business interests and Taxes. The specter of grave conflicts on interests that might influence him and adversely effect our nation needs to be brought into the light of day. He must immediately divest himself and put all assets into a blind trust--or everything he does will be suspect. Transparency is vital with his huge holdings around the world. Maybe it is true that his assets ONLY total 550 million, still that is leverage for espionage and favor. His behavior is definitely suspicious, given all the recent developments by our Intelligence Agencies.)

Citing unnamed U.S. officials, CNN reported on Tuesday afternoon that “classified documents presented last week to President Obama and President-elect Trump included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.”
The documents, CNN reports, are based on information gathered by a former British intelligence operative considered to be credible by U.S. officials. While CNN is electing not to disclose the specific contents of the documents at this time, their report on them notes they “also included allegations that there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government, according to two national security officials.”
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-compromising-information-russia-6f861b27b87b#.566dybap3

Unsubstantiated allegations developed at the request of Democratic Party researchers that Donald Trump was compromised and in league with the Russians were presented to both President Obama and President-elect Trump in intelligence briefings last week.
The FBI says it is investigating the allegations, which party operatives had delivered to the FBI and numerous news organizations before and since the election.
The claims include allegations that Trump was personally compromised by the Russians and that Trump aides were involved in organizing the Russian hack of the Democratic Party. None of the allegations has been verified by ABC News. Some specific allegations have brought sharp denials.
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/fbi-investigating-unconfirmed-claims-trump-compromised-during-election-005844756--abc-news-topstories.html
(Caution: what you will read below are unsubstanti... (show quote)


You got the part right where it says "none of the allegations have been verified"- for a very good reason. YOU CAN NOT TURN A LIE INTO THE TRUTH, HOWEVER HARD YOU TRY!!!!!!!!

Reply
Jan 13, 2017 10:34:42   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Singularity wrote:
At my mother's funeral last month, I had to evade three "funny uncle's". (Actually, one was a cousin.)

Before the jokes start, my family is NOT unusual except for its volume. Paternal granny had ten kids and adopted a couple more. Maternal relatives displayed even more fecundity! One hundred fifty three first cousins all together (and I don't have a count for their progeny,) over 600 relatives attended and it wasn't even catered except by volunteer church ladies. They filled three large tables with tasty offerings. Friends and male spouses were relagated to standing outside in the rain for the service.
At my I mother's funeral /i last month, I had to... (show quote)


We now live in the town in which my wife was born. There is a reason for the laws against discharging a fiream in the city limits. You might hit one of her relatives.

Reply
Jan 13, 2017 10:45:52   #
Singularity
 
Big Bass wrote:
You got the part right where it says "none of the allegations have been verified"- for a very good reason. YOU CAN NOT TURN A LIE INTO THE TRUTH, HOWEVER HARD YOU TRY!!!!!!!!


Unsubstantiated statement plus positive proof equals proven fact

Unsubstantiated statement plus negative proof equals proven refutation.

Unsubstantiated statement alone equals unsubstantiated statement requiring either dismissal or investigation.

A wise human will display curiosity in areas of importance, even the smallest or most ridiculous unsubstantiated claims.

Noting the alacrity in touting Hillary rumours, vs the indifference to Trump allegations, one is apt to wonder if emotional bias might be overruling logic and reason.

Reply
Jan 13, 2017 14:40:34   #
Singularity
 
Loki wrote:
We now live in the town in which my wife was born. There is a reason for the laws against discharging a fiream in the city limits. You might hit one of her relatives.


Hey, Loki.

My paternal relatives tend toward very large hands and feet! My father could not find adequately sized work gloves; my mom was an excellent seamstress and made alterations to people's clothes fairly frequently. She expanded leather work gloves for him somehow.

The grandchildren called him Big Paw!

Reply
 
 
Jan 14, 2017 11:19:53   #
Big Bass
 
Singularity wrote:
Unsubstantiated statement plus positive proof equals proven fact

Unsubstantiated statement plus negative proof equals proven refutation.

Unsubstantiated statement alone equals unsubstantiated statement requiring either dismissal or investigation.

A wise human will display curiosity in areas of importance, even the smallest or most ridiculous unsubstantiated claims.

Noting the alacrity in touting Hillary rumours, vs the indifference to Trump allegations, one is apt to wonder if emotional bias might be overruling logic and reason.
Unsubstantiated statement plus positive proof equa... (show quote)

No alacrity here, although I will point out that hellary's corruption is graver than any of your alleged indifference.

Reply
Jan 14, 2017 11:24:00   #
Singularity
 
Big Bass wrote:
No alacrity here, although I will point out that hellary's corruption is graver than any of your alleged indifference.
I would not argue her malfeasance. I am concerned about Trump's obvious unbridled concupiscence.

Reply
Jan 14, 2017 11:36:22   #
Big Bass
 
Singularity wrote:
I would not argue her malfeasance. I am concerned about Trump's obvious unbridled concupiscence.


You do, of course, have proof of this "unbridled concupiscence" as you claim it's obvious, or are you learning the Liberal Handbook of Promulgating Falsehoods? Perhaps you might be able to share that proof with us. BTW: where did I state that I wished to argue hellary's malfeasance? It's out there for everybody to see, and to argue about it is an exercise in futility.

Reply
Jan 14, 2017 11:47:16   #
Singularity
 
Big Bass wrote:
You do, of course, have proof of this "unbridled concupiscence" as you claim it's obvious, or are you learning the Liberal Handbook of Promulgating Falsehoods? Perhaps you might be able to share that proof with us. BTW: where did I state that I wisWhen your a hed to argue hellary's malfeasance? It's out there for everybody to see, and to argue about it is an exercise in futility.

"When you're a celebrity, you can do what you want. Grab them by the pussy." DJT's own words.

He has had at least three wives, depending on your outlook on and definitions for such things. He openly brags of his extramarital exploits.

Which other presidential candidate openly bragged about his "package" in the national televised debate?

It's out there for everybody to see and hear and to argue about it is an exercise in futility.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.