No wonder Donald Tweet did not want to release his tax statements (Page 4): It's a pipe. You use it to smoke pot and hash.

Loki Loc: Georgia

vernon wrote:

I don't know what a bong is but you can bet he is talking out of his ass.

It's a pipe. You use it to smoke pot and hash.

reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.

archie bunker wrote:

Bla bla bla!

Bet you need a big holster for all them toys , Bet the Misses can handle-em too !!

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

JFlorio wrote:

I find thinkprogress to be one of the most reputable publications. Right next to Mad Magazine.

Around where I live...they don't have it...but it would be next to the shit paper if they did!

Loki Loc: Georgia

America Only wrote:

Around where I live...they don't have it...but it would be next to the shit paper if they did!

They are easy to tell apart. The shit paper serves a useful purpose.

Randy131 Loc: Florida

Your propaganda doesn't hold water, or any truth. Julian Assange said that the leaker that gave them the DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails was a DNC employee, hence the connection to Seth Rich, his murder, and the $20,000.00 reward put up by Wikileaks for any information that leads to the arrest and conviction of any individuals involved in the murder of Seth Rich.

Your claim of a third party providing the hacked e-mails from the DNC and Clinton campaign to Wikileaks could then only mean that the Russians had secret assets working for the DNC, which I highly doubt.

Wikileaks has been in the public's purview for over 11 years, and not once in all that time has it ever been proven that they have said or provided lies or falsehoods to the public (American people), unlike all the lies that Obama has been proven to have told the American people, as well as James Clapper's 2013 testimony, under oath, to a congressional investigation committee. A couple of days later when it was proven that Clapper lied under oath, Obama was asked to fire him for it, but refused to do so.

The reason why Obama refused to fire Clapper for lying under oath to a congressional investigative committee is now very obvious. During the start of this situation, Clapper claimed he and the other intelligence agencies didn't agree with the CIA's report of Russian hacking affecting the US election. Then two weeks after Obama took revenge on Russia for supposedly doing so, Clapper comes up with a report to cover Obama's ass, by now saying Russia did hack the DNC and Clinton campaign, and it affected the election by the American people finding out the truth about Hillary Clinton, her campaign, and her campaign employees, from those leaked e-mails publicly released by Wikileaks.

This proves the 'JOKE OF THE YEAR' is more true than funny if the Russians were actually the culprits of the leaked DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails - Question: What did Russia do to 'Influence' the 'Election'? Answer: They helped the Democrats finally 'Deliver' on their 'Promises' of 'TRANSPARENCY'!

Your denials of Clinton involvement in the unsolved mysterious deaths of hundreds of Clinton associates over even longer than 25 years, is also BS and propaganda, which cannot be proven. If the old mot of "Where there is Smoke, there is Fire" is true, then the Clinton's political forrest has been ablaze for a very long time, and seems it can never be extinguished, until the Clintons stop taking revenge on people by killing them, as the leaker Seth Rich was, after releasing the huge trove of DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails to Wikileaks.

Any computer expert, after investigating the DNC computers, can easily discern which computer was used to copy that huge trove of leaked e-mails, and then checking on who was assigned that computer, can also discern who the culprit was that leaked that huge trove of e-mails to Wikileaks. Seth Rich's motive for doing so is that he was a huge Bernie Sanders supporter, and may have wanted to take revenge on Hillary Clinton and the DNC for cheating his candidate out of winning the Democratic Presidential nomination.

A couple of weeks after Wikileaks started releasing to the public those DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails. Seth Rich was mysteriously murdered, and the Clinton campaign immediately hired a 'Publicity Firm' that put out the theory that Seth Rich's murder was due to a robbery gone bad. The law enforcement authorities did not say or even agree with this theory. Seth Rich was found by the authorities at 4:30AM on a street in the upscale area where he lived, shot but alive, taken to a hospital, and died 1 1/2 hours later. Seth Rich's expensive cell phone, his expensive watch & jewelry, and his wallet with much cash and may credit cards, was found still untouched on his person, and why the authorities don't buy the theory of a robbery gone bad, put out solely by the Clinton campaign's hired 'Publicity Firm'.

permafrost wrote:

Randy,

Assange did not say Russia had nothing to do with hacking information, only that Russia gave him nothing. Go betweens gave the Russian information to Assange..

The murder conspiracies have been a wish dream of the right wing for 25 years.. Never true, never was..

CLAIM: DNC staffer Seth Rich was gunned down to prevent him from meeting with the FBI over plans to testify against Hillary Clinton.

FALSE

According to Washington, D.C. television station WUSA, a string of robberies had occurred in the area where Rich was killed, and police believe that spate of crime was likely connected with his death. The station also reported that the 27-year-old staffer worked in voter expansion, helping people "find their polling places"; Rich's age and the relatively minor scope of his duties made him an unlikely linchpin in a conspiracy involving election fraud or any purported testimony against Hillary Clinton. The young staffer had only been employed with the DNC, where he was a Voter Expansion Data Director, since 2014, making his position and tenure an unlikely match-up with possession of crucial information for which he was supposedly killed.

While it's true police maintain an open investigation into Seth Rich's death, the claim connecting him to Hillary Clinton was the third of its sort to emerge from the same conspiracy-monger in mid-2016. All those rumors were variations on the long-circulating (and false) "body bags" claims that the Clintons habitually do away with once-loyal associates turned political liabilities. Prior to publishing the trio of Clinton-related fabrications, the same site and blogger held that President Obama had ordered the military to nuke the city of Charleston (which didn't happen), that Rear Admiral Rick Williams was fired because he revealed Obama's purchase of a mansion in Dubai (Williams was actually terminated for misconduct), and that Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama were enmeshed in a potentially conflict-starting dispute over the practices of the Monsanto agribusiness corporation.

Randy, br br Assange did not say Russia had nothi... (show quote)

Loki Loc: Georgia

Randy131 wrote:

Your propaganda doesn't hold water, or any truth. Julian Assange said that the leaker that gave them the DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails was a DNC employee, hence the connection to Seth Rich, his murder, and the $20,000.00 reward put up by Wikileaks for any information that leads to the arrest and conviction of any individuals involved in the murder of Seth Rich.

Your claim of a third party providing the hacked e-mails from the DNC and Clinton campaign to Wikileaks could then only mean that the Russians had secret assets working for the DNC, which I highly doubt.

Wikileaks has been in the public's purview for over 11 years, and not once in all that time has it ever been proven that they have said or provided lies or falsehoods to the public (American people), unlike all the lies that Obama has been proven to have told the American people, as well as James Clapper's 2013 testimony, under oath, to a congressional investigation committee. A couple of days later when it was proven that Clapper lied under oath, Obama was asked to fire him for it, but refused to do so.

The reason why Obama refused to fire Clapper for lying under oath to a congressional investigative committee is now very obvious. During the start of this situation, Clapper claimed he and the other intelligence agencies didn't agree with the CIA's report of Russian hacking affecting the US election. Then two weeks after Obama took revenge on Russia for supposedly doing so, Clapper comes up with a report to cover Obama's ass, by now saying Russia did hack the DNC and Clinton campaign, and it affected the election by the American people finding out the truth about Hillary Clinton, her campaign, and her campaign employees, from those leaked e-mails publicly released by Wikileaks.

This proves the 'JOKE OF THE YEAR' is more true than funny if the Russians were actually the culprits of the leaked DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails - Question: What did Russia do to 'Influence' the 'Election'? Answer: They helped the Democrats finally 'Deliver' on their 'Promises' of 'TRANSPARENCY'!

Your denials of Clinton involvement in the unsolved mysterious deaths of hundreds of Clinton associates over even longer than 25 years, is also BS and propaganda, which cannot be proven. If the old mot of "Where there is Smoke, there is Fire" is true, then the Clinton's political forrest has been ablaze for a very long time, and seems it can never be extinguished, until the Clintons stop taking revenge on people by killing them, as the leaker Seth Rich was, after releasing the huge trove of DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails to Wikileaks.

Any computer expert, after investigating the DNC computers, can easily discern which computer was used to copy that huge trove of leaked e-mails, and then checking on who was assigned that computer, can also discern who the culprit was that leaked that huge trove of e-mails to Wikileaks. Seth Rich's motive for doing so is that he was a huge Bernie Sanders supporter, and may have wanted to take revenge on Hillary Clinton and the DNC for cheating his candidate out of winning the Democratic Presidential nomination.

A couple of weeks after Wikileaks started releasing to the public those DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails. Seth Rich was mysteriously murdered, and the Clinton campaign immediately hired a 'Publicity Firm' that put out the theory that Seth Rich's murder was due to a robbery gone bad. The law enforcement authorities did not say or even agree with this theory. Seth Rich was found by the authorities at 4:30AM on a street in the upscale area where he lived, shot but alive, taken to a hospital, and died 1 1/2 hours later. Seth Rich's expensive cell phone, his expensive watch & jewelry, and his wallet with much cash and may credit cards, was found still untouched on his person, and why the authorities don't buy the theory of a robbery gone bad, put out solely by the Clinton campaign's hired 'Publicity Firm'.

Your propaganda doesn't hold water, or any truth. ... (show quote)

Kind of like Vince Foster's "suicide." When one shoots oneself in the head, the gun does not remain in one's hand. The recoil throws it away.

Randy131 Loc: Florida

Also, when Vince Foster's body was found under a tree on a hill, the blood from the wound, that was then already dried up, was found to be running uphill when it had dried up, proving that the dead body had been moved from the original site of death, since no blood pool was found at the site of the body's discovery either. This is the main reason why the authorites didn't believe the suicide theory that the Clintons forced on them, and ordered the case closed, and who would disobey a President, as Obama has proven to us by his unconstitutional actions that nobody would.

Loki wrote:

Kind of like Vince Foster's "suicide." When one shoots oneself in the head, the gun does not remain in one's hand. The recoil throws it away.

cali

I have seen what a douche she really is since she killed Vince foster. Hated her ever since.
Make America great again
MAGA

Wolf counselor wrote:

I'm surprised that someone like Trump has disheartened you.

You've always seemed to be somewhat hardhearted.

I would never have guessed that you could be thrown off of your high horse by a big, rich, power hungry, fuzzy haired white dude.

So did you really think that the Clinton Pig was presidential ?

Can you see now how much of a douche she really is ?

Loki Loc: Georgia

cali wrote:

I have seen what a douche she really is since she killed Vince foster. Hated her ever since.
Make America great again
MAGA

I TOLD YOU, STOP calling Hillary the Harpy a pig! Do you know what kind of picture that conjures up anytime someone wants eggs and bacon for breakfast? What are you trying to do? Ruin my favorite meal?

cali

I love bacon

Loki Loc: Georgia

cali wrote:

I love bacon

So do I. I don't need to be thinking of two strips of extra crispy Hillary. Blecchh!!!!

Dr.Dross

bmac32 wrote:

Citing unnamed U.S. officials, more fake news, wonderful!

You do not now that yet. It is fake news when it is proven fake news and not before. Silly to make your your comment.

Dr.Dross

archie bunker wrote:

Bla bla bla!

Lol, help me to understand your lack of curiosity, patriotism, decency, honor, integrity, and thought in dismissing out of hand all these allegations. The least would be to say you have a wait and see attitude. Anything more, indictment or defense or dismissal, is completely unwarranted. Unless you are just an ideologue playing the three monkeys.

Dr.Dross

JFlorio wrote:

Not bad. Redneck rack.

The rabbits are in for it now. How many of those does it take to kill a deer or squirrel? Even a home invasion. How many arms and trigger fingers do you have? Or is it a blood-sport for the whole family and special neighbors? I am sorry. To you guys such a plethora of guns is normal, even something to hold with some pride. Mocking that is wrong. In my circle it is abhorrent. I call that a cultural clash. Wish there was some way to determine a common ground or the truth on the matter.

Dr.Dross

JFlorio wrote:

I find thinkprogress to be one of the most reputable publications. Right next to Mad Magazine.

I agree...but that does not mean either publication is not speaking the truth in some way. The Church Fathers said, "Do no read Galileo's absurd report about heliocentricty, it is in the Liberal publication "Science." And such a theory would have been considered not just liberal at that time but an attack on Christians. Nearly every advancement in almost every area is considered to be liberal by those still adhering to the traditional view.